Exploring different cultural configurations: how do they affect subsidiaries’ knowledge sharing behaviors?
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the impact of different cultural typologies (i.e. innovative, competitive, bureaucratic and community) on employees’ knowledge-sharing processes within multinational corporations (MNCs) by taking a subsidiary perspective. It particularly applies the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of knowledge management 2015-04, Vol.19 (2), p.141-163 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 163 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 141 |
container_title | Journal of knowledge management |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Cavaliere, Vincenzo Lombardi, Sara |
description | Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to explore the impact of different cultural typologies (i.e. innovative, competitive, bureaucratic and community) on employees’ knowledge-sharing processes within multinational corporations (MNCs) by taking a subsidiary perspective. It particularly applies the competing values framework to the study of individuals’ orientations toward sharing knowledge with others while also investigating the influence of top management support on such orientations.
Design/methodology/approach
– To test the proposed hypotheses, in this paper, survey data of 389 employees from six Italian subsidiaries are empirically analyzed by running hierarchical regressions on the two dimensions of knowledge-sharing processes, i.e. knowledge donating and knowledge collecting.
Findings
– The results show that the four types of organizational culture differently affect the knowledge-sharing sub-processes and confirm the importance of a strong top management support to facilitate interpersonal relationships.
Research limitations/implications
– Despite the cross-sectional nature of the data and the limitations arising from the subsidiaries’ position in the country, the findings suggest managers to pay great attention to the positive side of bureaucracy by emphasizing the need for order and efficiency while, at the same time, providing employees with a constant and encouraging support toward knowledge-sharing activities.
Originality/value
– The paper adds empirical evidence to the limited existing research on knowledge-sharing sub-processes of knowledge donating and collecting, extends the understanding of how different organizational cultures affect such processes, and contributes to the literature on MNCs’ knowledge-based activities by adopting a subsidiary perspective. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/JKM-04-2014-0167 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_JKM-04-2014-0167</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1709736954</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-f402fffa597678c6e1fa497ef3e4e26678566df6a0e1565b8d2d53acf782392a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkT1PwzAQhiMEEqWwM1piYQn1V-yEBSFUPotYYLbc5Ny6pHGxE0o3_gZ_j1-CS1lATHc6Pe_p9FySHBJ8QgjOB7d39ynmKcWEp5gIuZX0iMzyVPKcb8eeCZkyKvFushfCDEes4KKX1MO3Re28bSaossaAh6ZFZVe3ndc1Kl1j7CS2rXVNOEVTt0SVQ-0UVkhHumxR6MbBVlZ7C-Hz_QM9N25ZQzUBFKb6e-8YpvrVOh_O9pMdo-sABz-1nzxdDh8vrtPRw9XNxfkoLTmlbWo4psYYnRVSyLwUQIzmhQTDgAMVcZYJURmhMZBMZOO8olXGdGlkTllBNesnx5u9C-9eOgitmttQQl3rBlwXFJG4kEwUGY_o0R905jrfxOsUJSzHOSOcRApvqNK7EDwYtfB2rv1KEazW-lXUrzBXa_1qrT9GBpsIzCGqrP5L_HoY-wLXvYiH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2138083141</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploring different cultural configurations: how do they affect subsidiaries’ knowledge sharing behaviors?</title><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Cavaliere, Vincenzo ; Lombardi, Sara</creator><creatorcontrib>Cavaliere, Vincenzo ; Lombardi, Sara</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to explore the impact of different cultural typologies (i.e. innovative, competitive, bureaucratic and community) on employees’ knowledge-sharing processes within multinational corporations (MNCs) by taking a subsidiary perspective. It particularly applies the competing values framework to the study of individuals’ orientations toward sharing knowledge with others while also investigating the influence of top management support on such orientations.
Design/methodology/approach
– To test the proposed hypotheses, in this paper, survey data of 389 employees from six Italian subsidiaries are empirically analyzed by running hierarchical regressions on the two dimensions of knowledge-sharing processes, i.e. knowledge donating and knowledge collecting.
Findings
– The results show that the four types of organizational culture differently affect the knowledge-sharing sub-processes and confirm the importance of a strong top management support to facilitate interpersonal relationships.
Research limitations/implications
– Despite the cross-sectional nature of the data and the limitations arising from the subsidiaries’ position in the country, the findings suggest managers to pay great attention to the positive side of bureaucracy by emphasizing the need for order and efficiency while, at the same time, providing employees with a constant and encouraging support toward knowledge-sharing activities.
Originality/value
– The paper adds empirical evidence to the limited existing research on knowledge-sharing sub-processes of knowledge donating and collecting, extends the understanding of how different organizational cultures affect such processes, and contributes to the literature on MNCs’ knowledge-based activities by adopting a subsidiary perspective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1367-3270</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7484</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/JKM-04-2014-0167</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kempston: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Business competition ; Competitive advantage ; Constants ; Corporate culture ; Cross sections ; Empirical analysis ; Employees ; Influence ; Information & knowledge management ; Knowledge base ; Knowledge management ; Knowledge sharing ; Management ; Multinational corporations ; Organizational aspects ; Orientation ; Regression analysis ; Subsidiaries ; Test procedures ; Typological analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of knowledge management, 2015-04, Vol.19 (2), p.141-163</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-f402fffa597678c6e1fa497ef3e4e26678566df6a0e1565b8d2d53acf782392a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-f402fffa597678c6e1fa497ef3e4e26678566df6a0e1565b8d2d53acf782392a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JKM-04-2014-0167/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JKM-04-2014-0167/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,967,11635,21695,27924,27925,52686,52689,53244,53372</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cavaliere, Vincenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lombardi, Sara</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring different cultural configurations: how do they affect subsidiaries’ knowledge sharing behaviors?</title><title>Journal of knowledge management</title><description>Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to explore the impact of different cultural typologies (i.e. innovative, competitive, bureaucratic and community) on employees’ knowledge-sharing processes within multinational corporations (MNCs) by taking a subsidiary perspective. It particularly applies the competing values framework to the study of individuals’ orientations toward sharing knowledge with others while also investigating the influence of top management support on such orientations.
Design/methodology/approach
– To test the proposed hypotheses, in this paper, survey data of 389 employees from six Italian subsidiaries are empirically analyzed by running hierarchical regressions on the two dimensions of knowledge-sharing processes, i.e. knowledge donating and knowledge collecting.
Findings
– The results show that the four types of organizational culture differently affect the knowledge-sharing sub-processes and confirm the importance of a strong top management support to facilitate interpersonal relationships.
Research limitations/implications
– Despite the cross-sectional nature of the data and the limitations arising from the subsidiaries’ position in the country, the findings suggest managers to pay great attention to the positive side of bureaucracy by emphasizing the need for order and efficiency while, at the same time, providing employees with a constant and encouraging support toward knowledge-sharing activities.
Originality/value
– The paper adds empirical evidence to the limited existing research on knowledge-sharing sub-processes of knowledge donating and collecting, extends the understanding of how different organizational cultures affect such processes, and contributes to the literature on MNCs’ knowledge-based activities by adopting a subsidiary perspective.</description><subject>Business competition</subject><subject>Competitive advantage</subject><subject>Constants</subject><subject>Corporate culture</subject><subject>Cross sections</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Information & knowledge management</subject><subject>Knowledge base</subject><subject>Knowledge management</subject><subject>Knowledge sharing</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Multinational corporations</subject><subject>Organizational aspects</subject><subject>Orientation</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Subsidiaries</subject><subject>Test procedures</subject><subject>Typological analysis</subject><issn>1367-3270</issn><issn>1758-7484</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkT1PwzAQhiMEEqWwM1piYQn1V-yEBSFUPotYYLbc5Ny6pHGxE0o3_gZ_j1-CS1lATHc6Pe_p9FySHBJ8QgjOB7d39ynmKcWEp5gIuZX0iMzyVPKcb8eeCZkyKvFushfCDEes4KKX1MO3Re28bSaossaAh6ZFZVe3ndc1Kl1j7CS2rXVNOEVTt0SVQ-0UVkhHumxR6MbBVlZ7C-Hz_QM9N25ZQzUBFKb6e-8YpvrVOh_O9pMdo-sABz-1nzxdDh8vrtPRw9XNxfkoLTmlbWo4psYYnRVSyLwUQIzmhQTDgAMVcZYJURmhMZBMZOO8olXGdGlkTllBNesnx5u9C-9eOgitmttQQl3rBlwXFJG4kEwUGY_o0R905jrfxOsUJSzHOSOcRApvqNK7EDwYtfB2rv1KEazW-lXUrzBXa_1qrT9GBpsIzCGqrP5L_HoY-wLXvYiH</recordid><startdate>20150407</startdate><enddate>20150407</enddate><creator>Cavaliere, Vincenzo</creator><creator>Lombardi, Sara</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150407</creationdate><title>Exploring different cultural configurations: how do they affect subsidiaries’ knowledge sharing behaviors?</title><author>Cavaliere, Vincenzo ; Lombardi, Sara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-f402fffa597678c6e1fa497ef3e4e26678566df6a0e1565b8d2d53acf782392a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Business competition</topic><topic>Competitive advantage</topic><topic>Constants</topic><topic>Corporate culture</topic><topic>Cross sections</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Information & knowledge management</topic><topic>Knowledge base</topic><topic>Knowledge management</topic><topic>Knowledge sharing</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Multinational corporations</topic><topic>Organizational aspects</topic><topic>Orientation</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Subsidiaries</topic><topic>Test procedures</topic><topic>Typological analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cavaliere, Vincenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lombardi, Sara</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of knowledge management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cavaliere, Vincenzo</au><au>Lombardi, Sara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploring different cultural configurations: how do they affect subsidiaries’ knowledge sharing behaviors?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of knowledge management</jtitle><date>2015-04-07</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>163</epage><pages>141-163</pages><issn>1367-3270</issn><eissn>1758-7484</eissn><abstract>Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to explore the impact of different cultural typologies (i.e. innovative, competitive, bureaucratic and community) on employees’ knowledge-sharing processes within multinational corporations (MNCs) by taking a subsidiary perspective. It particularly applies the competing values framework to the study of individuals’ orientations toward sharing knowledge with others while also investigating the influence of top management support on such orientations.
Design/methodology/approach
– To test the proposed hypotheses, in this paper, survey data of 389 employees from six Italian subsidiaries are empirically analyzed by running hierarchical regressions on the two dimensions of knowledge-sharing processes, i.e. knowledge donating and knowledge collecting.
Findings
– The results show that the four types of organizational culture differently affect the knowledge-sharing sub-processes and confirm the importance of a strong top management support to facilitate interpersonal relationships.
Research limitations/implications
– Despite the cross-sectional nature of the data and the limitations arising from the subsidiaries’ position in the country, the findings suggest managers to pay great attention to the positive side of bureaucracy by emphasizing the need for order and efficiency while, at the same time, providing employees with a constant and encouraging support toward knowledge-sharing activities.
Originality/value
– The paper adds empirical evidence to the limited existing research on knowledge-sharing sub-processes of knowledge donating and collecting, extends the understanding of how different organizational cultures affect such processes, and contributes to the literature on MNCs’ knowledge-based activities by adopting a subsidiary perspective.</abstract><cop>Kempston</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/JKM-04-2014-0167</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1367-3270 |
ispartof | Journal of knowledge management, 2015-04, Vol.19 (2), p.141-163 |
issn | 1367-3270 1758-7484 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_JKM-04-2014-0167 |
source | Emerald A-Z Current Journals; Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection |
subjects | Business competition Competitive advantage Constants Corporate culture Cross sections Empirical analysis Employees Influence Information & knowledge management Knowledge base Knowledge management Knowledge sharing Management Multinational corporations Organizational aspects Orientation Regression analysis Subsidiaries Test procedures Typological analysis |
title | Exploring different cultural configurations: how do they affect subsidiaries’ knowledge sharing behaviors? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T07%3A53%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring%20different%20cultural%20configurations:%20how%20do%20they%20affect%20subsidiaries%E2%80%99%20knowledge%20sharing%20behaviors?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20knowledge%20management&rft.au=Cavaliere,%20Vincenzo&rft.date=2015-04-07&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=163&rft.pages=141-163&rft.issn=1367-3270&rft.eissn=1758-7484&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/JKM-04-2014-0167&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E1709736954%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2138083141&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |