Measuring interdependencies of preferred supplier enablers

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze preferred supplier enablers (PSEs) and measure the interdependencies among themselves for enhancing preferred supplier relationship. Design/methodology/approach In the current study, an approach has been developed in which the significance of various P...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Benchmarking : an international journal 2018-10, Vol.25 (7), p.2344-2369
Hauptverfasser: C.V, Sunil Kumar, Routroy, Srikanta
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2369
container_issue 7
container_start_page 2344
container_title Benchmarking : an international journal
container_volume 25
creator C.V, Sunil Kumar
Routroy, Srikanta
description Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze preferred supplier enablers (PSEs) and measure the interdependencies among themselves for enhancing preferred supplier relationship. Design/methodology/approach In the current study, an approach has been developed in which the significance of various PSEs was determined by applying Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and the prominent PSEs were screened out through Pareto analysis. Also, the interdependence among the prominent PSEs was measured by applying the Fuzzy Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory method in order to select the right PSEs in ascribing the Preferred Supplier Status. Finally, the weakest relationships among the PSEs were confirmed by applying the student’s t-test and then an impact relationship map of PSEs was developed. Findings The strength of relationships among the PSEs, grouping of PSEs into causes and effects on a causal diagram and a concise impact relationship map of PSEs were determined. Further, the PSEs that a manufacturer must primarily focus and monitor were also obtained. Research limitations/implications The study was conducted in an Indian electronic manufacturing environment. Therefore, the results obtained would be more relevant to the high end technology product manufacturers operating in the developing countries. Practical implications From the current study, a manufacturer can alleviate, favorably associate and integrate with the good suppliers and then eventually establish a strong supply base. Originality/value Manufacturers are looking for the closer and favored relationships by bringing in the concept of preferred supplier while dealing with their key suppliers. Thus, the results obtained from the current study would be of great assistance to a manufacturer in gaining an extra cutting-edge and, in turn, tackling the increased competitive pressures and reduced availability of resources.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/BIJ-02-2017-0023
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_BIJ-02-2017-0023</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2108848875</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-1e3bdfeeffb912094ee1eff7c813101aeae33598cb3b6536cae7eb0150dbfb1c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM1PwzAMxSMEEuPjzrES5zA7aZuMG0x8DA1xgXOUpA7q1LUlWQ_892QaFyROtqX37OcfY1cIN4ig5_erFw6CC0DFAYQ8YjNUleYlLMrj3Je15JVSeMrOUtoAQI1azNjtK9k0xbb_LNp-R7GhkfqGet9SKoZQjJECxUhNkaZx7FqKBfXWdRTTBTsJtkt0-VvP2cfjw_vyma_fnlbLuzX3EnHHkaRrAlEIboEipyHCPCivUSKgJUtSVgvtnXR1JWtvSZEDrKBxwaGX5-z6sHeMw9dEaWc2wxT7fNKI_LkutVZVVsFB5eOQUk5txthubfw2CGZPyGRCBoTZEzJ7QtkyP1hoS9F2zX-OP0zlD3ZoZ_M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2108848875</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring interdependencies of preferred supplier enablers</title><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>C.V, Sunil Kumar ; Routroy, Srikanta</creator><creatorcontrib>C.V, Sunil Kumar ; Routroy, Srikanta</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze preferred supplier enablers (PSEs) and measure the interdependencies among themselves for enhancing preferred supplier relationship. Design/methodology/approach In the current study, an approach has been developed in which the significance of various PSEs was determined by applying Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and the prominent PSEs were screened out through Pareto analysis. Also, the interdependence among the prominent PSEs was measured by applying the Fuzzy Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory method in order to select the right PSEs in ascribing the Preferred Supplier Status. Finally, the weakest relationships among the PSEs were confirmed by applying the student’s t-test and then an impact relationship map of PSEs was developed. Findings The strength of relationships among the PSEs, grouping of PSEs into causes and effects on a causal diagram and a concise impact relationship map of PSEs were determined. Further, the PSEs that a manufacturer must primarily focus and monitor were also obtained. Research limitations/implications The study was conducted in an Indian electronic manufacturing environment. Therefore, the results obtained would be more relevant to the high end technology product manufacturers operating in the developing countries. Practical implications From the current study, a manufacturer can alleviate, favorably associate and integrate with the good suppliers and then eventually establish a strong supply base. Originality/value Manufacturers are looking for the closer and favored relationships by bringing in the concept of preferred supplier while dealing with their key suppliers. Thus, the results obtained from the current study would be of great assistance to a manufacturer in gaining an extra cutting-edge and, in turn, tackling the increased competitive pressures and reduced availability of resources.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1463-5771</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-4094</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/BIJ-02-2017-0023</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Analytic hierarchy process ; Competition ; Cost control ; Decision making ; Developing countries ; Electronics industry ; LDCs ; Manufacturers ; Manufacturing ; Pareto analysis ; Printing industry ; Reputations ; Studies ; Suppliers ; Supplies ; Supply chain management ; Supply chains</subject><ispartof>Benchmarking : an international journal, 2018-10, Vol.25 (7), p.2344-2369</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-1e3bdfeeffb912094ee1eff7c813101aeae33598cb3b6536cae7eb0150dbfb1c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-1e3bdfeeffb912094ee1eff7c813101aeae33598cb3b6536cae7eb0150dbfb1c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/BIJ-02-2017-0023/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,962,11616,21676,27905,27906,52670,53225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>C.V, Sunil Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Routroy, Srikanta</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring interdependencies of preferred supplier enablers</title><title>Benchmarking : an international journal</title><description>Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze preferred supplier enablers (PSEs) and measure the interdependencies among themselves for enhancing preferred supplier relationship. Design/methodology/approach In the current study, an approach has been developed in which the significance of various PSEs was determined by applying Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and the prominent PSEs were screened out through Pareto analysis. Also, the interdependence among the prominent PSEs was measured by applying the Fuzzy Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory method in order to select the right PSEs in ascribing the Preferred Supplier Status. Finally, the weakest relationships among the PSEs were confirmed by applying the student’s t-test and then an impact relationship map of PSEs was developed. Findings The strength of relationships among the PSEs, grouping of PSEs into causes and effects on a causal diagram and a concise impact relationship map of PSEs were determined. Further, the PSEs that a manufacturer must primarily focus and monitor were also obtained. Research limitations/implications The study was conducted in an Indian electronic manufacturing environment. Therefore, the results obtained would be more relevant to the high end technology product manufacturers operating in the developing countries. Practical implications From the current study, a manufacturer can alleviate, favorably associate and integrate with the good suppliers and then eventually establish a strong supply base. Originality/value Manufacturers are looking for the closer and favored relationships by bringing in the concept of preferred supplier while dealing with their key suppliers. Thus, the results obtained from the current study would be of great assistance to a manufacturer in gaining an extra cutting-edge and, in turn, tackling the increased competitive pressures and reduced availability of resources.</description><subject>Analytic hierarchy process</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Electronics industry</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Manufacturers</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Pareto analysis</subject><subject>Printing industry</subject><subject>Reputations</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Suppliers</subject><subject>Supplies</subject><subject>Supply chain management</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><issn>1463-5771</issn><issn>1758-4094</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptkM1PwzAMxSMEEuPjzrES5zA7aZuMG0x8DA1xgXOUpA7q1LUlWQ_892QaFyROtqX37OcfY1cIN4ig5_erFw6CC0DFAYQ8YjNUleYlLMrj3Je15JVSeMrOUtoAQI1azNjtK9k0xbb_LNp-R7GhkfqGet9SKoZQjJECxUhNkaZx7FqKBfXWdRTTBTsJtkt0-VvP2cfjw_vyma_fnlbLuzX3EnHHkaRrAlEIboEipyHCPCivUSKgJUtSVgvtnXR1JWtvSZEDrKBxwaGX5-z6sHeMw9dEaWc2wxT7fNKI_LkutVZVVsFB5eOQUk5txthubfw2CGZPyGRCBoTZEzJ7QtkyP1hoS9F2zX-OP0zlD3ZoZ_M</recordid><startdate>20181001</startdate><enddate>20181001</enddate><creator>C.V, Sunil Kumar</creator><creator>Routroy, Srikanta</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181001</creationdate><title>Measuring interdependencies of preferred supplier enablers</title><author>C.V, Sunil Kumar ; Routroy, Srikanta</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-1e3bdfeeffb912094ee1eff7c813101aeae33598cb3b6536cae7eb0150dbfb1c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Analytic hierarchy process</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Electronics industry</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Manufacturers</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Pareto analysis</topic><topic>Printing industry</topic><topic>Reputations</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Suppliers</topic><topic>Supplies</topic><topic>Supply chain management</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>C.V, Sunil Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Routroy, Srikanta</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Benchmarking : an international journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>C.V, Sunil Kumar</au><au>Routroy, Srikanta</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring interdependencies of preferred supplier enablers</atitle><jtitle>Benchmarking : an international journal</jtitle><date>2018-10-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2344</spage><epage>2369</epage><pages>2344-2369</pages><issn>1463-5771</issn><eissn>1758-4094</eissn><abstract>Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze preferred supplier enablers (PSEs) and measure the interdependencies among themselves for enhancing preferred supplier relationship. Design/methodology/approach In the current study, an approach has been developed in which the significance of various PSEs was determined by applying Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and the prominent PSEs were screened out through Pareto analysis. Also, the interdependence among the prominent PSEs was measured by applying the Fuzzy Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory method in order to select the right PSEs in ascribing the Preferred Supplier Status. Finally, the weakest relationships among the PSEs were confirmed by applying the student’s t-test and then an impact relationship map of PSEs was developed. Findings The strength of relationships among the PSEs, grouping of PSEs into causes and effects on a causal diagram and a concise impact relationship map of PSEs were determined. Further, the PSEs that a manufacturer must primarily focus and monitor were also obtained. Research limitations/implications The study was conducted in an Indian electronic manufacturing environment. Therefore, the results obtained would be more relevant to the high end technology product manufacturers operating in the developing countries. Practical implications From the current study, a manufacturer can alleviate, favorably associate and integrate with the good suppliers and then eventually establish a strong supply base. Originality/value Manufacturers are looking for the closer and favored relationships by bringing in the concept of preferred supplier while dealing with their key suppliers. Thus, the results obtained from the current study would be of great assistance to a manufacturer in gaining an extra cutting-edge and, in turn, tackling the increased competitive pressures and reduced availability of resources.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/BIJ-02-2017-0023</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1463-5771
ispartof Benchmarking : an international journal, 2018-10, Vol.25 (7), p.2344-2369
issn 1463-5771
1758-4094
language eng
recordid cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_BIJ-02-2017-0023
source Emerald A-Z Current Journals; Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection
subjects Analytic hierarchy process
Competition
Cost control
Decision making
Developing countries
Electronics industry
LDCs
Manufacturers
Manufacturing
Pareto analysis
Printing industry
Reputations
Studies
Suppliers
Supplies
Supply chain management
Supply chains
title Measuring interdependencies of preferred supplier enablers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T14%3A51%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20interdependencies%20of%20preferred%20supplier%20enablers&rft.jtitle=Benchmarking%20:%20an%20international%20journal&rft.au=C.V,%20Sunil%20Kumar&rft.date=2018-10-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2344&rft.epage=2369&rft.pages=2344-2369&rft.issn=1463-5771&rft.eissn=1758-4094&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/BIJ-02-2017-0023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2108848875%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2108848875&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true