Criminal history and employment: an interdisciplinary literature synthesis
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present a systematic review of research conducted over the past ten years (2008–2018) that examines the relationship between criminal record and work in the USA. Furthermore, a research agenda is presented that may help to better inform future investigations o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 2019-06, Vol.38 (5), p.505-528 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 528 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 505 |
container_title | Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Griffith, Jakari N Rade, Candalyn B Anazodo, Kemi Salawu |
description | Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to present a systematic review of research conducted over the past ten years (2008–2018) that examines the relationship between criminal record and work in the USA. Furthermore, a research agenda is presented that may help to better inform future investigations of the relationships shared between these variables.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors review 58 peer-reviewed research articles identified in four electronic article databases: Business Source Premier, PsycINFO, ProQuest Sociology Collection and ProQuest Criminology Collection.
Findings
Of the 58 articles fitting the final inclusion criteria, 37 evaluated employee specific related outcomes, whereas 24 took the perspective of the employer (including some overlap). Studies employed a variety of methodologies and techniques, with qualitative interviews, archival data and audit methods as the most prevalent. Few studies examined the relationships between criminal record and work in ways that demonstrated improved employment outcomes for both employer and the employed together.
Originality/value
This is one of the first papers to synthesize interdisciplinary literature related to criminal record and employment, including an assessment of the varying methodological treatments and perspectives used in research studies to assess this relationship. The authors believe the findings from this research effort will provide much needed research direction for investigators seeking to make contributions to improving employment outcomes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/EDI-10-2018-0185 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_EDI-10-2018-0185</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2246058065</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-4580b00bed0a3bf1de201b9ba043bcb619ca5876d6632348f77bd68652c54fd93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM1LxDAQxYMouKx791jwHHfSfDT1JuuqKwte9FyaJmWz9MukPex_75QVQTAQMhPeG-b9CLllcM8Y6PX2aUcZ0BSYpnjlBVmkIIBmTGaXv7XIr8kqxiPg4ZxBphfkbRN867uySQ4-jn04JWVnE9cOTX9qXTc-YJ_4bnTB-lj5oUEtihqPP-U4BZfEUzceXPTxhlzVZRPd6uddks_n7cfmle7fX3abxz2tOGMjFVKDATDOQslNzazDtU1uShDcVEaxvCqlzpRViqdc6DrLjFVaybSSorY5X5K789wh9F-Ti2Nx7KeAEWKRpkIBzlcSVXBWVaGPMbi6GDAp7l4wKGZoBUKb6xlaMUNDy_pscS2Ga-x_jj-Y-TepqG1u</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2246058065</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Criminal history and employment: an interdisciplinary literature synthesis</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Griffith, Jakari N ; Rade, Candalyn B ; Anazodo, Kemi Salawu</creator><creatorcontrib>Griffith, Jakari N ; Rade, Candalyn B ; Anazodo, Kemi Salawu</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to present a systematic review of research conducted over the past ten years (2008–2018) that examines the relationship between criminal record and work in the USA. Furthermore, a research agenda is presented that may help to better inform future investigations of the relationships shared between these variables.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors review 58 peer-reviewed research articles identified in four electronic article databases: Business Source Premier, PsycINFO, ProQuest Sociology Collection and ProQuest Criminology Collection.
Findings
Of the 58 articles fitting the final inclusion criteria, 37 evaluated employee specific related outcomes, whereas 24 took the perspective of the employer (including some overlap). Studies employed a variety of methodologies and techniques, with qualitative interviews, archival data and audit methods as the most prevalent. Few studies examined the relationships between criminal record and work in ways that demonstrated improved employment outcomes for both employer and the employed together.
Originality/value
This is one of the first papers to synthesize interdisciplinary literature related to criminal record and employment, including an assessment of the varying methodological treatments and perspectives used in research studies to assess this relationship. The authors believe the findings from this research effort will provide much needed research direction for investigators seeking to make contributions to improving employment outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2040-7149</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2040-7157</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/EDI-10-2018-0185</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Birmingham: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Criminal records ; Criminology ; Discipline ; Employees ; Employers ; Employment ; Employment discrimination ; Interdisciplinary aspects ; Keywords ; Labor law ; Recidivism ; Reference services ; Research methodology ; Sociology ; Systematic review ; Treatment methods</subject><ispartof>Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 2019-06, Vol.38 (5), p.505-528</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-4580b00bed0a3bf1de201b9ba043bcb619ca5876d6632348f77bd68652c54fd93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-4580b00bed0a3bf1de201b9ba043bcb619ca5876d6632348f77bd68652c54fd93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/EDI-10-2018-0185/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,11614,21674,27321,27901,27902,33751,52664,53219</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Griffith, Jakari N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rade, Candalyn B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anazodo, Kemi Salawu</creatorcontrib><title>Criminal history and employment: an interdisciplinary literature synthesis</title><title>Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal</title><description>Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to present a systematic review of research conducted over the past ten years (2008–2018) that examines the relationship between criminal record and work in the USA. Furthermore, a research agenda is presented that may help to better inform future investigations of the relationships shared between these variables.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors review 58 peer-reviewed research articles identified in four electronic article databases: Business Source Premier, PsycINFO, ProQuest Sociology Collection and ProQuest Criminology Collection.
Findings
Of the 58 articles fitting the final inclusion criteria, 37 evaluated employee specific related outcomes, whereas 24 took the perspective of the employer (including some overlap). Studies employed a variety of methodologies and techniques, with qualitative interviews, archival data and audit methods as the most prevalent. Few studies examined the relationships between criminal record and work in ways that demonstrated improved employment outcomes for both employer and the employed together.
Originality/value
This is one of the first papers to synthesize interdisciplinary literature related to criminal record and employment, including an assessment of the varying methodological treatments and perspectives used in research studies to assess this relationship. The authors believe the findings from this research effort will provide much needed research direction for investigators seeking to make contributions to improving employment outcomes.</description><subject>Criminal records</subject><subject>Criminology</subject><subject>Discipline</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Employers</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Employment discrimination</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary aspects</subject><subject>Keywords</subject><subject>Labor law</subject><subject>Recidivism</subject><subject>Reference services</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Treatment methods</subject><issn>2040-7149</issn><issn>2040-7157</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>LD-</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>QXPDG</sourceid><recordid>eNptkM1LxDAQxYMouKx791jwHHfSfDT1JuuqKwte9FyaJmWz9MukPex_75QVQTAQMhPeG-b9CLllcM8Y6PX2aUcZ0BSYpnjlBVmkIIBmTGaXv7XIr8kqxiPg4ZxBphfkbRN867uySQ4-jn04JWVnE9cOTX9qXTc-YJ_4bnTB-lj5oUEtihqPP-U4BZfEUzceXPTxhlzVZRPd6uddks_n7cfmle7fX3abxz2tOGMjFVKDATDOQslNzazDtU1uShDcVEaxvCqlzpRViqdc6DrLjFVaybSSorY5X5K789wh9F-Ti2Nx7KeAEWKRpkIBzlcSVXBWVaGPMbi6GDAp7l4wKGZoBUKb6xlaMUNDy_pscS2Ga-x_jj-Y-TepqG1u</recordid><startdate>20190625</startdate><enddate>20190625</enddate><creator>Griffith, Jakari N</creator><creator>Rade, Candalyn B</creator><creator>Anazodo, Kemi Salawu</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7R6</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>LD-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGEN</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190625</creationdate><title>Criminal history and employment: an interdisciplinary literature synthesis</title><author>Griffith, Jakari N ; Rade, Candalyn B ; Anazodo, Kemi Salawu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-4580b00bed0a3bf1de201b9ba043bcb619ca5876d6632348f77bd68652c54fd93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Criminal records</topic><topic>Criminology</topic><topic>Discipline</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Employers</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Employment discrimination</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary aspects</topic><topic>Keywords</topic><topic>Labor law</topic><topic>Recidivism</topic><topic>Reference services</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Treatment methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Griffith, Jakari N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rade, Candalyn B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anazodo, Kemi Salawu</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>GenderWatch</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>Ethnic NewsWatch</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest Women's & Gender Studies</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Griffith, Jakari N</au><au>Rade, Candalyn B</au><au>Anazodo, Kemi Salawu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Criminal history and employment: an interdisciplinary literature synthesis</atitle><jtitle>Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal</jtitle><date>2019-06-25</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>505</spage><epage>528</epage><pages>505-528</pages><issn>2040-7149</issn><eissn>2040-7157</eissn><abstract>Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to present a systematic review of research conducted over the past ten years (2008–2018) that examines the relationship between criminal record and work in the USA. Furthermore, a research agenda is presented that may help to better inform future investigations of the relationships shared between these variables.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors review 58 peer-reviewed research articles identified in four electronic article databases: Business Source Premier, PsycINFO, ProQuest Sociology Collection and ProQuest Criminology Collection.
Findings
Of the 58 articles fitting the final inclusion criteria, 37 evaluated employee specific related outcomes, whereas 24 took the perspective of the employer (including some overlap). Studies employed a variety of methodologies and techniques, with qualitative interviews, archival data and audit methods as the most prevalent. Few studies examined the relationships between criminal record and work in ways that demonstrated improved employment outcomes for both employer and the employed together.
Originality/value
This is one of the first papers to synthesize interdisciplinary literature related to criminal record and employment, including an assessment of the varying methodological treatments and perspectives used in research studies to assess this relationship. The authors believe the findings from this research effort will provide much needed research direction for investigators seeking to make contributions to improving employment outcomes.</abstract><cop>Birmingham</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/EDI-10-2018-0185</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2040-7149 |
ispartof | Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 2019-06, Vol.38 (5), p.505-528 |
issn | 2040-7149 2040-7157 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_EDI-10-2018-0185 |
source | Emerald Journals; Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Criminal records Criminology Discipline Employees Employers Employment Employment discrimination Interdisciplinary aspects Keywords Labor law Recidivism Reference services Research methodology Sociology Systematic review Treatment methods |
title | Criminal history and employment: an interdisciplinary literature synthesis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T06%3A36%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Criminal%20history%20and%20employment:%20an%20interdisciplinary%20literature%20synthesis&rft.jtitle=Equality,%20Diversity%20and%20Inclusion:%20An%20International%20Journal&rft.au=Griffith,%20Jakari%20N&rft.date=2019-06-25&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=505&rft.epage=528&rft.pages=505-528&rft.issn=2040-7149&rft.eissn=2040-7157&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/EDI-10-2018-0185&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2246058065%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2246058065&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |