RCT evaluating provider outcomes by suicide prevention training modality: in-person vs. e-learning

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to evaluate provider outcomes in response to two modes of suicide prevention training (e-learning and in-person) and a control group. The Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS) was adapted for e-learning delivery to US Veterans Administration mental health providers. Outcomes include: self-evaluated beliefs, ability, and self-efficacy in managing suicidal patients. Design/methodology/approach – This study used a multicenter, randomized, cluster design to test the effectiveness of e-learning vs in-person conditions CAMS for changes in provider outcomes. Findings – Survey scores showed significant improvements for both the e-learning vs control and the in-person vs control between pre-intervention and post-intervention; however, the e-learning and in-person conditions were not significantly different from each other. Research limitations/implications – Limitations of the study include that there were drop-outs over the study period and the survey questions may not have captured all of the aspects of the CAMS training. Practical implications – Results suggest that e-learning training modules can provide comparable outcomes to in-person training for suicide prevention. Social implications – More providers may have accessible training materials for managing suicidal patients. Originality/value – Currently practicing providers now can choose between two equivalent training modalities for improving the management of suicidality in their patients.