The roles of external embeddedness and institutional distance in the subsidiary product/process innovation and R&D capacity
Purpose This study aims to look at the relationship of external embeddedness and institutional distance (governance aspects) with the foreign subsidiary research and development (R&D) capacity. Furthermore, it examines whether these relationships are mediated by subsidiary product and process in...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of knowledge management 2020-11, Vol.24 (10), p.2513-2530 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2530 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 2513 |
| container_title | Journal of knowledge management |
| container_volume | 24 |
| creator | Rodrigues, Cristina Doritta Borini, Felipe Mendes Raziq, Muhammad Mustafa Bernardes, Roberto Carlos |
| description | Purpose
This study aims to look at the relationship of external embeddedness and institutional distance (governance aspects) with the foreign subsidiary research and development (R&D) capacity. Furthermore, it examines whether these relationships are mediated by subsidiary product and process innovation, and whether institutional distance plays a moderating role in the relationship between subsidiary innovation and R&D capacity.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors draw on survey data from 130 foreign subsidiaries operating in Brazil and test their model using variance-based structural equation modeling.
Findings
Results suggest that subsidiary (product and process) innovation fully mediates the relationships between: subsidiary external embeddedness and R&D capacity; and institutional distance and subsidiary R&D capacity, such that the relationship is positive in case of the former and negative in case of the latter. The relationship between subsidiary product and process innovation and R&D capacity is positive and stronger at lower levels of institutional distance.
Originality/value
The research ignores the underlying mechanisms of the external embeddedness and institutional distance relationship with subsidiary R&D capacity. Furthermore, institutional distance based on formal governance aspects and their impacts on subsidiary innovation and R&D capacity are rarely investigated. This paper contributes with regard to these aspects. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1108/JKM-02-2020-0083 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_JKM-02-2020-0083</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2462030856</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-7d966999ea67bdfee3f1968ffaae066b2c15a3377c4560226138c6e680ad1f7e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkU1LAzEQhhdRsFbvHgOCt7WTZDfJHqV-WxGknkOazGJKu1s3WbH4581aL4KnGWbmeZl5J8tOKVxQCmry8PiUA8sZMMgBFN_LRlSWKpeFKvZTzoXMOZNwmB2FsASgRVWIUfY1f0PStSsMpK0JfkbsGrMiuF6gc-gaDIGYxhHfhOhjH307tJ0P0TQWU5nEJBD6RfDOm25LNl3rehsnKdoB9k3TfpiB-9F5Ob8i1myM9XF7nB3UZhXw5DeOs9eb6_n0Lp89395PL2e55aWKuXSVEFVVoRFy4WpEXtNKqLo2BkGIBbO0NJxLaYtSAGOCcmUFCgXG0VoiH2dnO92003uPIepl2w9nBs0KwYCDKkWagt2U7doQOqz1pvPrdJKmoAeLdbJYA9ODxXqwOCGTHYJr7MzK_Uf8eQr_BkB3fsg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2462030856</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The roles of external embeddedness and institutional distance in the subsidiary product/process innovation and R&D capacity</title><source>Emerald Complete Journals</source><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Rodrigues, Cristina Doritta ; Borini, Felipe Mendes ; Raziq, Muhammad Mustafa ; Bernardes, Roberto Carlos</creator><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Cristina Doritta ; Borini, Felipe Mendes ; Raziq, Muhammad Mustafa ; Bernardes, Roberto Carlos</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Purpose
This study aims to look at the relationship of external embeddedness and institutional distance (governance aspects) with the foreign subsidiary research and development (R&D) capacity. Furthermore, it examines whether these relationships are mediated by subsidiary product and process innovation, and whether institutional distance plays a moderating role in the relationship between subsidiary innovation and R&D capacity.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors draw on survey data from 130 foreign subsidiaries operating in Brazil and test their model using variance-based structural equation modeling.
Findings
Results suggest that subsidiary (product and process) innovation fully mediates the relationships between: subsidiary external embeddedness and R&D capacity; and institutional distance and subsidiary R&D capacity, such that the relationship is positive in case of the former and negative in case of the latter. The relationship between subsidiary product and process innovation and R&D capacity is positive and stronger at lower levels of institutional distance.
Originality/value
The research ignores the underlying mechanisms of the external embeddedness and institutional distance relationship with subsidiary R&D capacity. Furthermore, institutional distance based on formal governance aspects and their impacts on subsidiary innovation and R&D capacity are rarely investigated. This paper contributes with regard to these aspects.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 1367-3270</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7484</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/JKM-02-2020-0083</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kempston: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Emerging markets ; Executives ; Foreign subsidiaries ; Hypotheses ; Industrialized nations ; Innovations ; International business ; Investments ; Knowledge management ; Model testing ; Multinational corporations ; Multivariate statistical analysis ; R&D ; Research & development ; Subsidiaries</subject><ispartof>Journal of knowledge management, 2020-11, Vol.24 (10), p.2513-2530</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-7d966999ea67bdfee3f1968ffaae066b2c15a3377c4560226138c6e680ad1f7e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-7d966999ea67bdfee3f1968ffaae066b2c15a3377c4560226138c6e680ad1f7e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JKM-02-2020-0083/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,967,11635,21695,27924,27925,52689,53244</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Cristina Doritta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borini, Felipe Mendes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raziq, Muhammad Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernardes, Roberto Carlos</creatorcontrib><title>The roles of external embeddedness and institutional distance in the subsidiary product/process innovation and R&D capacity</title><title>Journal of knowledge management</title><description><![CDATA[Purpose
This study aims to look at the relationship of external embeddedness and institutional distance (governance aspects) with the foreign subsidiary research and development (R&D) capacity. Furthermore, it examines whether these relationships are mediated by subsidiary product and process innovation, and whether institutional distance plays a moderating role in the relationship between subsidiary innovation and R&D capacity.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors draw on survey data from 130 foreign subsidiaries operating in Brazil and test their model using variance-based structural equation modeling.
Findings
Results suggest that subsidiary (product and process) innovation fully mediates the relationships between: subsidiary external embeddedness and R&D capacity; and institutional distance and subsidiary R&D capacity, such that the relationship is positive in case of the former and negative in case of the latter. The relationship between subsidiary product and process innovation and R&D capacity is positive and stronger at lower levels of institutional distance.
Originality/value
The research ignores the underlying mechanisms of the external embeddedness and institutional distance relationship with subsidiary R&D capacity. Furthermore, institutional distance based on formal governance aspects and their impacts on subsidiary innovation and R&D capacity are rarely investigated. This paper contributes with regard to these aspects.]]></description><subject>Emerging markets</subject><subject>Executives</subject><subject>Foreign subsidiaries</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Industrialized nations</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>International business</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Knowledge management</subject><subject>Model testing</subject><subject>Multinational corporations</subject><subject>Multivariate statistical analysis</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Subsidiaries</subject><issn>1367-3270</issn><issn>1758-7484</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkU1LAzEQhhdRsFbvHgOCt7WTZDfJHqV-WxGknkOazGJKu1s3WbH4581aL4KnGWbmeZl5J8tOKVxQCmry8PiUA8sZMMgBFN_LRlSWKpeFKvZTzoXMOZNwmB2FsASgRVWIUfY1f0PStSsMpK0JfkbsGrMiuF6gc-gaDIGYxhHfhOhjH307tJ0P0TQWU5nEJBD6RfDOm25LNl3rehsnKdoB9k3TfpiB-9F5Ob8i1myM9XF7nB3UZhXw5DeOs9eb6_n0Lp89395PL2e55aWKuXSVEFVVoRFy4WpEXtNKqLo2BkGIBbO0NJxLaYtSAGOCcmUFCgXG0VoiH2dnO92003uPIepl2w9nBs0KwYCDKkWagt2U7doQOqz1pvPrdJKmoAeLdbJYA9ODxXqwOCGTHYJr7MzK_Uf8eQr_BkB3fsg</recordid><startdate>20201119</startdate><enddate>20201119</enddate><creator>Rodrigues, Cristina Doritta</creator><creator>Borini, Felipe Mendes</creator><creator>Raziq, Muhammad Mustafa</creator><creator>Bernardes, Roberto Carlos</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201119</creationdate><title>The roles of external embeddedness and institutional distance in the subsidiary product/process innovation and R&D capacity</title><author>Rodrigues, Cristina Doritta ; Borini, Felipe Mendes ; Raziq, Muhammad Mustafa ; Bernardes, Roberto Carlos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-7d966999ea67bdfee3f1968ffaae066b2c15a3377c4560226138c6e680ad1f7e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Emerging markets</topic><topic>Executives</topic><topic>Foreign subsidiaries</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Industrialized nations</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>International business</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Knowledge management</topic><topic>Model testing</topic><topic>Multinational corporations</topic><topic>Multivariate statistical analysis</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Subsidiaries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Cristina Doritta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borini, Felipe Mendes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raziq, Muhammad Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernardes, Roberto Carlos</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of knowledge management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rodrigues, Cristina Doritta</au><au>Borini, Felipe Mendes</au><au>Raziq, Muhammad Mustafa</au><au>Bernardes, Roberto Carlos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The roles of external embeddedness and institutional distance in the subsidiary product/process innovation and R&D capacity</atitle><jtitle>Journal of knowledge management</jtitle><date>2020-11-19</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2513</spage><epage>2530</epage><pages>2513-2530</pages><issn>1367-3270</issn><eissn>1758-7484</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Purpose
This study aims to look at the relationship of external embeddedness and institutional distance (governance aspects) with the foreign subsidiary research and development (R&D) capacity. Furthermore, it examines whether these relationships are mediated by subsidiary product and process innovation, and whether institutional distance plays a moderating role in the relationship between subsidiary innovation and R&D capacity.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors draw on survey data from 130 foreign subsidiaries operating in Brazil and test their model using variance-based structural equation modeling.
Findings
Results suggest that subsidiary (product and process) innovation fully mediates the relationships between: subsidiary external embeddedness and R&D capacity; and institutional distance and subsidiary R&D capacity, such that the relationship is positive in case of the former and negative in case of the latter. The relationship between subsidiary product and process innovation and R&D capacity is positive and stronger at lower levels of institutional distance.
Originality/value
The research ignores the underlying mechanisms of the external embeddedness and institutional distance relationship with subsidiary R&D capacity. Furthermore, institutional distance based on formal governance aspects and their impacts on subsidiary innovation and R&D capacity are rarely investigated. This paper contributes with regard to these aspects.]]></abstract><cop>Kempston</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/JKM-02-2020-0083</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1367-3270 |
| ispartof | Journal of knowledge management, 2020-11, Vol.24 (10), p.2513-2530 |
| issn | 1367-3270 1758-7484 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_JKM-02-2020-0083 |
| source | Emerald Complete Journals; Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection |
| subjects | Emerging markets Executives Foreign subsidiaries Hypotheses Industrialized nations Innovations International business Investments Knowledge management Model testing Multinational corporations Multivariate statistical analysis R&D Research & development Subsidiaries |
| title | The roles of external embeddedness and institutional distance in the subsidiary product/process innovation and R&D capacity |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T13%3A15%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20roles%20of%20external%20embeddedness%20and%20institutional%20distance%20in%20the%20subsidiary%20product/process%20innovation%20and%20R&D%20capacity&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20knowledge%20management&rft.au=Rodrigues,%20Cristina%20Doritta&rft.date=2020-11-19&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2513&rft.epage=2530&rft.pages=2513-2530&rft.issn=1367-3270&rft.eissn=1758-7484&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/JKM-02-2020-0083&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2462030856%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2462030856&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |