An instrument to measure mobile shower commode usability: the eMAST 1.0
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present a preliminary psychometric evaluation of the electronic mobile shower commode assessment tool (eMAST) 1.0. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional validation study was undertaken with 32 adults with spinal cord injury (SCI), aged 18 years or olde...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of assistive technologies 2016-09, Vol.10 (3), p.153-161 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 161 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 153 |
container_title | Journal of assistive technologies |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Friesen, Emma L Theodoros, Deborah Russell, Trevor G |
description | Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to present a preliminary psychometric evaluation of the electronic mobile shower commode assessment tool (eMAST) 1.0.
Design/methodology/approach
A cross-sectional validation study was undertaken with 32 adults with spinal cord injury (SCI), aged 18 years or older, who use mobile shower commodes for toileting and/or showering. The eMAST 1.0, Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology, Version 2.0 (QUEST 2.0), and modified system usability scale (SUS) were administered online via SurveyMonkey. The eMAST 1.0 was re-administered approximately seven days later. Psychometric properties of internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent validity were assessed.
Findings
As hypothesised, the eMAST 1.0 demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s α=0.73, N=32); acceptable test-retest reliability (intra-class coefficient (3, 1)=0.75 (0.53-0.88, 95 per cent confidence interval) (n=27)); and strong, positive correlations with the QUEST 2.0’s devices subscale and modified SUS (Pearson’s correlation coefficients 0.70 and 0.63, respectively).
Research limitations/implications
The sample was not fully representative of Australian data in terms of gender, or state of residence, but was representative in terms of SCI level. Age data were not assessed. The sample size was small but adequate for a preliminary psychometric evaluation.
Originality/value
The preliminary psychometric evaluation indicates the eMAST 1.0 is a valid and reliable instrument that measures usability of MSCs for adults with SCI. It may be useful for exploring relationships between usability and satisfaction of MSCs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/JAT-12-2015-0037 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_JAT-12-2015-0037</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4194224441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-bea21346894c2fc642d83323891c71c79f080343a9ec034e63330031373aa3283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3jwHPaSeZdDfrbSlalYoH6zmk21m6pbupyS7if29KvQjCwIPhvfn4MXYrYSIlmOlLuRJSCQVyJgAwP2MjBVoJkys8ZyOZz7Qo9Awu2VWMO4AMMYMRW5Qdb7rYh6Glrue95y25OATirV83e-Jx678o8Mq3rd8QH6JL7ab_vuf9lji9lu8rLidwzS5qt49086tj9vH4sJo_ieXb4nleLkWFUvZiTU5J1JkpdKXqKtNqYxAVmkJWeaqiBgOo0RVUJaV0JaZvJOboHCqDY3Z3mnsI_nOg2NudH0KXVlppFIJBlevkgpOrCj7GQLU9hKZ14dtKsEdcNuGyUtkjLnvElSLTU4RaCm6_-S_xBzD-AA3LZ_w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1823083274</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An instrument to measure mobile shower commode usability: the eMAST 1.0</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Emerald Journals</source><creator>Friesen, Emma L ; Theodoros, Deborah ; Russell, Trevor G</creator><creatorcontrib>Friesen, Emma L ; Theodoros, Deborah ; Russell, Trevor G</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to present a preliminary psychometric evaluation of the electronic mobile shower commode assessment tool (eMAST) 1.0.
Design/methodology/approach
A cross-sectional validation study was undertaken with 32 adults with spinal cord injury (SCI), aged 18 years or older, who use mobile shower commodes for toileting and/or showering. The eMAST 1.0, Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology, Version 2.0 (QUEST 2.0), and modified system usability scale (SUS) were administered online via SurveyMonkey. The eMAST 1.0 was re-administered approximately seven days later. Psychometric properties of internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent validity were assessed.
Findings
As hypothesised, the eMAST 1.0 demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s α=0.73, N=32); acceptable test-retest reliability (intra-class coefficient (3, 1)=0.75 (0.53-0.88, 95 per cent confidence interval) (n=27)); and strong, positive correlations with the QUEST 2.0’s devices subscale and modified SUS (Pearson’s correlation coefficients 0.70 and 0.63, respectively).
Research limitations/implications
The sample was not fully representative of Australian data in terms of gender, or state of residence, but was representative in terms of SCI level. Age data were not assessed. The sample size was small but adequate for a preliminary psychometric evaluation.
Originality/value
The preliminary psychometric evaluation indicates the eMAST 1.0 is a valid and reliable instrument that measures usability of MSCs for adults with SCI. It may be useful for exploring relationships between usability and satisfaction of MSCs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1754-9450</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2398-6263</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2042-8723</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2398-6271</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/JAT-12-2015-0037</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hove: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Confidence intervals ; Consumer satisfaction ; Convergent validity ; Correlation coefficients ; Design ; Injuries ; Product development ; Psychometric properties ; Quantitative psychology ; Rehabilitation ; Reliability ; Residence ; Spinal cord ; Spinal cord injuries ; Studies ; Technical aids ; Technology ; Test-Retest reliability ; Usability ; Validation</subject><ispartof>Journal of assistive technologies, 2016-09, Vol.10 (3), p.153-161</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-bea21346894c2fc642d83323891c71c79f080343a9ec034e63330031373aa3283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-bea21346894c2fc642d83323891c71c79f080343a9ec034e63330031373aa3283</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6969-8230</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JAT-12-2015-0037/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,964,11618,12829,27907,27908,30982,52672</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Friesen, Emma L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theodoros, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell, Trevor G</creatorcontrib><title>An instrument to measure mobile shower commode usability: the eMAST 1.0</title><title>Journal of assistive technologies</title><description>Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to present a preliminary psychometric evaluation of the electronic mobile shower commode assessment tool (eMAST) 1.0.
Design/methodology/approach
A cross-sectional validation study was undertaken with 32 adults with spinal cord injury (SCI), aged 18 years or older, who use mobile shower commodes for toileting and/or showering. The eMAST 1.0, Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology, Version 2.0 (QUEST 2.0), and modified system usability scale (SUS) were administered online via SurveyMonkey. The eMAST 1.0 was re-administered approximately seven days later. Psychometric properties of internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent validity were assessed.
Findings
As hypothesised, the eMAST 1.0 demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s α=0.73, N=32); acceptable test-retest reliability (intra-class coefficient (3, 1)=0.75 (0.53-0.88, 95 per cent confidence interval) (n=27)); and strong, positive correlations with the QUEST 2.0’s devices subscale and modified SUS (Pearson’s correlation coefficients 0.70 and 0.63, respectively).
Research limitations/implications
The sample was not fully representative of Australian data in terms of gender, or state of residence, but was representative in terms of SCI level. Age data were not assessed. The sample size was small but adequate for a preliminary psychometric evaluation.
Originality/value
The preliminary psychometric evaluation indicates the eMAST 1.0 is a valid and reliable instrument that measures usability of MSCs for adults with SCI. It may be useful for exploring relationships between usability and satisfaction of MSCs.</description><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Consumer satisfaction</subject><subject>Convergent validity</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>Psychometric properties</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Residence</subject><subject>Spinal cord</subject><subject>Spinal cord injuries</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Technical aids</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Test-Retest reliability</subject><subject>Usability</subject><subject>Validation</subject><issn>1754-9450</issn><issn>2398-6263</issn><issn>2042-8723</issn><issn>2398-6271</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptkM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3jwHPaSeZdDfrbSlalYoH6zmk21m6pbupyS7if29KvQjCwIPhvfn4MXYrYSIlmOlLuRJSCQVyJgAwP2MjBVoJkys8ZyOZz7Qo9Awu2VWMO4AMMYMRW5Qdb7rYh6Glrue95y25OATirV83e-Jx678o8Mq3rd8QH6JL7ab_vuf9lji9lu8rLidwzS5qt49086tj9vH4sJo_ieXb4nleLkWFUvZiTU5J1JkpdKXqKtNqYxAVmkJWeaqiBgOo0RVUJaV0JaZvJOboHCqDY3Z3mnsI_nOg2NudH0KXVlppFIJBlevkgpOrCj7GQLU9hKZ14dtKsEdcNuGyUtkjLnvElSLTU4RaCm6_-S_xBzD-AA3LZ_w</recordid><startdate>20160919</startdate><enddate>20160919</enddate><creator>Friesen, Emma L</creator><creator>Theodoros, Deborah</creator><creator>Russell, Trevor G</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6969-8230</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160919</creationdate><title>An instrument to measure mobile shower commode usability: the eMAST 1.0</title><author>Friesen, Emma L ; Theodoros, Deborah ; Russell, Trevor G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-bea21346894c2fc642d83323891c71c79f080343a9ec034e63330031373aa3283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Consumer satisfaction</topic><topic>Convergent validity</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>Psychometric properties</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Residence</topic><topic>Spinal cord</topic><topic>Spinal cord injuries</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Technical aids</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Test-Retest reliability</topic><topic>Usability</topic><topic>Validation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Friesen, Emma L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theodoros, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell, Trevor G</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of assistive technologies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Friesen, Emma L</au><au>Theodoros, Deborah</au><au>Russell, Trevor G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An instrument to measure mobile shower commode usability: the eMAST 1.0</atitle><jtitle>Journal of assistive technologies</jtitle><date>2016-09-19</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>153</spage><epage>161</epage><pages>153-161</pages><issn>1754-9450</issn><issn>2398-6263</issn><eissn>2042-8723</eissn><eissn>2398-6271</eissn><abstract>Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to present a preliminary psychometric evaluation of the electronic mobile shower commode assessment tool (eMAST) 1.0.
Design/methodology/approach
A cross-sectional validation study was undertaken with 32 adults with spinal cord injury (SCI), aged 18 years or older, who use mobile shower commodes for toileting and/or showering. The eMAST 1.0, Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology, Version 2.0 (QUEST 2.0), and modified system usability scale (SUS) were administered online via SurveyMonkey. The eMAST 1.0 was re-administered approximately seven days later. Psychometric properties of internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent validity were assessed.
Findings
As hypothesised, the eMAST 1.0 demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s α=0.73, N=32); acceptable test-retest reliability (intra-class coefficient (3, 1)=0.75 (0.53-0.88, 95 per cent confidence interval) (n=27)); and strong, positive correlations with the QUEST 2.0’s devices subscale and modified SUS (Pearson’s correlation coefficients 0.70 and 0.63, respectively).
Research limitations/implications
The sample was not fully representative of Australian data in terms of gender, or state of residence, but was representative in terms of SCI level. Age data were not assessed. The sample size was small but adequate for a preliminary psychometric evaluation.
Originality/value
The preliminary psychometric evaluation indicates the eMAST 1.0 is a valid and reliable instrument that measures usability of MSCs for adults with SCI. It may be useful for exploring relationships between usability and satisfaction of MSCs.</abstract><cop>Hove</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/JAT-12-2015-0037</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6969-8230</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1754-9450 |
ispartof | Journal of assistive technologies, 2016-09, Vol.10 (3), p.153-161 |
issn | 1754-9450 2398-6263 2042-8723 2398-6271 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_JAT-12-2015-0037 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Emerald Journals |
subjects | Confidence intervals Consumer satisfaction Convergent validity Correlation coefficients Design Injuries Product development Psychometric properties Quantitative psychology Rehabilitation Reliability Residence Spinal cord Spinal cord injuries Studies Technical aids Technology Test-Retest reliability Usability Validation |
title | An instrument to measure mobile shower commode usability: the eMAST 1.0 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T08%3A17%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20instrument%20to%20measure%20mobile%20shower%20commode%20usability:%20the%20eMAST%201.0&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20assistive%20technologies&rft.au=Friesen,%20Emma%20L&rft.date=2016-09-19&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=161&rft.pages=153-161&rft.issn=1754-9450&rft.eissn=2042-8723&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/JAT-12-2015-0037&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E4194224441%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1823083274&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |