Product differentiation and populistic entry strategies in a mortgage market with Bertrand competition
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to analyse the interaction between a profit maximising mortgagor and a newcomer to a mortgage market with Bertrand competition where the newcomer has a populistic entry strategy and undercuts mortgage market rates. The intention of the paper is to relate the popul...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of European real estate research 2022-06, Vol.15 (2), p.263-277 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 277 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 263 |
container_title | Journal of European real estate research |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Borgersen, Trond Arne |
description | PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to analyse the interaction between a profit maximising mortgagor and a newcomer to a mortgage market with Bertrand competition where the newcomer has a populistic entry strategy and undercuts mortgage market rates. The intention of the paper is to relate the populistic entry strategy to mortgage market characteristics and the strategic market position of both the established mortgagor and the newcomer in question.Design/methodology/approachThe paper analyses a mortgage market by combining the behaviour of a profit maximising mortgagor with that of a newcomer to the mortgage market which has a populistic entry strategy and does not maximise profits. The short-run market solution provides comparative statics on the strategic market position of both the established mortgagor and the newcomer to the mortgage market during the entry phase both related to product differentiation and to price mirroring and undercutting of mortgage rates.FindingsThe model finds a mortgage market solution where a lower mortgage rate helps the newcomer gain a customer base. As the newcomer's strategy to mirror prices makes it unable to pass-through funding cost to its mortgage rate, the strategy is unsustainable over time. The established mortgagor has a strategically beneficial position as the mortgage market rates only relate to its funding cost. Unless the newcomer has a funding cost advantage, the established mortgagor has a higher interest rate margin. Differentiation impacts the newcomers’ interest rate margin positively. If the newcomer lacks a funding cost advantage, there is a critical mirroring rate that ensures it a higher interest rate margin. The higher the newcomers’ own funding cost, the higher is the upper bound for price mirroring, relating market entry to a small undercutting of mortgage rates and a mortgage market with weak competition. The funding cost of the established mortgagor pulls pricing in the opposite direction, allowing for a lower mirroring rate and tougher mortgage market competition during entry.Originality/valueThe paper aims to contribute to the understanding of market equilibrium in the absence of profit maximising behaviour. Framing a mortgage market in terms of a duopoly where a newcomer enters with a populistic entry strategy offering a lower mortgage rate and a mortgage product with a different loan-to-value (LTV) ratio, a novel mortgage market case comes about. The populistic entry strategy produces an augm |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/JERER-03-2021-0013 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_JERER-03-2021-0013</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2681294053</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-a1facfcab3198a43e48269a64c7a25f505ef4cf83c01b199e14d9d7ead4642093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUdtKAzEQDaJgrf6ATwGfV3PbSx611BsFpehzSLOTmtq9mGSR_r1ZK4Lg0wzMOWfmnEHonJJLSkl19ThfzpcZ4RkjjGaEUH6AJrTMeSZZWR7-9oU8RichbAgppCBiguyz7-rBRFw7a8FDG52Ormuxbmvcd_2wdSE6g9PA73CIXkdYOwjYJQhuOh_Xeg240f4dIv508Q3fgE-wRDdd00N0o9wpOrJ6G-Dsp07R6-38ZXafLZ7uHmbXi8zwnMRMU6uNNXrFqay04CCqdLIuhCk1y21OcrDC2IobQldUSqCilnUJuhaFYETyKbrY6_a--xggRLXpBt-mlYoVFWXJdM4Tiu1RxncheLCq9y5Z2ClK1Jin-s5TEa7GPNWYZyLRPQka8Hpb_8_58wP-BQ9meYk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2681294053</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Product differentiation and populistic entry strategies in a mortgage market with Bertrand competition</title><source>Emerald Insight</source><creator>Borgersen, Trond Arne</creator><creatorcontrib>Borgersen, Trond Arne</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to analyse the interaction between a profit maximising mortgagor and a newcomer to a mortgage market with Bertrand competition where the newcomer has a populistic entry strategy and undercuts mortgage market rates. The intention of the paper is to relate the populistic entry strategy to mortgage market characteristics and the strategic market position of both the established mortgagor and the newcomer in question.Design/methodology/approachThe paper analyses a mortgage market by combining the behaviour of a profit maximising mortgagor with that of a newcomer to the mortgage market which has a populistic entry strategy and does not maximise profits. The short-run market solution provides comparative statics on the strategic market position of both the established mortgagor and the newcomer to the mortgage market during the entry phase both related to product differentiation and to price mirroring and undercutting of mortgage rates.FindingsThe model finds a mortgage market solution where a lower mortgage rate helps the newcomer gain a customer base. As the newcomer's strategy to mirror prices makes it unable to pass-through funding cost to its mortgage rate, the strategy is unsustainable over time. The established mortgagor has a strategically beneficial position as the mortgage market rates only relate to its funding cost. Unless the newcomer has a funding cost advantage, the established mortgagor has a higher interest rate margin. Differentiation impacts the newcomers’ interest rate margin positively. If the newcomer lacks a funding cost advantage, there is a critical mirroring rate that ensures it a higher interest rate margin. The higher the newcomers’ own funding cost, the higher is the upper bound for price mirroring, relating market entry to a small undercutting of mortgage rates and a mortgage market with weak competition. The funding cost of the established mortgagor pulls pricing in the opposite direction, allowing for a lower mirroring rate and tougher mortgage market competition during entry.Originality/valueThe paper aims to contribute to the understanding of market equilibrium in the absence of profit maximising behaviour. Framing a mortgage market in terms of a duopoly where a newcomer enters with a populistic entry strategy offering a lower mortgage rate and a mortgage product with a different loan-to-value (LTV) ratio, a novel mortgage market case comes about. The populistic entry strategy produces an augmented reaction curve, crucial for the mortgage market rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1753-9269</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1753-9277</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/JERER-03-2021-0013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Competition ; European Monetary Union ; Funding ; Interest rates ; Market entry ; Market positioning ; Monetary policy ; Mortgage rates ; Predatory pricing ; Pricing policies ; Product differentiation ; Profits</subject><ispartof>Journal of European real estate research, 2022-06, Vol.15 (2), p.263-277</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-a1facfcab3198a43e48269a64c7a25f505ef4cf83c01b199e14d9d7ead4642093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-a1facfcab3198a43e48269a64c7a25f505ef4cf83c01b199e14d9d7ead4642093</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0105-8883</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JERER-03-2021-0013/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21695,27924,27925,53244</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Borgersen, Trond Arne</creatorcontrib><title>Product differentiation and populistic entry strategies in a mortgage market with Bertrand competition</title><title>Journal of European real estate research</title><description>PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to analyse the interaction between a profit maximising mortgagor and a newcomer to a mortgage market with Bertrand competition where the newcomer has a populistic entry strategy and undercuts mortgage market rates. The intention of the paper is to relate the populistic entry strategy to mortgage market characteristics and the strategic market position of both the established mortgagor and the newcomer in question.Design/methodology/approachThe paper analyses a mortgage market by combining the behaviour of a profit maximising mortgagor with that of a newcomer to the mortgage market which has a populistic entry strategy and does not maximise profits. The short-run market solution provides comparative statics on the strategic market position of both the established mortgagor and the newcomer to the mortgage market during the entry phase both related to product differentiation and to price mirroring and undercutting of mortgage rates.FindingsThe model finds a mortgage market solution where a lower mortgage rate helps the newcomer gain a customer base. As the newcomer's strategy to mirror prices makes it unable to pass-through funding cost to its mortgage rate, the strategy is unsustainable over time. The established mortgagor has a strategically beneficial position as the mortgage market rates only relate to its funding cost. Unless the newcomer has a funding cost advantage, the established mortgagor has a higher interest rate margin. Differentiation impacts the newcomers’ interest rate margin positively. If the newcomer lacks a funding cost advantage, there is a critical mirroring rate that ensures it a higher interest rate margin. The higher the newcomers’ own funding cost, the higher is the upper bound for price mirroring, relating market entry to a small undercutting of mortgage rates and a mortgage market with weak competition. The funding cost of the established mortgagor pulls pricing in the opposite direction, allowing for a lower mirroring rate and tougher mortgage market competition during entry.Originality/valueThe paper aims to contribute to the understanding of market equilibrium in the absence of profit maximising behaviour. Framing a mortgage market in terms of a duopoly where a newcomer enters with a populistic entry strategy offering a lower mortgage rate and a mortgage product with a different loan-to-value (LTV) ratio, a novel mortgage market case comes about. The populistic entry strategy produces an augmented reaction curve, crucial for the mortgage market rates.</description><subject>Competition</subject><subject>European Monetary Union</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Interest rates</subject><subject>Market entry</subject><subject>Market positioning</subject><subject>Monetary policy</subject><subject>Mortgage rates</subject><subject>Predatory pricing</subject><subject>Pricing policies</subject><subject>Product differentiation</subject><subject>Profits</subject><issn>1753-9269</issn><issn>1753-9277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptUdtKAzEQDaJgrf6ATwGfV3PbSx611BsFpehzSLOTmtq9mGSR_r1ZK4Lg0wzMOWfmnEHonJJLSkl19ThfzpcZ4RkjjGaEUH6AJrTMeSZZWR7-9oU8RichbAgppCBiguyz7-rBRFw7a8FDG52Ormuxbmvcd_2wdSE6g9PA73CIXkdYOwjYJQhuOh_Xeg240f4dIv508Q3fgE-wRDdd00N0o9wpOrJ6G-Dsp07R6-38ZXafLZ7uHmbXi8zwnMRMU6uNNXrFqay04CCqdLIuhCk1y21OcrDC2IobQldUSqCilnUJuhaFYETyKbrY6_a--xggRLXpBt-mlYoVFWXJdM4Tiu1RxncheLCq9y5Z2ClK1Jin-s5TEa7GPNWYZyLRPQka8Hpb_8_58wP-BQ9meYk</recordid><startdate>20220628</startdate><enddate>20220628</enddate><creator>Borgersen, Trond Arne</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0105-8883</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220628</creationdate><title>Product differentiation and populistic entry strategies in a mortgage market with Bertrand competition</title><author>Borgersen, Trond Arne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-a1facfcab3198a43e48269a64c7a25f505ef4cf83c01b199e14d9d7ead4642093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Competition</topic><topic>European Monetary Union</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Interest rates</topic><topic>Market entry</topic><topic>Market positioning</topic><topic>Monetary policy</topic><topic>Mortgage rates</topic><topic>Predatory pricing</topic><topic>Pricing policies</topic><topic>Product differentiation</topic><topic>Profits</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Borgersen, Trond Arne</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest_ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of European real estate research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Borgersen, Trond Arne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Product differentiation and populistic entry strategies in a mortgage market with Bertrand competition</atitle><jtitle>Journal of European real estate research</jtitle><date>2022-06-28</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>263</spage><epage>277</epage><pages>263-277</pages><issn>1753-9269</issn><eissn>1753-9277</eissn><abstract>PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to analyse the interaction between a profit maximising mortgagor and a newcomer to a mortgage market with Bertrand competition where the newcomer has a populistic entry strategy and undercuts mortgage market rates. The intention of the paper is to relate the populistic entry strategy to mortgage market characteristics and the strategic market position of both the established mortgagor and the newcomer in question.Design/methodology/approachThe paper analyses a mortgage market by combining the behaviour of a profit maximising mortgagor with that of a newcomer to the mortgage market which has a populistic entry strategy and does not maximise profits. The short-run market solution provides comparative statics on the strategic market position of both the established mortgagor and the newcomer to the mortgage market during the entry phase both related to product differentiation and to price mirroring and undercutting of mortgage rates.FindingsThe model finds a mortgage market solution where a lower mortgage rate helps the newcomer gain a customer base. As the newcomer's strategy to mirror prices makes it unable to pass-through funding cost to its mortgage rate, the strategy is unsustainable over time. The established mortgagor has a strategically beneficial position as the mortgage market rates only relate to its funding cost. Unless the newcomer has a funding cost advantage, the established mortgagor has a higher interest rate margin. Differentiation impacts the newcomers’ interest rate margin positively. If the newcomer lacks a funding cost advantage, there is a critical mirroring rate that ensures it a higher interest rate margin. The higher the newcomers’ own funding cost, the higher is the upper bound for price mirroring, relating market entry to a small undercutting of mortgage rates and a mortgage market with weak competition. The funding cost of the established mortgagor pulls pricing in the opposite direction, allowing for a lower mirroring rate and tougher mortgage market competition during entry.Originality/valueThe paper aims to contribute to the understanding of market equilibrium in the absence of profit maximising behaviour. Framing a mortgage market in terms of a duopoly where a newcomer enters with a populistic entry strategy offering a lower mortgage rate and a mortgage product with a different loan-to-value (LTV) ratio, a novel mortgage market case comes about. The populistic entry strategy produces an augmented reaction curve, crucial for the mortgage market rates.</abstract><cop>Bingley</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/JERER-03-2021-0013</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0105-8883</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1753-9269 |
ispartof | Journal of European real estate research, 2022-06, Vol.15 (2), p.263-277 |
issn | 1753-9269 1753-9277 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_JERER-03-2021-0013 |
source | Emerald Insight |
subjects | Competition European Monetary Union Funding Interest rates Market entry Market positioning Monetary policy Mortgage rates Predatory pricing Pricing policies Product differentiation Profits |
title | Product differentiation and populistic entry strategies in a mortgage market with Bertrand competition |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T06%3A29%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Product%20differentiation%20and%20populistic%20entry%20strategies%20in%20a%20mortgage%20market%20with%20Bertrand%20competition&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20European%20real%20estate%20research&rft.au=Borgersen,%20Trond%20Arne&rft.date=2022-06-28&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=263&rft.epage=277&rft.pages=263-277&rft.issn=1753-9269&rft.eissn=1753-9277&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/JERER-03-2021-0013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2681294053%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2681294053&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |