Civil Forfeiture of Proceeds of Crime in Australia

Civil Forfeiture of Proceeds of Crime in Australia

'It is incorrect to view the recovery of the profits of unlawful activity as a part of the criminal justice process and, as such, justifiable only on the basis of a prior finding of guilt according to the criminal standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt.'

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of money laundering control 2002-04, Vol.5 (4), p.345-359
1. Verfasser: Lusty, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Confiscation
Crime prevention
Criminal law
Criminals
Drug trafficking
Fines & penalties
Forfeitures
Money laundering
Narcotics
Organized crime
Profitability
Profits
Provisions
Trials
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 359
container_issue 4
container_start_page 345
container_title Journal of money laundering control
container_volume 5
creator Lusty, David
description 'It is incorrect to view the recovery of the profits of unlawful activity as a part of the criminal justice process and, as such, justifiable only on the basis of a prior finding of guilt according to the criminal standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt.'
doi_str_mv 10.1108/eb027317
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_eb027317</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>120980346</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-459c1e7b1fde58c2957747a8b23719037fafb0d55f5fdc2d1477e3d861b114cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90F1LwzAUBuAiCs4p-BOKgnpTzUfTpJdbcVOZOFHxMqTJCXR260xa0X9vRtULEa_OuXg4H28UHWJ0jjESF1AiwinmW9EAcyYSLpDYDj3NRMIIwrvRnvcLhDBjKB1EpKjeqjqeNM5C1XYO4sbGc9doAOM3feGqJcTVKh51vnWqrtR-tGNV7eHgqw6jp8nlY3GVzO6m18VolmjKwrKU5RoDL7E1wIQmOeM85UqUhHKcI8qtsiUyjFlmjSYGp5wDNSLDJcapLukwOunnrl3z2oFv5bLyGuparaDpvKRMZITxPMCjX3DRdG4VbpMkIMEzlgZ01iPtGu8dWLkOnyn3ITGSm-Tkd3KBJj2tfAvvP065F5lxyplMn4kcj2-m6P5hLm-DP-09LCEkZP6bfPy3_BZybSz9BK1rhZA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>235887654</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Civil Forfeiture of Proceeds of Crime in Australia</title><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><creator>Lusty, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Lusty, David</creatorcontrib><description>'It is incorrect to view the recovery of the profits of unlawful activity as a part of the criminal justice process and, as such, justifiable only on the basis of a prior finding of guilt according to the criminal standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt.'</description><identifier>ISSN: 1368-5201</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7808</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/eb027317</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: MCB UP Ltd</publisher><subject>Confiscation ; Crime prevention ; Criminal law ; Criminals ; Drug trafficking ; Fines &amp; penalties ; Forfeitures ; Money laundering ; Narcotics ; Organized crime ; Profitability ; Profits ; Provisions ; Trials</subject><ispartof>Journal of money laundering control, 2002-04, Vol.5 (4), p.345-359</ispartof><rights>MCB UP Limited</rights><rights>Copyright Henry Stewart Conferences and Publications Ltd. Spring 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-459c1e7b1fde58c2957747a8b23719037fafb0d55f5fdc2d1477e3d861b114cb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/eb027317/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/eb027317/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,11615,27903,27904,52665,52668</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lusty, David</creatorcontrib><title>Civil Forfeiture of Proceeds of Crime in Australia</title><title>Journal of money laundering control</title><description>'It is incorrect to view the recovery of the profits of unlawful activity as a part of the criminal justice process and, as such, justifiable only on the basis of a prior finding of guilt according to the criminal standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt.'</description><subject>Confiscation</subject><subject>Crime prevention</subject><subject>Criminal law</subject><subject>Criminals</subject><subject>Drug trafficking</subject><subject>Fines &amp; penalties</subject><subject>Forfeitures</subject><subject>Money laundering</subject><subject>Narcotics</subject><subject>Organized crime</subject><subject>Profitability</subject><subject>Profits</subject><subject>Provisions</subject><subject>Trials</subject><issn>1368-5201</issn><issn>1758-7808</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp90F1LwzAUBuAiCs4p-BOKgnpTzUfTpJdbcVOZOFHxMqTJCXR260xa0X9vRtULEa_OuXg4H28UHWJ0jjESF1AiwinmW9EAcyYSLpDYDj3NRMIIwrvRnvcLhDBjKB1EpKjeqjqeNM5C1XYO4sbGc9doAOM3feGqJcTVKh51vnWqrtR-tGNV7eHgqw6jp8nlY3GVzO6m18VolmjKwrKU5RoDL7E1wIQmOeM85UqUhHKcI8qtsiUyjFlmjSYGp5wDNSLDJcapLukwOunnrl3z2oFv5bLyGuparaDpvKRMZITxPMCjX3DRdG4VbpMkIMEzlgZ01iPtGu8dWLkOnyn3ITGSm-Tkd3KBJj2tfAvvP065F5lxyplMn4kcj2-m6P5hLm-DP-09LCEkZP6bfPy3_BZybSz9BK1rhZA</recordid><startdate>20020401</startdate><enddate>20020401</enddate><creator>Lusty, David</creator><general>MCB UP Ltd</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M1F</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020401</creationdate><title>Civil Forfeiture of Proceeds of Crime in Australia</title><author>Lusty, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-459c1e7b1fde58c2957747a8b23719037fafb0d55f5fdc2d1477e3d861b114cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Confiscation</topic><topic>Crime prevention</topic><topic>Criminal law</topic><topic>Criminals</topic><topic>Drug trafficking</topic><topic>Fines &amp; penalties</topic><topic>Forfeitures</topic><topic>Money laundering</topic><topic>Narcotics</topic><topic>Organized crime</topic><topic>Profitability</topic><topic>Profits</topic><topic>Provisions</topic><topic>Trials</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lusty, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice</collection><collection>Banking Information Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Journal of money laundering control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lusty, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Civil Forfeiture of Proceeds of Crime in Australia</atitle><jtitle>Journal of money laundering control</jtitle><date>2002-04-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>345</spage><epage>359</epage><pages>345-359</pages><issn>1368-5201</issn><eissn>1758-7808</eissn><abstract>'It is incorrect to view the recovery of the profits of unlawful activity as a part of the criminal justice process and, as such, justifiable only on the basis of a prior finding of guilt according to the criminal standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt.'</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>MCB UP Ltd</pub><doi>10.1108/eb027317</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1368-5201
ispartof Journal of money laundering control, 2002-04, Vol.5 (4), p.345-359
issn 1368-5201
1758-7808
language eng
recordid cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_eb027317
source Emerald A-Z Current Journals
subjects Confiscation
Crime prevention
Criminal law
Criminals
Drug trafficking
Fines & penalties
Forfeitures
Money laundering
Narcotics
Organized crime
Profitability
Profits
Provisions
Trials
title Civil Forfeiture of Proceeds of Crime in Australia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T14%3A36%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Civil%20Forfeiture%20of%20Proceeds%20of%20Crime%20in%20Australia&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20money%20laundering%20control&rft.au=Lusty,%20David&rft.date=2002-04-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=345&rft.epage=359&rft.pages=345-359&rft.issn=1368-5201&rft.eissn=1758-7808&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/eb027317&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E120980346%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=235887654&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true