Discovering social media topics and patterns in the coronavirus and election era

Purpose This study aims to understand the relationship between politics and pandemics in shaping the characteristics and themes of people’s Tweets during the US 2020 presidential election. Additionally, the purpose is to detect misinformation and extremism, not only to help online social networks (O...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of information, communication & ethics in society (Online) communication & ethics in society (Online), 2022-02, Vol.20 (1), p.1-17
1. Verfasser: Hashemi, Mahdi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 17
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Journal of information, communication & ethics in society (Online)
container_volume 20
creator Hashemi, Mahdi
description Purpose This study aims to understand the relationship between politics and pandemics in shaping the characteristics and themes of people’s Tweets during the US 2020 presidential election. Additionally, the purpose is to detect misinformation and extremism, not only to help online social networks (OSN) to target such content more rapidly but also to provide a close to real-time picture of trending topics, misinformation, and extremism flowing on OSN. This could help authorities to identify the intents behind them and find out how and when they should address such content. Design/methodology/approach This study focuses on extracting and verifying knowledge from large-scale OSN data, at the intersection of the Coronavirus pandemic and the US 2020 presidential election. More specifically, this study makes manual, statistical and automatic inferences and extracts knowledge from over a million Tweets related to the two aforementioned major events. On the other hand, disinformation operations intensified in 2020 with the coincidence of the Coronavirus pandemic and presidential election. This study applies machine learning to detect misinformation and extreme opinions on OSN. Over one million Tweets have been collected by our server in real-time from the beginning of April 2020 to the end of January 2021, using six keywords, namely, Covid, Corona, Trump, Biden, Democrats and Republicans. These Tweets are inspected with regard to their topics, opinions, news, and political affiliation, along with misinformation and extremism. Findings Our analyses showed that the majority of these Tweets concern death tolls, testing, mask, drugs, vaccine, and travel bans. The second concern among these Tweets is reopening the economy and schools, unemployment, and stimulus bills. The third concern is related to the Coronavirus pandemic’s impacts on politics, voting, and misinformation. This highlights the topics that US voters on Twitter were most concerned about during this time period, among the multitude of other topics that politicians and news media were reporting or discussing. Automatic classification of these Tweets using a long short-term memory network revealed that Tweets containing misinformation formed between 0.5% and 1.1% of Coronavirus-related Tweets every month and Tweets containing extreme opinions formed between 0.5% and 3.1% of them every month, with its pick in October 2020, coinciding with the US presidential election month. Originality/value The originality
doi_str_mv 10.1108/JICES-04-2021-0039
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_JICES-04-2021-0039</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2652817009</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-f65dd57df605288c23f4bf9f8ad3f9b7a11ba0d65865caabec376da0b81ef1ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AU8Bz9Gkf5L0KOuqKwsKKngLaTLRLN2mJt0Fv72t9SJ4moF57w3vh9A5o5eMUXn1sFosnwktSEYzRijNqwM0Y6KURErBDoe9EIJUFX87RicpbSjlMiuKGXq68cmEPUTfvuMUjNcN3oL1Gveh8yZh3Vrc6b6H2CbsW9x_ADYhhlbvfdxNd2jA9D60GKI-RUdONwnOfuccvd4uXxb3ZP14t1pcr4nJmeiJ46W1pbCO0zKT0mS5K2pXOalt7qpaaMZqTS0vJS-N1jWYXHCraS0ZOAaQz9HFlNvF8LmD1KtN2MV2eKkyPkQyQWk1qLJJZWJIKYJTXfRbHb8Uo2okp37IKVqokZwayQ0mNplgOxRq7P-eP7Tzb8T9cYI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2652817009</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Discovering social media topics and patterns in the coronavirus and election era</title><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Hashemi, Mahdi</creator><creatorcontrib>Hashemi, Mahdi</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose This study aims to understand the relationship between politics and pandemics in shaping the characteristics and themes of people’s Tweets during the US 2020 presidential election. Additionally, the purpose is to detect misinformation and extremism, not only to help online social networks (OSN) to target such content more rapidly but also to provide a close to real-time picture of trending topics, misinformation, and extremism flowing on OSN. This could help authorities to identify the intents behind them and find out how and when they should address such content. Design/methodology/approach This study focuses on extracting and verifying knowledge from large-scale OSN data, at the intersection of the Coronavirus pandemic and the US 2020 presidential election. More specifically, this study makes manual, statistical and automatic inferences and extracts knowledge from over a million Tweets related to the two aforementioned major events. On the other hand, disinformation operations intensified in 2020 with the coincidence of the Coronavirus pandemic and presidential election. This study applies machine learning to detect misinformation and extreme opinions on OSN. Over one million Tweets have been collected by our server in real-time from the beginning of April 2020 to the end of January 2021, using six keywords, namely, Covid, Corona, Trump, Biden, Democrats and Republicans. These Tweets are inspected with regard to their topics, opinions, news, and political affiliation, along with misinformation and extremism. Findings Our analyses showed that the majority of these Tweets concern death tolls, testing, mask, drugs, vaccine, and travel bans. The second concern among these Tweets is reopening the economy and schools, unemployment, and stimulus bills. The third concern is related to the Coronavirus pandemic’s impacts on politics, voting, and misinformation. This highlights the topics that US voters on Twitter were most concerned about during this time period, among the multitude of other topics that politicians and news media were reporting or discussing. Automatic classification of these Tweets using a long short-term memory network revealed that Tweets containing misinformation formed between 0.5% and 1.1% of Coronavirus-related Tweets every month and Tweets containing extreme opinions formed between 0.5% and 3.1% of them every month, with its pick in October 2020, coinciding with the US presidential election month. Originality/value The originality of this study lies in establishing a framework to collect, process, and classify OSN data to detect misinformation and extremism and to provide a close to real-time picture of trending topics, misinformation, and extremism flowing on OSN.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1477-996X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-8871</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/JICES-04-2021-0039</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Clinical trials ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Disease prevention ; Disease transmission ; Election results ; Extremism ; False information ; Health literacy ; Information sharing ; Knowledge ; Natural language processing ; Pandemics ; Politics ; Presidential elections ; Schools ; Social networks</subject><ispartof>Journal of information, communication &amp; ethics in society (Online), 2022-02, Vol.20 (1), p.1-17</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-f65dd57df605288c23f4bf9f8ad3f9b7a11ba0d65865caabec376da0b81ef1ee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-f65dd57df605288c23f4bf9f8ad3f9b7a11ba0d65865caabec376da0b81ef1ee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JICES-04-2021-0039/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21674,27901,27902,53219</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hashemi, Mahdi</creatorcontrib><title>Discovering social media topics and patterns in the coronavirus and election era</title><title>Journal of information, communication &amp; ethics in society (Online)</title><description>Purpose This study aims to understand the relationship between politics and pandemics in shaping the characteristics and themes of people’s Tweets during the US 2020 presidential election. Additionally, the purpose is to detect misinformation and extremism, not only to help online social networks (OSN) to target such content more rapidly but also to provide a close to real-time picture of trending topics, misinformation, and extremism flowing on OSN. This could help authorities to identify the intents behind them and find out how and when they should address such content. Design/methodology/approach This study focuses on extracting and verifying knowledge from large-scale OSN data, at the intersection of the Coronavirus pandemic and the US 2020 presidential election. More specifically, this study makes manual, statistical and automatic inferences and extracts knowledge from over a million Tweets related to the two aforementioned major events. On the other hand, disinformation operations intensified in 2020 with the coincidence of the Coronavirus pandemic and presidential election. This study applies machine learning to detect misinformation and extreme opinions on OSN. Over one million Tweets have been collected by our server in real-time from the beginning of April 2020 to the end of January 2021, using six keywords, namely, Covid, Corona, Trump, Biden, Democrats and Republicans. These Tweets are inspected with regard to their topics, opinions, news, and political affiliation, along with misinformation and extremism. Findings Our analyses showed that the majority of these Tweets concern death tolls, testing, mask, drugs, vaccine, and travel bans. The second concern among these Tweets is reopening the economy and schools, unemployment, and stimulus bills. The third concern is related to the Coronavirus pandemic’s impacts on politics, voting, and misinformation. This highlights the topics that US voters on Twitter were most concerned about during this time period, among the multitude of other topics that politicians and news media were reporting or discussing. Automatic classification of these Tweets using a long short-term memory network revealed that Tweets containing misinformation formed between 0.5% and 1.1% of Coronavirus-related Tweets every month and Tweets containing extreme opinions formed between 0.5% and 3.1% of them every month, with its pick in October 2020, coinciding with the US presidential election month. Originality/value The originality of this study lies in establishing a framework to collect, process, and classify OSN data to detect misinformation and extremism and to provide a close to real-time picture of trending topics, misinformation, and extremism flowing on OSN.</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Election results</subject><subject>Extremism</subject><subject>False information</subject><subject>Health literacy</subject><subject>Information sharing</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Natural language processing</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Presidential elections</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><issn>1477-996X</issn><issn>1758-8871</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AU8Bz9Gkf5L0KOuqKwsKKngLaTLRLN2mJt0Fv72t9SJ4moF57w3vh9A5o5eMUXn1sFosnwktSEYzRijNqwM0Y6KURErBDoe9EIJUFX87RicpbSjlMiuKGXq68cmEPUTfvuMUjNcN3oL1Gveh8yZh3Vrc6b6H2CbsW9x_ADYhhlbvfdxNd2jA9D60GKI-RUdONwnOfuccvd4uXxb3ZP14t1pcr4nJmeiJ46W1pbCO0zKT0mS5K2pXOalt7qpaaMZqTS0vJS-N1jWYXHCraS0ZOAaQz9HFlNvF8LmD1KtN2MV2eKkyPkQyQWk1qLJJZWJIKYJTXfRbHb8Uo2okp37IKVqokZwayQ0mNplgOxRq7P-eP7Tzb8T9cYI</recordid><startdate>20220207</startdate><enddate>20220207</enddate><creator>Hashemi, Mahdi</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220207</creationdate><title>Discovering social media topics and patterns in the coronavirus and election era</title><author>Hashemi, Mahdi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-f65dd57df605288c23f4bf9f8ad3f9b7a11ba0d65865caabec376da0b81ef1ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Election results</topic><topic>Extremism</topic><topic>False information</topic><topic>Health literacy</topic><topic>Information sharing</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Natural language processing</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Presidential elections</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hashemi, Mahdi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of information, communication &amp; ethics in society (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hashemi, Mahdi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Discovering social media topics and patterns in the coronavirus and election era</atitle><jtitle>Journal of information, communication &amp; ethics in society (Online)</jtitle><date>2022-02-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>17</epage><pages>1-17</pages><issn>1477-996X</issn><eissn>1758-8871</eissn><abstract>Purpose This study aims to understand the relationship between politics and pandemics in shaping the characteristics and themes of people’s Tweets during the US 2020 presidential election. Additionally, the purpose is to detect misinformation and extremism, not only to help online social networks (OSN) to target such content more rapidly but also to provide a close to real-time picture of trending topics, misinformation, and extremism flowing on OSN. This could help authorities to identify the intents behind them and find out how and when they should address such content. Design/methodology/approach This study focuses on extracting and verifying knowledge from large-scale OSN data, at the intersection of the Coronavirus pandemic and the US 2020 presidential election. More specifically, this study makes manual, statistical and automatic inferences and extracts knowledge from over a million Tweets related to the two aforementioned major events. On the other hand, disinformation operations intensified in 2020 with the coincidence of the Coronavirus pandemic and presidential election. This study applies machine learning to detect misinformation and extreme opinions on OSN. Over one million Tweets have been collected by our server in real-time from the beginning of April 2020 to the end of January 2021, using six keywords, namely, Covid, Corona, Trump, Biden, Democrats and Republicans. These Tweets are inspected with regard to their topics, opinions, news, and political affiliation, along with misinformation and extremism. Findings Our analyses showed that the majority of these Tweets concern death tolls, testing, mask, drugs, vaccine, and travel bans. The second concern among these Tweets is reopening the economy and schools, unemployment, and stimulus bills. The third concern is related to the Coronavirus pandemic’s impacts on politics, voting, and misinformation. This highlights the topics that US voters on Twitter were most concerned about during this time period, among the multitude of other topics that politicians and news media were reporting or discussing. Automatic classification of these Tweets using a long short-term memory network revealed that Tweets containing misinformation formed between 0.5% and 1.1% of Coronavirus-related Tweets every month and Tweets containing extreme opinions formed between 0.5% and 3.1% of them every month, with its pick in October 2020, coinciding with the US presidential election month. Originality/value The originality of this study lies in establishing a framework to collect, process, and classify OSN data to detect misinformation and extremism and to provide a close to real-time picture of trending topics, misinformation, and extremism flowing on OSN.</abstract><cop>Bingley</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/JICES-04-2021-0039</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1477-996X
ispartof Journal of information, communication & ethics in society (Online), 2022-02, Vol.20 (1), p.1-17
issn 1477-996X
1758-8871
language eng
recordid cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_JICES-04-2021-0039
source Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection
subjects Cancer
Clinical trials
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
Disease prevention
Disease transmission
Election results
Extremism
False information
Health literacy
Information sharing
Knowledge
Natural language processing
Pandemics
Politics
Presidential elections
Schools
Social networks
title Discovering social media topics and patterns in the coronavirus and election era
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T22%3A25%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Discovering%20social%20media%20topics%20and%20patterns%20in%20the%20coronavirus%20and%20election%20era&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20information,%20communication%20&%20ethics%20in%20society%20(Online)&rft.au=Hashemi,%20Mahdi&rft.date=2022-02-07&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=17&rft.pages=1-17&rft.issn=1477-996X&rft.eissn=1758-8871&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/JICES-04-2021-0039&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2652817009%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2652817009&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true