The Effect of Microteaching, Directive and Non-Directive Lectures on Achievement and Attitudes in A Basic Educational Psychology Course. The Effect of Mode of Feedback in Microteaching. (2 Documents Combined)
The subject of both papers is microteaching. The purpose of the first study was to assess the effects of focusing on general technical skills versus interpersonal relationship skills in conjunction with microteaching. A total of three training procedures were used: (1) directive lecture (DL), (2) no...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Text Resource |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Reed, Cheryl L |
description | The subject of both papers is microteaching. The purpose of the first study was to assess the effects of focusing on general technical skills versus interpersonal relationship skills in conjunction with microteaching. A total of three training procedures were used: (1) directive lecture (DL), (2) non-directive lecture (NDL), and (3) microteaching treatment (MT). At the end of the experiment, all students participated in one microteaching session to have their teaching skills assessed. Results showed greater teaching skills but less favorable attitudes toward it than students who did not participate. The second study examined the effects on teacher performance and attitudes of several manipulations of the conditions under which the microteaching supervisor provides feedback. Each student was placed in a group. Each taught a short lesson, was critiqued by his supervisor, and taught the lesson again. Various methods of supervision were used, depending on the group. The treatment resulting in the greatest amount of change was the audiotape treatment. (author/KJ) |
format | Text Resource |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_ED037791</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>ED037791</ericid><sourcerecordid>ED037791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_ED0377913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjrtuwkAQRd1QRJA_SDElkWIEuECUBNtKQVAKerSeHeMR9k60DyT_ZT6JNUKKkobqSHOu7tyn5OfQEBR1TehBavhktOJJYcPm9AY52yj4QqCMhr2Y9PeyiwyWHIiBTczThToy_pbceM8-6Cg5SnhXjhEKHVB5FqNa-HI9NtLKqYetBOtoBv-GiKaBJZGuFJ6Hoj_jZjBdQi4YhqcutnQVG9Kvk2RUq9bR853j5KUsDtuPlCzj8dtyp2x_LPJ5tlqtF9kDfQUudWEg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>text_resource</recordtype></control><display><type>text_resource</type><title>The Effect of Microteaching, Directive and Non-Directive Lectures on Achievement and Attitudes in A Basic Educational Psychology Course. The Effect of Mode of Feedback in Microteaching. (2 Documents Combined)</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>Reed, Cheryl L</creator><creatorcontrib>Reed, Cheryl L ; Purdue Univ., Lafayette, IN ; American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC</creatorcontrib><description>The subject of both papers is microteaching. The purpose of the first study was to assess the effects of focusing on general technical skills versus interpersonal relationship skills in conjunction with microteaching. A total of three training procedures were used: (1) directive lecture (DL), (2) non-directive lecture (NDL), and (3) microteaching treatment (MT). At the end of the experiment, all students participated in one microteaching session to have their teaching skills assessed. Results showed greater teaching skills but less favorable attitudes toward it than students who did not participate. The second study examined the effects on teacher performance and attitudes of several manipulations of the conditions under which the microteaching supervisor provides feedback. Each student was placed in a group. Each taught a short lesson, was critiqued by his supervisor, and taught the lesson again. Various methods of supervision were used, depending on the group. The treatment resulting in the greatest amount of change was the audiotape treatment. (author/KJ)</description><language>eng</language><subject>Audiovisual Instruction ; Microteaching ; Student Teaching ; Students ; Supervisory Methods ; Teacher Education ; Teacher Evaluation ; Teaching ; Training Methods</subject><creationdate>1970</creationdate><tpages>25</tpages><format>25</format><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,690,780,885</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED037791$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED037791$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reed, Cheryl L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purdue Univ., Lafayette, IN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC</creatorcontrib><title>The Effect of Microteaching, Directive and Non-Directive Lectures on Achievement and Attitudes in A Basic Educational Psychology Course. The Effect of Mode of Feedback in Microteaching. (2 Documents Combined)</title><description>The subject of both papers is microteaching. The purpose of the first study was to assess the effects of focusing on general technical skills versus interpersonal relationship skills in conjunction with microteaching. A total of three training procedures were used: (1) directive lecture (DL), (2) non-directive lecture (NDL), and (3) microteaching treatment (MT). At the end of the experiment, all students participated in one microteaching session to have their teaching skills assessed. Results showed greater teaching skills but less favorable attitudes toward it than students who did not participate. The second study examined the effects on teacher performance and attitudes of several manipulations of the conditions under which the microteaching supervisor provides feedback. Each student was placed in a group. Each taught a short lesson, was critiqued by his supervisor, and taught the lesson again. Various methods of supervision were used, depending on the group. The treatment resulting in the greatest amount of change was the audiotape treatment. (author/KJ)</description><subject>Audiovisual Instruction</subject><subject>Microteaching</subject><subject>Student Teaching</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Supervisory Methods</subject><subject>Teacher Education</subject><subject>Teacher Evaluation</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Training Methods</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>text_resource</rsrctype><creationdate>1970</creationdate><recordtype>text_resource</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjrtuwkAQRd1QRJA_SDElkWIEuECUBNtKQVAKerSeHeMR9k60DyT_ZT6JNUKKkobqSHOu7tyn5OfQEBR1TehBavhktOJJYcPm9AY52yj4QqCMhr2Y9PeyiwyWHIiBTczThToy_pbceM8-6Cg5SnhXjhEKHVB5FqNa-HI9NtLKqYetBOtoBv-GiKaBJZGuFJ6Hoj_jZjBdQi4YhqcutnQVG9Kvk2RUq9bR853j5KUsDtuPlCzj8dtyp2x_LPJ5tlqtF9kDfQUudWEg</recordid><startdate>19700302</startdate><enddate>19700302</enddate><creator>Reed, Cheryl L</creator><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19700302</creationdate><title>The Effect of Microteaching, Directive and Non-Directive Lectures on Achievement and Attitudes in A Basic Educational Psychology Course. The Effect of Mode of Feedback in Microteaching. (2 Documents Combined)</title><author>Reed, Cheryl L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_ED0377913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>text_resources</rsrctype><prefilter>text_resources</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1970</creationdate><topic>Audiovisual Instruction</topic><topic>Microteaching</topic><topic>Student Teaching</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Supervisory Methods</topic><topic>Teacher Education</topic><topic>Teacher Evaluation</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Training Methods</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reed, Cheryl L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purdue Univ., Lafayette, IN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reed, Cheryl L</au><aucorp>Purdue Univ., Lafayette, IN</aucorp><aucorp>American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><ericid>ED037791</ericid><btitle>The Effect of Microteaching, Directive and Non-Directive Lectures on Achievement and Attitudes in A Basic Educational Psychology Course. The Effect of Mode of Feedback in Microteaching. (2 Documents Combined)</btitle><date>1970-03-02</date><risdate>1970</risdate><abstract>The subject of both papers is microteaching. The purpose of the first study was to assess the effects of focusing on general technical skills versus interpersonal relationship skills in conjunction with microteaching. A total of three training procedures were used: (1) directive lecture (DL), (2) non-directive lecture (NDL), and (3) microteaching treatment (MT). At the end of the experiment, all students participated in one microteaching session to have their teaching skills assessed. Results showed greater teaching skills but less favorable attitudes toward it than students who did not participate. The second study examined the effects on teacher performance and attitudes of several manipulations of the conditions under which the microteaching supervisor provides feedback. Each student was placed in a group. Each taught a short lesson, was critiqued by his supervisor, and taught the lesson again. Various methods of supervision were used, depending on the group. The treatment resulting in the greatest amount of change was the audiotape treatment. (author/KJ)</abstract><tpages>25</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_ED037791 |
source | ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery) |
subjects | Audiovisual Instruction Microteaching Student Teaching Students Supervisory Methods Teacher Education Teacher Evaluation Teaching Training Methods |
title | The Effect of Microteaching, Directive and Non-Directive Lectures on Achievement and Attitudes in A Basic Educational Psychology Course. The Effect of Mode of Feedback in Microteaching. (2 Documents Combined) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T17%3A23%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.btitle=The%20Effect%20of%20Microteaching,%20Directive%20and%20Non-Directive%20Lectures%20on%20Achievement%20and%20Attitudes%20in%20A%20Basic%20Educational%20Psychology%20Course.%20The%20Effect%20of%20Mode%20of%20Feedback%20in%20Microteaching.%20(2%20Documents%20Combined)&rft.au=Reed,%20Cheryl%20L&rft.aucorp=Purdue%20Univ.,%20Lafayette,%20IN&rft.date=1970-03-02&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric_GA5%3EED037791%3C/eric_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=ED037791&rfr_iscdi=true |