Catastrophe risk, reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer solutions: a review
PurposeCatastrophe (CAT) events associated with natural catastrophes and man-made disasters cause profound impacts on the insurance industry. This research thus reviews the impact of CAT risk on the insurance industry and how traditional reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer instruments are used...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | China finance review international 2021-10, Vol.11 (4), p.449-473 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 473 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 449 |
container_title | China finance review international |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Zhao, Yang Lee, Jin-Ping Yu, Min-Teh |
description | PurposeCatastrophe (CAT) events associated with natural catastrophes and man-made disasters cause profound impacts on the insurance industry. This research thus reviews the impact of CAT risk on the insurance industry and how traditional reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer instruments are used for managing CAT risk.Design/methodology/approachThis research reviews the impact of CAT risk on the insurance industry and how traditional reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer instruments are used for managing CAT risk. Apart from many negative influences, CAT events can increase the net revenue of the insurance industry around CAT events and improve insurance demand over the post-CAT periods. The underwriting cycle of reinsurance causes inefficiencies in transferring CAT risks. Securitized risk-transfer instruments resolve some inefficiencies of the reinsurance market, but are subject to moral hazard, basis risk, credit risk, regulatory uncertainty, etc. The authors introduce some popular securitized solutions and use Merton's structural framework to demonstrate how to value these CAT-linked securities. The hybrid solutions by combining reinsurance with securitized CAT instruments are expected to offer promising applications for CAT risk management.FindingsThe authors introduce some popular securitized solutions and use Merton's structural framework to demonstrate how to value these CAT-linked securities. The hybrid solutions by combining reinsurance with securitized CAT instruments are expected to offer promising applications for CAT risk management.Originality/valueThis research reviews a broad array of impacts of CAT risks on the (re)insurance industry. CAT events challenge (re)insurance capacity and influence insurers' supply decisions and reconstruction costs in the aftermath of catastrophes. While losses from natural catastrophes are the primary threat to property–casualty insurers, the mortality risk posed by influenza pandemics is a leading CAT risk for life insurers. At the same time, natural catastrophes and man-made disasters cause distinct impacts on (re)insures. Man-made disasters can increase the correlation between insurance stocks and the overall market, and natural catastrophes reduce the above correlation. It should be noted that huge CAT losses can also improve (re)insurance demand during the postevent period and thus bring long-term effects to the (re)insurance industry. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/CFRI-06-2021-0120 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_CFRI-06-2021-0120</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2583301794</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-cdbfcdc824e5096032fb0035fb8934a52b485eb976ca9e330fb556dffa7011633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1Lw0AQhhdRsNT-AG8Br67OfiVZbxJsLRQKoudls5nF1Dapu4miv97E6kFwLjMw7zMDDyHnDK4Yg_y6mD8sKaSUA2cUGIcjMuEgJWUS2PHvLHR-SmYxbmCoXGVa6wlZF7azsQvt_hmTUMeXyyRg3cQ-2MZhYpsqiej6UHf1J1bfCdoNu-gxJLHd9l3dNvEmsQP2VuP7GTnxdhtx9tOn5Gl-91jc09V6sSxuV9QJmXXUVaV3lcu5RAU6BcF9CSCUL3MtpFW8lLnCUmepsxqFAF8qlVbe2wwYS4WYkovD3X1oX3uMndm0fWiGl4arfABYpuWQYoeUC22MAb3Zh3pnw4dhYEZ1ZlRnIDWjOjOqGxg4MLjDYLfVv8gf2-ILUqNv6A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2583301794</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Catastrophe risk, reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer solutions: a review</title><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Zhao, Yang ; Lee, Jin-Ping ; Yu, Min-Teh</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yang ; Lee, Jin-Ping ; Yu, Min-Teh</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeCatastrophe (CAT) events associated with natural catastrophes and man-made disasters cause profound impacts on the insurance industry. This research thus reviews the impact of CAT risk on the insurance industry and how traditional reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer instruments are used for managing CAT risk.Design/methodology/approachThis research reviews the impact of CAT risk on the insurance industry and how traditional reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer instruments are used for managing CAT risk. Apart from many negative influences, CAT events can increase the net revenue of the insurance industry around CAT events and improve insurance demand over the post-CAT periods. The underwriting cycle of reinsurance causes inefficiencies in transferring CAT risks. Securitized risk-transfer instruments resolve some inefficiencies of the reinsurance market, but are subject to moral hazard, basis risk, credit risk, regulatory uncertainty, etc. The authors introduce some popular securitized solutions and use Merton's structural framework to demonstrate how to value these CAT-linked securities. The hybrid solutions by combining reinsurance with securitized CAT instruments are expected to offer promising applications for CAT risk management.FindingsThe authors introduce some popular securitized solutions and use Merton's structural framework to demonstrate how to value these CAT-linked securities. The hybrid solutions by combining reinsurance with securitized CAT instruments are expected to offer promising applications for CAT risk management.Originality/valueThis research reviews a broad array of impacts of CAT risks on the (re)insurance industry. CAT events challenge (re)insurance capacity and influence insurers' supply decisions and reconstruction costs in the aftermath of catastrophes. While losses from natural catastrophes are the primary threat to property–casualty insurers, the mortality risk posed by influenza pandemics is a leading CAT risk for life insurers. At the same time, natural catastrophes and man-made disasters cause distinct impacts on (re)insures. Man-made disasters can increase the correlation between insurance stocks and the overall market, and natural catastrophes reduce the above correlation. It should be noted that huge CAT losses can also improve (re)insurance demand during the postevent period and thus bring long-term effects to the (re)insurance industry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2044-1398</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-1401</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/CFRI-06-2021-0120</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Beijing: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Bond markets ; Capital markets ; Catastrophes ; Default ; Diversification ; Economic impact ; Efficient markets ; GDP ; Gross Domestic Product ; Hurricanes ; Insurance companies ; Insurance industry ; Insurance policies ; Insured losses ; Prices ; Property & casualty insurance ; Put & call options ; Reinsurance ; Risk premiums ; Short sales ; Stock prices ; Underwriting ; Volatility</subject><ispartof>China finance review international, 2021-10, Vol.11 (4), p.449-473</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-cdbfcdc824e5096032fb0035fb8934a52b485eb976ca9e330fb556dffa7011633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-cdbfcdc824e5096032fb0035fb8934a52b485eb976ca9e330fb556dffa7011633</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4686-1327 ; 0000-0003-4710-6411 ; 0000-0002-9446-8901</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/CFRI-06-2021-0120/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,963,11617,21677,27906,27907,52671,53226</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jin-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Min-Teh</creatorcontrib><title>Catastrophe risk, reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer solutions: a review</title><title>China finance review international</title><description>PurposeCatastrophe (CAT) events associated with natural catastrophes and man-made disasters cause profound impacts on the insurance industry. This research thus reviews the impact of CAT risk on the insurance industry and how traditional reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer instruments are used for managing CAT risk.Design/methodology/approachThis research reviews the impact of CAT risk on the insurance industry and how traditional reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer instruments are used for managing CAT risk. Apart from many negative influences, CAT events can increase the net revenue of the insurance industry around CAT events and improve insurance demand over the post-CAT periods. The underwriting cycle of reinsurance causes inefficiencies in transferring CAT risks. Securitized risk-transfer instruments resolve some inefficiencies of the reinsurance market, but are subject to moral hazard, basis risk, credit risk, regulatory uncertainty, etc. The authors introduce some popular securitized solutions and use Merton's structural framework to demonstrate how to value these CAT-linked securities. The hybrid solutions by combining reinsurance with securitized CAT instruments are expected to offer promising applications for CAT risk management.FindingsThe authors introduce some popular securitized solutions and use Merton's structural framework to demonstrate how to value these CAT-linked securities. The hybrid solutions by combining reinsurance with securitized CAT instruments are expected to offer promising applications for CAT risk management.Originality/valueThis research reviews a broad array of impacts of CAT risks on the (re)insurance industry. CAT events challenge (re)insurance capacity and influence insurers' supply decisions and reconstruction costs in the aftermath of catastrophes. While losses from natural catastrophes are the primary threat to property–casualty insurers, the mortality risk posed by influenza pandemics is a leading CAT risk for life insurers. At the same time, natural catastrophes and man-made disasters cause distinct impacts on (re)insures. Man-made disasters can increase the correlation between insurance stocks and the overall market, and natural catastrophes reduce the above correlation. It should be noted that huge CAT losses can also improve (re)insurance demand during the postevent period and thus bring long-term effects to the (re)insurance industry.</description><subject>Bond markets</subject><subject>Capital markets</subject><subject>Catastrophes</subject><subject>Default</subject><subject>Diversification</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Efficient markets</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>Hurricanes</subject><subject>Insurance companies</subject><subject>Insurance industry</subject><subject>Insurance policies</subject><subject>Insured losses</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Property & casualty insurance</subject><subject>Put & call options</subject><subject>Reinsurance</subject><subject>Risk premiums</subject><subject>Short sales</subject><subject>Stock prices</subject><subject>Underwriting</subject><subject>Volatility</subject><issn>2044-1398</issn><issn>2044-1401</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE1Lw0AQhhdRsNT-AG8Br67OfiVZbxJsLRQKoudls5nF1Dapu4miv97E6kFwLjMw7zMDDyHnDK4Yg_y6mD8sKaSUA2cUGIcjMuEgJWUS2PHvLHR-SmYxbmCoXGVa6wlZF7azsQvt_hmTUMeXyyRg3cQ-2MZhYpsqiej6UHf1J1bfCdoNu-gxJLHd9l3dNvEmsQP2VuP7GTnxdhtx9tOn5Gl-91jc09V6sSxuV9QJmXXUVaV3lcu5RAU6BcF9CSCUL3MtpFW8lLnCUmepsxqFAF8qlVbe2wwYS4WYkovD3X1oX3uMndm0fWiGl4arfABYpuWQYoeUC22MAb3Zh3pnw4dhYEZ1ZlRnIDWjOjOqGxg4MLjDYLfVv8gf2-ILUqNv6A</recordid><startdate>20211020</startdate><enddate>20211020</enddate><creator>Zhao, Yang</creator><creator>Lee, Jin-Ping</creator><creator>Yu, Min-Teh</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4686-1327</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4710-6411</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9446-8901</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211020</creationdate><title>Catastrophe risk, reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer solutions: a review</title><author>Zhao, Yang ; Lee, Jin-Ping ; Yu, Min-Teh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-cdbfcdc824e5096032fb0035fb8934a52b485eb976ca9e330fb556dffa7011633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Bond markets</topic><topic>Capital markets</topic><topic>Catastrophes</topic><topic>Default</topic><topic>Diversification</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Efficient markets</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>Hurricanes</topic><topic>Insurance companies</topic><topic>Insurance industry</topic><topic>Insurance policies</topic><topic>Insured losses</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Property & casualty insurance</topic><topic>Put & call options</topic><topic>Reinsurance</topic><topic>Risk premiums</topic><topic>Short sales</topic><topic>Stock prices</topic><topic>Underwriting</topic><topic>Volatility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jin-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Min-Teh</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>China finance review international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Yang</au><au>Lee, Jin-Ping</au><au>Yu, Min-Teh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Catastrophe risk, reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer solutions: a review</atitle><jtitle>China finance review international</jtitle><date>2021-10-20</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>449</spage><epage>473</epage><pages>449-473</pages><issn>2044-1398</issn><eissn>2044-1401</eissn><abstract>PurposeCatastrophe (CAT) events associated with natural catastrophes and man-made disasters cause profound impacts on the insurance industry. This research thus reviews the impact of CAT risk on the insurance industry and how traditional reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer instruments are used for managing CAT risk.Design/methodology/approachThis research reviews the impact of CAT risk on the insurance industry and how traditional reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer instruments are used for managing CAT risk. Apart from many negative influences, CAT events can increase the net revenue of the insurance industry around CAT events and improve insurance demand over the post-CAT periods. The underwriting cycle of reinsurance causes inefficiencies in transferring CAT risks. Securitized risk-transfer instruments resolve some inefficiencies of the reinsurance market, but are subject to moral hazard, basis risk, credit risk, regulatory uncertainty, etc. The authors introduce some popular securitized solutions and use Merton's structural framework to demonstrate how to value these CAT-linked securities. The hybrid solutions by combining reinsurance with securitized CAT instruments are expected to offer promising applications for CAT risk management.FindingsThe authors introduce some popular securitized solutions and use Merton's structural framework to demonstrate how to value these CAT-linked securities. The hybrid solutions by combining reinsurance with securitized CAT instruments are expected to offer promising applications for CAT risk management.Originality/valueThis research reviews a broad array of impacts of CAT risks on the (re)insurance industry. CAT events challenge (re)insurance capacity and influence insurers' supply decisions and reconstruction costs in the aftermath of catastrophes. While losses from natural catastrophes are the primary threat to property–casualty insurers, the mortality risk posed by influenza pandemics is a leading CAT risk for life insurers. At the same time, natural catastrophes and man-made disasters cause distinct impacts on (re)insures. Man-made disasters can increase the correlation between insurance stocks and the overall market, and natural catastrophes reduce the above correlation. It should be noted that huge CAT losses can also improve (re)insurance demand during the postevent period and thus bring long-term effects to the (re)insurance industry.</abstract><cop>Beijing</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/CFRI-06-2021-0120</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4686-1327</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4710-6411</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9446-8901</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2044-1398 |
ispartof | China finance review international, 2021-10, Vol.11 (4), p.449-473 |
issn | 2044-1398 2044-1401 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_CFRI-06-2021-0120 |
source | Emerald A-Z Current Journals; Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection |
subjects | Bond markets Capital markets Catastrophes Default Diversification Economic impact Efficient markets GDP Gross Domestic Product Hurricanes Insurance companies Insurance industry Insurance policies Insured losses Prices Property & casualty insurance Put & call options Reinsurance Risk premiums Short sales Stock prices Underwriting Volatility |
title | Catastrophe risk, reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer solutions: a review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T10%3A45%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Catastrophe%20risk,%20reinsurance%20and%20securitized%20risk-transfer%20solutions:%20a%20review&rft.jtitle=China%20finance%20review%20international&rft.au=Zhao,%20Yang&rft.date=2021-10-20&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=449&rft.epage=473&rft.pages=449-473&rft.issn=2044-1398&rft.eissn=2044-1401&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/CFRI-06-2021-0120&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2583301794%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2583301794&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |