Suggestions for improving outcomes in the NHS following "mild" traumatic brain injury in adults, a bio-psycho-social approach

Purpose - Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a common occurrence. For most people recovery is quick and complete. For a minority disability persists. This paper aims to discuss the factors that likely give rise to this on-going disability and discuss the current evidence-based approaches to treat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social care and neurodisability 2013-05, Vol.4 (2), p.70-76
1. Verfasser: Bunnage, Martin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 76
container_issue 2
container_start_page 70
container_title Social care and neurodisability
container_volume 4
creator Bunnage, Martin
description Purpose - Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a common occurrence. For most people recovery is quick and complete. For a minority disability persists. This paper aims to discuss the factors that likely give rise to this on-going disability and discuss the current evidence-based approaches to treatment.Design methodology approach - A selective review of the contemporaneous research literature was undertaken.Findings - On-going disability following mTBI is likely to be secondary to a combination of factors, namely subtle organic damage, psychological factors and situational motivational factors. These factors likely operate to different degrees in different individuals and may vary over time in individual cases. Treatment in the form of a multi-disciplinary assessment, accurate sign-posting to appropriate services and cognitive-behavioural psychotherapy is likely to improve outcomes for some with on-going disability following mTBI.Research limitations implications - Future research should aim to identify at an early stage post-injury those individuals at risk of developing on-going disability following mTBI and the efficacy of different treatment approaches.Practical implications - Earlier identification of individuals not making the expected rapid recovery from mTBI, followed by appropriate multi-disciplinary assessment and intervention would likely improve outcomes for patients at risk of developing on-going disability following mTBI.Originality value - This paper is of value to healthcare professionals who encounter individuals reporting on-going symptoms and problems following an apparently mild traumatic brain injury.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/SCN-03-2013-0010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_SCN-03-2013-0010</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3009957571</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c245t-2b54d89b8d7658ea00b72e73bc8655c6999bb7a10ff239905ecd984cb999f0513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFr2zAUh81YYaXNvUeRXXaY2ifJsq3jCG1TKN0h7VlIspwoyFYm2S057H-vTHbYxmC6PMH7fu_x-IriisA1IdDcbFZPGBimQBgGIPChOKdQUgyCiI-__T8Vi5T2kF8FvAJ2XvzcTNutTaMLQ0JdiMj1hxhe3bBFYRpN6G1CbkDjzqKn9SYT3oe3ubvsnW-XaIxq6tXoDNJRZdAN-yke54hqJz-mr0gh7QI-pKPZBZyCccojdchLlNldFmed8skuftWL4uXu9nm1xo_f7x9W3x6xoSUfMdW8bBuhm7aueGMVgK6prZk2TcW5qYQQWteKQNdRJgRwa1rRlEbnRgecsIviy2luXvtjyufK3iVjvVeDDVOShJdEiIpW9P9oJhmrK2gy-vkvdB-mOORDJGE1o6wsaZ0pOFEmhpSi7eQhul7FoyQgZ3sy25PA5GxPzvZy5OYUsb2Nyrf_Svzhm70DklyaPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1373234427</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Suggestions for improving outcomes in the NHS following "mild" traumatic brain injury in adults, a bio-psycho-social approach</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><creator>Bunnage, Martin</creator><creatorcontrib>Bunnage, Martin</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a common occurrence. For most people recovery is quick and complete. For a minority disability persists. This paper aims to discuss the factors that likely give rise to this on-going disability and discuss the current evidence-based approaches to treatment.Design methodology approach - A selective review of the contemporaneous research literature was undertaken.Findings - On-going disability following mTBI is likely to be secondary to a combination of factors, namely subtle organic damage, psychological factors and situational motivational factors. These factors likely operate to different degrees in different individuals and may vary over time in individual cases. Treatment in the form of a multi-disciplinary assessment, accurate sign-posting to appropriate services and cognitive-behavioural psychotherapy is likely to improve outcomes for some with on-going disability following mTBI.Research limitations implications - Future research should aim to identify at an early stage post-injury those individuals at risk of developing on-going disability following mTBI and the efficacy of different treatment approaches.Practical implications - Earlier identification of individuals not making the expected rapid recovery from mTBI, followed by appropriate multi-disciplinary assessment and intervention would likely improve outcomes for patients at risk of developing on-going disability following mTBI.Originality value - This paper is of value to healthcare professionals who encounter individuals reporting on-going symptoms and problems following an apparently mild traumatic brain injury.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2042-0919</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2042-0919</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/SCN-03-2013-0010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Brain ; Brain damage ; Brain research ; Head injuries ; Health Care Services ; Injuries ; Literature Reviews ; Methodology (Data Collection) ; Pathology ; Physically Handicapped ; Psychological Factors ; Rehabilitation ; Risk ; Trauma</subject><ispartof>Social care and neurodisability, 2013-05, Vol.4 (2), p.70-76</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Copyright Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2013</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c245t-2b54d89b8d7658ea00b72e73bc8655c6999bb7a10ff239905ecd984cb999f0513</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/SCN-03-2013-0010/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/SCN-03-2013-0010/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,967,11635,27344,27924,27925,33774,33775,52686,52689</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bunnage, Martin</creatorcontrib><title>Suggestions for improving outcomes in the NHS following "mild" traumatic brain injury in adults, a bio-psycho-social approach</title><title>Social care and neurodisability</title><description>Purpose - Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a common occurrence. For most people recovery is quick and complete. For a minority disability persists. This paper aims to discuss the factors that likely give rise to this on-going disability and discuss the current evidence-based approaches to treatment.Design methodology approach - A selective review of the contemporaneous research literature was undertaken.Findings - On-going disability following mTBI is likely to be secondary to a combination of factors, namely subtle organic damage, psychological factors and situational motivational factors. These factors likely operate to different degrees in different individuals and may vary over time in individual cases. Treatment in the form of a multi-disciplinary assessment, accurate sign-posting to appropriate services and cognitive-behavioural psychotherapy is likely to improve outcomes for some with on-going disability following mTBI.Research limitations implications - Future research should aim to identify at an early stage post-injury those individuals at risk of developing on-going disability following mTBI and the efficacy of different treatment approaches.Practical implications - Earlier identification of individuals not making the expected rapid recovery from mTBI, followed by appropriate multi-disciplinary assessment and intervention would likely improve outcomes for patients at risk of developing on-going disability following mTBI.Originality value - This paper is of value to healthcare professionals who encounter individuals reporting on-going symptoms and problems following an apparently mild traumatic brain injury.</description><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain damage</subject><subject>Brain research</subject><subject>Head injuries</subject><subject>Health Care Services</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Methodology (Data Collection)</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Physically Handicapped</subject><subject>Psychological Factors</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><issn>2042-0919</issn><issn>2042-0919</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFr2zAUh81YYaXNvUeRXXaY2ifJsq3jCG1TKN0h7VlIspwoyFYm2S057H-vTHbYxmC6PMH7fu_x-IriisA1IdDcbFZPGBimQBgGIPChOKdQUgyCiI-__T8Vi5T2kF8FvAJ2XvzcTNutTaMLQ0JdiMj1hxhe3bBFYRpN6G1CbkDjzqKn9SYT3oe3ubvsnW-XaIxq6tXoDNJRZdAN-yke54hqJz-mr0gh7QI-pKPZBZyCccojdchLlNldFmed8skuftWL4uXu9nm1xo_f7x9W3x6xoSUfMdW8bBuhm7aueGMVgK6prZk2TcW5qYQQWteKQNdRJgRwa1rRlEbnRgecsIviy2luXvtjyufK3iVjvVeDDVOShJdEiIpW9P9oJhmrK2gy-vkvdB-mOORDJGE1o6wsaZ0pOFEmhpSi7eQhul7FoyQgZ3sy25PA5GxPzvZy5OYUsb2Nyrf_Svzhm70DklyaPQ</recordid><startdate>20130510</startdate><enddate>20130510</enddate><creator>Bunnage, Martin</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>EHMNL</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130510</creationdate><title>Suggestions for improving outcomes in the NHS following "mild" traumatic brain injury in adults, a bio-psycho-social approach</title><author>Bunnage, Martin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c245t-2b54d89b8d7658ea00b72e73bc8655c6999bb7a10ff239905ecd984cb999f0513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain damage</topic><topic>Brain research</topic><topic>Head injuries</topic><topic>Health Care Services</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Methodology (Data Collection)</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Physically Handicapped</topic><topic>Psychological Factors</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bunnage, Martin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>UK &amp; Ireland Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>Social care and neurodisability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bunnage, Martin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Suggestions for improving outcomes in the NHS following "mild" traumatic brain injury in adults, a bio-psycho-social approach</atitle><jtitle>Social care and neurodisability</jtitle><date>2013-05-10</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>70</spage><epage>76</epage><pages>70-76</pages><issn>2042-0919</issn><eissn>2042-0919</eissn><abstract>Purpose - Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a common occurrence. For most people recovery is quick and complete. For a minority disability persists. This paper aims to discuss the factors that likely give rise to this on-going disability and discuss the current evidence-based approaches to treatment.Design methodology approach - A selective review of the contemporaneous research literature was undertaken.Findings - On-going disability following mTBI is likely to be secondary to a combination of factors, namely subtle organic damage, psychological factors and situational motivational factors. These factors likely operate to different degrees in different individuals and may vary over time in individual cases. Treatment in the form of a multi-disciplinary assessment, accurate sign-posting to appropriate services and cognitive-behavioural psychotherapy is likely to improve outcomes for some with on-going disability following mTBI.Research limitations implications - Future research should aim to identify at an early stage post-injury those individuals at risk of developing on-going disability following mTBI and the efficacy of different treatment approaches.Practical implications - Earlier identification of individuals not making the expected rapid recovery from mTBI, followed by appropriate multi-disciplinary assessment and intervention would likely improve outcomes for patients at risk of developing on-going disability following mTBI.Originality value - This paper is of value to healthcare professionals who encounter individuals reporting on-going symptoms and problems following an apparently mild traumatic brain injury.</abstract><cop>Bingley</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/SCN-03-2013-0010</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2042-0919
ispartof Social care and neurodisability, 2013-05, Vol.4 (2), p.70-76
issn 2042-0919
2042-0919
language eng
recordid cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_SCN-03-2013-0010
source Sociological Abstracts; Emerald A-Z Current Journals
subjects Brain
Brain damage
Brain research
Head injuries
Health Care Services
Injuries
Literature Reviews
Methodology (Data Collection)
Pathology
Physically Handicapped
Psychological Factors
Rehabilitation
Risk
Trauma
title Suggestions for improving outcomes in the NHS following "mild" traumatic brain injury in adults, a bio-psycho-social approach
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T03%3A49%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Suggestions%20for%20improving%20outcomes%20in%20the%20NHS%20following%20%22mild%22%20traumatic%20brain%20injury%20in%20adults,%20a%20bio-psycho-social%20approach&rft.jtitle=Social%20care%20and%20neurodisability&rft.au=Bunnage,%20Martin&rft.date=2013-05-10&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=70&rft.epage=76&rft.pages=70-76&rft.issn=2042-0919&rft.eissn=2042-0919&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/SCN-03-2013-0010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E3009957571%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1373234427&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true