Identity reflexivity: a framework of heuristics for strategy change in hybrid organizations

PurposeThe aim of this research is to investigate the relationship between (dual) organizational identity and individual heuristics – simple rules and biases – in the process of strategy change. This paper offers a theory on identity reflexivity as a cognitive mechanism of strategy change in the con...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Management decision 2021-08, Vol.59 (7), p.1684-1705
Hauptverfasser: Greco, Angela, Long, Thomas, de Jong, Gjalt
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1705
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1684
container_title Management decision
container_volume 59
creator Greco, Angela
Long, Thomas
de Jong, Gjalt
description PurposeThe aim of this research is to investigate the relationship between (dual) organizational identity and individual heuristics – simple rules and biases – in the process of strategy change. This paper offers a theory on identity reflexivity as a cognitive mechanism of strategy change in the context of organizational hybridity.Design/methodology/approachThe authors draw on a 2-year ethnographic study at a Dutch social housing association dealing with the process of strategy change. The empirical data comprises of in-depth semi-structured interviews, ethnographic observations as well as secondary sources.FindingsConflicting identities at the organizational level influence heuristics at the individual level, since members tend to identify with their department's identity. Despite conflicting interpretations, paths of cognitive shortcuts – that the authors define as internal and external identity reflexivity – are shared by the conflicting identities.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings of this research are subject to limitations typical of a qualitative case-study, such as possibly being context dependent. The authors argue that this research contributes to the understanding of how individual heuristics relate to organizational heuristics, and suggest that the process of identity reflexivity can contribute to the alignment of conflicting identities enabling strategy formation in the context of a dual-identity organization.Practical implicationsUnderstanding how managers with conflicting identities achieve agreements is important to help organizational leaders to pursue sustainability-oriented strategy change.Social implicationsGiven the pressure experienced by mission-driven organizations to integrate multiple sustainability demands in their mission, understanding managers' decision-making mechanism when adapting to new, often conflicting, sustainability demands is important to accelerate societal sustainability transitions.Originality/valueThis paper addresses the process of new strategy design in the context of a socially driven business. This context fundamentally differs from the one addressed by the existing heuristics literature with respect to organizational environment and role, and specific competing demands.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/MD-10-2019-1369
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_MD-10-2019-1369</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2561374391</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-57c574ab45d8f659c19480f4e79a84d73de8dcbebf8856f2086c5e0e351f863f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkDtPwzAURi0EEqUws1piNrXjZ9hQy6NSKxaYGCLXsVuXNi62C4RfT6KyIDHdb_jOvboHgEuCrwnBajSfIIJRgUmJCBXlERgQyRUSWOJjMMC44IhIJk_BWUprjAnlXAzA67S2Tfa5hdG6jf3yH12-gRq6qLf2M8Q3GBxc2X30KXuToAsRphx1tssWmpVulhb6Bq7aRfQ1DHGpG_-tsw9NOgcnTm-SvfidQ_Byf_c8fkSzp4fp-HaGDGVlRlwaLpleMF4rJ3hpSMkUdszKUitWS1pbVZuFXTiluHAFVsJwiy3lxClBHR2Cq8PeXQzve5tytQ772HQnq4ILQiWjJelao0PLxJBS9221i36rY1sRXPUGq_mkj73BqjfYEdcHwm5t1Jv6H-CPcvoDRR9ybg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2561374391</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Identity reflexivity: a framework of heuristics for strategy change in hybrid organizations</title><source>Emerald</source><creator>Greco, Angela ; Long, Thomas ; de Jong, Gjalt</creator><creatorcontrib>Greco, Angela ; Long, Thomas ; de Jong, Gjalt</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeThe aim of this research is to investigate the relationship between (dual) organizational identity and individual heuristics – simple rules and biases – in the process of strategy change. This paper offers a theory on identity reflexivity as a cognitive mechanism of strategy change in the context of organizational hybridity.Design/methodology/approachThe authors draw on a 2-year ethnographic study at a Dutch social housing association dealing with the process of strategy change. The empirical data comprises of in-depth semi-structured interviews, ethnographic observations as well as secondary sources.FindingsConflicting identities at the organizational level influence heuristics at the individual level, since members tend to identify with their department's identity. Despite conflicting interpretations, paths of cognitive shortcuts – that the authors define as internal and external identity reflexivity – are shared by the conflicting identities.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings of this research are subject to limitations typical of a qualitative case-study, such as possibly being context dependent. The authors argue that this research contributes to the understanding of how individual heuristics relate to organizational heuristics, and suggest that the process of identity reflexivity can contribute to the alignment of conflicting identities enabling strategy formation in the context of a dual-identity organization.Practical implicationsUnderstanding how managers with conflicting identities achieve agreements is important to help organizational leaders to pursue sustainability-oriented strategy change.Social implicationsGiven the pressure experienced by mission-driven organizations to integrate multiple sustainability demands in their mission, understanding managers' decision-making mechanism when adapting to new, often conflicting, sustainability demands is important to accelerate societal sustainability transitions.Originality/valueThis paper addresses the process of new strategy design in the context of a socially driven business. This context fundamentally differs from the one addressed by the existing heuristics literature with respect to organizational environment and role, and specific competing demands.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-1747</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-6070</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/MD-10-2019-1369</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Climate change ; Decision making ; Ethnography ; Heuristic ; Housing ; Reflexivity ; Strategic management ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Management decision, 2021-08, Vol.59 (7), p.1684-1705</ispartof><rights>Angela Greco, Thomas Long and Gjalt de Jong</rights><rights>Angela Greco, Thomas Long and Gjalt de Jong. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-57c574ab45d8f659c19480f4e79a84d73de8dcbebf8856f2086c5e0e351f863f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-57c574ab45d8f659c19480f4e79a84d73de8dcbebf8856f2086c5e0e351f863f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9202-6536</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MD-10-2019-1369/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,966,11634,27923,27924,52688</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Greco, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Gjalt</creatorcontrib><title>Identity reflexivity: a framework of heuristics for strategy change in hybrid organizations</title><title>Management decision</title><description>PurposeThe aim of this research is to investigate the relationship between (dual) organizational identity and individual heuristics – simple rules and biases – in the process of strategy change. This paper offers a theory on identity reflexivity as a cognitive mechanism of strategy change in the context of organizational hybridity.Design/methodology/approachThe authors draw on a 2-year ethnographic study at a Dutch social housing association dealing with the process of strategy change. The empirical data comprises of in-depth semi-structured interviews, ethnographic observations as well as secondary sources.FindingsConflicting identities at the organizational level influence heuristics at the individual level, since members tend to identify with their department's identity. Despite conflicting interpretations, paths of cognitive shortcuts – that the authors define as internal and external identity reflexivity – are shared by the conflicting identities.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings of this research are subject to limitations typical of a qualitative case-study, such as possibly being context dependent. The authors argue that this research contributes to the understanding of how individual heuristics relate to organizational heuristics, and suggest that the process of identity reflexivity can contribute to the alignment of conflicting identities enabling strategy formation in the context of a dual-identity organization.Practical implicationsUnderstanding how managers with conflicting identities achieve agreements is important to help organizational leaders to pursue sustainability-oriented strategy change.Social implicationsGiven the pressure experienced by mission-driven organizations to integrate multiple sustainability demands in their mission, understanding managers' decision-making mechanism when adapting to new, often conflicting, sustainability demands is important to accelerate societal sustainability transitions.Originality/valueThis paper addresses the process of new strategy design in the context of a socially driven business. This context fundamentally differs from the one addressed by the existing heuristics literature with respect to organizational environment and role, and specific competing demands.</description><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Ethnography</subject><subject>Heuristic</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Reflexivity</subject><subject>Strategic management</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>0025-1747</issn><issn>1758-6070</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>XDTOA</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkDtPwzAURi0EEqUws1piNrXjZ9hQy6NSKxaYGCLXsVuXNi62C4RfT6KyIDHdb_jOvboHgEuCrwnBajSfIIJRgUmJCBXlERgQyRUSWOJjMMC44IhIJk_BWUprjAnlXAzA67S2Tfa5hdG6jf3yH12-gRq6qLf2M8Q3GBxc2X30KXuToAsRphx1tssWmpVulhb6Bq7aRfQ1DHGpG_-tsw9NOgcnTm-SvfidQ_Byf_c8fkSzp4fp-HaGDGVlRlwaLpleMF4rJ3hpSMkUdszKUitWS1pbVZuFXTiluHAFVsJwiy3lxClBHR2Cq8PeXQzve5tytQ772HQnq4ILQiWjJelao0PLxJBS9221i36rY1sRXPUGq_mkj73BqjfYEdcHwm5t1Jv6H-CPcvoDRR9ybg</recordid><startdate>20210817</startdate><enddate>20210817</enddate><creator>Greco, Angela</creator><creator>Long, Thomas</creator><creator>de Jong, Gjalt</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>XDTOA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9202-6536</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210817</creationdate><title>Identity reflexivity: a framework of heuristics for strategy change in hybrid organizations</title><author>Greco, Angela ; Long, Thomas ; de Jong, Gjalt</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-57c574ab45d8f659c19480f4e79a84d73de8dcbebf8856f2086c5e0e351f863f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Ethnography</topic><topic>Heuristic</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Reflexivity</topic><topic>Strategic management</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Greco, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Gjalt</creatorcontrib><collection>Emerald Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Management decision</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Greco, Angela</au><au>Long, Thomas</au><au>de Jong, Gjalt</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Identity reflexivity: a framework of heuristics for strategy change in hybrid organizations</atitle><jtitle>Management decision</jtitle><date>2021-08-17</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1684</spage><epage>1705</epage><pages>1684-1705</pages><issn>0025-1747</issn><eissn>1758-6070</eissn><abstract>PurposeThe aim of this research is to investigate the relationship between (dual) organizational identity and individual heuristics – simple rules and biases – in the process of strategy change. This paper offers a theory on identity reflexivity as a cognitive mechanism of strategy change in the context of organizational hybridity.Design/methodology/approachThe authors draw on a 2-year ethnographic study at a Dutch social housing association dealing with the process of strategy change. The empirical data comprises of in-depth semi-structured interviews, ethnographic observations as well as secondary sources.FindingsConflicting identities at the organizational level influence heuristics at the individual level, since members tend to identify with their department's identity. Despite conflicting interpretations, paths of cognitive shortcuts – that the authors define as internal and external identity reflexivity – are shared by the conflicting identities.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings of this research are subject to limitations typical of a qualitative case-study, such as possibly being context dependent. The authors argue that this research contributes to the understanding of how individual heuristics relate to organizational heuristics, and suggest that the process of identity reflexivity can contribute to the alignment of conflicting identities enabling strategy formation in the context of a dual-identity organization.Practical implicationsUnderstanding how managers with conflicting identities achieve agreements is important to help organizational leaders to pursue sustainability-oriented strategy change.Social implicationsGiven the pressure experienced by mission-driven organizations to integrate multiple sustainability demands in their mission, understanding managers' decision-making mechanism when adapting to new, often conflicting, sustainability demands is important to accelerate societal sustainability transitions.Originality/valueThis paper addresses the process of new strategy design in the context of a socially driven business. This context fundamentally differs from the one addressed by the existing heuristics literature with respect to organizational environment and role, and specific competing demands.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/MD-10-2019-1369</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9202-6536</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-1747
ispartof Management decision, 2021-08, Vol.59 (7), p.1684-1705
issn 0025-1747
1758-6070
language eng
recordid cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_MD-10-2019-1369
source Emerald
subjects Climate change
Decision making
Ethnography
Heuristic
Housing
Reflexivity
Strategic management
Sustainability
title Identity reflexivity: a framework of heuristics for strategy change in hybrid organizations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T17%3A01%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identity%20reflexivity:%20a%20framework%20of%20heuristics%20for%20strategy%20change%20in%20hybrid%20organizations&rft.jtitle=Management%20decision&rft.au=Greco,%20Angela&rft.date=2021-08-17&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1684&rft.epage=1705&rft.pages=1684-1705&rft.issn=0025-1747&rft.eissn=1758-6070&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/MD-10-2019-1369&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2561374391%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2561374391&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true