YouTube marketing: how marketers' video optimization practices influence video views
PurposeYouTube's vast and engaged user base makes it central to firms' digital marketing effort. With extant studies focusing on viewers' post-view engagement behavior, however, research into what motivates viewers to click on and watch YouTube videos is scarce. This study investigate...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Internet research 2020-10, Vol.30 (6), p.1689-1707 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1707 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1689 |
container_title | Internet research |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Tafesse, Wondwesen |
description | PurposeYouTube's vast and engaged user base makes it central to firms' digital marketing effort. With extant studies focusing on viewers' post-view engagement behavior, however, research into what motivates viewers to click on and watch YouTube videos is scarce. This study investigates the implications of marketers' video optimization practices for video views on YouTube.Design/methodology/approachThe study employed a data set of videos (N = 4,398) gathered by scraping YouTube's trending list. Using a combination of text and sentiment analysis, the study measured four video optimization practices: information content of video titles, emotional intensity of video titles, information content of video descriptions and volume of video tags. It then analyzed the effect of these video optimization practices on video views.FindingsThe study finds that greater availability of information in video titles is negatively associated with video views, whereas intensity of negative emotional sentiment in video titles is positively associated with video views. Further, greater availability of information in video descriptions is positively associated with video views. Finally, an inverted U-shaped relationship is found between volume of video tags and video views. Up to 17 video tags can contribute to more video views; however, beyond 17 tags, the relationship turns negative.Originality/valueThis study investigates the effect of marketers' video optimization practices on video views. While extant studies mainly focus on viewers' post-view engagement behavior, such as liking, commenting on and sharing videos, this study examines video views. Similarly, extant studies investigate videos' internal content, while this study investigates elements of the video metadata. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/INTR-10-2019-0406 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_INTR-10-2019-0406</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2453900912</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-e81d0d8613cd11efd099f58c6943aeb653246f41becea5121507254017679c543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gLeAB0-rM5vdTeJNih-FoiDx4Cmkm4lubbN1N2nRX29CexE8DS887wzzMHaOcIUI6fX0KX_hCFwAZhwk6AM2EqAkV1olh2yEoDUXQsbH7CSEBUDPZXLE8jfX5d2colXpP6m1zftN9OG2-0g-XEYbW5GL3Lq1K_tTttY10dqXprWGQmSbetlRY2iPbSxtwyk7qstloLP9HLPX-7t88shnzw_Tye2Mm1iLllOKFVSpxthUiFRXkGW1So3OZFzSXKtYSF1LnJOhUqFABYlQEjDRSWaUjMfsYrd37d1XR6EtFq7zTX-yEFLFGUCGoqdwRxnvQvBUF2tv-_--C4RikFcM8oYwyCsGeX0Hdh1akS-X1b-VP77jX543cJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2453900912</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>YouTube marketing: how marketers' video optimization practices influence video views</title><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><creator>Tafesse, Wondwesen</creator><creatorcontrib>Tafesse, Wondwesen</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeYouTube's vast and engaged user base makes it central to firms' digital marketing effort. With extant studies focusing on viewers' post-view engagement behavior, however, research into what motivates viewers to click on and watch YouTube videos is scarce. This study investigates the implications of marketers' video optimization practices for video views on YouTube.Design/methodology/approachThe study employed a data set of videos (N = 4,398) gathered by scraping YouTube's trending list. Using a combination of text and sentiment analysis, the study measured four video optimization practices: information content of video titles, emotional intensity of video titles, information content of video descriptions and volume of video tags. It then analyzed the effect of these video optimization practices on video views.FindingsThe study finds that greater availability of information in video titles is negatively associated with video views, whereas intensity of negative emotional sentiment in video titles is positively associated with video views. Further, greater availability of information in video descriptions is positively associated with video views. Finally, an inverted U-shaped relationship is found between volume of video tags and video views. Up to 17 video tags can contribute to more video views; however, beyond 17 tags, the relationship turns negative.Originality/valueThis study investigates the effect of marketers' video optimization practices on video views. While extant studies mainly focus on viewers' post-view engagement behavior, such as liking, commenting on and sharing videos, this study examines video views. Similarly, extant studies investigate videos' internal content, while this study investigates elements of the video metadata.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1066-2243</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2054-5657</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/INTR-10-2019-0406</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Advertising ; Advertising expenditures ; Algorithms ; Alliances ; Availability ; Customer feedback ; Customer relationship management ; Customers ; Data mining ; Descriptions ; Digital marketing ; Indexing ; Investigations ; Literature Reviews ; Marketing ; Mathematics ; Optimization ; Product reviews ; Social networks ; Tags ; User generated content ; Video ; Video Technology ; Viral marketing</subject><ispartof>Internet research, 2020-10, Vol.30 (6), p.1689-1707</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-e81d0d8613cd11efd099f58c6943aeb653246f41becea5121507254017679c543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-e81d0d8613cd11efd099f58c6943aeb653246f41becea5121507254017679c543</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8208-6922</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/INTR-10-2019-0406/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,967,11635,27924,27925,52689</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tafesse, Wondwesen</creatorcontrib><title>YouTube marketing: how marketers' video optimization practices influence video views</title><title>Internet research</title><description>PurposeYouTube's vast and engaged user base makes it central to firms' digital marketing effort. With extant studies focusing on viewers' post-view engagement behavior, however, research into what motivates viewers to click on and watch YouTube videos is scarce. This study investigates the implications of marketers' video optimization practices for video views on YouTube.Design/methodology/approachThe study employed a data set of videos (N = 4,398) gathered by scraping YouTube's trending list. Using a combination of text and sentiment analysis, the study measured four video optimization practices: information content of video titles, emotional intensity of video titles, information content of video descriptions and volume of video tags. It then analyzed the effect of these video optimization practices on video views.FindingsThe study finds that greater availability of information in video titles is negatively associated with video views, whereas intensity of negative emotional sentiment in video titles is positively associated with video views. Further, greater availability of information in video descriptions is positively associated with video views. Finally, an inverted U-shaped relationship is found between volume of video tags and video views. Up to 17 video tags can contribute to more video views; however, beyond 17 tags, the relationship turns negative.Originality/valueThis study investigates the effect of marketers' video optimization practices on video views. While extant studies mainly focus on viewers' post-view engagement behavior, such as liking, commenting on and sharing videos, this study examines video views. Similarly, extant studies investigate videos' internal content, while this study investigates elements of the video metadata.</description><subject>Advertising</subject><subject>Advertising expenditures</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Alliances</subject><subject>Availability</subject><subject>Customer feedback</subject><subject>Customer relationship management</subject><subject>Customers</subject><subject>Data mining</subject><subject>Descriptions</subject><subject>Digital marketing</subject><subject>Indexing</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Product reviews</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Tags</subject><subject>User generated content</subject><subject>Video</subject><subject>Video Technology</subject><subject>Viral marketing</subject><issn>1066-2243</issn><issn>2054-5657</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gLeAB0-rM5vdTeJNih-FoiDx4Cmkm4lubbN1N2nRX29CexE8DS887wzzMHaOcIUI6fX0KX_hCFwAZhwk6AM2EqAkV1olh2yEoDUXQsbH7CSEBUDPZXLE8jfX5d2colXpP6m1zftN9OG2-0g-XEYbW5GL3Lq1K_tTttY10dqXprWGQmSbetlRY2iPbSxtwyk7qstloLP9HLPX-7t88shnzw_Tye2Mm1iLllOKFVSpxthUiFRXkGW1So3OZFzSXKtYSF1LnJOhUqFABYlQEjDRSWaUjMfsYrd37d1XR6EtFq7zTX-yEFLFGUCGoqdwRxnvQvBUF2tv-_--C4RikFcM8oYwyCsGeX0Hdh1akS-X1b-VP77jX543cJw</recordid><startdate>20201026</startdate><enddate>20201026</enddate><creator>Tafesse, Wondwesen</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8208-6922</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201026</creationdate><title>YouTube marketing: how marketers' video optimization practices influence video views</title><author>Tafesse, Wondwesen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-e81d0d8613cd11efd099f58c6943aeb653246f41becea5121507254017679c543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Advertising</topic><topic>Advertising expenditures</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Alliances</topic><topic>Availability</topic><topic>Customer feedback</topic><topic>Customer relationship management</topic><topic>Customers</topic><topic>Data mining</topic><topic>Descriptions</topic><topic>Digital marketing</topic><topic>Indexing</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Product reviews</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Tags</topic><topic>User generated content</topic><topic>Video</topic><topic>Video Technology</topic><topic>Viral marketing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tafesse, Wondwesen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Internet research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tafesse, Wondwesen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>YouTube marketing: how marketers' video optimization practices influence video views</atitle><jtitle>Internet research</jtitle><date>2020-10-26</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1689</spage><epage>1707</epage><pages>1689-1707</pages><issn>1066-2243</issn><eissn>2054-5657</eissn><abstract>PurposeYouTube's vast and engaged user base makes it central to firms' digital marketing effort. With extant studies focusing on viewers' post-view engagement behavior, however, research into what motivates viewers to click on and watch YouTube videos is scarce. This study investigates the implications of marketers' video optimization practices for video views on YouTube.Design/methodology/approachThe study employed a data set of videos (N = 4,398) gathered by scraping YouTube's trending list. Using a combination of text and sentiment analysis, the study measured four video optimization practices: information content of video titles, emotional intensity of video titles, information content of video descriptions and volume of video tags. It then analyzed the effect of these video optimization practices on video views.FindingsThe study finds that greater availability of information in video titles is negatively associated with video views, whereas intensity of negative emotional sentiment in video titles is positively associated with video views. Further, greater availability of information in video descriptions is positively associated with video views. Finally, an inverted U-shaped relationship is found between volume of video tags and video views. Up to 17 video tags can contribute to more video views; however, beyond 17 tags, the relationship turns negative.Originality/valueThis study investigates the effect of marketers' video optimization practices on video views. While extant studies mainly focus on viewers' post-view engagement behavior, such as liking, commenting on and sharing videos, this study examines video views. Similarly, extant studies investigate videos' internal content, while this study investigates elements of the video metadata.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/INTR-10-2019-0406</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8208-6922</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1066-2243 |
ispartof | Internet research, 2020-10, Vol.30 (6), p.1689-1707 |
issn | 1066-2243 2054-5657 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_INTR-10-2019-0406 |
source | Emerald A-Z Current Journals |
subjects | Advertising Advertising expenditures Algorithms Alliances Availability Customer feedback Customer relationship management Customers Data mining Descriptions Digital marketing Indexing Investigations Literature Reviews Marketing Mathematics Optimization Product reviews Social networks Tags User generated content Video Video Technology Viral marketing |
title | YouTube marketing: how marketers' video optimization practices influence video views |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T09%3A04%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=YouTube%20marketing:%20how%20marketers'%20video%20optimization%20practices%20influence%20video%20views&rft.jtitle=Internet%20research&rft.au=Tafesse,%20Wondwesen&rft.date=2020-10-26&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1689&rft.epage=1707&rft.pages=1689-1707&rft.issn=1066-2243&rft.eissn=2054-5657&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/INTR-10-2019-0406&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2453900912%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2453900912&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |