Knowledge sharing

Purpose Academics research productivity is the pinnacle issue of higher learning institution (HLI) quest for providing the best service for the community and a country’s as a whole. Being productive in their area of expertise will determine how far HLI can challenge for the best education in the wor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:VINE journal of information and knowledge management systems 2019-03, Vol.49 (1), p.136-159
Hauptverfasser: Fauzi, Muhammad Ashraf, Nya-Ling, Christine Tan, Thursamy, Ramayah, Ojo, Adedapo Oluwaseyi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 159
container_issue 1
container_start_page 136
container_title VINE journal of information and knowledge management systems
container_volume 49
creator Fauzi, Muhammad Ashraf
Nya-Ling, Christine Tan
Thursamy, Ramayah
Ojo, Adedapo Oluwaseyi
description Purpose Academics research productivity is the pinnacle issue of higher learning institution (HLI) quest for providing the best service for the community and a country’s as a whole. Being productive in their area of expertise will determine how far HLI can challenge for the best education in the world. In lieu of this, knowledge sharing (KS) behavior determinants are assessed to determine what factors that can contribute to academic’s research productivity. Design/methodology/approach A quota sampling method was applied in selecting academics from public and private universities in Malaysia. A partial least square structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) was used for analysis. Findings The results show that academics productivity explained variance is 22.6 per cent. This suggests that academics KS behavior has substantial impact on research productivity. As for determinants of academic’s attitude, academics commitment, trust and social network constituted an explained variance of 36.4 per cent. Management support has an explained variance of 38.7 per cent towards subjective norm, while facilitating condition and social media has an explained variance of 26.5 per cent towards perceived behavioral control (PBC). Academics KS intention and KS behavior explained variance were 62.1 and 47.1 per cent, respectively. Research limitations/implications All the hypotheses result in significant relationship except for H1, commitment toward attitude. The impact of this study will be discussed in term of its theoretical and managerial perspectives. Originality/value The KS behavior in a multiracial and multinational country in Malaysia can be a benchmark for Asian countries in general.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/VJIKMS-09-2018-0074
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_VJIKMS-09-2018-0074</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2187929930</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1210-627177902db10e7aef608c1de56603904c3280ed0d518ca0aeafa6b11e7b00363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptTztPwzAYtBBIVKUDMwsSs-E-u_FjRBXQ0iIGHqvlJF9KqzQpDhXi3xNU2JjuhnsKcUa4JIK7er2fzR-eJLxUICcBOz4QA4XMy8wjO_zjztOxGHXdGgBZryy5gTidN-1nzeWSz7u3mFbN8kQcVbHuePSLQ_Fye_M8mcrF491scr2QBSmCNL3fWg9V5gS2kSsDV1DJmTHQHuNCKwcuUWbkiojIsYomJ2KbA9roobjY525T-77j7iOs211q-sqgyPX7vNfoVWqv4g2nWJdhm1abmL4CIfy8D_-81988bEmY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2187929930</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Knowledge sharing</title><source>Emerald Complete Journals</source><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Fauzi, Muhammad Ashraf ; Nya-Ling, Christine Tan ; Thursamy, Ramayah ; Ojo, Adedapo Oluwaseyi</creator><creatorcontrib>Fauzi, Muhammad Ashraf ; Nya-Ling, Christine Tan ; Thursamy, Ramayah ; Ojo, Adedapo Oluwaseyi</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Academics research productivity is the pinnacle issue of higher learning institution (HLI) quest for providing the best service for the community and a country’s as a whole. Being productive in their area of expertise will determine how far HLI can challenge for the best education in the world. In lieu of this, knowledge sharing (KS) behavior determinants are assessed to determine what factors that can contribute to academic’s research productivity. Design/methodology/approach A quota sampling method was applied in selecting academics from public and private universities in Malaysia. A partial least square structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) was used for analysis. Findings The results show that academics productivity explained variance is 22.6 per cent. This suggests that academics KS behavior has substantial impact on research productivity. As for determinants of academic’s attitude, academics commitment, trust and social network constituted an explained variance of 36.4 per cent. Management support has an explained variance of 38.7 per cent towards subjective norm, while facilitating condition and social media has an explained variance of 26.5 per cent towards perceived behavioral control (PBC). Academics KS intention and KS behavior explained variance were 62.1 and 47.1 per cent, respectively. Research limitations/implications All the hypotheses result in significant relationship except for H1, commitment toward attitude. The impact of this study will be discussed in term of its theoretical and managerial perspectives. Originality/value The KS behavior in a multiracial and multinational country in Malaysia can be a benchmark for Asian countries in general.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2059-5891</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2059-5905</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/VJIKMS-09-2018-0074</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Author productivity ; Behavior ; Colleges &amp; universities ; Determinants ; Digital media ; Explicit knowledge ; Hypotheses ; Knowledge sharing ; Productivity ; Researchers ; Self-efficacy ; Social interaction ; Social networks ; Social research ; Software</subject><ispartof>VINE journal of information and knowledge management systems, 2019-03, Vol.49 (1), p.136-159</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1210-627177902db10e7aef608c1de56603904c3280ed0d518ca0aeafa6b11e7b00363</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/VJIKMS-09-2018-0074/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,967,11635,21695,27924,27925,52689,53244</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fauzi, Muhammad Ashraf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nya-Ling, Christine Tan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thursamy, Ramayah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ojo, Adedapo Oluwaseyi</creatorcontrib><title>Knowledge sharing</title><title>VINE journal of information and knowledge management systems</title><description>Purpose Academics research productivity is the pinnacle issue of higher learning institution (HLI) quest for providing the best service for the community and a country’s as a whole. Being productive in their area of expertise will determine how far HLI can challenge for the best education in the world. In lieu of this, knowledge sharing (KS) behavior determinants are assessed to determine what factors that can contribute to academic’s research productivity. Design/methodology/approach A quota sampling method was applied in selecting academics from public and private universities in Malaysia. A partial least square structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) was used for analysis. Findings The results show that academics productivity explained variance is 22.6 per cent. This suggests that academics KS behavior has substantial impact on research productivity. As for determinants of academic’s attitude, academics commitment, trust and social network constituted an explained variance of 36.4 per cent. Management support has an explained variance of 38.7 per cent towards subjective norm, while facilitating condition and social media has an explained variance of 26.5 per cent towards perceived behavioral control (PBC). Academics KS intention and KS behavior explained variance were 62.1 and 47.1 per cent, respectively. Research limitations/implications All the hypotheses result in significant relationship except for H1, commitment toward attitude. The impact of this study will be discussed in term of its theoretical and managerial perspectives. Originality/value The KS behavior in a multiracial and multinational country in Malaysia can be a benchmark for Asian countries in general.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Author productivity</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Colleges &amp; universities</subject><subject>Determinants</subject><subject>Digital media</subject><subject>Explicit knowledge</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Knowledge sharing</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Self-efficacy</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Software</subject><issn>2059-5891</issn><issn>2059-5905</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptTztPwzAYtBBIVKUDMwsSs-E-u_FjRBXQ0iIGHqvlJF9KqzQpDhXi3xNU2JjuhnsKcUa4JIK7er2fzR-eJLxUICcBOz4QA4XMy8wjO_zjztOxGHXdGgBZryy5gTidN-1nzeWSz7u3mFbN8kQcVbHuePSLQ_Fye_M8mcrF491scr2QBSmCNL3fWg9V5gS2kSsDV1DJmTHQHuNCKwcuUWbkiojIsYomJ2KbA9roobjY525T-77j7iOs211q-sqgyPX7vNfoVWqv4g2nWJdhm1abmL4CIfy8D_-81988bEmY</recordid><startdate>20190305</startdate><enddate>20190305</enddate><creator>Fauzi, Muhammad Ashraf</creator><creator>Nya-Ling, Christine Tan</creator><creator>Thursamy, Ramayah</creator><creator>Ojo, Adedapo Oluwaseyi</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190305</creationdate><title>Knowledge sharing</title><author>Fauzi, Muhammad Ashraf ; Nya-Ling, Christine Tan ; Thursamy, Ramayah ; Ojo, Adedapo Oluwaseyi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1210-627177902db10e7aef608c1de56603904c3280ed0d518ca0aeafa6b11e7b00363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Author productivity</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Colleges &amp; universities</topic><topic>Determinants</topic><topic>Digital media</topic><topic>Explicit knowledge</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Knowledge sharing</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Self-efficacy</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Software</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fauzi, Muhammad Ashraf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nya-Ling, Christine Tan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thursamy, Ramayah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ojo, Adedapo Oluwaseyi</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>VINE journal of information and knowledge management systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fauzi, Muhammad Ashraf</au><au>Nya-Ling, Christine Tan</au><au>Thursamy, Ramayah</au><au>Ojo, Adedapo Oluwaseyi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Knowledge sharing</atitle><jtitle>VINE journal of information and knowledge management systems</jtitle><date>2019-03-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>136</spage><epage>159</epage><pages>136-159</pages><issn>2059-5891</issn><eissn>2059-5905</eissn><abstract>Purpose Academics research productivity is the pinnacle issue of higher learning institution (HLI) quest for providing the best service for the community and a country’s as a whole. Being productive in their area of expertise will determine how far HLI can challenge for the best education in the world. In lieu of this, knowledge sharing (KS) behavior determinants are assessed to determine what factors that can contribute to academic’s research productivity. Design/methodology/approach A quota sampling method was applied in selecting academics from public and private universities in Malaysia. A partial least square structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) was used for analysis. Findings The results show that academics productivity explained variance is 22.6 per cent. This suggests that academics KS behavior has substantial impact on research productivity. As for determinants of academic’s attitude, academics commitment, trust and social network constituted an explained variance of 36.4 per cent. Management support has an explained variance of 38.7 per cent towards subjective norm, while facilitating condition and social media has an explained variance of 26.5 per cent towards perceived behavioral control (PBC). Academics KS intention and KS behavior explained variance were 62.1 and 47.1 per cent, respectively. Research limitations/implications All the hypotheses result in significant relationship except for H1, commitment toward attitude. The impact of this study will be discussed in term of its theoretical and managerial perspectives. Originality/value The KS behavior in a multiracial and multinational country in Malaysia can be a benchmark for Asian countries in general.</abstract><cop>Bingley</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/VJIKMS-09-2018-0074</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2059-5891
ispartof VINE journal of information and knowledge management systems, 2019-03, Vol.49 (1), p.136-159
issn 2059-5891
2059-5905
language eng
recordid cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_VJIKMS-09-2018-0074
source Emerald Complete Journals; Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection
subjects Attitudes
Author productivity
Behavior
Colleges & universities
Determinants
Digital media
Explicit knowledge
Hypotheses
Knowledge sharing
Productivity
Researchers
Self-efficacy
Social interaction
Social networks
Social research
Software
title Knowledge sharing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T12%3A21%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Knowledge%20sharing&rft.jtitle=VINE%20journal%20of%20information%20and%20knowledge%20management%20systems&rft.au=Fauzi,%20Muhammad%20Ashraf&rft.date=2019-03-05&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=136&rft.epage=159&rft.pages=136-159&rft.issn=2059-5891&rft.eissn=2059-5905&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/VJIKMS-09-2018-0074&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2187929930%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2187929930&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true