The Effect of Reading Method on Composition

The effects on written composition of two reading approaches--traditional orthography (TO) and the initial teaching alphabet (i.t.a.)--are compared. Two hundred and ninety-three first graders and 391 second graders, half of whom had learned reading with TO and half with i.t.a., were each asked to wr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Shapiro, Phyllis P, Shapiro, Bernard J
Format: Text Resource
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Shapiro, Phyllis P
Shapiro, Bernard J
description The effects on written composition of two reading approaches--traditional orthography (TO) and the initial teaching alphabet (i.t.a.)--are compared. Two hundred and ninety-three first graders and 391 second graders, half of whom had learned reading with TO and half with i.t.a., were each asked to write two compositions. These essays were rated on length, vocabulary level, originality, emotional content, and overall communication, and the ratings of the i.t.a. and TO groups in both grades were compared. It was found that the first-grade i.t.a. essays were longer, on a more advanced vocabulary level, and more original than the TO group, but that there were no significant differences in the other ratings. In the second-grade group the differences between the i.t.a. and TO groups were not significant. The author points out that the rating scales might not have been appropriate for this particular sample and that a different scale of ratings might produce a different outcome. It was concluded that the causality of written behavior is more complex than simply the medium for beginning reading instruction. Tables and references are included. (AL)
format Text Resource
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_ED053892</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>ED053892</ericid><sourcerecordid>ED053892</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_ED0538923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZNAOyUhVcE1LS00uUchPUwhKTUzJzEtX8E0tychPUcjPU3DOzy3IL84syczP42FgTUvMKU7lhdLcDDJuriHOHrqpRZnJ8QVFmbmJRZXxri4GpsYWlkbGBKQBeXQmMQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>text_resource</recordtype></control><display><type>text_resource</type><title>The Effect of Reading Method on Composition</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>Shapiro, Phyllis P ; Shapiro, Bernard J</creator><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Phyllis P ; Shapiro, Bernard J</creatorcontrib><description>The effects on written composition of two reading approaches--traditional orthography (TO) and the initial teaching alphabet (i.t.a.)--are compared. Two hundred and ninety-three first graders and 391 second graders, half of whom had learned reading with TO and half with i.t.a., were each asked to write two compositions. These essays were rated on length, vocabulary level, originality, emotional content, and overall communication, and the ratings of the i.t.a. and TO groups in both grades were compared. It was found that the first-grade i.t.a. essays were longer, on a more advanced vocabulary level, and more original than the TO group, but that there were no significant differences in the other ratings. In the second-grade group the differences between the i.t.a. and TO groups were not significant. The author points out that the rating scales might not have been appropriate for this particular sample and that a different scale of ratings might produce a different outcome. It was concluded that the causality of written behavior is more complex than simply the medium for beginning reading instruction. Tables and references are included. (AL)</description><language>eng</language><subject>Conventional Instruction ; Creative Writing ; Grade 1 ; Grade 2 ; Initial Teaching Alphabet ; Reading Instruction ; Reading Research ; Vocabulary ; Writing Skills</subject><creationdate>1971</creationdate><tpages>14</tpages><format>14</format><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,687,776,881</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED053892$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED053892$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Phyllis P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Bernard J</creatorcontrib><title>The Effect of Reading Method on Composition</title><description>The effects on written composition of two reading approaches--traditional orthography (TO) and the initial teaching alphabet (i.t.a.)--are compared. Two hundred and ninety-three first graders and 391 second graders, half of whom had learned reading with TO and half with i.t.a., were each asked to write two compositions. These essays were rated on length, vocabulary level, originality, emotional content, and overall communication, and the ratings of the i.t.a. and TO groups in both grades were compared. It was found that the first-grade i.t.a. essays were longer, on a more advanced vocabulary level, and more original than the TO group, but that there were no significant differences in the other ratings. In the second-grade group the differences between the i.t.a. and TO groups were not significant. The author points out that the rating scales might not have been appropriate for this particular sample and that a different scale of ratings might produce a different outcome. It was concluded that the causality of written behavior is more complex than simply the medium for beginning reading instruction. Tables and references are included. (AL)</description><subject>Conventional Instruction</subject><subject>Creative Writing</subject><subject>Grade 1</subject><subject>Grade 2</subject><subject>Initial Teaching Alphabet</subject><subject>Reading Instruction</subject><subject>Reading Research</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><subject>Writing Skills</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>text_resource</rsrctype><creationdate>1971</creationdate><recordtype>text_resource</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZNAOyUhVcE1LS00uUchPUwhKTUzJzEtX8E0tychPUcjPU3DOzy3IL84syczP42FgTUvMKU7lhdLcDDJuriHOHrqpRZnJ8QVFmbmJRZXxri4GpsYWlkbGBKQBeXQmMQ</recordid><startdate>197106</startdate><enddate>197106</enddate><creator>Shapiro, Phyllis P</creator><creator>Shapiro, Bernard J</creator><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197106</creationdate><title>The Effect of Reading Method on Composition</title><author>Shapiro, Phyllis P ; Shapiro, Bernard J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_ED0538923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>text_resources</rsrctype><prefilter>text_resources</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1971</creationdate><topic>Conventional Instruction</topic><topic>Creative Writing</topic><topic>Grade 1</topic><topic>Grade 2</topic><topic>Initial Teaching Alphabet</topic><topic>Reading Instruction</topic><topic>Reading Research</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><topic>Writing Skills</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Phyllis P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Bernard J</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shapiro, Phyllis P</au><au>Shapiro, Bernard J</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><ericid>ED053892</ericid><btitle>The Effect of Reading Method on Composition</btitle><date>1971-06</date><risdate>1971</risdate><abstract>The effects on written composition of two reading approaches--traditional orthography (TO) and the initial teaching alphabet (i.t.a.)--are compared. Two hundred and ninety-three first graders and 391 second graders, half of whom had learned reading with TO and half with i.t.a., were each asked to write two compositions. These essays were rated on length, vocabulary level, originality, emotional content, and overall communication, and the ratings of the i.t.a. and TO groups in both grades were compared. It was found that the first-grade i.t.a. essays were longer, on a more advanced vocabulary level, and more original than the TO group, but that there were no significant differences in the other ratings. In the second-grade group the differences between the i.t.a. and TO groups were not significant. The author points out that the rating scales might not have been appropriate for this particular sample and that a different scale of ratings might produce a different outcome. It was concluded that the causality of written behavior is more complex than simply the medium for beginning reading instruction. Tables and references are included. (AL)</abstract><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_ED053892
source ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)
subjects Conventional Instruction
Creative Writing
Grade 1
Grade 2
Initial Teaching Alphabet
Reading Instruction
Reading Research
Vocabulary
Writing Skills
title The Effect of Reading Method on Composition
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T01%3A59%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.btitle=The%20Effect%20of%20Reading%20Method%20on%20Composition&rft.au=Shapiro,%20Phyllis%20P&rft.date=1971-06&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric_GA5%3EED053892%3C/eric_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=ED053892&rfr_iscdi=true