Objective comparison of particle tracking methods
Particle tracking is of key importance for quantitative analysis of intracellular dynamic processes from time-lapse microscopy image data. Because manually detecting and following large numbers of individual particles is not feasible, automated computational methods have been developed for these tas...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Web Resource |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Chenouard, Nicolas Smal, Ihor De Chaumont, Fabrice Maska, Martin Sbalzarini, Ivo F Gong, Yuanhao Cardinale, Janick Carthel, Craig Coraluppi, Stefano Winter, Mark Cohen, Andrew R Godinez, William J Rohr, Karl Kalaidzidis, Yannis Liang, Liang Duncan, James Shen, Hongying Xu, Yingke Magnusson, Klas E. G Jalden, Joakim Blau, Helen M Paul-Gilloteaux, Perrine Roudot, Philippe Kervrann, Charles Waharte, Francois Tinevez, Jean-Yves Shorte, Spencer L Willemse, Joost Celler, Katherine Van Wezel, Gilles P Dan, Han-Wei Tsai, Yuh-Show Ortiz De Solorzano, Carlos Olivo-Marin, Jean-Christophe Meijering, Erik |
description | Particle tracking is of key importance for quantitative analysis of intracellular dynamic processes from time-lapse microscopy image data. Because manually detecting and following large numbers of individual particles is not feasible, automated computational methods have been developed for these tasks by many groups. Aiming to perform an objective comparison of methods, we gathered the community and organized an open competition in which participating teams applied their own methods independently to a commonly defined data set including diverse scenarios. Performance was assessed using commonly defined measures. Although no single method performed best across all scenarios, the results revealed clear differences between the various approaches, leading to notable practical conclusions for users and developers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/nmeth.2808 |
format | Web Resource |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>epfl_F1K</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_epfl_infoscience_oai_infoscience_tind_io_198655</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_infoscience_tind_io_198655</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-epfl_infoscience_oai_infoscience_tind_io_1986553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdizEOwjAMALMwIGDhBfkAJaFqFWYEYmNhj4LrgCG1qybi_YDEwsp0d8MptbSmsqZ2a-6x3KqNM26q7OlyRyj0RA3SD2GkLKwl6rcWgoS6jAEexFf9uaTLczWJIWVcfDlT7WF_3h1XOMTkiaNkIGRAL4F-uhB3nsTbrWubpv57fAEGdUQG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>web_resource</recordtype></control><display><type>web_resource</type><title>Objective comparison of particle tracking methods</title><source>Infoscience: EPF Lausanne</source><creator>Chenouard, Nicolas ; Smal, Ihor ; De Chaumont, Fabrice ; Maska, Martin ; Sbalzarini, Ivo F ; Gong, Yuanhao ; Cardinale, Janick ; Carthel, Craig ; Coraluppi, Stefano ; Winter, Mark ; Cohen, Andrew R ; Godinez, William J ; Rohr, Karl ; Kalaidzidis, Yannis ; Liang, Liang ; Duncan, James ; Shen, Hongying ; Xu, Yingke ; Magnusson, Klas E. G ; Jalden, Joakim ; Blau, Helen M ; Paul-Gilloteaux, Perrine ; Roudot, Philippe ; Kervrann, Charles ; Waharte, Francois ; Tinevez, Jean-Yves ; Shorte, Spencer L ; Willemse, Joost ; Celler, Katherine ; Van Wezel, Gilles P ; Dan, Han-Wei ; Tsai, Yuh-Show ; Ortiz De Solorzano, Carlos ; Olivo-Marin, Jean-Christophe ; Meijering, Erik</creator><creatorcontrib>Chenouard, Nicolas ; Smal, Ihor ; De Chaumont, Fabrice ; Maska, Martin ; Sbalzarini, Ivo F ; Gong, Yuanhao ; Cardinale, Janick ; Carthel, Craig ; Coraluppi, Stefano ; Winter, Mark ; Cohen, Andrew R ; Godinez, William J ; Rohr, Karl ; Kalaidzidis, Yannis ; Liang, Liang ; Duncan, James ; Shen, Hongying ; Xu, Yingke ; Magnusson, Klas E. G ; Jalden, Joakim ; Blau, Helen M ; Paul-Gilloteaux, Perrine ; Roudot, Philippe ; Kervrann, Charles ; Waharte, Francois ; Tinevez, Jean-Yves ; Shorte, Spencer L ; Willemse, Joost ; Celler, Katherine ; Van Wezel, Gilles P ; Dan, Han-Wei ; Tsai, Yuh-Show ; Ortiz De Solorzano, Carlos ; Olivo-Marin, Jean-Christophe ; Meijering, Erik</creatorcontrib><description>Particle tracking is of key importance for quantitative analysis of intracellular dynamic processes from time-lapse microscopy image data. Because manually detecting and following large numbers of individual particles is not feasible, automated computational methods have been developed for these tasks by many groups. Aiming to perform an objective comparison of methods, we gathered the community and organized an open competition in which participating teams applied their own methods independently to a commonly defined data set including diverse scenarios. Performance was assessed using commonly defined measures. Although no single method performed best across all scenarios, the results revealed clear differences between the various approaches, leading to notable practical conclusions for users and developers.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2808</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, Nature Publishing Group</publisher><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,776,27839</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/198655$$EView_record_in_EPF_Lausanne$$FView_record_in_$$GEPF_Lausanne$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chenouard, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smal, Ihor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Chaumont, Fabrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maska, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sbalzarini, Ivo F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Yuanhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardinale, Janick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carthel, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coraluppi, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winter, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Andrew R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godinez, William J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohr, Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalaidzidis, Yannis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Hongying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yingke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magnusson, Klas E. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jalden, Joakim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blau, Helen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul-Gilloteaux, Perrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roudot, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kervrann, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waharte, Francois</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tinevez, Jean-Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shorte, Spencer L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willemse, Joost</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Celler, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Wezel, Gilles P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dan, Han-Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Yuh-Show</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortiz De Solorzano, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olivo-Marin, Jean-Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijering, Erik</creatorcontrib><title>Objective comparison of particle tracking methods</title><description>Particle tracking is of key importance for quantitative analysis of intracellular dynamic processes from time-lapse microscopy image data. Because manually detecting and following large numbers of individual particles is not feasible, automated computational methods have been developed for these tasks by many groups. Aiming to perform an objective comparison of methods, we gathered the community and organized an open competition in which participating teams applied their own methods independently to a commonly defined data set including diverse scenarios. Performance was assessed using commonly defined measures. Although no single method performed best across all scenarios, the results revealed clear differences between the various approaches, leading to notable practical conclusions for users and developers.</description><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>web_resource</rsrctype><recordtype>web_resource</recordtype><sourceid>F1K</sourceid><recordid>eNqdizEOwjAMALMwIGDhBfkAJaFqFWYEYmNhj4LrgCG1qybi_YDEwsp0d8MptbSmsqZ2a-6x3KqNM26q7OlyRyj0RA3SD2GkLKwl6rcWgoS6jAEexFf9uaTLczWJIWVcfDlT7WF_3h1XOMTkiaNkIGRAL4F-uhB3nsTbrWubpv57fAEGdUQG</recordid><creator>Chenouard, Nicolas</creator><creator>Smal, Ihor</creator><creator>De Chaumont, Fabrice</creator><creator>Maska, Martin</creator><creator>Sbalzarini, Ivo F</creator><creator>Gong, Yuanhao</creator><creator>Cardinale, Janick</creator><creator>Carthel, Craig</creator><creator>Coraluppi, Stefano</creator><creator>Winter, Mark</creator><creator>Cohen, Andrew R</creator><creator>Godinez, William J</creator><creator>Rohr, Karl</creator><creator>Kalaidzidis, Yannis</creator><creator>Liang, Liang</creator><creator>Duncan, James</creator><creator>Shen, Hongying</creator><creator>Xu, Yingke</creator><creator>Magnusson, Klas E. G</creator><creator>Jalden, Joakim</creator><creator>Blau, Helen M</creator><creator>Paul-Gilloteaux, Perrine</creator><creator>Roudot, Philippe</creator><creator>Kervrann, Charles</creator><creator>Waharte, Francois</creator><creator>Tinevez, Jean-Yves</creator><creator>Shorte, Spencer L</creator><creator>Willemse, Joost</creator><creator>Celler, Katherine</creator><creator>Van Wezel, Gilles P</creator><creator>Dan, Han-Wei</creator><creator>Tsai, Yuh-Show</creator><creator>Ortiz De Solorzano, Carlos</creator><creator>Olivo-Marin, Jean-Christophe</creator><creator>Meijering, Erik</creator><general>London, Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>F1K</scope></search><sort><title>Objective comparison of particle tracking methods</title><author>Chenouard, Nicolas ; Smal, Ihor ; De Chaumont, Fabrice ; Maska, Martin ; Sbalzarini, Ivo F ; Gong, Yuanhao ; Cardinale, Janick ; Carthel, Craig ; Coraluppi, Stefano ; Winter, Mark ; Cohen, Andrew R ; Godinez, William J ; Rohr, Karl ; Kalaidzidis, Yannis ; Liang, Liang ; Duncan, James ; Shen, Hongying ; Xu, Yingke ; Magnusson, Klas E. G ; Jalden, Joakim ; Blau, Helen M ; Paul-Gilloteaux, Perrine ; Roudot, Philippe ; Kervrann, Charles ; Waharte, Francois ; Tinevez, Jean-Yves ; Shorte, Spencer L ; Willemse, Joost ; Celler, Katherine ; Van Wezel, Gilles P ; Dan, Han-Wei ; Tsai, Yuh-Show ; Ortiz De Solorzano, Carlos ; Olivo-Marin, Jean-Christophe ; Meijering, Erik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-epfl_infoscience_oai_infoscience_tind_io_1986553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>web_resources</rsrctype><prefilter>web_resources</prefilter><language>eng</language><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chenouard, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smal, Ihor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Chaumont, Fabrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maska, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sbalzarini, Ivo F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Yuanhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardinale, Janick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carthel, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coraluppi, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winter, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Andrew R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godinez, William J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohr, Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalaidzidis, Yannis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Hongying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yingke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magnusson, Klas E. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jalden, Joakim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blau, Helen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul-Gilloteaux, Perrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roudot, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kervrann, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waharte, Francois</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tinevez, Jean-Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shorte, Spencer L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willemse, Joost</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Celler, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Wezel, Gilles P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dan, Han-Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Yuh-Show</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortiz De Solorzano, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olivo-Marin, Jean-Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijering, Erik</creatorcontrib><collection>Infoscience: EPF Lausanne</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chenouard, Nicolas</au><au>Smal, Ihor</au><au>De Chaumont, Fabrice</au><au>Maska, Martin</au><au>Sbalzarini, Ivo F</au><au>Gong, Yuanhao</au><au>Cardinale, Janick</au><au>Carthel, Craig</au><au>Coraluppi, Stefano</au><au>Winter, Mark</au><au>Cohen, Andrew R</au><au>Godinez, William J</au><au>Rohr, Karl</au><au>Kalaidzidis, Yannis</au><au>Liang, Liang</au><au>Duncan, James</au><au>Shen, Hongying</au><au>Xu, Yingke</au><au>Magnusson, Klas E. G</au><au>Jalden, Joakim</au><au>Blau, Helen M</au><au>Paul-Gilloteaux, Perrine</au><au>Roudot, Philippe</au><au>Kervrann, Charles</au><au>Waharte, Francois</au><au>Tinevez, Jean-Yves</au><au>Shorte, Spencer L</au><au>Willemse, Joost</au><au>Celler, Katherine</au><au>Van Wezel, Gilles P</au><au>Dan, Han-Wei</au><au>Tsai, Yuh-Show</au><au>Ortiz De Solorzano, Carlos</au><au>Olivo-Marin, Jean-Christophe</au><au>Meijering, Erik</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><btitle>Objective comparison of particle tracking methods</btitle><abstract>Particle tracking is of key importance for quantitative analysis of intracellular dynamic processes from time-lapse microscopy image data. Because manually detecting and following large numbers of individual particles is not feasible, automated computational methods have been developed for these tasks by many groups. Aiming to perform an objective comparison of methods, we gathered the community and organized an open competition in which participating teams applied their own methods independently to a commonly defined data set including diverse scenarios. Performance was assessed using commonly defined measures. Although no single method performed best across all scenarios, the results revealed clear differences between the various approaches, leading to notable practical conclusions for users and developers.</abstract><pub>London, Nature Publishing Group</pub><doi>10.1038/nmeth.2808</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2808 |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_epfl_infoscience_oai_infoscience_tind_io_198655 |
source | Infoscience: EPF Lausanne |
title | Objective comparison of particle tracking methods |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T01%3A06%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-epfl_F1K&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Objective%20comparison%20of%20particle%20tracking%20methods&rft.au=Chenouard,%20Nicolas&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/nmeth.2808&rft_dat=%3Cepfl_F1K%3Eoai_infoscience_tind_io_198655%3C/epfl_F1K%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |