Determining whether a measurement signature is specific to a biological process
A Specificity statistic (or metric) is computed as a means to identify amplitude scores associated with a signature that can be attributed with high probability to a specific biological entity or process represented by the signature. Preferably, Specificity is computed by assessing a likelihood of a...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Patent |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | THOMSON TY MATTHEW PRATT DEXTER ROYDON |
description | A Specificity statistic (or metric) is computed as a means to identify amplitude scores associated with a signature that can be attributed with high probability to a specific biological entity or process represented by the signature. Preferably, Specificity is computed by assessing a likelihood of a given null hypothesis, namely, that an amplitude score is not representative of the specific signature but, instead, is representative of a general trend in the applicable data set that can be measured by any signature that is comparable to the signature of interest. In a typical implementation, a first step to compute the Specificity metric is to construct a set of comparable signatures. Next, an amplitude score is computed for each of these signatures, preferably using the same data set. Then, the Specificity metric is computed, preferably as a two-tailed p-value, by placing the amplitude score for the signature of interest on a distribution of scores for the comparable signatures. Scores that have Specificity p-values less than a particular value, e.g., 0.05, are considered to be scores that can be attributed with high confidence to the signature of interest. |
format | Patent |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>epo_EVB</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_epo_espacenet_US2013046726A1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>US2013046726A1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-epo_espacenet_US2013046726A13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyrkKAjEURuE0FqK-wwVrYRaZqcUFOwu1HmL4J3MhG7kRX98pfACrw4FvqW4nFGTPgYOlz4QyIZMmDy3vDI9QSNgGXeYjFpIEwyMbKnFmL44uWjbaUcrRQGStFqN2gs2vK7W9nB_H6w4pDpCkDQLK8Lw3Vd1W-65vukPd_qe-YJs4KA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>patent</recordtype></control><display><type>patent</type><title>Determining whether a measurement signature is specific to a biological process</title><source>esp@cenet</source><creator>THOMSON TY MATTHEW ; PRATT DEXTER ROYDON</creator><creatorcontrib>THOMSON TY MATTHEW ; PRATT DEXTER ROYDON</creatorcontrib><description>A Specificity statistic (or metric) is computed as a means to identify amplitude scores associated with a signature that can be attributed with high probability to a specific biological entity or process represented by the signature. Preferably, Specificity is computed by assessing a likelihood of a given null hypothesis, namely, that an amplitude score is not representative of the specific signature but, instead, is representative of a general trend in the applicable data set that can be measured by any signature that is comparable to the signature of interest. In a typical implementation, a first step to compute the Specificity metric is to construct a set of comparable signatures. Next, an amplitude score is computed for each of these signatures, preferably using the same data set. Then, the Specificity metric is computed, preferably as a two-tailed p-value, by placing the amplitude score for the signature of interest on a distribution of scores for the comparable signatures. Scores that have Specificity p-values less than a particular value, e.g., 0.05, are considered to be scores that can be attributed with high confidence to the signature of interest.</description><language>eng</language><subject>CALCULATING ; COMPUTER SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS ; COMPUTING ; COUNTING ; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTEDFOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS ; PHYSICS</subject><creationdate>2013</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?FT=D&date=20130221&DB=EPODOC&CC=US&NR=2013046726A1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gepo$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,308,780,885,25564,76547</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?FT=D&date=20130221&DB=EPODOC&CC=US&NR=2013046726A1$$EView_record_in_European_Patent_Office$$FView_record_in_$$GEuropean_Patent_Office$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>THOMSON TY MATTHEW</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PRATT DEXTER ROYDON</creatorcontrib><title>Determining whether a measurement signature is specific to a biological process</title><description>A Specificity statistic (or metric) is computed as a means to identify amplitude scores associated with a signature that can be attributed with high probability to a specific biological entity or process represented by the signature. Preferably, Specificity is computed by assessing a likelihood of a given null hypothesis, namely, that an amplitude score is not representative of the specific signature but, instead, is representative of a general trend in the applicable data set that can be measured by any signature that is comparable to the signature of interest. In a typical implementation, a first step to compute the Specificity metric is to construct a set of comparable signatures. Next, an amplitude score is computed for each of these signatures, preferably using the same data set. Then, the Specificity metric is computed, preferably as a two-tailed p-value, by placing the amplitude score for the signature of interest on a distribution of scores for the comparable signatures. Scores that have Specificity p-values less than a particular value, e.g., 0.05, are considered to be scores that can be attributed with high confidence to the signature of interest.</description><subject>CALCULATING</subject><subject>COMPUTER SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS</subject><subject>COMPUTING</subject><subject>COUNTING</subject><subject>INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTEDFOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS</subject><subject>PHYSICS</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>patent</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>patent</recordtype><sourceid>EVB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNyrkKAjEURuE0FqK-wwVrYRaZqcUFOwu1HmL4J3MhG7kRX98pfACrw4FvqW4nFGTPgYOlz4QyIZMmDy3vDI9QSNgGXeYjFpIEwyMbKnFmL44uWjbaUcrRQGStFqN2gs2vK7W9nB_H6w4pDpCkDQLK8Lw3Vd1W-65vukPd_qe-YJs4KA</recordid><startdate>20130221</startdate><enddate>20130221</enddate><creator>THOMSON TY MATTHEW</creator><creator>PRATT DEXTER ROYDON</creator><scope>EVB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130221</creationdate><title>Determining whether a measurement signature is specific to a biological process</title><author>THOMSON TY MATTHEW ; PRATT DEXTER ROYDON</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-epo_espacenet_US2013046726A13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>patents</rsrctype><prefilter>patents</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>CALCULATING</topic><topic>COMPUTER SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS</topic><topic>COMPUTING</topic><topic>COUNTING</topic><topic>INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTEDFOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS</topic><topic>PHYSICS</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>THOMSON TY MATTHEW</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PRATT DEXTER ROYDON</creatorcontrib><collection>esp@cenet</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>THOMSON TY MATTHEW</au><au>PRATT DEXTER ROYDON</au><format>patent</format><genre>patent</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><title>Determining whether a measurement signature is specific to a biological process</title><date>2013-02-21</date><risdate>2013</risdate><abstract>A Specificity statistic (or metric) is computed as a means to identify amplitude scores associated with a signature that can be attributed with high probability to a specific biological entity or process represented by the signature. Preferably, Specificity is computed by assessing a likelihood of a given null hypothesis, namely, that an amplitude score is not representative of the specific signature but, instead, is representative of a general trend in the applicable data set that can be measured by any signature that is comparable to the signature of interest. In a typical implementation, a first step to compute the Specificity metric is to construct a set of comparable signatures. Next, an amplitude score is computed for each of these signatures, preferably using the same data set. Then, the Specificity metric is computed, preferably as a two-tailed p-value, by placing the amplitude score for the signature of interest on a distribution of scores for the comparable signatures. Scores that have Specificity p-values less than a particular value, e.g., 0.05, are considered to be scores that can be attributed with high confidence to the signature of interest.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_epo_espacenet_US2013046726A1 |
source | esp@cenet |
subjects | CALCULATING COMPUTER SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS COMPUTING COUNTING INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTEDFOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS PHYSICS |
title | Determining whether a measurement signature is specific to a biological process |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T05%3A17%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-epo_EVB&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:patent&rft.genre=patent&rft.au=THOMSON%20TY%20MATTHEW&rft.date=2013-02-21&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cepo_EVB%3EUS2013046726A1%3C/epo_EVB%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |