Catastrophe risk, reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer solutions: a review

PurposeCatastrophe (CAT) events associated with natural catastrophes and man-made disasters cause profound impacts on the insurance industry. This research thus reviews the impact of CAT risk on the insurance industry and how traditional reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer instruments are used...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:China finance review international 2021-10, Vol.11 (4), p.449-473
Hauptverfasser: Zhao, Yang, Lee, Jin-Ping, Yu, Min-Teh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 473
container_issue 4
container_start_page 449
container_title China finance review international
container_volume 11
creator Zhao, Yang
Lee, Jin-Ping
Yu, Min-Teh
description PurposeCatastrophe (CAT) events associated with natural catastrophes and man-made disasters cause profound impacts on the insurance industry. This research thus reviews the impact of CAT risk on the insurance industry and how traditional reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer instruments are used for managing CAT risk.Design/methodology/approachThis research reviews the impact of CAT risk on the insurance industry and how traditional reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer instruments are used for managing CAT risk. Apart from many negative influences, CAT events can increase the net revenue of the insurance industry around CAT events and improve insurance demand over the post-CAT periods. The underwriting cycle of reinsurance causes inefficiencies in transferring CAT risks. Securitized risk-transfer instruments resolve some inefficiencies of the reinsurance market, but are subject to moral hazard, basis risk, credit risk, regulatory uncertainty, etc. The authors introduce some popular securitized solutions and use Merton's structural framework to demonstrate how to value these CAT-linked securities. The hybrid solutions by combining reinsurance with securitized CAT instruments are expected to offer promising applications for CAT risk management.FindingsThe authors introduce some popular securitized solutions and use Merton's structural framework to demonstrate how to value these CAT-linked securities. The hybrid solutions by combining reinsurance with securitized CAT instruments are expected to offer promising applications for CAT risk management.Originality/valueThis research reviews a broad array of impacts of CAT risks on the (re)insurance industry. CAT events challenge (re)insurance capacity and influence insurers' supply decisions and reconstruction costs in the aftermath of catastrophes. While losses from natural catastrophes are the primary threat to property–casualty insurers, the mortality risk posed by influenza pandemics is a leading CAT risk for life insurers. At the same time, natural catastrophes and man-made disasters cause distinct impacts on (re)insures. Man-made disasters can increase the correlation between insurance stocks and the overall market, and natural catastrophes reduce the above correlation. It should be noted that huge CAT losses can also improve (re)insurance demand during the postevent period and thus bring long-term effects to the (re)insurance industry.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/CFRI-06-2021-0120
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_CFRI-06-2021-0120</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2583301794</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-cdbfcdc824e5096032fb0035fb8934a52b485eb976ca9e330fb556dffa7011633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1Lw0AQhhdRsNT-AG8Br67OfiVZbxJsLRQKoudls5nF1Dapu4miv97E6kFwLjMw7zMDDyHnDK4Yg_y6mD8sKaSUA2cUGIcjMuEgJWUS2PHvLHR-SmYxbmCoXGVa6wlZF7azsQvt_hmTUMeXyyRg3cQ-2MZhYpsqiej6UHf1J1bfCdoNu-gxJLHd9l3dNvEmsQP2VuP7GTnxdhtx9tOn5Gl-91jc09V6sSxuV9QJmXXUVaV3lcu5RAU6BcF9CSCUL3MtpFW8lLnCUmepsxqFAF8qlVbe2wwYS4WYkovD3X1oX3uMndm0fWiGl4arfABYpuWQYoeUC22MAb3Zh3pnw4dhYEZ1ZlRnIDWjOjOqGxg4MLjDYLfVv8gf2-ILUqNv6A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2583301794</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Catastrophe risk, reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer solutions: a review</title><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Zhao, Yang ; Lee, Jin-Ping ; Yu, Min-Teh</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yang ; Lee, Jin-Ping ; Yu, Min-Teh</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeCatastrophe (CAT) events associated with natural catastrophes and man-made disasters cause profound impacts on the insurance industry. This research thus reviews the impact of CAT risk on the insurance industry and how traditional reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer instruments are used for managing CAT risk.Design/methodology/approachThis research reviews the impact of CAT risk on the insurance industry and how traditional reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer instruments are used for managing CAT risk. Apart from many negative influences, CAT events can increase the net revenue of the insurance industry around CAT events and improve insurance demand over the post-CAT periods. The underwriting cycle of reinsurance causes inefficiencies in transferring CAT risks. Securitized risk-transfer instruments resolve some inefficiencies of the reinsurance market, but are subject to moral hazard, basis risk, credit risk, regulatory uncertainty, etc. The authors introduce some popular securitized solutions and use Merton's structural framework to demonstrate how to value these CAT-linked securities. The hybrid solutions by combining reinsurance with securitized CAT instruments are expected to offer promising applications for CAT risk management.FindingsThe authors introduce some popular securitized solutions and use Merton's structural framework to demonstrate how to value these CAT-linked securities. The hybrid solutions by combining reinsurance with securitized CAT instruments are expected to offer promising applications for CAT risk management.Originality/valueThis research reviews a broad array of impacts of CAT risks on the (re)insurance industry. CAT events challenge (re)insurance capacity and influence insurers' supply decisions and reconstruction costs in the aftermath of catastrophes. While losses from natural catastrophes are the primary threat to property–casualty insurers, the mortality risk posed by influenza pandemics is a leading CAT risk for life insurers. At the same time, natural catastrophes and man-made disasters cause distinct impacts on (re)insures. Man-made disasters can increase the correlation between insurance stocks and the overall market, and natural catastrophes reduce the above correlation. It should be noted that huge CAT losses can also improve (re)insurance demand during the postevent period and thus bring long-term effects to the (re)insurance industry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2044-1398</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-1401</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/CFRI-06-2021-0120</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Beijing: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Bond markets ; Capital markets ; Catastrophes ; Default ; Diversification ; Economic impact ; Efficient markets ; GDP ; Gross Domestic Product ; Hurricanes ; Insurance companies ; Insurance industry ; Insurance policies ; Insured losses ; Prices ; Property &amp; casualty insurance ; Put &amp; call options ; Reinsurance ; Risk premiums ; Short sales ; Stock prices ; Underwriting ; Volatility</subject><ispartof>China finance review international, 2021-10, Vol.11 (4), p.449-473</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-cdbfcdc824e5096032fb0035fb8934a52b485eb976ca9e330fb556dffa7011633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-cdbfcdc824e5096032fb0035fb8934a52b485eb976ca9e330fb556dffa7011633</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4686-1327 ; 0000-0003-4710-6411 ; 0000-0002-9446-8901</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/CFRI-06-2021-0120/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,963,11617,21677,27906,27907,52671,53226</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jin-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Min-Teh</creatorcontrib><title>Catastrophe risk, reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer solutions: a review</title><title>China finance review international</title><description>PurposeCatastrophe (CAT) events associated with natural catastrophes and man-made disasters cause profound impacts on the insurance industry. This research thus reviews the impact of CAT risk on the insurance industry and how traditional reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer instruments are used for managing CAT risk.Design/methodology/approachThis research reviews the impact of CAT risk on the insurance industry and how traditional reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer instruments are used for managing CAT risk. Apart from many negative influences, CAT events can increase the net revenue of the insurance industry around CAT events and improve insurance demand over the post-CAT periods. The underwriting cycle of reinsurance causes inefficiencies in transferring CAT risks. Securitized risk-transfer instruments resolve some inefficiencies of the reinsurance market, but are subject to moral hazard, basis risk, credit risk, regulatory uncertainty, etc. The authors introduce some popular securitized solutions and use Merton's structural framework to demonstrate how to value these CAT-linked securities. The hybrid solutions by combining reinsurance with securitized CAT instruments are expected to offer promising applications for CAT risk management.FindingsThe authors introduce some popular securitized solutions and use Merton's structural framework to demonstrate how to value these CAT-linked securities. The hybrid solutions by combining reinsurance with securitized CAT instruments are expected to offer promising applications for CAT risk management.Originality/valueThis research reviews a broad array of impacts of CAT risks on the (re)insurance industry. CAT events challenge (re)insurance capacity and influence insurers' supply decisions and reconstruction costs in the aftermath of catastrophes. While losses from natural catastrophes are the primary threat to property–casualty insurers, the mortality risk posed by influenza pandemics is a leading CAT risk for life insurers. At the same time, natural catastrophes and man-made disasters cause distinct impacts on (re)insures. Man-made disasters can increase the correlation between insurance stocks and the overall market, and natural catastrophes reduce the above correlation. It should be noted that huge CAT losses can also improve (re)insurance demand during the postevent period and thus bring long-term effects to the (re)insurance industry.</description><subject>Bond markets</subject><subject>Capital markets</subject><subject>Catastrophes</subject><subject>Default</subject><subject>Diversification</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Efficient markets</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>Hurricanes</subject><subject>Insurance companies</subject><subject>Insurance industry</subject><subject>Insurance policies</subject><subject>Insured losses</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Property &amp; casualty insurance</subject><subject>Put &amp; call options</subject><subject>Reinsurance</subject><subject>Risk premiums</subject><subject>Short sales</subject><subject>Stock prices</subject><subject>Underwriting</subject><subject>Volatility</subject><issn>2044-1398</issn><issn>2044-1401</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE1Lw0AQhhdRsNT-AG8Br67OfiVZbxJsLRQKoudls5nF1Dapu4miv97E6kFwLjMw7zMDDyHnDK4Yg_y6mD8sKaSUA2cUGIcjMuEgJWUS2PHvLHR-SmYxbmCoXGVa6wlZF7azsQvt_hmTUMeXyyRg3cQ-2MZhYpsqiej6UHf1J1bfCdoNu-gxJLHd9l3dNvEmsQP2VuP7GTnxdhtx9tOn5Gl-91jc09V6sSxuV9QJmXXUVaV3lcu5RAU6BcF9CSCUL3MtpFW8lLnCUmepsxqFAF8qlVbe2wwYS4WYkovD3X1oX3uMndm0fWiGl4arfABYpuWQYoeUC22MAb3Zh3pnw4dhYEZ1ZlRnIDWjOjOqGxg4MLjDYLfVv8gf2-ILUqNv6A</recordid><startdate>20211020</startdate><enddate>20211020</enddate><creator>Zhao, Yang</creator><creator>Lee, Jin-Ping</creator><creator>Yu, Min-Teh</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4686-1327</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4710-6411</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9446-8901</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211020</creationdate><title>Catastrophe risk, reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer solutions: a review</title><author>Zhao, Yang ; Lee, Jin-Ping ; Yu, Min-Teh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-cdbfcdc824e5096032fb0035fb8934a52b485eb976ca9e330fb556dffa7011633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Bond markets</topic><topic>Capital markets</topic><topic>Catastrophes</topic><topic>Default</topic><topic>Diversification</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Efficient markets</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>Hurricanes</topic><topic>Insurance companies</topic><topic>Insurance industry</topic><topic>Insurance policies</topic><topic>Insured losses</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Property &amp; casualty insurance</topic><topic>Put &amp; call options</topic><topic>Reinsurance</topic><topic>Risk premiums</topic><topic>Short sales</topic><topic>Stock prices</topic><topic>Underwriting</topic><topic>Volatility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jin-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Min-Teh</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Asian &amp; European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>China finance review international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Yang</au><au>Lee, Jin-Ping</au><au>Yu, Min-Teh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Catastrophe risk, reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer solutions: a review</atitle><jtitle>China finance review international</jtitle><date>2021-10-20</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>449</spage><epage>473</epage><pages>449-473</pages><issn>2044-1398</issn><eissn>2044-1401</eissn><abstract>PurposeCatastrophe (CAT) events associated with natural catastrophes and man-made disasters cause profound impacts on the insurance industry. This research thus reviews the impact of CAT risk on the insurance industry and how traditional reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer instruments are used for managing CAT risk.Design/methodology/approachThis research reviews the impact of CAT risk on the insurance industry and how traditional reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer instruments are used for managing CAT risk. Apart from many negative influences, CAT events can increase the net revenue of the insurance industry around CAT events and improve insurance demand over the post-CAT periods. The underwriting cycle of reinsurance causes inefficiencies in transferring CAT risks. Securitized risk-transfer instruments resolve some inefficiencies of the reinsurance market, but are subject to moral hazard, basis risk, credit risk, regulatory uncertainty, etc. The authors introduce some popular securitized solutions and use Merton's structural framework to demonstrate how to value these CAT-linked securities. The hybrid solutions by combining reinsurance with securitized CAT instruments are expected to offer promising applications for CAT risk management.FindingsThe authors introduce some popular securitized solutions and use Merton's structural framework to demonstrate how to value these CAT-linked securities. The hybrid solutions by combining reinsurance with securitized CAT instruments are expected to offer promising applications for CAT risk management.Originality/valueThis research reviews a broad array of impacts of CAT risks on the (re)insurance industry. CAT events challenge (re)insurance capacity and influence insurers' supply decisions and reconstruction costs in the aftermath of catastrophes. While losses from natural catastrophes are the primary threat to property–casualty insurers, the mortality risk posed by influenza pandemics is a leading CAT risk for life insurers. At the same time, natural catastrophes and man-made disasters cause distinct impacts on (re)insures. Man-made disasters can increase the correlation between insurance stocks and the overall market, and natural catastrophes reduce the above correlation. It should be noted that huge CAT losses can also improve (re)insurance demand during the postevent period and thus bring long-term effects to the (re)insurance industry.</abstract><cop>Beijing</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/CFRI-06-2021-0120</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4686-1327</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4710-6411</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9446-8901</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2044-1398
ispartof China finance review international, 2021-10, Vol.11 (4), p.449-473
issn 2044-1398
2044-1401
language eng
recordid cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_CFRI-06-2021-0120
source Emerald A-Z Current Journals; Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection
subjects Bond markets
Capital markets
Catastrophes
Default
Diversification
Economic impact
Efficient markets
GDP
Gross Domestic Product
Hurricanes
Insurance companies
Insurance industry
Insurance policies
Insured losses
Prices
Property & casualty insurance
Put & call options
Reinsurance
Risk premiums
Short sales
Stock prices
Underwriting
Volatility
title Catastrophe risk, reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer solutions: a review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T10%3A45%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Catastrophe%20risk,%20reinsurance%20and%20securitized%20risk-transfer%20solutions:%20a%20review&rft.jtitle=China%20finance%20review%20international&rft.au=Zhao,%20Yang&rft.date=2021-10-20&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=449&rft.epage=473&rft.pages=449-473&rft.issn=2044-1398&rft.eissn=2044-1401&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/CFRI-06-2021-0120&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2583301794%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2583301794&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true