An instrument to measure mobile shower commode usability: the eMAST 1.0

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present a preliminary psychometric evaluation of the electronic mobile shower commode assessment tool (eMAST) 1.0. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional validation study was undertaken with 32 adults with spinal cord injury (SCI), aged 18 years or olde...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of assistive technologies 2016-09, Vol.10 (3), p.153-161
Hauptverfasser: Friesen, Emma L, Theodoros, Deborah, Russell, Trevor G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 161
container_issue 3
container_start_page 153
container_title Journal of assistive technologies
container_volume 10
creator Friesen, Emma L
Theodoros, Deborah
Russell, Trevor G
description Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present a preliminary psychometric evaluation of the electronic mobile shower commode assessment tool (eMAST) 1.0. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional validation study was undertaken with 32 adults with spinal cord injury (SCI), aged 18 years or older, who use mobile shower commodes for toileting and/or showering. The eMAST 1.0, Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology, Version 2.0 (QUEST 2.0), and modified system usability scale (SUS) were administered online via SurveyMonkey. The eMAST 1.0 was re-administered approximately seven days later. Psychometric properties of internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent validity were assessed. Findings As hypothesised, the eMAST 1.0 demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s α=0.73, N=32); acceptable test-retest reliability (intra-class coefficient (3, 1)=0.75 (0.53-0.88, 95 per cent confidence interval) (n=27)); and strong, positive correlations with the QUEST 2.0’s devices subscale and modified SUS (Pearson’s correlation coefficients 0.70 and 0.63, respectively). Research limitations/implications The sample was not fully representative of Australian data in terms of gender, or state of residence, but was representative in terms of SCI level. Age data were not assessed. The sample size was small but adequate for a preliminary psychometric evaluation. Originality/value The preliminary psychometric evaluation indicates the eMAST 1.0 is a valid and reliable instrument that measures usability of MSCs for adults with SCI. It may be useful for exploring relationships between usability and satisfaction of MSCs.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/JAT-12-2015-0037
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_JAT-12-2015-0037</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4194224441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-bea21346894c2fc642d83323891c71c79f080343a9ec034e63330031373aa3283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3jwHPaSeZdDfrbSlalYoH6zmk21m6pbupyS7if29KvQjCwIPhvfn4MXYrYSIlmOlLuRJSCQVyJgAwP2MjBVoJkys8ZyOZz7Qo9Awu2VWMO4AMMYMRW5Qdb7rYh6Glrue95y25OATirV83e-Jx678o8Mq3rd8QH6JL7ab_vuf9lji9lu8rLidwzS5qt49086tj9vH4sJo_ieXb4nleLkWFUvZiTU5J1JkpdKXqKtNqYxAVmkJWeaqiBgOo0RVUJaV0JaZvJOboHCqDY3Z3mnsI_nOg2NudH0KXVlppFIJBlevkgpOrCj7GQLU9hKZ14dtKsEdcNuGyUtkjLnvElSLTU4RaCm6_-S_xBzD-AA3LZ_w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1823083274</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An instrument to measure mobile shower commode usability: the eMAST 1.0</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Emerald Journals</source><creator>Friesen, Emma L ; Theodoros, Deborah ; Russell, Trevor G</creator><creatorcontrib>Friesen, Emma L ; Theodoros, Deborah ; Russell, Trevor G</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present a preliminary psychometric evaluation of the electronic mobile shower commode assessment tool (eMAST) 1.0. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional validation study was undertaken with 32 adults with spinal cord injury (SCI), aged 18 years or older, who use mobile shower commodes for toileting and/or showering. The eMAST 1.0, Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology, Version 2.0 (QUEST 2.0), and modified system usability scale (SUS) were administered online via SurveyMonkey. The eMAST 1.0 was re-administered approximately seven days later. Psychometric properties of internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent validity were assessed. Findings As hypothesised, the eMAST 1.0 demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s α=0.73, N=32); acceptable test-retest reliability (intra-class coefficient (3, 1)=0.75 (0.53-0.88, 95 per cent confidence interval) (n=27)); and strong, positive correlations with the QUEST 2.0’s devices subscale and modified SUS (Pearson’s correlation coefficients 0.70 and 0.63, respectively). Research limitations/implications The sample was not fully representative of Australian data in terms of gender, or state of residence, but was representative in terms of SCI level. Age data were not assessed. The sample size was small but adequate for a preliminary psychometric evaluation. Originality/value The preliminary psychometric evaluation indicates the eMAST 1.0 is a valid and reliable instrument that measures usability of MSCs for adults with SCI. It may be useful for exploring relationships between usability and satisfaction of MSCs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1754-9450</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2398-6263</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2042-8723</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2398-6271</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/JAT-12-2015-0037</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hove: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Confidence intervals ; Consumer satisfaction ; Convergent validity ; Correlation coefficients ; Design ; Injuries ; Product development ; Psychometric properties ; Quantitative psychology ; Rehabilitation ; Reliability ; Residence ; Spinal cord ; Spinal cord injuries ; Studies ; Technical aids ; Technology ; Test-Retest reliability ; Usability ; Validation</subject><ispartof>Journal of assistive technologies, 2016-09, Vol.10 (3), p.153-161</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-bea21346894c2fc642d83323891c71c79f080343a9ec034e63330031373aa3283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-bea21346894c2fc642d83323891c71c79f080343a9ec034e63330031373aa3283</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6969-8230</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JAT-12-2015-0037/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,964,11618,12829,27907,27908,30982,52672</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Friesen, Emma L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theodoros, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell, Trevor G</creatorcontrib><title>An instrument to measure mobile shower commode usability: the eMAST 1.0</title><title>Journal of assistive technologies</title><description>Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present a preliminary psychometric evaluation of the electronic mobile shower commode assessment tool (eMAST) 1.0. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional validation study was undertaken with 32 adults with spinal cord injury (SCI), aged 18 years or older, who use mobile shower commodes for toileting and/or showering. The eMAST 1.0, Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology, Version 2.0 (QUEST 2.0), and modified system usability scale (SUS) were administered online via SurveyMonkey. The eMAST 1.0 was re-administered approximately seven days later. Psychometric properties of internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent validity were assessed. Findings As hypothesised, the eMAST 1.0 demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s α=0.73, N=32); acceptable test-retest reliability (intra-class coefficient (3, 1)=0.75 (0.53-0.88, 95 per cent confidence interval) (n=27)); and strong, positive correlations with the QUEST 2.0’s devices subscale and modified SUS (Pearson’s correlation coefficients 0.70 and 0.63, respectively). Research limitations/implications The sample was not fully representative of Australian data in terms of gender, or state of residence, but was representative in terms of SCI level. Age data were not assessed. The sample size was small but adequate for a preliminary psychometric evaluation. Originality/value The preliminary psychometric evaluation indicates the eMAST 1.0 is a valid and reliable instrument that measures usability of MSCs for adults with SCI. It may be useful for exploring relationships between usability and satisfaction of MSCs.</description><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Consumer satisfaction</subject><subject>Convergent validity</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>Psychometric properties</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Residence</subject><subject>Spinal cord</subject><subject>Spinal cord injuries</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Technical aids</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Test-Retest reliability</subject><subject>Usability</subject><subject>Validation</subject><issn>1754-9450</issn><issn>2398-6263</issn><issn>2042-8723</issn><issn>2398-6271</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptkM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3jwHPaSeZdDfrbSlalYoH6zmk21m6pbupyS7if29KvQjCwIPhvfn4MXYrYSIlmOlLuRJSCQVyJgAwP2MjBVoJkys8ZyOZz7Qo9Awu2VWMO4AMMYMRW5Qdb7rYh6Glrue95y25OATirV83e-Jx678o8Mq3rd8QH6JL7ab_vuf9lji9lu8rLidwzS5qt49086tj9vH4sJo_ieXb4nleLkWFUvZiTU5J1JkpdKXqKtNqYxAVmkJWeaqiBgOo0RVUJaV0JaZvJOboHCqDY3Z3mnsI_nOg2NudH0KXVlppFIJBlevkgpOrCj7GQLU9hKZ14dtKsEdcNuGyUtkjLnvElSLTU4RaCm6_-S_xBzD-AA3LZ_w</recordid><startdate>20160919</startdate><enddate>20160919</enddate><creator>Friesen, Emma L</creator><creator>Theodoros, Deborah</creator><creator>Russell, Trevor G</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6969-8230</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160919</creationdate><title>An instrument to measure mobile shower commode usability: the eMAST 1.0</title><author>Friesen, Emma L ; Theodoros, Deborah ; Russell, Trevor G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-bea21346894c2fc642d83323891c71c79f080343a9ec034e63330031373aa3283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Consumer satisfaction</topic><topic>Convergent validity</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>Psychometric properties</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Residence</topic><topic>Spinal cord</topic><topic>Spinal cord injuries</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Technical aids</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Test-Retest reliability</topic><topic>Usability</topic><topic>Validation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Friesen, Emma L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theodoros, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell, Trevor G</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of assistive technologies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Friesen, Emma L</au><au>Theodoros, Deborah</au><au>Russell, Trevor G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An instrument to measure mobile shower commode usability: the eMAST 1.0</atitle><jtitle>Journal of assistive technologies</jtitle><date>2016-09-19</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>153</spage><epage>161</epage><pages>153-161</pages><issn>1754-9450</issn><issn>2398-6263</issn><eissn>2042-8723</eissn><eissn>2398-6271</eissn><abstract>Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present a preliminary psychometric evaluation of the electronic mobile shower commode assessment tool (eMAST) 1.0. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional validation study was undertaken with 32 adults with spinal cord injury (SCI), aged 18 years or older, who use mobile shower commodes for toileting and/or showering. The eMAST 1.0, Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology, Version 2.0 (QUEST 2.0), and modified system usability scale (SUS) were administered online via SurveyMonkey. The eMAST 1.0 was re-administered approximately seven days later. Psychometric properties of internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent validity were assessed. Findings As hypothesised, the eMAST 1.0 demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s α=0.73, N=32); acceptable test-retest reliability (intra-class coefficient (3, 1)=0.75 (0.53-0.88, 95 per cent confidence interval) (n=27)); and strong, positive correlations with the QUEST 2.0’s devices subscale and modified SUS (Pearson’s correlation coefficients 0.70 and 0.63, respectively). Research limitations/implications The sample was not fully representative of Australian data in terms of gender, or state of residence, but was representative in terms of SCI level. Age data were not assessed. The sample size was small but adequate for a preliminary psychometric evaluation. Originality/value The preliminary psychometric evaluation indicates the eMAST 1.0 is a valid and reliable instrument that measures usability of MSCs for adults with SCI. It may be useful for exploring relationships between usability and satisfaction of MSCs.</abstract><cop>Hove</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/JAT-12-2015-0037</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6969-8230</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1754-9450
ispartof Journal of assistive technologies, 2016-09, Vol.10 (3), p.153-161
issn 1754-9450
2398-6263
2042-8723
2398-6271
language eng
recordid cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_JAT-12-2015-0037
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Emerald Journals
subjects Confidence intervals
Consumer satisfaction
Convergent validity
Correlation coefficients
Design
Injuries
Product development
Psychometric properties
Quantitative psychology
Rehabilitation
Reliability
Residence
Spinal cord
Spinal cord injuries
Studies
Technical aids
Technology
Test-Retest reliability
Usability
Validation
title An instrument to measure mobile shower commode usability: the eMAST 1.0
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T08%3A17%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20instrument%20to%20measure%20mobile%20shower%20commode%20usability:%20the%20eMAST%201.0&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20assistive%20technologies&rft.au=Friesen,%20Emma%20L&rft.date=2016-09-19&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=161&rft.pages=153-161&rft.issn=1754-9450&rft.eissn=2042-8723&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/JAT-12-2015-0037&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E4194224441%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1823083274&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true