Assessment of Senior Officials or How To Get the Goods on the Chief Executive Officer

Assessment of senior officials, according to this report, is designed to improve performance in terms of systems objectives. Assessment is defined as the measurement of the distance between performance desired and performance achieved. The author suggests that in developing an evaluative system the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser:	Hickcox, Edward S
Format:	Text Resource
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Administrator Evaluation Administrator Selection Administrators Assessment Boards of Education Management by Objectives Measurement Superintendents
Online-Zugang:	Volltext bestellen
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator	Hickcox, Edward S
description	Assessment of senior officials, according to this report, is designed to improve performance in terms of systems objectives. Assessment is defined as the measurement of the distance between performance desired and performance achieved. The author suggests that in developing an evaluative system the school system should first spend a lot of time, money, and effort in choosing administrators. In addition, he recommends development of a system for a nonthreatening cooperative assessment of administrator performance. The system recommended by the author is essentially a management-by-objectives approach. The author contends that an assessment program should ensure that expectations held for a system's educational program by trustees and administrative officers be congruent. (Page 1 may reproduce poorly.) (JF)
format	Text Resource
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>eric_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_ED082376</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>ED082376</ericid><sourcerecordid>ED082376</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_ED0823763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZAh1LC5OLS7OTc0rUchPUwhOzcvML1LwT0vLTM5MzClWAHI88ssVQvIV3FNLFEoyUhXc8_NTgOJ5YI5zRmZqmoJrRWpyaUlmWSpEY2oRDwNrGlB3Ki-U5maQcXMNcfbQTS3KTI4vKMrMTSyqjHd1MbAwMjY3MyYgDQDzUTUh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>text_resource</recordtype></control><display><type>text_resource</type><title>Assessment of Senior Officials or How To Get the Goods on the Chief Executive Officer</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>Hickcox, Edward S</creator><creatorcontrib>Hickcox, Edward S</creatorcontrib><description>Assessment of senior officials, according to this report, is designed to improve performance in terms of systems objectives. Assessment is defined as the measurement of the distance between performance desired and performance achieved. The author suggests that in developing an evaluative system the school system should first spend a lot of time, money, and effort in choosing administrators. In addition, he recommends development of a system for a nonthreatening cooperative assessment of administrator performance. The system recommended by the author is essentially a management-by-objectives approach. The author contends that an assessment program should ensure that expectations held for a system's educational program by trustees and administrative officers be congruent. (Page 1 may reproduce poorly.) (JF)</description><language>eng</language><subject>Administrator Evaluation ; Administrator Selection ; Administrators ; Assessment ; Boards of Education ; Management by Objectives ; Measurement ; Superintendents</subject><creationdate>1972</creationdate><tpages>8</tpages><format>8</format><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,687,776,881</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED082376$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED082376$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hickcox, Edward S</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of Senior Officials or How To Get the Goods on the Chief Executive Officer</title><description>Assessment of senior officials, according to this report, is designed to improve performance in terms of systems objectives. Assessment is defined as the measurement of the distance between performance desired and performance achieved. The author suggests that in developing an evaluative system the school system should first spend a lot of time, money, and effort in choosing administrators. In addition, he recommends development of a system for a nonthreatening cooperative assessment of administrator performance. The system recommended by the author is essentially a management-by-objectives approach. The author contends that an assessment program should ensure that expectations held for a system's educational program by trustees and administrative officers be congruent. (Page 1 may reproduce poorly.) (JF)</description><subject>Administrator Evaluation</subject><subject>Administrator Selection</subject><subject>Administrators</subject><subject>Assessment</subject><subject>Boards of Education</subject><subject>Management by Objectives</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Superintendents</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>text_resource</rsrctype><creationdate>1972</creationdate><recordtype>text_resource</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZAh1LC5OLS7OTc0rUchPUwhOzcvML1LwT0vLTM5MzClWAHI88ssVQvIV3FNLFEoyUhXc8_NTgOJ5YI5zRmZqmoJrRWpyaUlmWSpEY2oRDwNrGlB3Ki-U5maQcXMNcfbQTS3KTI4vKMrMTSyqjHd1MbAwMjY3MyYgDQDzUTUh</recordid><startdate>197206</startdate><enddate>197206</enddate><creator>Hickcox, Edward S</creator><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197206</creationdate><title>Assessment of Senior Officials or How To Get the Goods on the Chief Executive Officer</title><author>Hickcox, Edward S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_ED0823763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>text_resources</rsrctype><prefilter>text_resources</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1972</creationdate><topic>Administrator Evaluation</topic><topic>Administrator Selection</topic><topic>Administrators</topic><topic>Assessment</topic><topic>Boards of Education</topic><topic>Management by Objectives</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Superintendents</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hickcox, Edward S</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hickcox, Edward S</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><ericid>ED082376</ericid><btitle>Assessment of Senior Officials or How To Get the Goods on the Chief Executive Officer</btitle><date>1972-06</date><risdate>1972</risdate><abstract>Assessment of senior officials, according to this report, is designed to improve performance in terms of systems objectives. Assessment is defined as the measurement of the distance between performance desired and performance achieved. The author suggests that in developing an evaluative system the school system should first spend a lot of time, money, and effort in choosing administrators. In addition, he recommends development of a system for a nonthreatening cooperative assessment of administrator performance. The system recommended by the author is essentially a management-by-objectives approach. The author contends that an assessment program should ensure that expectations held for a system's educational program by trustees and administrative officers be congruent. (Page 1 may reproduce poorly.) (JF)</abstract><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language	eng
recordid	cdi_eric_primary_ED082376
source	ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)
subjects	Administrator Evaluation Administrator Selection Administrators Assessment Boards of Education Management by Objectives Measurement Superintendents
title	Assessment of Senior Officials or How To Get the Goods on the Chief Executive Officer
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T04%3A08%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.btitle=Assessment%20of%20Senior%20Officials%20or%20How%20To%20Get%20the%20Goods%20on%20the%20Chief%20Executive%20Officer&rft.au=Hickcox,%20Edward%20S&rft.date=1972-06&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric_GA5%3EED082376%3C/eric_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=ED082376&rfr_iscdi=true