Communication patterns to address the consumption of PDO products

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify the communication patterns adopted by special organisations, called Producers’ Consortia, to promote Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) products. In particular, the paper analyses the key differences among the communication patterns in terms of the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British food journal (1966) 2020-01, Vol.122 (2), p.390-403
Hauptverfasser: Bonetti, Enrico, Mattiacci, Alberto, Simoni, Michele
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 403
container_issue 2
container_start_page 390
container_title British food journal (1966)
container_volume 122
creator Bonetti, Enrico
Mattiacci, Alberto
Simoni, Michele
description Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify the communication patterns adopted by special organisations, called Producers’ Consortia, to promote Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) products. In particular, the paper analyses the key differences among the communication patterns in terms of the task assigned to communication, the communication tools employed to convey key messages to customers and the amount of the budget allocated to the mix of communication. Design/methodology/approach The authors analysed the communication activities conducted by all the Italian Consortia (112 in total) over a period of four years. A centred log-ratio transformation (clr) was applied to make the compositional data treatable in the Euclidean space. A clustering procedure was then followed to identify the different communication patterns adopted by the Consortia. The authors adopted an analytical framework where different communication patterns of Consortia are identified by the mostly used types (traditional advertising, public relations and digital communication) and the corresponding aimed consumer response (i.e. awareness, attitude and engagement). Findings This paper identifies four relevant and different communication patterns that co-exist in the Italian PDO market. Each pattern responds to a different logic and focusses on a specific task assigned to communication: to increase the awareness of the PDO label, to improve the attitude towards the PDO products and to enhance the engagement with the PDO’s values. Research limitations/implications PDO products are key assets of a growing relevance for the European agri-food industry and consumer education is at the very core of the PDO labelling system. By law, the Consortia are in charge of the crucial task of communicating to customers. This research suggests that the communication of PDO is a complex activity that requires a careful choice of the right communication mix. Different patterns are driven by specific logic and are suitable for Consortia with different characteristics. Future research could complete the results of this study using a qualitative analysis of the content of communication activities. Caution should be used when generalising these findings to markets that present relevant differences in consumer food culture. Practical implications This research identifies some possible communication mixes that managers of the Consortia can adopt to promote PDO products and some options that can guide the
doi_str_mv 10.1108/BFJ-03-2019-0204
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_BFJ-03-2019-0204</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2534589786</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-1c9c2b6ed1b1e519fdc2b6eb48887a79e11cc3ec62c0d2096dd9c09599ef10233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkL1PwzAQxS0EEqWwM0ZiNr2zk9geS6F8qFIZQGKzXNsRrZo42MnAf0_SsiAx3T3de_ekHyHXCLeIIGd3yxcKnDJARYFBfkImKApJ8-F4SiYAICgI-DgnFyntRsmEmJD5ItR132yt6bahyVrTdT42KetCZpyLPg3rp89saFJftwdPqLLX-3XWxuB626VLclaZffJXv3NK3pcPb4snulo_Pi_mK2o5YkfRKss2pXe4QV-gqtxBbnIppTBCeURrubcls-AYqNI5ZUEVSvkKgXE-JTfHv0PxV-9Tp3ehj81QqVnB80IqIcvBBUeXjSGl6Cvdxm1t4rdG0CMoPYDSwPUISo-ghsjsGPG1j2bv_kv8Qct_AOFaaSg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2534589786</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Communication patterns to address the consumption of PDO products</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><creator>Bonetti, Enrico ; Mattiacci, Alberto ; Simoni, Michele</creator><creatorcontrib>Bonetti, Enrico ; Mattiacci, Alberto ; Simoni, Michele</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify the communication patterns adopted by special organisations, called Producers’ Consortia, to promote Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) products. In particular, the paper analyses the key differences among the communication patterns in terms of the task assigned to communication, the communication tools employed to convey key messages to customers and the amount of the budget allocated to the mix of communication. Design/methodology/approach The authors analysed the communication activities conducted by all the Italian Consortia (112 in total) over a period of four years. A centred log-ratio transformation (clr) was applied to make the compositional data treatable in the Euclidean space. A clustering procedure was then followed to identify the different communication patterns adopted by the Consortia. The authors adopted an analytical framework where different communication patterns of Consortia are identified by the mostly used types (traditional advertising, public relations and digital communication) and the corresponding aimed consumer response (i.e. awareness, attitude and engagement). Findings This paper identifies four relevant and different communication patterns that co-exist in the Italian PDO market. Each pattern responds to a different logic and focusses on a specific task assigned to communication: to increase the awareness of the PDO label, to improve the attitude towards the PDO products and to enhance the engagement with the PDO’s values. Research limitations/implications PDO products are key assets of a growing relevance for the European agri-food industry and consumer education is at the very core of the PDO labelling system. By law, the Consortia are in charge of the crucial task of communicating to customers. This research suggests that the communication of PDO is a complex activity that requires a careful choice of the right communication mix. Different patterns are driven by specific logic and are suitable for Consortia with different characteristics. Future research could complete the results of this study using a qualitative analysis of the content of communication activities. Caution should be used when generalising these findings to markets that present relevant differences in consumer food culture. Practical implications This research identifies some possible communication mixes that managers of the Consortia can adopt to promote PDO products and some options that can guide the development of their communication activities over time. Originality/value This work adds value to the literature on food marketing, and more specifically on food communication, by analysing the yet underexplored issue of how PDO products can be promoted in the “post-modern” food consumption era.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-070X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-4108</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/BFJ-03-2019-0204</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Agribusiness ; Agricultural production ; Attitudes ; Clustering ; Communication ; Consortia ; Consumers ; Consumption ; Customers ; Euclidean geometry ; Food ; Food consumption ; Food industry ; Food processing industry ; Food products ; Labeling ; Marketing ; Public relations ; Qualitative analysis</subject><ispartof>British food journal (1966), 2020-01, Vol.122 (2), p.390-403</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-1c9c2b6ed1b1e519fdc2b6eb48887a79e11cc3ec62c0d2096dd9c09599ef10233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-1c9c2b6ed1b1e519fdc2b6eb48887a79e11cc3ec62c0d2096dd9c09599ef10233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/BFJ-03-2019-0204/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,11615,27903,27904,52668</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bonetti, Enrico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattiacci, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simoni, Michele</creatorcontrib><title>Communication patterns to address the consumption of PDO products</title><title>British food journal (1966)</title><description>Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify the communication patterns adopted by special organisations, called Producers’ Consortia, to promote Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) products. In particular, the paper analyses the key differences among the communication patterns in terms of the task assigned to communication, the communication tools employed to convey key messages to customers and the amount of the budget allocated to the mix of communication. Design/methodology/approach The authors analysed the communication activities conducted by all the Italian Consortia (112 in total) over a period of four years. A centred log-ratio transformation (clr) was applied to make the compositional data treatable in the Euclidean space. A clustering procedure was then followed to identify the different communication patterns adopted by the Consortia. The authors adopted an analytical framework where different communication patterns of Consortia are identified by the mostly used types (traditional advertising, public relations and digital communication) and the corresponding aimed consumer response (i.e. awareness, attitude and engagement). Findings This paper identifies four relevant and different communication patterns that co-exist in the Italian PDO market. Each pattern responds to a different logic and focusses on a specific task assigned to communication: to increase the awareness of the PDO label, to improve the attitude towards the PDO products and to enhance the engagement with the PDO’s values. Research limitations/implications PDO products are key assets of a growing relevance for the European agri-food industry and consumer education is at the very core of the PDO labelling system. By law, the Consortia are in charge of the crucial task of communicating to customers. This research suggests that the communication of PDO is a complex activity that requires a careful choice of the right communication mix. Different patterns are driven by specific logic and are suitable for Consortia with different characteristics. Future research could complete the results of this study using a qualitative analysis of the content of communication activities. Caution should be used when generalising these findings to markets that present relevant differences in consumer food culture. Practical implications This research identifies some possible communication mixes that managers of the Consortia can adopt to promote PDO products and some options that can guide the development of their communication activities over time. Originality/value This work adds value to the literature on food marketing, and more specifically on food communication, by analysing the yet underexplored issue of how PDO products can be promoted in the “post-modern” food consumption era.</description><subject>Agribusiness</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Clustering</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Consortia</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Customers</subject><subject>Euclidean geometry</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food consumption</subject><subject>Food industry</subject><subject>Food processing industry</subject><subject>Food products</subject><subject>Labeling</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Public relations</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><issn>0007-070X</issn><issn>1758-4108</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptkL1PwzAQxS0EEqWwM0ZiNr2zk9geS6F8qFIZQGKzXNsRrZo42MnAf0_SsiAx3T3de_ekHyHXCLeIIGd3yxcKnDJARYFBfkImKApJ8-F4SiYAICgI-DgnFyntRsmEmJD5ItR132yt6bahyVrTdT42KetCZpyLPg3rp89saFJftwdPqLLX-3XWxuB626VLclaZffJXv3NK3pcPb4snulo_Pi_mK2o5YkfRKss2pXe4QV-gqtxBbnIppTBCeURrubcls-AYqNI5ZUEVSvkKgXE-JTfHv0PxV-9Tp3ehj81QqVnB80IqIcvBBUeXjSGl6Cvdxm1t4rdG0CMoPYDSwPUISo-ghsjsGPG1j2bv_kv8Qct_AOFaaSg</recordid><startdate>20200109</startdate><enddate>20200109</enddate><creator>Bonetti, Enrico</creator><creator>Mattiacci, Alberto</creator><creator>Simoni, Michele</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0Q</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200109</creationdate><title>Communication patterns to address the consumption of PDO products</title><author>Bonetti, Enrico ; Mattiacci, Alberto ; Simoni, Michele</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-1c9c2b6ed1b1e519fdc2b6eb48887a79e11cc3ec62c0d2096dd9c09599ef10233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agribusiness</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Clustering</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Consortia</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Customers</topic><topic>Euclidean geometry</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food consumption</topic><topic>Food industry</topic><topic>Food processing industry</topic><topic>Food products</topic><topic>Labeling</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Public relations</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bonetti, Enrico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattiacci, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simoni, Michele</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Asian &amp; European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>European Business Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>British food journal (1966)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bonetti, Enrico</au><au>Mattiacci, Alberto</au><au>Simoni, Michele</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Communication patterns to address the consumption of PDO products</atitle><jtitle>British food journal (1966)</jtitle><date>2020-01-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>122</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>390</spage><epage>403</epage><pages>390-403</pages><issn>0007-070X</issn><eissn>1758-4108</eissn><abstract>Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify the communication patterns adopted by special organisations, called Producers’ Consortia, to promote Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) products. In particular, the paper analyses the key differences among the communication patterns in terms of the task assigned to communication, the communication tools employed to convey key messages to customers and the amount of the budget allocated to the mix of communication. Design/methodology/approach The authors analysed the communication activities conducted by all the Italian Consortia (112 in total) over a period of four years. A centred log-ratio transformation (clr) was applied to make the compositional data treatable in the Euclidean space. A clustering procedure was then followed to identify the different communication patterns adopted by the Consortia. The authors adopted an analytical framework where different communication patterns of Consortia are identified by the mostly used types (traditional advertising, public relations and digital communication) and the corresponding aimed consumer response (i.e. awareness, attitude and engagement). Findings This paper identifies four relevant and different communication patterns that co-exist in the Italian PDO market. Each pattern responds to a different logic and focusses on a specific task assigned to communication: to increase the awareness of the PDO label, to improve the attitude towards the PDO products and to enhance the engagement with the PDO’s values. Research limitations/implications PDO products are key assets of a growing relevance for the European agri-food industry and consumer education is at the very core of the PDO labelling system. By law, the Consortia are in charge of the crucial task of communicating to customers. This research suggests that the communication of PDO is a complex activity that requires a careful choice of the right communication mix. Different patterns are driven by specific logic and are suitable for Consortia with different characteristics. Future research could complete the results of this study using a qualitative analysis of the content of communication activities. Caution should be used when generalising these findings to markets that present relevant differences in consumer food culture. Practical implications This research identifies some possible communication mixes that managers of the Consortia can adopt to promote PDO products and some options that can guide the development of their communication activities over time. Originality/value This work adds value to the literature on food marketing, and more specifically on food communication, by analysing the yet underexplored issue of how PDO products can be promoted in the “post-modern” food consumption era.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/BFJ-03-2019-0204</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-070X
ispartof British food journal (1966), 2020-01, Vol.122 (2), p.390-403
issn 0007-070X
1758-4108
language eng
recordid cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_BFJ-03-2019-0204
source Emerald Journals
subjects Agribusiness
Agricultural production
Attitudes
Clustering
Communication
Consortia
Consumers
Consumption
Customers
Euclidean geometry
Food
Food consumption
Food industry
Food processing industry
Food products
Labeling
Marketing
Public relations
Qualitative analysis
title Communication patterns to address the consumption of PDO products
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T01%3A50%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Communication%20patterns%20to%20address%20the%20consumption%20of%20PDO%20products&rft.jtitle=British%20food%20journal%20(1966)&rft.au=Bonetti,%20Enrico&rft.date=2020-01-09&rft.volume=122&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=390&rft.epage=403&rft.pages=390-403&rft.issn=0007-070X&rft.eissn=1758-4108&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/BFJ-03-2019-0204&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2534589786%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2534589786&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true