Managing multi-owned, mixed-use developments in the Netherlands: the opinion of professional managing agents
Purpose This paper analyses the management difficulties experienced in multi-owned, mixed-use developments and possible solutions, based on the opinions of professional management agencies in the Netherlands. Design/methodology/approach We performed a survey among professional management agencies th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of law in the built environment 2014-10, Vol.6 (3), p.271-285 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 285 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 271 |
container_title | International journal of law in the built environment |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Ploeger, Hendrik Groetelaers, Daniëlle |
description | Purpose
This paper analyses the management difficulties experienced in multi-owned, mixed-use developments and possible solutions, based on the opinions of professional management agencies in the Netherlands.
Design/methodology/approach
We performed a survey among professional management agencies that take care of the day-to-day management of many multi-owned, mixed-use developments. The survey focused on aspects such as the influence of the developer on the deed of division and the appointment of the professional manager, and the role of legal advisors.
Findings
The outcomes support the assumption that mixed-use developments have more problems, and problems of a different nature, than homogeneous complexes. We conclude that a custom-made deed of division, or at least one that is appropriate to the mixed-use situation, is preferable. The legal expert involved (a civil law notary) should therefore consult the owners and – if applicable – the professional management agency. They have the practical knowledge to identify management difficulties. Drawing up the deed of division should never be the final piece of the process, but it should be an analogous development to the design and development process. However, our hypothesis that developers should consult the notary during the planning phase of new projects was not confirmed by the survey.
Originality/value
Most legal research focuses on the law and the legality of instruments, sometimes including the practical implications by performing case law research. We stress the importance of including day-to-day practice and practitioners in legal research. Professional management agencies have the requisite knowledge – both practical and legal – of how the system of ‘apartment ownership’ works. This makes them a very useful source of information. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/IJLBE-07-2013-0028 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_IJLBE-07-2013-0028</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1800444183</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-fb4ffc411cc5b4f171d75bc1ceb718e6f36a7fcfecca1d0f32b794db1b6173e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc1OwzAQhCMEEqXwApwsceGAwVs7ccINqgJFBS5wthxnXVIlcYkTft4etwUkEBd7dzWzGu0XRYfATgFYeja9nV1OKJN0xIBTxkbpVjQAGScURJJt_9Qx2432vF8wlmSCZYOoutONnpfNnNR91ZXUvTVYnJC6fMeC9h5Jga9YuWWNTedJ2ZDuGck9hretdFP48_XALcumdA1xlixbZ9H70OmK1N_L9Xzl3492rK48Hnz9w-jpavI4vqGzh-vp-GJGDY-zjtpcWGsEgDFxKEFCIePcgMFcQoqJ5YmW1lg0RkPBLB_lMhNFDnkCkmPMh9HxZm8I89Kj71RdeoNVSIyu9wpSxoQQkPIgPfojXbi-DdmDKuEi3EnEaVCNNirTOu9btGrZlrVuPxQwtQKg1gAUk2oFQK0ABBNsTFhjq6vif88vaPwTvx6JqA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1634006458</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Managing multi-owned, mixed-use developments in the Netherlands: the opinion of professional managing agents</title><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Ploeger, Hendrik ; Groetelaers, Daniëlle</creator><creatorcontrib>Ploeger, Hendrik ; Groetelaers, Daniëlle</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
This paper analyses the management difficulties experienced in multi-owned, mixed-use developments and possible solutions, based on the opinions of professional management agencies in the Netherlands.
Design/methodology/approach
We performed a survey among professional management agencies that take care of the day-to-day management of many multi-owned, mixed-use developments. The survey focused on aspects such as the influence of the developer on the deed of division and the appointment of the professional manager, and the role of legal advisors.
Findings
The outcomes support the assumption that mixed-use developments have more problems, and problems of a different nature, than homogeneous complexes. We conclude that a custom-made deed of division, or at least one that is appropriate to the mixed-use situation, is preferable. The legal expert involved (a civil law notary) should therefore consult the owners and – if applicable – the professional management agency. They have the practical knowledge to identify management difficulties. Drawing up the deed of division should never be the final piece of the process, but it should be an analogous development to the design and development process. However, our hypothesis that developers should consult the notary during the planning phase of new projects was not confirmed by the survey.
Originality/value
Most legal research focuses on the law and the legality of instruments, sometimes including the practical implications by performing case law research. We stress the importance of including day-to-day practice and practitioners in legal research. Professional management agencies have the requisite knowledge – both practical and legal – of how the system of ‘apartment ownership’ works. This makes them a very useful source of information.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1756-1450</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2514-9407</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-1469</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2514-9415</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/IJLBE-07-2013-0028</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bingley: International Journal of Law in the Built Environment</publisher><subject>Apartments ; Associations ; Buildings ; Condominiums ; Consultancy services ; Deeds ; Design engineering ; Developers ; Division ; Households ; International law ; Land economics ; Laws ; Legal ; Management ; Mixed use developments ; Postwar reconstruction ; Property management ; Site planning ; Studies</subject><ispartof>International journal of law in the built environment, 2014-10, Vol.6 (3), p.271-285</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-fb4ffc411cc5b4f171d75bc1ceb718e6f36a7fcfecca1d0f32b794db1b6173e53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJLBE-07-2013-0028/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21674,27901,27902,53219</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ploeger, Hendrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groetelaers, Daniëlle</creatorcontrib><title>Managing multi-owned, mixed-use developments in the Netherlands: the opinion of professional managing agents</title><title>International journal of law in the built environment</title><description>Purpose
This paper analyses the management difficulties experienced in multi-owned, mixed-use developments and possible solutions, based on the opinions of professional management agencies in the Netherlands.
Design/methodology/approach
We performed a survey among professional management agencies that take care of the day-to-day management of many multi-owned, mixed-use developments. The survey focused on aspects such as the influence of the developer on the deed of division and the appointment of the professional manager, and the role of legal advisors.
Findings
The outcomes support the assumption that mixed-use developments have more problems, and problems of a different nature, than homogeneous complexes. We conclude that a custom-made deed of division, or at least one that is appropriate to the mixed-use situation, is preferable. The legal expert involved (a civil law notary) should therefore consult the owners and – if applicable – the professional management agency. They have the practical knowledge to identify management difficulties. Drawing up the deed of division should never be the final piece of the process, but it should be an analogous development to the design and development process. However, our hypothesis that developers should consult the notary during the planning phase of new projects was not confirmed by the survey.
Originality/value
Most legal research focuses on the law and the legality of instruments, sometimes including the practical implications by performing case law research. We stress the importance of including day-to-day practice and practitioners in legal research. Professional management agencies have the requisite knowledge – both practical and legal – of how the system of ‘apartment ownership’ works. This makes them a very useful source of information.</description><subject>Apartments</subject><subject>Associations</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Condominiums</subject><subject>Consultancy services</subject><subject>Deeds</subject><subject>Design engineering</subject><subject>Developers</subject><subject>Division</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>International law</subject><subject>Land economics</subject><subject>Laws</subject><subject>Legal</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Mixed use developments</subject><subject>Postwar reconstruction</subject><subject>Property management</subject><subject>Site planning</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1756-1450</issn><issn>2514-9407</issn><issn>1756-1469</issn><issn>2514-9415</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkc1OwzAQhCMEEqXwApwsceGAwVs7ccINqgJFBS5wthxnXVIlcYkTft4etwUkEBd7dzWzGu0XRYfATgFYeja9nV1OKJN0xIBTxkbpVjQAGScURJJt_9Qx2432vF8wlmSCZYOoutONnpfNnNR91ZXUvTVYnJC6fMeC9h5Jga9YuWWNTedJ2ZDuGck9hretdFP48_XALcumdA1xlixbZ9H70OmK1N_L9Xzl3492rK48Hnz9w-jpavI4vqGzh-vp-GJGDY-zjtpcWGsEgDFxKEFCIePcgMFcQoqJ5YmW1lg0RkPBLB_lMhNFDnkCkmPMh9HxZm8I89Kj71RdeoNVSIyu9wpSxoQQkPIgPfojXbi-DdmDKuEi3EnEaVCNNirTOu9btGrZlrVuPxQwtQKg1gAUk2oFQK0ABBNsTFhjq6vif88vaPwTvx6JqA</recordid><startdate>20141007</startdate><enddate>20141007</enddate><creator>Ploeger, Hendrik</creator><creator>Groetelaers, Daniëlle</creator><general>International Journal of Law in the Built Environment</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141007</creationdate><title>Managing multi-owned, mixed-use developments in the Netherlands: the opinion of professional managing agents</title><author>Ploeger, Hendrik ; Groetelaers, Daniëlle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-fb4ffc411cc5b4f171d75bc1ceb718e6f36a7fcfecca1d0f32b794db1b6173e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Apartments</topic><topic>Associations</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Condominiums</topic><topic>Consultancy services</topic><topic>Deeds</topic><topic>Design engineering</topic><topic>Developers</topic><topic>Division</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>International law</topic><topic>Land economics</topic><topic>Laws</topic><topic>Legal</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Mixed use developments</topic><topic>Postwar reconstruction</topic><topic>Property management</topic><topic>Site planning</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ploeger, Hendrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groetelaers, Daniëlle</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of law in the built environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ploeger, Hendrik</au><au>Groetelaers, Daniëlle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Managing multi-owned, mixed-use developments in the Netherlands: the opinion of professional managing agents</atitle><jtitle>International journal of law in the built environment</jtitle><date>2014-10-07</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>271</spage><epage>285</epage><pages>271-285</pages><issn>1756-1450</issn><issn>2514-9407</issn><eissn>1756-1469</eissn><eissn>2514-9415</eissn><abstract>Purpose
This paper analyses the management difficulties experienced in multi-owned, mixed-use developments and possible solutions, based on the opinions of professional management agencies in the Netherlands.
Design/methodology/approach
We performed a survey among professional management agencies that take care of the day-to-day management of many multi-owned, mixed-use developments. The survey focused on aspects such as the influence of the developer on the deed of division and the appointment of the professional manager, and the role of legal advisors.
Findings
The outcomes support the assumption that mixed-use developments have more problems, and problems of a different nature, than homogeneous complexes. We conclude that a custom-made deed of division, or at least one that is appropriate to the mixed-use situation, is preferable. The legal expert involved (a civil law notary) should therefore consult the owners and – if applicable – the professional management agency. They have the practical knowledge to identify management difficulties. Drawing up the deed of division should never be the final piece of the process, but it should be an analogous development to the design and development process. However, our hypothesis that developers should consult the notary during the planning phase of new projects was not confirmed by the survey.
Originality/value
Most legal research focuses on the law and the legality of instruments, sometimes including the practical implications by performing case law research. We stress the importance of including day-to-day practice and practitioners in legal research. Professional management agencies have the requisite knowledge – both practical and legal – of how the system of ‘apartment ownership’ works. This makes them a very useful source of information.</abstract><cop>Bingley</cop><pub>International Journal of Law in the Built Environment</pub><doi>10.1108/IJLBE-07-2013-0028</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1756-1450 |
ispartof | International journal of law in the built environment, 2014-10, Vol.6 (3), p.271-285 |
issn | 1756-1450 2514-9407 1756-1469 2514-9415 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_IJLBE-07-2013-0028 |
source | Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection |
subjects | Apartments Associations Buildings Condominiums Consultancy services Deeds Design engineering Developers Division Households International law Land economics Laws Legal Management Mixed use developments Postwar reconstruction Property management Site planning Studies |
title | Managing multi-owned, mixed-use developments in the Netherlands: the opinion of professional managing agents |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T00%3A43%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Managing%20multi-owned,%20mixed-use%20developments%20in%20the%20Netherlands:%20the%20opinion%20of%20professional%20managing%20agents&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20law%20in%20the%20built%20environment&rft.au=Ploeger,%20Hendrik&rft.date=2014-10-07&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=271&rft.epage=285&rft.pages=271-285&rft.issn=1756-1450&rft.eissn=1756-1469&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/IJLBE-07-2013-0028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E1800444183%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1634006458&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |