Crisis management in high-reliability organizations: lessons from Brazilian air disasters
PurposeThe focus of this study was to analyze crisis management in a context of high-reliability organizations (HRO) evidenced in two cases of Brazilian air disasters. Aspects of human and technological natures were examined, addressing the complex sociotechnical system.Design/methodology/approachTh...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Disaster prevention and management 2021-03, Vol.30 (2), p.209-224 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 224 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 209 |
| container_title | Disaster prevention and management |
| container_volume | 30 |
| creator | Meyer Jr, Victor Cunha, Miguel Piña e Mamédio, Diórgenes Falcão Nogueira, Danillo Prado |
| description | PurposeThe focus of this study was to analyze crisis management in a context of high-reliability organizations (HRO) evidenced in two cases of Brazilian air disasters. Aspects of human and technological natures were examined, addressing the complex sociotechnical system.Design/methodology/approachThis in-depth case study addressed the two most serious air disasters on Brazilian territory. The first case involved a midair collision between Gol Flight 1907 and the Legacy jet. In the second case, TAM flight 3054 had difficulty braking when landing at the airport and crashed into a building. Data were collected from official disaster documents.FindingsThe results revealed that the management and operational activities aimed to maintain the necessary conditions that prioritize a high level of reliability. High reliability mainly involves concern over failure, reluctance to accept simplified interpretations, sensitivity to operations, commitment to resilience and detailed structure specifications.Practical implicationsThe implications are based on alerting highly reliable organizations, emphasizing the focus on managing more reliably, resiliently and conscientiously. Changes will be required in the operations of organizations seeking to learn to manage unexpected events and respond quickly to continually improve the responsiveness of their services.Originality/valueIn the perspective of an intrinsic case study for crisis management in a context of HRO and disaster risk management, the originality of this study lies in its examination of the paradoxical nature of control within the systems of dangerous operations in complex organizations, as well as their contradictions in a high-reliability system. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1108/DPM-08-2019-0245 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_DPM-08-2019-0245</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2534512025</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-5e020ca4bd5aeafffaddbe21fa4b453fe253ff755ae890b082ad869cda7649253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkL1PwzAQxS0EEqWwM1piNj07cZqwQfmUimCAgcm6xHbrKnHATof2r8elLEgsd6d7791JP0LOOVxyDuXk9vWZQckE8IqByOUBGfGpLFnBAQ7JCKpCskwW4picxLgCgILzakQ-ZsFFF2mHHhemM36gztOlWyxZMK3D2rVu2NA-LNC7LQ6u9_GKtibGNFAb-o7eBNwmF3qKLlDtIsbBhHhKjiy20Zz99jF5v797mz2y-cvD0-x6zppMZgOTBgQ0mNdaokFrLWpdG8FtWuUys0akYqcyqWUFNZQCdVlUjcZpkVdJHJOL_d3P0H-tTRzUql8Hn16qpOaSC_hxwd7VhD7GYKz6DK7DsFEc1A6gSgBVajuAagcwRSb7SMISsNX_Jf4gz74BUotzjg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2534512025</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Crisis management in high-reliability organizations: lessons from Brazilian air disasters</title><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Meyer Jr, Victor ; Cunha, Miguel Piña e ; Mamédio, Diórgenes Falcão ; Nogueira, Danillo Prado</creator><creatorcontrib>Meyer Jr, Victor ; Cunha, Miguel Piña e ; Mamédio, Diórgenes Falcão ; Nogueira, Danillo Prado</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeThe focus of this study was to analyze crisis management in a context of high-reliability organizations (HRO) evidenced in two cases of Brazilian air disasters. Aspects of human and technological natures were examined, addressing the complex sociotechnical system.Design/methodology/approachThis in-depth case study addressed the two most serious air disasters on Brazilian territory. The first case involved a midair collision between Gol Flight 1907 and the Legacy jet. In the second case, TAM flight 3054 had difficulty braking when landing at the airport and crashed into a building. Data were collected from official disaster documents.FindingsThe results revealed that the management and operational activities aimed to maintain the necessary conditions that prioritize a high level of reliability. High reliability mainly involves concern over failure, reluctance to accept simplified interpretations, sensitivity to operations, commitment to resilience and detailed structure specifications.Practical implicationsThe implications are based on alerting highly reliable organizations, emphasizing the focus on managing more reliably, resiliently and conscientiously. Changes will be required in the operations of organizations seeking to learn to manage unexpected events and respond quickly to continually improve the responsiveness of their services.Originality/valueIn the perspective of an intrinsic case study for crisis management in a context of HRO and disaster risk management, the originality of this study lies in its examination of the paradoxical nature of control within the systems of dangerous operations in complex organizations, as well as their contradictions in a high-reliability system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0965-3562</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-6100</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/DPM-08-2019-0245</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Air ; Airlines ; Airports ; Aviation ; Braking ; Case studies ; Context ; Crises ; Disaster management ; Disaster risk ; Disasters ; Emergency preparedness ; Failure ; Flight ; Human error ; Landing behavior ; Management of crises ; Midair collisions ; Organizations ; Reliability ; Reliability analysis ; Reliability aspects ; Risk management</subject><ispartof>Disaster prevention and management, 2021-03, Vol.30 (2), p.209-224</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-5e020ca4bd5aeafffaddbe21fa4b453fe253ff755ae890b082ad869cda7649253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-5e020ca4bd5aeafffaddbe21fa4b453fe253ff755ae890b082ad869cda7649253</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3696-0743</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/DPM-08-2019-0245/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,967,11635,21695,27924,27925,52689,53244</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meyer Jr, Victor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunha, Miguel Piña e</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mamédio, Diórgenes Falcão</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nogueira, Danillo Prado</creatorcontrib><title>Crisis management in high-reliability organizations: lessons from Brazilian air disasters</title><title>Disaster prevention and management</title><description>PurposeThe focus of this study was to analyze crisis management in a context of high-reliability organizations (HRO) evidenced in two cases of Brazilian air disasters. Aspects of human and technological natures were examined, addressing the complex sociotechnical system.Design/methodology/approachThis in-depth case study addressed the two most serious air disasters on Brazilian territory. The first case involved a midair collision between Gol Flight 1907 and the Legacy jet. In the second case, TAM flight 3054 had difficulty braking when landing at the airport and crashed into a building. Data were collected from official disaster documents.FindingsThe results revealed that the management and operational activities aimed to maintain the necessary conditions that prioritize a high level of reliability. High reliability mainly involves concern over failure, reluctance to accept simplified interpretations, sensitivity to operations, commitment to resilience and detailed structure specifications.Practical implicationsThe implications are based on alerting highly reliable organizations, emphasizing the focus on managing more reliably, resiliently and conscientiously. Changes will be required in the operations of organizations seeking to learn to manage unexpected events and respond quickly to continually improve the responsiveness of their services.Originality/valueIn the perspective of an intrinsic case study for crisis management in a context of HRO and disaster risk management, the originality of this study lies in its examination of the paradoxical nature of control within the systems of dangerous operations in complex organizations, as well as their contradictions in a high-reliability system.</description><subject>Air</subject><subject>Airlines</subject><subject>Airports</subject><subject>Aviation</subject><subject>Braking</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Context</subject><subject>Crises</subject><subject>Disaster management</subject><subject>Disaster risk</subject><subject>Disasters</subject><subject>Emergency preparedness</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Flight</subject><subject>Human error</subject><subject>Landing behavior</subject><subject>Management of crises</subject><subject>Midair collisions</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Reliability aspects</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><issn>0965-3562</issn><issn>1758-6100</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkL1PwzAQxS0EEqWwM1piNj07cZqwQfmUimCAgcm6xHbrKnHATof2r8elLEgsd6d7791JP0LOOVxyDuXk9vWZQckE8IqByOUBGfGpLFnBAQ7JCKpCskwW4picxLgCgILzakQ-ZsFFF2mHHhemM36gztOlWyxZMK3D2rVu2NA-LNC7LQ6u9_GKtibGNFAb-o7eBNwmF3qKLlDtIsbBhHhKjiy20Zz99jF5v797mz2y-cvD0-x6zppMZgOTBgQ0mNdaokFrLWpdG8FtWuUys0akYqcyqWUFNZQCdVlUjcZpkVdJHJOL_d3P0H-tTRzUql8Hn16qpOaSC_hxwd7VhD7GYKz6DK7DsFEc1A6gSgBVajuAagcwRSb7SMISsNX_Jf4gz74BUotzjg</recordid><startdate>20210315</startdate><enddate>20210315</enddate><creator>Meyer Jr, Victor</creator><creator>Cunha, Miguel Piña e</creator><creator>Mamédio, Diórgenes Falcão</creator><creator>Nogueira, Danillo Prado</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3696-0743</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210315</creationdate><title>Crisis management in high-reliability organizations: lessons from Brazilian air disasters</title><author>Meyer Jr, Victor ; Cunha, Miguel Piña e ; Mamédio, Diórgenes Falcão ; Nogueira, Danillo Prado</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-5e020ca4bd5aeafffaddbe21fa4b453fe253ff755ae890b082ad869cda7649253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Air</topic><topic>Airlines</topic><topic>Airports</topic><topic>Aviation</topic><topic>Braking</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Context</topic><topic>Crises</topic><topic>Disaster management</topic><topic>Disaster risk</topic><topic>Disasters</topic><topic>Emergency preparedness</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Flight</topic><topic>Human error</topic><topic>Landing behavior</topic><topic>Management of crises</topic><topic>Midair collisions</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Reliability aspects</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meyer Jr, Victor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunha, Miguel Piña e</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mamédio, Diórgenes Falcão</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nogueira, Danillo Prado</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Disaster prevention and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meyer Jr, Victor</au><au>Cunha, Miguel Piña e</au><au>Mamédio, Diórgenes Falcão</au><au>Nogueira, Danillo Prado</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Crisis management in high-reliability organizations: lessons from Brazilian air disasters</atitle><jtitle>Disaster prevention and management</jtitle><date>2021-03-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>209</spage><epage>224</epage><pages>209-224</pages><issn>0965-3562</issn><eissn>1758-6100</eissn><abstract>PurposeThe focus of this study was to analyze crisis management in a context of high-reliability organizations (HRO) evidenced in two cases of Brazilian air disasters. Aspects of human and technological natures were examined, addressing the complex sociotechnical system.Design/methodology/approachThis in-depth case study addressed the two most serious air disasters on Brazilian territory. The first case involved a midair collision between Gol Flight 1907 and the Legacy jet. In the second case, TAM flight 3054 had difficulty braking when landing at the airport and crashed into a building. Data were collected from official disaster documents.FindingsThe results revealed that the management and operational activities aimed to maintain the necessary conditions that prioritize a high level of reliability. High reliability mainly involves concern over failure, reluctance to accept simplified interpretations, sensitivity to operations, commitment to resilience and detailed structure specifications.Practical implicationsThe implications are based on alerting highly reliable organizations, emphasizing the focus on managing more reliably, resiliently and conscientiously. Changes will be required in the operations of organizations seeking to learn to manage unexpected events and respond quickly to continually improve the responsiveness of their services.Originality/valueIn the perspective of an intrinsic case study for crisis management in a context of HRO and disaster risk management, the originality of this study lies in its examination of the paradoxical nature of control within the systems of dangerous operations in complex organizations, as well as their contradictions in a high-reliability system.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/DPM-08-2019-0245</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3696-0743</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0965-3562 |
| ispartof | Disaster prevention and management, 2021-03, Vol.30 (2), p.209-224 |
| issn | 0965-3562 1758-6100 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_DPM-08-2019-0245 |
| source | Emerald A-Z Current Journals; Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection |
| subjects | Air Airlines Airports Aviation Braking Case studies Context Crises Disaster management Disaster risk Disasters Emergency preparedness Failure Flight Human error Landing behavior Management of crises Midair collisions Organizations Reliability Reliability analysis Reliability aspects Risk management |
| title | Crisis management in high-reliability organizations: lessons from Brazilian air disasters |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T06%3A10%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Crisis%20management%20in%20high-reliability%20organizations:%20lessons%20from%20Brazilian%20air%20disasters&rft.jtitle=Disaster%20prevention%20and%20management&rft.au=Meyer%20Jr,%20Victor&rft.date=2021-03-15&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=209&rft.epage=224&rft.pages=209-224&rft.issn=0965-3562&rft.eissn=1758-6100&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/DPM-08-2019-0245&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2534512025%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2534512025&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |