Exploring different cultural configurations: how do they affect subsidiaries’ knowledge sharing behaviors?

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the impact of different cultural typologies (i.e. innovative, competitive, bureaucratic and community) on employees’ knowledge-sharing processes within multinational corporations (MNCs) by taking a subsidiary perspective. It particularly applies the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of knowledge management 2015-04, Vol.19 (2), p.141-163
Hauptverfasser: Cavaliere, Vincenzo, Lombardi, Sara
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 163
container_issue 2
container_start_page 141
container_title Journal of knowledge management
container_volume 19
creator Cavaliere, Vincenzo
Lombardi, Sara
description Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the impact of different cultural typologies (i.e. innovative, competitive, bureaucratic and community) on employees’ knowledge-sharing processes within multinational corporations (MNCs) by taking a subsidiary perspective. It particularly applies the competing values framework to the study of individuals’ orientations toward sharing knowledge with others while also investigating the influence of top management support on such orientations. Design/methodology/approach – To test the proposed hypotheses, in this paper, survey data of 389 employees from six Italian subsidiaries are empirically analyzed by running hierarchical regressions on the two dimensions of knowledge-sharing processes, i.e. knowledge donating and knowledge collecting. Findings – The results show that the four types of organizational culture differently affect the knowledge-sharing sub-processes and confirm the importance of a strong top management support to facilitate interpersonal relationships. Research limitations/implications – Despite the cross-sectional nature of the data and the limitations arising from the subsidiaries’ position in the country, the findings suggest managers to pay great attention to the positive side of bureaucracy by emphasizing the need for order and efficiency while, at the same time, providing employees with a constant and encouraging support toward knowledge-sharing activities. Originality/value – The paper adds empirical evidence to the limited existing research on knowledge-sharing sub-processes of knowledge donating and collecting, extends the understanding of how different organizational cultures affect such processes, and contributes to the literature on MNCs’ knowledge-based activities by adopting a subsidiary perspective.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/JKM-04-2014-0167
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_JKM-04-2014-0167</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1709736954</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-f402fffa597678c6e1fa497ef3e4e26678566df6a0e1565b8d2d53acf782392a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkT1PwzAQhiMEEqWwM1piYQn1V-yEBSFUPotYYLbc5Ny6pHGxE0o3_gZ_j1-CS1lATHc6Pe_p9FySHBJ8QgjOB7d39ynmKcWEp5gIuZX0iMzyVPKcb8eeCZkyKvFushfCDEes4KKX1MO3Re28bSaossaAh6ZFZVe3ndc1Kl1j7CS2rXVNOEVTt0SVQ-0UVkhHumxR6MbBVlZ7C-Hz_QM9N25ZQzUBFKb6e-8YpvrVOh_O9pMdo-sABz-1nzxdDh8vrtPRw9XNxfkoLTmlbWo4psYYnRVSyLwUQIzmhQTDgAMVcZYJURmhMZBMZOO8olXGdGlkTllBNesnx5u9C-9eOgitmttQQl3rBlwXFJG4kEwUGY_o0R905jrfxOsUJSzHOSOcRApvqNK7EDwYtfB2rv1KEazW-lXUrzBXa_1qrT9GBpsIzCGqrP5L_HoY-wLXvYiH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2138083141</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploring different cultural configurations: how do they affect subsidiaries’ knowledge sharing behaviors?</title><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Cavaliere, Vincenzo ; Lombardi, Sara</creator><creatorcontrib>Cavaliere, Vincenzo ; Lombardi, Sara</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the impact of different cultural typologies (i.e. innovative, competitive, bureaucratic and community) on employees’ knowledge-sharing processes within multinational corporations (MNCs) by taking a subsidiary perspective. It particularly applies the competing values framework to the study of individuals’ orientations toward sharing knowledge with others while also investigating the influence of top management support on such orientations. Design/methodology/approach – To test the proposed hypotheses, in this paper, survey data of 389 employees from six Italian subsidiaries are empirically analyzed by running hierarchical regressions on the two dimensions of knowledge-sharing processes, i.e. knowledge donating and knowledge collecting. Findings – The results show that the four types of organizational culture differently affect the knowledge-sharing sub-processes and confirm the importance of a strong top management support to facilitate interpersonal relationships. Research limitations/implications – Despite the cross-sectional nature of the data and the limitations arising from the subsidiaries’ position in the country, the findings suggest managers to pay great attention to the positive side of bureaucracy by emphasizing the need for order and efficiency while, at the same time, providing employees with a constant and encouraging support toward knowledge-sharing activities. Originality/value – The paper adds empirical evidence to the limited existing research on knowledge-sharing sub-processes of knowledge donating and collecting, extends the understanding of how different organizational cultures affect such processes, and contributes to the literature on MNCs’ knowledge-based activities by adopting a subsidiary perspective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1367-3270</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7484</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/JKM-04-2014-0167</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kempston: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Business competition ; Competitive advantage ; Constants ; Corporate culture ; Cross sections ; Empirical analysis ; Employees ; Influence ; Information &amp; knowledge management ; Knowledge base ; Knowledge management ; Knowledge sharing ; Management ; Multinational corporations ; Organizational aspects ; Orientation ; Regression analysis ; Subsidiaries ; Test procedures ; Typological analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of knowledge management, 2015-04, Vol.19 (2), p.141-163</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-f402fffa597678c6e1fa497ef3e4e26678566df6a0e1565b8d2d53acf782392a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-f402fffa597678c6e1fa497ef3e4e26678566df6a0e1565b8d2d53acf782392a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JKM-04-2014-0167/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JKM-04-2014-0167/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,967,11635,21695,27924,27925,52686,52689,53244,53372</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cavaliere, Vincenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lombardi, Sara</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring different cultural configurations: how do they affect subsidiaries’ knowledge sharing behaviors?</title><title>Journal of knowledge management</title><description>Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the impact of different cultural typologies (i.e. innovative, competitive, bureaucratic and community) on employees’ knowledge-sharing processes within multinational corporations (MNCs) by taking a subsidiary perspective. It particularly applies the competing values framework to the study of individuals’ orientations toward sharing knowledge with others while also investigating the influence of top management support on such orientations. Design/methodology/approach – To test the proposed hypotheses, in this paper, survey data of 389 employees from six Italian subsidiaries are empirically analyzed by running hierarchical regressions on the two dimensions of knowledge-sharing processes, i.e. knowledge donating and knowledge collecting. Findings – The results show that the four types of organizational culture differently affect the knowledge-sharing sub-processes and confirm the importance of a strong top management support to facilitate interpersonal relationships. Research limitations/implications – Despite the cross-sectional nature of the data and the limitations arising from the subsidiaries’ position in the country, the findings suggest managers to pay great attention to the positive side of bureaucracy by emphasizing the need for order and efficiency while, at the same time, providing employees with a constant and encouraging support toward knowledge-sharing activities. Originality/value – The paper adds empirical evidence to the limited existing research on knowledge-sharing sub-processes of knowledge donating and collecting, extends the understanding of how different organizational cultures affect such processes, and contributes to the literature on MNCs’ knowledge-based activities by adopting a subsidiary perspective.</description><subject>Business competition</subject><subject>Competitive advantage</subject><subject>Constants</subject><subject>Corporate culture</subject><subject>Cross sections</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Information &amp; knowledge management</subject><subject>Knowledge base</subject><subject>Knowledge management</subject><subject>Knowledge sharing</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Multinational corporations</subject><subject>Organizational aspects</subject><subject>Orientation</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Subsidiaries</subject><subject>Test procedures</subject><subject>Typological analysis</subject><issn>1367-3270</issn><issn>1758-7484</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkT1PwzAQhiMEEqWwM1piYQn1V-yEBSFUPotYYLbc5Ny6pHGxE0o3_gZ_j1-CS1lATHc6Pe_p9FySHBJ8QgjOB7d39ynmKcWEp5gIuZX0iMzyVPKcb8eeCZkyKvFushfCDEes4KKX1MO3Re28bSaossaAh6ZFZVe3ndc1Kl1j7CS2rXVNOEVTt0SVQ-0UVkhHumxR6MbBVlZ7C-Hz_QM9N25ZQzUBFKb6e-8YpvrVOh_O9pMdo-sABz-1nzxdDh8vrtPRw9XNxfkoLTmlbWo4psYYnRVSyLwUQIzmhQTDgAMVcZYJURmhMZBMZOO8olXGdGlkTllBNesnx5u9C-9eOgitmttQQl3rBlwXFJG4kEwUGY_o0R905jrfxOsUJSzHOSOcRApvqNK7EDwYtfB2rv1KEazW-lXUrzBXa_1qrT9GBpsIzCGqrP5L_HoY-wLXvYiH</recordid><startdate>20150407</startdate><enddate>20150407</enddate><creator>Cavaliere, Vincenzo</creator><creator>Lombardi, Sara</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150407</creationdate><title>Exploring different cultural configurations: how do they affect subsidiaries’ knowledge sharing behaviors?</title><author>Cavaliere, Vincenzo ; Lombardi, Sara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-f402fffa597678c6e1fa497ef3e4e26678566df6a0e1565b8d2d53acf782392a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Business competition</topic><topic>Competitive advantage</topic><topic>Constants</topic><topic>Corporate culture</topic><topic>Cross sections</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Information &amp; knowledge management</topic><topic>Knowledge base</topic><topic>Knowledge management</topic><topic>Knowledge sharing</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Multinational corporations</topic><topic>Organizational aspects</topic><topic>Orientation</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Subsidiaries</topic><topic>Test procedures</topic><topic>Typological analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cavaliere, Vincenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lombardi, Sara</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of knowledge management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cavaliere, Vincenzo</au><au>Lombardi, Sara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploring different cultural configurations: how do they affect subsidiaries’ knowledge sharing behaviors?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of knowledge management</jtitle><date>2015-04-07</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>163</epage><pages>141-163</pages><issn>1367-3270</issn><eissn>1758-7484</eissn><abstract>Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the impact of different cultural typologies (i.e. innovative, competitive, bureaucratic and community) on employees’ knowledge-sharing processes within multinational corporations (MNCs) by taking a subsidiary perspective. It particularly applies the competing values framework to the study of individuals’ orientations toward sharing knowledge with others while also investigating the influence of top management support on such orientations. Design/methodology/approach – To test the proposed hypotheses, in this paper, survey data of 389 employees from six Italian subsidiaries are empirically analyzed by running hierarchical regressions on the two dimensions of knowledge-sharing processes, i.e. knowledge donating and knowledge collecting. Findings – The results show that the four types of organizational culture differently affect the knowledge-sharing sub-processes and confirm the importance of a strong top management support to facilitate interpersonal relationships. Research limitations/implications – Despite the cross-sectional nature of the data and the limitations arising from the subsidiaries’ position in the country, the findings suggest managers to pay great attention to the positive side of bureaucracy by emphasizing the need for order and efficiency while, at the same time, providing employees with a constant and encouraging support toward knowledge-sharing activities. Originality/value – The paper adds empirical evidence to the limited existing research on knowledge-sharing sub-processes of knowledge donating and collecting, extends the understanding of how different organizational cultures affect such processes, and contributes to the literature on MNCs’ knowledge-based activities by adopting a subsidiary perspective.</abstract><cop>Kempston</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/JKM-04-2014-0167</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1367-3270
ispartof Journal of knowledge management, 2015-04, Vol.19 (2), p.141-163
issn 1367-3270
1758-7484
language eng
recordid cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_JKM-04-2014-0167
source Emerald A-Z Current Journals; Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection
subjects Business competition
Competitive advantage
Constants
Corporate culture
Cross sections
Empirical analysis
Employees
Influence
Information & knowledge management
Knowledge base
Knowledge management
Knowledge sharing
Management
Multinational corporations
Organizational aspects
Orientation
Regression analysis
Subsidiaries
Test procedures
Typological analysis
title Exploring different cultural configurations: how do they affect subsidiaries’ knowledge sharing behaviors?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T07%3A53%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring%20different%20cultural%20configurations:%20how%20do%20they%20affect%20subsidiaries%E2%80%99%20knowledge%20sharing%20behaviors?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20knowledge%20management&rft.au=Cavaliere,%20Vincenzo&rft.date=2015-04-07&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=163&rft.pages=141-163&rft.issn=1367-3270&rft.eissn=1758-7484&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/JKM-04-2014-0167&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E1709736954%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2138083141&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true