OPTIMUM NUMBER EVALUATION METHOD OF STANDBY ELEMENT

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide an optimum number evaluation method of standby elements capable of calculating the optimum number of standby elements in a system in short time by a simple method.SOLUTION: An optimum number evaluation method of standby elements has: a first step of acquiring basic i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: OKAMOTO TOMOKI, YAMAKAWA TAIJI, OKI ISAO
Format: Patent
Sprache:eng ; jpn
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator OKAMOTO TOMOKI
YAMAKAWA TAIJI
OKI ISAO
description PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide an optimum number evaluation method of standby elements capable of calculating the optimum number of standby elements in a system in short time by a simple method.SOLUTION: An optimum number evaluation method of standby elements has: a first step of acquiring basic information including the number of lines having elements in common, average operation time between failures of the elements, work stop time which is required for replacement when the elements are failed, and new item procurement time for procuring the elements; a second step of determining upper and lower limit ranges of deficiency stop time of a system from the number of lines, the work stop time and the number of standby items of the elements; a third step of analytically calculating average deficiency stop time which is stop time of the system when the elements are failed and there are no elements to be replaced by the number of lines, the average operation time between failures, the number of standby items, the new item procurement time, and the upper and lower limit ranges of the deficiency stop time; and a fourth step of evaluating the optimum number of standby elements based on the basic information and the average deficiency stop time.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 9 【課題】システムにおける予備の要素の最適数を簡単な方法で短時間に求めることができる予備要素の最適数評価方法を提供する。【解決手段】予備要素の最適数評価方法は、要素を共通に有するライン数、要素の平均故障間動作時間、要素が故障したときの交換に必要な作業停止時間、及び、要素を調達するための新品調達時間を含む基本情報を取得する第1のステップと、ライン数、作業停止時間及び要素の予備品数からシステムの欠品停止時間の上下限範囲を決定する第2のステップと、ライン数、平均故障間動作時間、予備品数、新品調達時間、及び、欠品停止時間の上下限範囲により要素が故障して交換する要素がないときのシステムの停止時間である平均欠品停止時間を解析的に算出する第3のステップと、基本情報及び平均欠品停止時間に基づいて予備要素の最適数を評価する第4のステップと、を有する。【選択図】図9
format Patent
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>epo_EVB</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_epo_espacenet_JP2017037499A</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>JP2017037499A</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-epo_espacenet_JP2017037499A3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZDD2Dwjx9A31VfAL9XVyDVJwDXP0CXUM8fT3U_B1DfHwd1Hwd1MIDnH0c3GKVHD1cfV19QvhYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMSm6uIc4euqkF-fGpxQWJyal5qSXxXgFGBobmBsbmJpaWjsZEKQIAAwInww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>patent</recordtype></control><display><type>patent</type><title>OPTIMUM NUMBER EVALUATION METHOD OF STANDBY ELEMENT</title><source>esp@cenet</source><creator>OKAMOTO TOMOKI ; YAMAKAWA TAIJI ; OKI ISAO</creator><creatorcontrib>OKAMOTO TOMOKI ; YAMAKAWA TAIJI ; OKI ISAO</creatorcontrib><description>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide an optimum number evaluation method of standby elements capable of calculating the optimum number of standby elements in a system in short time by a simple method.SOLUTION: An optimum number evaluation method of standby elements has: a first step of acquiring basic information including the number of lines having elements in common, average operation time between failures of the elements, work stop time which is required for replacement when the elements are failed, and new item procurement time for procuring the elements; a second step of determining upper and lower limit ranges of deficiency stop time of a system from the number of lines, the work stop time and the number of standby items of the elements; a third step of analytically calculating average deficiency stop time which is stop time of the system when the elements are failed and there are no elements to be replaced by the number of lines, the average operation time between failures, the number of standby items, the new item procurement time, and the upper and lower limit ranges of the deficiency stop time; and a fourth step of evaluating the optimum number of standby elements based on the basic information and the average deficiency stop time.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 9 【課題】システムにおける予備の要素の最適数を簡単な方法で短時間に求めることができる予備要素の最適数評価方法を提供する。【解決手段】予備要素の最適数評価方法は、要素を共通に有するライン数、要素の平均故障間動作時間、要素が故障したときの交換に必要な作業停止時間、及び、要素を調達するための新品調達時間を含む基本情報を取得する第1のステップと、ライン数、作業停止時間及び要素の予備品数からシステムの欠品停止時間の上下限範囲を決定する第2のステップと、ライン数、平均故障間動作時間、予備品数、新品調達時間、及び、欠品停止時間の上下限範囲により要素が故障して交換する要素がないときのシステムの停止時間である平均欠品停止時間を解析的に算出する第3のステップと、基本情報及び平均欠品停止時間に基づいて予備要素の最適数を評価する第4のステップと、を有する。【選択図】図9</description><language>eng ; jpn</language><subject>CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION ORPROCESSING OF GOODS ; CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL ; CONTROLLING ; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS ; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC ; GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS ; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS ORELEMENTS ; PHYSICS ; REGULATING ; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS ; TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINSTCLIMATE CHANGE</subject><creationdate>2017</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?FT=D&amp;date=20170216&amp;DB=EPODOC&amp;CC=JP&amp;NR=2017037499A$$EHTML$$P50$$Gepo$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,308,776,881,25544,76293</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?FT=D&amp;date=20170216&amp;DB=EPODOC&amp;CC=JP&amp;NR=2017037499A$$EView_record_in_European_Patent_Office$$FView_record_in_$$GEuropean_Patent_Office$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>OKAMOTO TOMOKI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YAMAKAWA TAIJI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OKI ISAO</creatorcontrib><title>OPTIMUM NUMBER EVALUATION METHOD OF STANDBY ELEMENT</title><description>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide an optimum number evaluation method of standby elements capable of calculating the optimum number of standby elements in a system in short time by a simple method.SOLUTION: An optimum number evaluation method of standby elements has: a first step of acquiring basic information including the number of lines having elements in common, average operation time between failures of the elements, work stop time which is required for replacement when the elements are failed, and new item procurement time for procuring the elements; a second step of determining upper and lower limit ranges of deficiency stop time of a system from the number of lines, the work stop time and the number of standby items of the elements; a third step of analytically calculating average deficiency stop time which is stop time of the system when the elements are failed and there are no elements to be replaced by the number of lines, the average operation time between failures, the number of standby items, the new item procurement time, and the upper and lower limit ranges of the deficiency stop time; and a fourth step of evaluating the optimum number of standby elements based on the basic information and the average deficiency stop time.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 9 【課題】システムにおける予備の要素の最適数を簡単な方法で短時間に求めることができる予備要素の最適数評価方法を提供する。【解決手段】予備要素の最適数評価方法は、要素を共通に有するライン数、要素の平均故障間動作時間、要素が故障したときの交換に必要な作業停止時間、及び、要素を調達するための新品調達時間を含む基本情報を取得する第1のステップと、ライン数、作業停止時間及び要素の予備品数からシステムの欠品停止時間の上下限範囲を決定する第2のステップと、ライン数、平均故障間動作時間、予備品数、新品調達時間、及び、欠品停止時間の上下限範囲により要素が故障して交換する要素がないときのシステムの停止時間である平均欠品停止時間を解析的に算出する第3のステップと、基本情報及び平均欠品停止時間に基づいて予備要素の最適数を評価する第4のステップと、を有する。【選択図】図9</description><subject>CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION ORPROCESSING OF GOODS</subject><subject>CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL</subject><subject>CONTROLLING</subject><subject>FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS</subject><subject>GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC</subject><subject>GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS</subject><subject>MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS ORELEMENTS</subject><subject>PHYSICS</subject><subject>REGULATING</subject><subject>TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS</subject><subject>TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINSTCLIMATE CHANGE</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>patent</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>patent</recordtype><sourceid>EVB</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZDD2Dwjx9A31VfAL9XVyDVJwDXP0CXUM8fT3U_B1DfHwd1Hwd1MIDnH0c3GKVHD1cfV19QvhYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMSm6uIc4euqkF-fGpxQWJyal5qSXxXgFGBobmBsbmJpaWjsZEKQIAAwInww</recordid><startdate>20170216</startdate><enddate>20170216</enddate><creator>OKAMOTO TOMOKI</creator><creator>YAMAKAWA TAIJI</creator><creator>OKI ISAO</creator><scope>EVB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170216</creationdate><title>OPTIMUM NUMBER EVALUATION METHOD OF STANDBY ELEMENT</title><author>OKAMOTO TOMOKI ; YAMAKAWA TAIJI ; OKI ISAO</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-epo_espacenet_JP2017037499A3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>patents</rsrctype><prefilter>patents</prefilter><language>eng ; jpn</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION ORPROCESSING OF GOODS</topic><topic>CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL</topic><topic>CONTROLLING</topic><topic>FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS</topic><topic>GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC</topic><topic>GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS</topic><topic>MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS ORELEMENTS</topic><topic>PHYSICS</topic><topic>REGULATING</topic><topic>TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS</topic><topic>TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINSTCLIMATE CHANGE</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>OKAMOTO TOMOKI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YAMAKAWA TAIJI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OKI ISAO</creatorcontrib><collection>esp@cenet</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>OKAMOTO TOMOKI</au><au>YAMAKAWA TAIJI</au><au>OKI ISAO</au><format>patent</format><genre>patent</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><title>OPTIMUM NUMBER EVALUATION METHOD OF STANDBY ELEMENT</title><date>2017-02-16</date><risdate>2017</risdate><abstract>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide an optimum number evaluation method of standby elements capable of calculating the optimum number of standby elements in a system in short time by a simple method.SOLUTION: An optimum number evaluation method of standby elements has: a first step of acquiring basic information including the number of lines having elements in common, average operation time between failures of the elements, work stop time which is required for replacement when the elements are failed, and new item procurement time for procuring the elements; a second step of determining upper and lower limit ranges of deficiency stop time of a system from the number of lines, the work stop time and the number of standby items of the elements; a third step of analytically calculating average deficiency stop time which is stop time of the system when the elements are failed and there are no elements to be replaced by the number of lines, the average operation time between failures, the number of standby items, the new item procurement time, and the upper and lower limit ranges of the deficiency stop time; and a fourth step of evaluating the optimum number of standby elements based on the basic information and the average deficiency stop time.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 9 【課題】システムにおける予備の要素の最適数を簡単な方法で短時間に求めることができる予備要素の最適数評価方法を提供する。【解決手段】予備要素の最適数評価方法は、要素を共通に有するライン数、要素の平均故障間動作時間、要素が故障したときの交換に必要な作業停止時間、及び、要素を調達するための新品調達時間を含む基本情報を取得する第1のステップと、ライン数、作業停止時間及び要素の予備品数からシステムの欠品停止時間の上下限範囲を決定する第2のステップと、ライン数、平均故障間動作時間、予備品数、新品調達時間、及び、欠品停止時間の上下限範囲により要素が故障して交換する要素がないときのシステムの停止時間である平均欠品停止時間を解析的に算出する第3のステップと、基本情報及び平均欠品停止時間に基づいて予備要素の最適数を評価する第4のステップと、を有する。【選択図】図9</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng ; jpn
recordid cdi_epo_espacenet_JP2017037499A
source esp@cenet
subjects CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION ORPROCESSING OF GOODS
CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL
CONTROLLING
FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS
GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS
MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS ORELEMENTS
PHYSICS
REGULATING
TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINSTCLIMATE CHANGE
title OPTIMUM NUMBER EVALUATION METHOD OF STANDBY ELEMENT
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T05%3A29%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-epo_EVB&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:patent&rft.genre=patent&rft.au=OKAMOTO%20TOMOKI&rft.date=2017-02-16&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cepo_EVB%3EJP2017037499A%3C/epo_EVB%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true