Sharing #MeToo on Twitter: incidents, coping responses, and social reactions

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine 2,102 #MeToo tweets and focuses on the content of the tweets and social reactions to these tweets. For a subsample of 912 tweets that included disclosures of sexual assault or harassment, the incident type and context, along with coping were also exami...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 2020-01, Vol.39 (1), p.87-100
Hauptverfasser: Schneider, Kimberly T, Carpenter, Nathan J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 100
container_issue 1
container_start_page 87
container_title Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal
container_volume 39
creator Schneider, Kimberly T
Carpenter, Nathan J
description Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine 2,102 #MeToo tweets and focuses on the content of the tweets and social reactions to these tweets. For a subsample of 912 tweets that included disclosures of sexual assault or harassment, the incident type and context, along with coping were also examined. Design/methodology/approach #MeToo tweets were retrieved from a 24 h time period immediately after the initial tweet prompting responses. Both sentiment analysis and content and context analyses were performed. Findings Although the overall sentiment of tweets indicated a negative tone, the majority of positive social reactions indicated validation and belief of survivors, offered emotional support and called for social change. Targets who disclosed generally described workplace harassment and assertive coping responses. Research limitations/implications Sentiment analysis can be limited given a lack of context. Not all targets using #MeToo shared details of their harassment or assault; those who did reported using more assertive coping responses than traditional samples of survivors. Practical implications Social media platforms offer unique opportunities for targets to share personal stories and receive emotional and social support they may not have access in-person. Social implications #MeToo provided targets with a groundswell of social and emotional support, along with a less frequent amount of backlash against the movement. Originality/value A multimethod approach was used with both sentiment analysis and text coding to examine #MeToo, allowing for a description of types of incidents shared, coping strategies and social reactions.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/EDI-09-2018-0161
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_EDI-09-2018-0161</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2534480162</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-b7a986af13777e37d43b7596d6ecf8d62650d4a0e8e2f95d9f9c0844dce28fa03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkEFLAzEQhYMoWGrvHhd6de1kk90k3qRWLVQ8WM8hTWZ1S7tZky3ivzdLRRCcywyP9-bBR8glhWtKQc4Wd8scVF4AlTnQip6QUQEcckFLcfp7c3VOJjFuIQ1jFIQckdXLuwlN-5ZNn3DtfebbbP3Z9D2Gm6xpbeOw7eNVZn03mALGzrcRk2Jal0VvG7NLqrF9k_QLclabXcTJzx6T1_vFev6Yr54flvPbVW4ZpX2-EUbJytSUCSGQCcfZRpSqchXaWrqqqEpw3ABKLGpVOlUrC5JzZ7GQtQE2JtPj3y74jwPGXm_9IbSpUhcl41wmBkVywdFlg48xYK270OxN-NIU9IBNJ2walB6w6QFbisyOEdxjMDv3X-IPaPYN6ctsxQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2534480162</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sharing #MeToo on Twitter: incidents, coping responses, and social reactions</title><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><creator>Schneider, Kimberly T ; Carpenter, Nathan J</creator><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Kimberly T ; Carpenter, Nathan J</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine 2,102 #MeToo tweets and focuses on the content of the tweets and social reactions to these tweets. For a subsample of 912 tweets that included disclosures of sexual assault or harassment, the incident type and context, along with coping were also examined. Design/methodology/approach #MeToo tweets were retrieved from a 24 h time period immediately after the initial tweet prompting responses. Both sentiment analysis and content and context analyses were performed. Findings Although the overall sentiment of tweets indicated a negative tone, the majority of positive social reactions indicated validation and belief of survivors, offered emotional support and called for social change. Targets who disclosed generally described workplace harassment and assertive coping responses. Research limitations/implications Sentiment analysis can be limited given a lack of context. Not all targets using #MeToo shared details of their harassment or assault; those who did reported using more assertive coping responses than traditional samples of survivors. Practical implications Social media platforms offer unique opportunities for targets to share personal stories and receive emotional and social support they may not have access in-person. Social implications #MeToo provided targets with a groundswell of social and emotional support, along with a less frequent amount of backlash against the movement. Originality/value A multimethod approach was used with both sentiment analysis and text coding to examine #MeToo, allowing for a description of types of incidents shared, coping strategies and social reactions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2040-7149</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2040-7157</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/EDI-09-2018-0161</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Birmingham: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Assaults ; Assertiveness ; Celebrities ; Contextual analysis ; Coping ; Coping strategies ; Disclosure ; Emotional support ; Emotions ; Harassment ; Misogyny ; Sentiment analysis ; Sex crimes ; Sexual assault ; Sexual harassment ; Social activism ; Social change ; Social media ; Social networks ; Social response ; Social support ; Survivor ; Validity ; Workplaces</subject><ispartof>Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 2020-01, Vol.39 (1), p.87-100</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-b7a986af13777e37d43b7596d6ecf8d62650d4a0e8e2f95d9f9c0844dce28fa03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-b7a986af13777e37d43b7596d6ecf8d62650d4a0e8e2f95d9f9c0844dce28fa03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/EDI-09-2018-0161/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,11614,21674,27321,27901,27902,33751,52664,53219</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Kimberly T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Nathan J</creatorcontrib><title>Sharing #MeToo on Twitter: incidents, coping responses, and social reactions</title><title>Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal</title><description>Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine 2,102 #MeToo tweets and focuses on the content of the tweets and social reactions to these tweets. For a subsample of 912 tweets that included disclosures of sexual assault or harassment, the incident type and context, along with coping were also examined. Design/methodology/approach #MeToo tweets were retrieved from a 24 h time period immediately after the initial tweet prompting responses. Both sentiment analysis and content and context analyses were performed. Findings Although the overall sentiment of tweets indicated a negative tone, the majority of positive social reactions indicated validation and belief of survivors, offered emotional support and called for social change. Targets who disclosed generally described workplace harassment and assertive coping responses. Research limitations/implications Sentiment analysis can be limited given a lack of context. Not all targets using #MeToo shared details of their harassment or assault; those who did reported using more assertive coping responses than traditional samples of survivors. Practical implications Social media platforms offer unique opportunities for targets to share personal stories and receive emotional and social support they may not have access in-person. Social implications #MeToo provided targets with a groundswell of social and emotional support, along with a less frequent amount of backlash against the movement. Originality/value A multimethod approach was used with both sentiment analysis and text coding to examine #MeToo, allowing for a description of types of incidents shared, coping strategies and social reactions.</description><subject>Assaults</subject><subject>Assertiveness</subject><subject>Celebrities</subject><subject>Contextual analysis</subject><subject>Coping</subject><subject>Coping strategies</subject><subject>Disclosure</subject><subject>Emotional support</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Harassment</subject><subject>Misogyny</subject><subject>Sentiment analysis</subject><subject>Sex crimes</subject><subject>Sexual assault</subject><subject>Sexual harassment</subject><subject>Social activism</subject><subject>Social change</subject><subject>Social media</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social response</subject><subject>Social support</subject><subject>Survivor</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Workplaces</subject><issn>2040-7149</issn><issn>2040-7157</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>LD-</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>QXPDG</sourceid><recordid>eNptkEFLAzEQhYMoWGrvHhd6de1kk90k3qRWLVQ8WM8hTWZ1S7tZky3ivzdLRRCcywyP9-bBR8glhWtKQc4Wd8scVF4AlTnQip6QUQEcckFLcfp7c3VOJjFuIQ1jFIQckdXLuwlN-5ZNn3DtfebbbP3Z9D2Gm6xpbeOw7eNVZn03mALGzrcRk2Jal0VvG7NLqrF9k_QLclabXcTJzx6T1_vFev6Yr54flvPbVW4ZpX2-EUbJytSUCSGQCcfZRpSqchXaWrqqqEpw3ABKLGpVOlUrC5JzZ7GQtQE2JtPj3y74jwPGXm_9IbSpUhcl41wmBkVywdFlg48xYK270OxN-NIU9IBNJ2walB6w6QFbisyOEdxjMDv3X-IPaPYN6ctsxQ</recordid><startdate>20200108</startdate><enddate>20200108</enddate><creator>Schneider, Kimberly T</creator><creator>Carpenter, Nathan J</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7R6</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>LD-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGEN</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200108</creationdate><title>Sharing #MeToo on Twitter: incidents, coping responses, and social reactions</title><author>Schneider, Kimberly T ; Carpenter, Nathan J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-b7a986af13777e37d43b7596d6ecf8d62650d4a0e8e2f95d9f9c0844dce28fa03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Assaults</topic><topic>Assertiveness</topic><topic>Celebrities</topic><topic>Contextual analysis</topic><topic>Coping</topic><topic>Coping strategies</topic><topic>Disclosure</topic><topic>Emotional support</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Harassment</topic><topic>Misogyny</topic><topic>Sentiment analysis</topic><topic>Sex crimes</topic><topic>Sexual assault</topic><topic>Sexual harassment</topic><topic>Social activism</topic><topic>Social change</topic><topic>Social media</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social response</topic><topic>Social support</topic><topic>Survivor</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Workplaces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Kimberly T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Nathan J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>GenderWatch</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>Ethnic NewsWatch</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest Women's &amp; Gender Studies</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schneider, Kimberly T</au><au>Carpenter, Nathan J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sharing #MeToo on Twitter: incidents, coping responses, and social reactions</atitle><jtitle>Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal</jtitle><date>2020-01-08</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>87</spage><epage>100</epage><pages>87-100</pages><issn>2040-7149</issn><eissn>2040-7157</eissn><abstract>Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine 2,102 #MeToo tweets and focuses on the content of the tweets and social reactions to these tweets. For a subsample of 912 tweets that included disclosures of sexual assault or harassment, the incident type and context, along with coping were also examined. Design/methodology/approach #MeToo tweets were retrieved from a 24 h time period immediately after the initial tweet prompting responses. Both sentiment analysis and content and context analyses were performed. Findings Although the overall sentiment of tweets indicated a negative tone, the majority of positive social reactions indicated validation and belief of survivors, offered emotional support and called for social change. Targets who disclosed generally described workplace harassment and assertive coping responses. Research limitations/implications Sentiment analysis can be limited given a lack of context. Not all targets using #MeToo shared details of their harassment or assault; those who did reported using more assertive coping responses than traditional samples of survivors. Practical implications Social media platforms offer unique opportunities for targets to share personal stories and receive emotional and social support they may not have access in-person. Social implications #MeToo provided targets with a groundswell of social and emotional support, along with a less frequent amount of backlash against the movement. Originality/value A multimethod approach was used with both sentiment analysis and text coding to examine #MeToo, allowing for a description of types of incidents shared, coping strategies and social reactions.</abstract><cop>Birmingham</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/EDI-09-2018-0161</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2040-7149
ispartof Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 2020-01, Vol.39 (1), p.87-100
issn 2040-7149
2040-7157
language eng
recordid cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_EDI-09-2018-0161
source Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection; Sociological Abstracts; Emerald A-Z Current Journals
subjects Assaults
Assertiveness
Celebrities
Contextual analysis
Coping
Coping strategies
Disclosure
Emotional support
Emotions
Harassment
Misogyny
Sentiment analysis
Sex crimes
Sexual assault
Sexual harassment
Social activism
Social change
Social media
Social networks
Social response
Social support
Survivor
Validity
Workplaces
title Sharing #MeToo on Twitter: incidents, coping responses, and social reactions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T17%3A25%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sharing%20%23MeToo%20on%20Twitter:%20incidents,%20coping%20responses,%20and%20social%20reactions&rft.jtitle=Equality,%20Diversity%20and%20Inclusion:%20An%20International%20Journal&rft.au=Schneider,%20Kimberly%20T&rft.date=2020-01-08&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=87&rft.epage=100&rft.pages=87-100&rft.issn=2040-7149&rft.eissn=2040-7157&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/EDI-09-2018-0161&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2534480162%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2534480162&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true