TELEVISION DRAMA PREFERENCE CHOICE

A BASIS FOR A GENERAL THEORY TO EXPLAIN PREFERENCES OF COMMERCIAL TELEVISION (TV) SHOWS WAS DEVELOPED. THE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF THE STUDY WAS BASED ON THE RELATIONSHIP OF EDUCATIONAL LEVEL TO TV PREFERENCES, AND THE STUDY SAMPLE CONSISTED OF SEVENTH-GRADE THROUGH COLLEGE-LEVEL STUDENTS. FINDINGS...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser:	MACDONALD, NEIL W
Format:	Text Resource
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Attitude Change Broadcast Television Individual Development Interest Inventories Interests Mass Media Measurement Instruments Student Interests Television Viewing Theories
Online-Zugang:	Volltext bestellen
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator	MACDONALD, NEIL W
description	A BASIS FOR A GENERAL THEORY TO EXPLAIN PREFERENCES OF COMMERCIAL TELEVISION (TV) SHOWS WAS DEVELOPED. THE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF THE STUDY WAS BASED ON THE RELATIONSHIP OF EDUCATIONAL LEVEL TO TV PREFERENCES, AND THE STUDY SAMPLE CONSISTED OF SEVENTH-GRADE THROUGH COLLEGE-LEVEL STUDENTS. FINDINGS SHOWED THAT AS EDUCATION INCREASES, DEMAND FOR CONTENT IN TV PRESENTATIONS MOVES FROM NONINFORMATIVE TO INFORMATIVE, FROM UNREALISTIC TO REALISTIC, AND FROM ACTION TO NONACTION. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EDUCATION AND PREFERENCE, THEREFORE, WAS FOUND TO BE POSITIVE AND RECTILINEAR. THE POSSIBILITY OF A PLATEAU OR REGRESSION AT THE GRADE LEVEL OF 9 OR 10 WAS NOTED, HOWEVER. IN ADDITION TO THE THEORETICAL STUDY, OTHER ACTIVITIES OF THE PROJECT INCLUDED THE DEVELOPMENT OF (1) A COMPREHENSIVE CONTENT ANALYTIC MODEL BY WHICH THE CONTENT OF TV SHOWS COULD BE EXAMINED OBJECTIVELY AND THOROUGHLY, AND (2) A RELIABLE PAPER-AND-PENCIL TEST BY WHICH INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN TV PREFERENCE CHOICE COULD BE MEASURED. (JH)
format	Text Resource
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>eric_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_ED010379</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>ED010379</ericid><sourcerecordid>ED010379</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_ED0103793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZFAKcfVxDfMM9vT3U3AJcvR1VAgIcnVzDXL1c3ZVcPbw93R25WFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDDJuriHOHrqpRZnJ8QVFmbmJRZXxri4GhgbG5pbGBKQB6L0f3A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>text_resource</recordtype></control><display><type>text_resource</type><title>TELEVISION DRAMA PREFERENCE CHOICE</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>MACDONALD, NEIL W</creator><creatorcontrib>MACDONALD, NEIL W ; Minnesota Univ., Minneapolis. School of Journalism</creatorcontrib><description>A BASIS FOR A GENERAL THEORY TO EXPLAIN PREFERENCES OF COMMERCIAL TELEVISION (TV) SHOWS WAS DEVELOPED. THE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF THE STUDY WAS BASED ON THE RELATIONSHIP OF EDUCATIONAL LEVEL TO TV PREFERENCES, AND THE STUDY SAMPLE CONSISTED OF SEVENTH-GRADE THROUGH COLLEGE-LEVEL STUDENTS. FINDINGS SHOWED THAT AS EDUCATION INCREASES, DEMAND FOR CONTENT IN TV PRESENTATIONS MOVES FROM NONINFORMATIVE TO INFORMATIVE, FROM UNREALISTIC TO REALISTIC, AND FROM ACTION TO NONACTION. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EDUCATION AND PREFERENCE, THEREFORE, WAS FOUND TO BE POSITIVE AND RECTILINEAR. THE POSSIBILITY OF A PLATEAU OR REGRESSION AT THE GRADE LEVEL OF 9 OR 10 WAS NOTED, HOWEVER. IN ADDITION TO THE THEORETICAL STUDY, OTHER ACTIVITIES OF THE PROJECT INCLUDED THE DEVELOPMENT OF (1) A COMPREHENSIVE CONTENT ANALYTIC MODEL BY WHICH THE CONTENT OF TV SHOWS COULD BE EXAMINED OBJECTIVELY AND THOROUGHLY, AND (2) A RELIABLE PAPER-AND-PENCIL TEST BY WHICH INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN TV PREFERENCE CHOICE COULD BE MEASURED. (JH)</description><language>eng</language><subject>Attitude Change ; Broadcast Television ; Individual Development ; Interest Inventories ; Interests ; Mass Media ; Measurement Instruments ; Student Interests ; Television Viewing ; Theories</subject><creationdate>1966</creationdate><tpages>419</tpages><format>419</format><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,691,781,886</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED010379$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED010379$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MACDONALD, NEIL W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minnesota Univ., Minneapolis. School of Journalism</creatorcontrib><title>TELEVISION DRAMA PREFERENCE CHOICE</title><description>A BASIS FOR A GENERAL THEORY TO EXPLAIN PREFERENCES OF COMMERCIAL TELEVISION (TV) SHOWS WAS DEVELOPED. THE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF THE STUDY WAS BASED ON THE RELATIONSHIP OF EDUCATIONAL LEVEL TO TV PREFERENCES, AND THE STUDY SAMPLE CONSISTED OF SEVENTH-GRADE THROUGH COLLEGE-LEVEL STUDENTS. FINDINGS SHOWED THAT AS EDUCATION INCREASES, DEMAND FOR CONTENT IN TV PRESENTATIONS MOVES FROM NONINFORMATIVE TO INFORMATIVE, FROM UNREALISTIC TO REALISTIC, AND FROM ACTION TO NONACTION. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EDUCATION AND PREFERENCE, THEREFORE, WAS FOUND TO BE POSITIVE AND RECTILINEAR. THE POSSIBILITY OF A PLATEAU OR REGRESSION AT THE GRADE LEVEL OF 9 OR 10 WAS NOTED, HOWEVER. IN ADDITION TO THE THEORETICAL STUDY, OTHER ACTIVITIES OF THE PROJECT INCLUDED THE DEVELOPMENT OF (1) A COMPREHENSIVE CONTENT ANALYTIC MODEL BY WHICH THE CONTENT OF TV SHOWS COULD BE EXAMINED OBJECTIVELY AND THOROUGHLY, AND (2) A RELIABLE PAPER-AND-PENCIL TEST BY WHICH INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN TV PREFERENCE CHOICE COULD BE MEASURED. (JH)</description><subject>Attitude Change</subject><subject>Broadcast Television</subject><subject>Individual Development</subject><subject>Interest Inventories</subject><subject>Interests</subject><subject>Mass Media</subject><subject>Measurement Instruments</subject><subject>Student Interests</subject><subject>Television Viewing</subject><subject>Theories</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>text_resource</rsrctype><creationdate>1966</creationdate><recordtype>text_resource</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZFAKcfVxDfMM9vT3U3AJcvR1VAgIcnVzDXL1c3ZVcPbw93R25WFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDDJuriHOHrqpRZnJ8QVFmbmJRZXxri4GhgbG5pbGBKQB6L0f3A</recordid><startdate>196606</startdate><enddate>196606</enddate><creator>MACDONALD, NEIL W</creator><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>196606</creationdate><title>TELEVISION DRAMA PREFERENCE CHOICE</title><author>MACDONALD, NEIL W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_ED0103793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>text_resources</rsrctype><prefilter>text_resources</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1966</creationdate><topic>Attitude Change</topic><topic>Broadcast Television</topic><topic>Individual Development</topic><topic>Interest Inventories</topic><topic>Interests</topic><topic>Mass Media</topic><topic>Measurement Instruments</topic><topic>Student Interests</topic><topic>Television Viewing</topic><topic>Theories</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MACDONALD, NEIL W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minnesota Univ., Minneapolis. School of Journalism</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MACDONALD, NEIL W</au><aucorp>Minnesota Univ., Minneapolis. School of Journalism</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><ericid>ED010379</ericid><btitle>TELEVISION DRAMA PREFERENCE CHOICE</btitle><date>1966-06</date><risdate>1966</risdate><abstract>A BASIS FOR A GENERAL THEORY TO EXPLAIN PREFERENCES OF COMMERCIAL TELEVISION (TV) SHOWS WAS DEVELOPED. THE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF THE STUDY WAS BASED ON THE RELATIONSHIP OF EDUCATIONAL LEVEL TO TV PREFERENCES, AND THE STUDY SAMPLE CONSISTED OF SEVENTH-GRADE THROUGH COLLEGE-LEVEL STUDENTS. FINDINGS SHOWED THAT AS EDUCATION INCREASES, DEMAND FOR CONTENT IN TV PRESENTATIONS MOVES FROM NONINFORMATIVE TO INFORMATIVE, FROM UNREALISTIC TO REALISTIC, AND FROM ACTION TO NONACTION. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EDUCATION AND PREFERENCE, THEREFORE, WAS FOUND TO BE POSITIVE AND RECTILINEAR. THE POSSIBILITY OF A PLATEAU OR REGRESSION AT THE GRADE LEVEL OF 9 OR 10 WAS NOTED, HOWEVER. IN ADDITION TO THE THEORETICAL STUDY, OTHER ACTIVITIES OF THE PROJECT INCLUDED THE DEVELOPMENT OF (1) A COMPREHENSIVE CONTENT ANALYTIC MODEL BY WHICH THE CONTENT OF TV SHOWS COULD BE EXAMINED OBJECTIVELY AND THOROUGHLY, AND (2) A RELIABLE PAPER-AND-PENCIL TEST BY WHICH INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN TV PREFERENCE CHOICE COULD BE MEASURED. (JH)</abstract><tpages>419</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language	eng
recordid	cdi_eric_primary_ED010379
source	ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)
subjects	Attitude Change Broadcast Television Individual Development Interest Inventories Interests Mass Media Measurement Instruments Student Interests Television Viewing Theories
title	TELEVISION DRAMA PREFERENCE CHOICE
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T22%3A05%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.btitle=TELEVISION%20DRAMA%20PREFERENCE%20CHOICE&rft.au=MACDONALD,%20NEIL%20W&rft.aucorp=Minnesota%20Univ.,%20Minneapolis.%20School%20of%20Journalism&rft.date=1966-06&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric_GA5%3EED010379%3C/eric_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=ED010379&rfr_iscdi=true