Two Investigations of the Relationship among Selected Ratings of Speech Effectiveness and Comprehension
This research project examined the relationship between measures of speaker effectiveness obtained from rating scales and those obtained from objective comprehension tests of speech content. Two studies were used in order to provide independently derived results which could be compared. In the first...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Speech Monographs 1968-08, Vol.35 (3), p.400 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 400 |
container_title | Speech Monographs |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Barker, Larry L |
description | This research project examined the relationship between measures of speaker effectiveness obtained from rating scales and those obtained from objective comprehension tests of speech content. Two studies were used in order to provide independently derived results which could be compared. In the first study, 49 undergraduate public-speaking students judged 6 speeches using both a modified Baird-Knower rating scale and an objective comprehension test. Approximately half of the subjects listened to audio tapes of the speeches and half to video tapes with four of the six speeches used for final analysis. In the second study, 1190 students in 54 basic speech classes each judged one speech using five rating scales and a three-item comprehnsion test. Results from these studies indicated that (1) relationships among ratings on individual scales were high, (2) comprehension measures correlated to a modest degree (first investigation only), and (3) neglibible relationships existed between ratings and comprehension scores. These findings suggest that rating scales and comprehension scores are not measuring the same degrees and forms of speaker effectiveness. (JM) |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_ED044399</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>ED044399</ericid><sourcerecordid>ED044399</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_ED0443993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFzL8KwjAYBPAuDqK-gcP3AoLQLp1ri65t9xLayx9IvoQkVHx7i7o7HdzvuH2hxqenB69I2SiRjedEXlLWoB72W2gTSDjPigZYzBkL9Zuw-kyHAMyaWik3MisYKZHghRrvQoQGp-3kWOyksAmnXx6Kc9eOzf2CaOYpRONEfE3t7VpVZV2Xf_gNSLk9kg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Two Investigations of the Relationship among Selected Ratings of Speech Effectiveness and Comprehension</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>Barker, Larry L</creator><creatorcontrib>Barker, Larry L ; Speech Association of America, New York, NY</creatorcontrib><description>This research project examined the relationship between measures of speaker effectiveness obtained from rating scales and those obtained from objective comprehension tests of speech content. Two studies were used in order to provide independently derived results which could be compared. In the first study, 49 undergraduate public-speaking students judged 6 speeches using both a modified Baird-Knower rating scale and an objective comprehension test. Approximately half of the subjects listened to audio tapes of the speeches and half to video tapes with four of the six speeches used for final analysis. In the second study, 1190 students in 54 basic speech classes each judged one speech using five rating scales and a three-item comprehnsion test. Results from these studies indicated that (1) relationships among ratings on individual scales were high, (2) comprehension measures correlated to a modest degree (first investigation only), and (3) neglibible relationships existed between ratings and comprehension scores. These findings suggest that rating scales and comprehension scores are not measuring the same degrees and forms of speaker effectiveness. (JM)</description><language>eng</language><subject>Comparative Testing ; Comprehension ; Educational Research ; Public Speaking ; Rating Scales ; Speech Education ; Speech Evaluation ; Speech Tests ; Speeches</subject><ispartof>Speech Monographs, 1968-08, Vol.35 (3), p.400</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,690,780,885</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED044399$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED044399$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barker, Larry L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Speech Association of America, New York, NY</creatorcontrib><title>Two Investigations of the Relationship among Selected Ratings of Speech Effectiveness and Comprehension</title><title>Speech Monographs</title><description>This research project examined the relationship between measures of speaker effectiveness obtained from rating scales and those obtained from objective comprehension tests of speech content. Two studies were used in order to provide independently derived results which could be compared. In the first study, 49 undergraduate public-speaking students judged 6 speeches using both a modified Baird-Knower rating scale and an objective comprehension test. Approximately half of the subjects listened to audio tapes of the speeches and half to video tapes with four of the six speeches used for final analysis. In the second study, 1190 students in 54 basic speech classes each judged one speech using five rating scales and a three-item comprehnsion test. Results from these studies indicated that (1) relationships among ratings on individual scales were high, (2) comprehension measures correlated to a modest degree (first investigation only), and (3) neglibible relationships existed between ratings and comprehension scores. These findings suggest that rating scales and comprehension scores are not measuring the same degrees and forms of speaker effectiveness. (JM)</description><subject>Comparative Testing</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Public Speaking</subject><subject>Rating Scales</subject><subject>Speech Education</subject><subject>Speech Evaluation</subject><subject>Speech Tests</subject><subject>Speeches</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1968</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNqFzL8KwjAYBPAuDqK-gcP3AoLQLp1ri65t9xLayx9IvoQkVHx7i7o7HdzvuH2hxqenB69I2SiRjedEXlLWoB72W2gTSDjPigZYzBkL9Zuw-kyHAMyaWik3MisYKZHghRrvQoQGp-3kWOyksAmnXx6Kc9eOzf2CaOYpRONEfE3t7VpVZV2Xf_gNSLk9kg</recordid><startdate>196808</startdate><enddate>196808</enddate><creator>Barker, Larry L</creator><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>196808</creationdate><title>Two Investigations of the Relationship among Selected Ratings of Speech Effectiveness and Comprehension</title><author>Barker, Larry L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_ED0443993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1968</creationdate><topic>Comparative Testing</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Public Speaking</topic><topic>Rating Scales</topic><topic>Speech Education</topic><topic>Speech Evaluation</topic><topic>Speech Tests</topic><topic>Speeches</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barker, Larry L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Speech Association of America, New York, NY</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Speech Monographs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barker, Larry L</au><aucorp>Speech Association of America, New York, NY</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>ED044399</ericid><atitle>Two Investigations of the Relationship among Selected Ratings of Speech Effectiveness and Comprehension</atitle><jtitle>Speech Monographs</jtitle><date>1968-08</date><risdate>1968</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>400</spage><pages>400-</pages><abstract>This research project examined the relationship between measures of speaker effectiveness obtained from rating scales and those obtained from objective comprehension tests of speech content. Two studies were used in order to provide independently derived results which could be compared. In the first study, 49 undergraduate public-speaking students judged 6 speeches using both a modified Baird-Knower rating scale and an objective comprehension test. Approximately half of the subjects listened to audio tapes of the speeches and half to video tapes with four of the six speeches used for final analysis. In the second study, 1190 students in 54 basic speech classes each judged one speech using five rating scales and a three-item comprehnsion test. Results from these studies indicated that (1) relationships among ratings on individual scales were high, (2) comprehension measures correlated to a modest degree (first investigation only), and (3) neglibible relationships existed between ratings and comprehension scores. These findings suggest that rating scales and comprehension scores are not measuring the same degrees and forms of speaker effectiveness. (JM)</abstract><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | |
ispartof | Speech Monographs, 1968-08, Vol.35 (3), p.400 |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_ED044399 |
source | ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery) |
subjects | Comparative Testing Comprehension Educational Research Public Speaking Rating Scales Speech Education Speech Evaluation Speech Tests Speeches |
title | Two Investigations of the Relationship among Selected Ratings of Speech Effectiveness and Comprehension |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T20%3A14%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Two%20Investigations%20of%20the%20Relationship%20among%20Selected%20Ratings%20of%20Speech%20Effectiveness%20and%20Comprehension&rft.jtitle=Speech%20Monographs&rft.au=Barker,%20Larry%20L&rft.aucorp=Speech%20Association%20of%20America,%20New%20York,%20NY&rft.date=1968-08&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=400&rft.pages=400-&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric_GA5%3EED044399%3C/eric_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=ED044399&rfr_iscdi=true |