Two Investigations of the Relationship among Selected Ratings of Speech Effectiveness and Comprehension

This research project examined the relationship between measures of speaker effectiveness obtained from rating scales and those obtained from objective comprehension tests of speech content. Two studies were used in order to provide independently derived results which could be compared. In the first...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Speech Monographs 1968-08, Vol.35 (3), p.400
1. Verfasser: Barker, Larry L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 400
container_title Speech Monographs
container_volume 35
creator Barker, Larry L
description This research project examined the relationship between measures of speaker effectiveness obtained from rating scales and those obtained from objective comprehension tests of speech content. Two studies were used in order to provide independently derived results which could be compared. In the first study, 49 undergraduate public-speaking students judged 6 speeches using both a modified Baird-Knower rating scale and an objective comprehension test. Approximately half of the subjects listened to audio tapes of the speeches and half to video tapes with four of the six speeches used for final analysis. In the second study, 1190 students in 54 basic speech classes each judged one speech using five rating scales and a three-item comprehnsion test. Results from these studies indicated that (1) relationships among ratings on individual scales were high, (2) comprehension measures correlated to a modest degree (first investigation only), and (3) neglibible relationships existed between ratings and comprehension scores. These findings suggest that rating scales and comprehension scores are not measuring the same degrees and forms of speaker effectiveness. (JM)
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_ED044399</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>ED044399</ericid><sourcerecordid>ED044399</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_ED0443993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFzL8KwjAYBPAuDqK-gcP3AoLQLp1ri65t9xLayx9IvoQkVHx7i7o7HdzvuH2hxqenB69I2SiRjedEXlLWoB72W2gTSDjPigZYzBkL9Zuw-kyHAMyaWik3MisYKZHghRrvQoQGp-3kWOyksAmnXx6Kc9eOzf2CaOYpRONEfE3t7VpVZV2Xf_gNSLk9kg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Two Investigations of the Relationship among Selected Ratings of Speech Effectiveness and Comprehension</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>Barker, Larry L</creator><creatorcontrib>Barker, Larry L ; Speech Association of America, New York, NY</creatorcontrib><description>This research project examined the relationship between measures of speaker effectiveness obtained from rating scales and those obtained from objective comprehension tests of speech content. Two studies were used in order to provide independently derived results which could be compared. In the first study, 49 undergraduate public-speaking students judged 6 speeches using both a modified Baird-Knower rating scale and an objective comprehension test. Approximately half of the subjects listened to audio tapes of the speeches and half to video tapes with four of the six speeches used for final analysis. In the second study, 1190 students in 54 basic speech classes each judged one speech using five rating scales and a three-item comprehnsion test. Results from these studies indicated that (1) relationships among ratings on individual scales were high, (2) comprehension measures correlated to a modest degree (first investigation only), and (3) neglibible relationships existed between ratings and comprehension scores. These findings suggest that rating scales and comprehension scores are not measuring the same degrees and forms of speaker effectiveness. (JM)</description><language>eng</language><subject>Comparative Testing ; Comprehension ; Educational Research ; Public Speaking ; Rating Scales ; Speech Education ; Speech Evaluation ; Speech Tests ; Speeches</subject><ispartof>Speech Monographs, 1968-08, Vol.35 (3), p.400</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,690,780,885</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED044399$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED044399$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barker, Larry L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Speech Association of America, New York, NY</creatorcontrib><title>Two Investigations of the Relationship among Selected Ratings of Speech Effectiveness and Comprehension</title><title>Speech Monographs</title><description>This research project examined the relationship between measures of speaker effectiveness obtained from rating scales and those obtained from objective comprehension tests of speech content. Two studies were used in order to provide independently derived results which could be compared. In the first study, 49 undergraduate public-speaking students judged 6 speeches using both a modified Baird-Knower rating scale and an objective comprehension test. Approximately half of the subjects listened to audio tapes of the speeches and half to video tapes with four of the six speeches used for final analysis. In the second study, 1190 students in 54 basic speech classes each judged one speech using five rating scales and a three-item comprehnsion test. Results from these studies indicated that (1) relationships among ratings on individual scales were high, (2) comprehension measures correlated to a modest degree (first investigation only), and (3) neglibible relationships existed between ratings and comprehension scores. These findings suggest that rating scales and comprehension scores are not measuring the same degrees and forms of speaker effectiveness. (JM)</description><subject>Comparative Testing</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Public Speaking</subject><subject>Rating Scales</subject><subject>Speech Education</subject><subject>Speech Evaluation</subject><subject>Speech Tests</subject><subject>Speeches</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1968</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNqFzL8KwjAYBPAuDqK-gcP3AoLQLp1ri65t9xLayx9IvoQkVHx7i7o7HdzvuH2hxqenB69I2SiRjedEXlLWoB72W2gTSDjPigZYzBkL9Zuw-kyHAMyaWik3MisYKZHghRrvQoQGp-3kWOyksAmnXx6Kc9eOzf2CaOYpRONEfE3t7VpVZV2Xf_gNSLk9kg</recordid><startdate>196808</startdate><enddate>196808</enddate><creator>Barker, Larry L</creator><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>196808</creationdate><title>Two Investigations of the Relationship among Selected Ratings of Speech Effectiveness and Comprehension</title><author>Barker, Larry L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_ED0443993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1968</creationdate><topic>Comparative Testing</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Public Speaking</topic><topic>Rating Scales</topic><topic>Speech Education</topic><topic>Speech Evaluation</topic><topic>Speech Tests</topic><topic>Speeches</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barker, Larry L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Speech Association of America, New York, NY</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Speech Monographs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barker, Larry L</au><aucorp>Speech Association of America, New York, NY</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>ED044399</ericid><atitle>Two Investigations of the Relationship among Selected Ratings of Speech Effectiveness and Comprehension</atitle><jtitle>Speech Monographs</jtitle><date>1968-08</date><risdate>1968</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>400</spage><pages>400-</pages><abstract>This research project examined the relationship between measures of speaker effectiveness obtained from rating scales and those obtained from objective comprehension tests of speech content. Two studies were used in order to provide independently derived results which could be compared. In the first study, 49 undergraduate public-speaking students judged 6 speeches using both a modified Baird-Knower rating scale and an objective comprehension test. Approximately half of the subjects listened to audio tapes of the speeches and half to video tapes with four of the six speeches used for final analysis. In the second study, 1190 students in 54 basic speech classes each judged one speech using five rating scales and a three-item comprehnsion test. Results from these studies indicated that (1) relationships among ratings on individual scales were high, (2) comprehension measures correlated to a modest degree (first investigation only), and (3) neglibible relationships existed between ratings and comprehension scores. These findings suggest that rating scales and comprehension scores are not measuring the same degrees and forms of speaker effectiveness. (JM)</abstract><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof Speech Monographs, 1968-08, Vol.35 (3), p.400
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_ED044399
source ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)
subjects Comparative Testing
Comprehension
Educational Research
Public Speaking
Rating Scales
Speech Education
Speech Evaluation
Speech Tests
Speeches
title Two Investigations of the Relationship among Selected Ratings of Speech Effectiveness and Comprehension
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T20%3A14%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Two%20Investigations%20of%20the%20Relationship%20among%20Selected%20Ratings%20of%20Speech%20Effectiveness%20and%20Comprehension&rft.jtitle=Speech%20Monographs&rft.au=Barker,%20Larry%20L&rft.aucorp=Speech%20Association%20of%20America,%20New%20York,%20NY&rft.date=1968-08&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=400&rft.pages=400-&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric_GA5%3EED044399%3C/eric_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=ED044399&rfr_iscdi=true