Heroic narratives of intentional non-compliance with PRME

Purpose The governing bodies responsible for drafting and promoting the Principles for Responsible Management Education (PRME) apparently envisioned a completely voluntary initiative without concern for accountability. Public concern and commentary led to the addition of a reporting requirement in 2...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Society and business review 2017-10, Vol.12 (3), p.256-273
1. Verfasser: Hillon, Yue Cai
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 273
container_issue 3
container_start_page 256
container_title Society and business review
container_volume 12
creator Hillon, Yue Cai
description Purpose The governing bodies responsible for drafting and promoting the Principles for Responsible Management Education (PRME) apparently envisioned a completely voluntary initiative without concern for accountability. Public concern and commentary led to the addition of a reporting requirement in 2010. Two years later, program administrators began to update statuses. As of January 2016, PRME listed 636 signatories on their website. Because the reporting requirement took effect, approximately 86 schools have broken their commitment to comply with the PRME standards. Some schools were de-listed for inaction, whereas others actively left the program. This study aims to understand those who intentionally chose not to comply with PRME. Design/methodology/approach This study utilized a heroic quest typology to analyze and understand the behavior of institutions that intentionally chose not to comply with PRME. Narrative analysis of these concluded quests included strategic plans, research summaries, course syllabi and descriptions, press releases, PRME Sharing Information on Progress reports, UNGC letters of commitment, Communication on Progress reports, and internal informants. Findings Out of the 15 entities, 4 exhibited dual or quasi-heroic quests. Their experiences offered two viable and practical alternatives for institutions seeking to transcend the business ethics industry limitations of the PRME initiative. Research limitations/implications The narrative analysis of this study encompassed a sufficiently large amount of data for confidence in the typological characterization of each institution’s heroic quest. Additional insights from informants would no doubt strengthen the analysis. Practical implications The existence of the business ethics industry casts doubt on the ability of business schools and their accreditors to offer substantive change to create a genuine form of responsible management education. This study concludes with two alternative paths taken by schools attempting to escape the narrative of irresponsible management. Originality/value The PRME publicly lists signatories in non-compliance. While most of these result from passive inaction, a small number of institutions intentionally choose to leave the PRME. No research has been done to understand these intriguing cases and the heroic quest typology is a unique application in narrative analysis.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/SBR-10-2016-0054
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_SBR-10-2016-0054</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1957729603</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-d34aae0fac1c286e143b0f60972f04dd0f0c7526359600d549bd141bb190a81b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkMFLwzAUxoMoOKd3jwXPce-ladocdUwnTJSp55CmCXZ0yUyq4n9vy0QQPL3v8P0-Hj9CzhEuEaGaPV2vKQJlgIICFPyATLDkghZCysPfXMExOUlpAyCqgZoQubQxtCbzOkbdtx82ZcFlre-t79vgdZf54KkJ213Xam9s9tn2r9nj-n5xSo6c7pI9-7lT8nKzeJ4v6erh9m5-taKGMdHTJudaW3DaoGGVsMjzGpwAWTIHvGnAgSkLJvJCCoCm4LJukGNdowRdYZ1PycV-dxfD27tNvdqE9zh8lhTKoizZwOVDC_YtE0NK0Tq1i-1Wxy-FoEZBahA05lGQGgUNyGyP2K2Numv-I_4ozb8BGvhlMQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1957729603</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Heroic narratives of intentional non-compliance with PRME</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Hillon, Yue Cai</creator><creatorcontrib>Hillon, Yue Cai</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The governing bodies responsible for drafting and promoting the Principles for Responsible Management Education (PRME) apparently envisioned a completely voluntary initiative without concern for accountability. Public concern and commentary led to the addition of a reporting requirement in 2010. Two years later, program administrators began to update statuses. As of January 2016, PRME listed 636 signatories on their website. Because the reporting requirement took effect, approximately 86 schools have broken their commitment to comply with the PRME standards. Some schools were de-listed for inaction, whereas others actively left the program. This study aims to understand those who intentionally chose not to comply with PRME. Design/methodology/approach This study utilized a heroic quest typology to analyze and understand the behavior of institutions that intentionally chose not to comply with PRME. Narrative analysis of these concluded quests included strategic plans, research summaries, course syllabi and descriptions, press releases, PRME Sharing Information on Progress reports, UNGC letters of commitment, Communication on Progress reports, and internal informants. Findings Out of the 15 entities, 4 exhibited dual or quasi-heroic quests. Their experiences offered two viable and practical alternatives for institutions seeking to transcend the business ethics industry limitations of the PRME initiative. Research limitations/implications The narrative analysis of this study encompassed a sufficiently large amount of data for confidence in the typological characterization of each institution’s heroic quest. Additional insights from informants would no doubt strengthen the analysis. Practical implications The existence of the business ethics industry casts doubt on the ability of business schools and their accreditors to offer substantive change to create a genuine form of responsible management education. This study concludes with two alternative paths taken by schools attempting to escape the narrative of irresponsible management. Originality/value The PRME publicly lists signatories in non-compliance. While most of these result from passive inaction, a small number of institutions intentionally choose to leave the PRME. No research has been done to understand these intriguing cases and the heroic quest typology is a unique application in narrative analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1746-5680</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1746-5699</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/SBR-10-2016-0054</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Business education ; Business ethics ; Business schools ; Capitalism ; Compliance ; Corruption ; Curricula ; Governors ; Industrial development ; Initiatives ; Management training ; Mercantilism ; Narratives ; Protestant Reformation ; Social responsibility ; Society ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Society and business review, 2017-10, Vol.12 (3), p.256-273</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-d34aae0fac1c286e143b0f60972f04dd0f0c7526359600d549bd141bb190a81b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/SBR-10-2016-0054/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,967,11635,21695,27924,27925,52689,53244</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hillon, Yue Cai</creatorcontrib><title>Heroic narratives of intentional non-compliance with PRME</title><title>Society and business review</title><description>Purpose The governing bodies responsible for drafting and promoting the Principles for Responsible Management Education (PRME) apparently envisioned a completely voluntary initiative without concern for accountability. Public concern and commentary led to the addition of a reporting requirement in 2010. Two years later, program administrators began to update statuses. As of January 2016, PRME listed 636 signatories on their website. Because the reporting requirement took effect, approximately 86 schools have broken their commitment to comply with the PRME standards. Some schools were de-listed for inaction, whereas others actively left the program. This study aims to understand those who intentionally chose not to comply with PRME. Design/methodology/approach This study utilized a heroic quest typology to analyze and understand the behavior of institutions that intentionally chose not to comply with PRME. Narrative analysis of these concluded quests included strategic plans, research summaries, course syllabi and descriptions, press releases, PRME Sharing Information on Progress reports, UNGC letters of commitment, Communication on Progress reports, and internal informants. Findings Out of the 15 entities, 4 exhibited dual or quasi-heroic quests. Their experiences offered two viable and practical alternatives for institutions seeking to transcend the business ethics industry limitations of the PRME initiative. Research limitations/implications The narrative analysis of this study encompassed a sufficiently large amount of data for confidence in the typological characterization of each institution’s heroic quest. Additional insights from informants would no doubt strengthen the analysis. Practical implications The existence of the business ethics industry casts doubt on the ability of business schools and their accreditors to offer substantive change to create a genuine form of responsible management education. This study concludes with two alternative paths taken by schools attempting to escape the narrative of irresponsible management. Originality/value The PRME publicly lists signatories in non-compliance. While most of these result from passive inaction, a small number of institutions intentionally choose to leave the PRME. No research has been done to understand these intriguing cases and the heroic quest typology is a unique application in narrative analysis.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Business education</subject><subject>Business ethics</subject><subject>Business schools</subject><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Corruption</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Governors</subject><subject>Industrial development</subject><subject>Initiatives</subject><subject>Management training</subject><subject>Mercantilism</subject><subject>Narratives</subject><subject>Protestant Reformation</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1746-5680</issn><issn>1746-5699</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkMFLwzAUxoMoOKd3jwXPce-ladocdUwnTJSp55CmCXZ0yUyq4n9vy0QQPL3v8P0-Hj9CzhEuEaGaPV2vKQJlgIICFPyATLDkghZCysPfXMExOUlpAyCqgZoQubQxtCbzOkbdtx82ZcFlre-t79vgdZf54KkJ213Xam9s9tn2r9nj-n5xSo6c7pI9-7lT8nKzeJ4v6erh9m5-taKGMdHTJudaW3DaoGGVsMjzGpwAWTIHvGnAgSkLJvJCCoCm4LJukGNdowRdYZ1PycV-dxfD27tNvdqE9zh8lhTKoizZwOVDC_YtE0NK0Tq1i-1Wxy-FoEZBahA05lGQGgUNyGyP2K2Numv-I_4ozb8BGvhlMQ</recordid><startdate>20171009</startdate><enddate>20171009</enddate><creator>Hillon, Yue Cai</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171009</creationdate><title>Heroic narratives of intentional non-compliance with PRME</title><author>Hillon, Yue Cai</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-d34aae0fac1c286e143b0f60972f04dd0f0c7526359600d549bd141bb190a81b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Business education</topic><topic>Business ethics</topic><topic>Business schools</topic><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Corruption</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Governors</topic><topic>Industrial development</topic><topic>Initiatives</topic><topic>Management training</topic><topic>Mercantilism</topic><topic>Narratives</topic><topic>Protestant Reformation</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hillon, Yue Cai</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Society and business review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hillon, Yue Cai</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Heroic narratives of intentional non-compliance with PRME</atitle><jtitle>Society and business review</jtitle><date>2017-10-09</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>256</spage><epage>273</epage><pages>256-273</pages><issn>1746-5680</issn><eissn>1746-5699</eissn><abstract>Purpose The governing bodies responsible for drafting and promoting the Principles for Responsible Management Education (PRME) apparently envisioned a completely voluntary initiative without concern for accountability. Public concern and commentary led to the addition of a reporting requirement in 2010. Two years later, program administrators began to update statuses. As of January 2016, PRME listed 636 signatories on their website. Because the reporting requirement took effect, approximately 86 schools have broken their commitment to comply with the PRME standards. Some schools were de-listed for inaction, whereas others actively left the program. This study aims to understand those who intentionally chose not to comply with PRME. Design/methodology/approach This study utilized a heroic quest typology to analyze and understand the behavior of institutions that intentionally chose not to comply with PRME. Narrative analysis of these concluded quests included strategic plans, research summaries, course syllabi and descriptions, press releases, PRME Sharing Information on Progress reports, UNGC letters of commitment, Communication on Progress reports, and internal informants. Findings Out of the 15 entities, 4 exhibited dual or quasi-heroic quests. Their experiences offered two viable and practical alternatives for institutions seeking to transcend the business ethics industry limitations of the PRME initiative. Research limitations/implications The narrative analysis of this study encompassed a sufficiently large amount of data for confidence in the typological characterization of each institution’s heroic quest. Additional insights from informants would no doubt strengthen the analysis. Practical implications The existence of the business ethics industry casts doubt on the ability of business schools and their accreditors to offer substantive change to create a genuine form of responsible management education. This study concludes with two alternative paths taken by schools attempting to escape the narrative of irresponsible management. Originality/value The PRME publicly lists signatories in non-compliance. While most of these result from passive inaction, a small number of institutions intentionally choose to leave the PRME. No research has been done to understand these intriguing cases and the heroic quest typology is a unique application in narrative analysis.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/SBR-10-2016-0054</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1746-5680
ispartof Society and business review, 2017-10, Vol.12 (3), p.256-273
issn 1746-5680
1746-5699
language eng
recordid cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_SBR-10-2016-0054
source Emerald Journals; Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection
subjects Accountability
Business education
Business ethics
Business schools
Capitalism
Compliance
Corruption
Curricula
Governors
Industrial development
Initiatives
Management training
Mercantilism
Narratives
Protestant Reformation
Social responsibility
Society
Studies
title Heroic narratives of intentional non-compliance with PRME
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T18%3A29%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Heroic%20narratives%20of%20intentional%20non-compliance%20with%20PRME&rft.jtitle=Society%20and%20business%20review&rft.au=Hillon,%20Yue%20Cai&rft.date=2017-10-09&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=256&rft.epage=273&rft.pages=256-273&rft.issn=1746-5680&rft.eissn=1746-5699&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/SBR-10-2016-0054&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E1957729603%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1957729603&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true