Board characteristics and demand for audit quality: a meta-analysis
PurposeThe study explores extant knowledge on the nature of the relationship between internal and external corporate governance mechanisms, particularly board characteristics and audit quality, respectively, while also investigating how the relationship varies across geographies.Design/methodology/a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Asian review of accounting 2023-02, Vol.31 (1), p.153-175 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 175 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 153 |
container_title | Asian review of accounting |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Kalia, Deepali Basu, Debarati Kundu, Sayantan |
description | PurposeThe study explores extant knowledge on the nature of the relationship between internal and external corporate governance mechanisms, particularly board characteristics and audit quality, respectively, while also investigating how the relationship varies across geographies.Design/methodology/approachThe extant knowledge is synthesized using a meta-analysis, which is conducted using a sample of 56 empirical studies from publications of varying grades. The studies span over 25 years (1996–2021) and cover 147 empirical samples (343,787 firm-year observations) across more than 20 countries. The dependent variable is audit fees, and the independent variable captures 12 different measures of board characteristics.FindingsOverall, the results reveal a positive association between board characteristics and audit fees, indicating complementarity between governance mechanisms. Effect size analysis shows board characteristics, like size and independence, are positively associated with audit fees. However, heterogeneity is noted for some characteristics, and further analysis by geography (developed vs emerging countries) explains the heterogeneity.Practical implicationsThis study helps multiple stakeholders like firms, shareholders, boards, regulators and policymakers in designing and strengthening governance frameworks.Social implicationsBoth governance and auditing literature benefit from identifying specific board characteristics that drive audit quality consistently across different institutional settings and samples. Heterogeneity analysis helps improve the understanding of contradictions documented in prior literature.Originality/valueThis meta-analysis is the first to explore the interplay between internal and external corporate governance mechanisms, with a focus on board characteristics and audit quality. The study provides valuable insights on how different governance mechanisms influence each other while highlighting, for the first time, how the interaction between governance mechanisms varies by a country's level of development. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/ARA-05-2022-0121 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_econi</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_ARA-05-2022-0121</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2774012994</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-4e982defd0eb2dd0cd5e0c91db13d3e9fb22d9dd41013d7dcf8b38b97ed66d653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkEtLAzEUhYMoWKt7lwHXsXnM5OGuFl9QEETXIZObwSkznTaZWfTfm6EFEVydy-Wcw70fQreM3jNG9WL5sSS0JJxyTijj7AzNmCo10VqK8zwLzogShb5EVyltKJVKCjVDq8feRcD-20XnhxCbNDQ-YbcFDKGbpO4jdiM0A96Prm2GwwN2uAuDI27r2kNq0jW6qF2bws1J5-jr-elz9UrW7y9vq-WaeCHkQIpgNIdQAw0VB6AeykC9YVAxASKYuuIcDEDBaF4o8LWuhK6MCiAlyFLM0d2xdxf7_RjSYDf9GPMRyXKlivy1MUV20aPLxz6lGGq7i03n4sEyaidUNqOytLQTKjuhyhF8jATfb5v0G9DCCC0nhHO0OFm6EF0L_5X-4S9-ADzadJQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2774012994</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Board characteristics and demand for audit quality: a meta-analysis</title><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Kalia, Deepali ; Basu, Debarati ; Kundu, Sayantan</creator><creatorcontrib>Kalia, Deepali ; Basu, Debarati ; Kundu, Sayantan</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeThe study explores extant knowledge on the nature of the relationship between internal and external corporate governance mechanisms, particularly board characteristics and audit quality, respectively, while also investigating how the relationship varies across geographies.Design/methodology/approachThe extant knowledge is synthesized using a meta-analysis, which is conducted using a sample of 56 empirical studies from publications of varying grades. The studies span over 25 years (1996–2021) and cover 147 empirical samples (343,787 firm-year observations) across more than 20 countries. The dependent variable is audit fees, and the independent variable captures 12 different measures of board characteristics.FindingsOverall, the results reveal a positive association between board characteristics and audit fees, indicating complementarity between governance mechanisms. Effect size analysis shows board characteristics, like size and independence, are positively associated with audit fees. However, heterogeneity is noted for some characteristics, and further analysis by geography (developed vs emerging countries) explains the heterogeneity.Practical implicationsThis study helps multiple stakeholders like firms, shareholders, boards, regulators and policymakers in designing and strengthening governance frameworks.Social implicationsBoth governance and auditing literature benefit from identifying specific board characteristics that drive audit quality consistently across different institutional settings and samples. Heterogeneity analysis helps improve the understanding of contradictions documented in prior literature.Originality/valueThis meta-analysis is the first to explore the interplay between internal and external corporate governance mechanisms, with a focus on board characteristics and audit quality. The study provides valuable insights on how different governance mechanisms influence each other while highlighting, for the first time, how the interaction between governance mechanisms varies by a country's level of development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1321-7348</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-8863</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/ARA-05-2022-0121</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Audit committees ; Audit fees ; Audit quality ; Boards of directors ; Corporate governance ; Emerging markets ; Meta-analysis ; Public Company Accounting Reform & Investor Protection Act 2002-US</subject><ispartof>Asian review of accounting, 2023-02, Vol.31 (1), p.153-175</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-4e982defd0eb2dd0cd5e0c91db13d3e9fb22d9dd41013d7dcf8b38b97ed66d653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-4e982defd0eb2dd0cd5e0c91db13d3e9fb22d9dd41013d7dcf8b38b97ed66d653</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8647-1855 ; 0000-0002-9347-1279 ; 0000-0002-6047-7156</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ARA-05-2022-0121/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,21697,27926,27927,53246</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kalia, Deepali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basu, Debarati</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kundu, Sayantan</creatorcontrib><title>Board characteristics and demand for audit quality: a meta-analysis</title><title>Asian review of accounting</title><description>PurposeThe study explores extant knowledge on the nature of the relationship between internal and external corporate governance mechanisms, particularly board characteristics and audit quality, respectively, while also investigating how the relationship varies across geographies.Design/methodology/approachThe extant knowledge is synthesized using a meta-analysis, which is conducted using a sample of 56 empirical studies from publications of varying grades. The studies span over 25 years (1996–2021) and cover 147 empirical samples (343,787 firm-year observations) across more than 20 countries. The dependent variable is audit fees, and the independent variable captures 12 different measures of board characteristics.FindingsOverall, the results reveal a positive association between board characteristics and audit fees, indicating complementarity between governance mechanisms. Effect size analysis shows board characteristics, like size and independence, are positively associated with audit fees. However, heterogeneity is noted for some characteristics, and further analysis by geography (developed vs emerging countries) explains the heterogeneity.Practical implicationsThis study helps multiple stakeholders like firms, shareholders, boards, regulators and policymakers in designing and strengthening governance frameworks.Social implicationsBoth governance and auditing literature benefit from identifying specific board characteristics that drive audit quality consistently across different institutional settings and samples. Heterogeneity analysis helps improve the understanding of contradictions documented in prior literature.Originality/valueThis meta-analysis is the first to explore the interplay between internal and external corporate governance mechanisms, with a focus on board characteristics and audit quality. The study provides valuable insights on how different governance mechanisms influence each other while highlighting, for the first time, how the interaction between governance mechanisms varies by a country's level of development.</description><subject>Audit committees</subject><subject>Audit fees</subject><subject>Audit quality</subject><subject>Boards of directors</subject><subject>Corporate governance</subject><subject>Emerging markets</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Public Company Accounting Reform & Investor Protection Act 2002-US</subject><issn>1321-7348</issn><issn>1758-8863</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptkEtLAzEUhYMoWKt7lwHXsXnM5OGuFl9QEETXIZObwSkznTaZWfTfm6EFEVydy-Wcw70fQreM3jNG9WL5sSS0JJxyTijj7AzNmCo10VqK8zwLzogShb5EVyltKJVKCjVDq8feRcD-20XnhxCbNDQ-YbcFDKGbpO4jdiM0A96Prm2GwwN2uAuDI27r2kNq0jW6qF2bws1J5-jr-elz9UrW7y9vq-WaeCHkQIpgNIdQAw0VB6AeykC9YVAxASKYuuIcDEDBaF4o8LWuhK6MCiAlyFLM0d2xdxf7_RjSYDf9GPMRyXKlivy1MUV20aPLxz6lGGq7i03n4sEyaidUNqOytLQTKjuhyhF8jATfb5v0G9DCCC0nhHO0OFm6EF0L_5X-4S9-ADzadJQ</recordid><startdate>20230209</startdate><enddate>20230209</enddate><creator>Kalia, Deepali</creator><creator>Basu, Debarati</creator><creator>Kundu, Sayantan</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8647-1855</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9347-1279</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6047-7156</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230209</creationdate><title>Board characteristics and demand for audit quality: a meta-analysis</title><author>Kalia, Deepali ; Basu, Debarati ; Kundu, Sayantan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-4e982defd0eb2dd0cd5e0c91db13d3e9fb22d9dd41013d7dcf8b38b97ed66d653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Audit committees</topic><topic>Audit fees</topic><topic>Audit quality</topic><topic>Boards of directors</topic><topic>Corporate governance</topic><topic>Emerging markets</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Public Company Accounting Reform & Investor Protection Act 2002-US</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kalia, Deepali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basu, Debarati</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kundu, Sayantan</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>ProQuest: Accounting and Tax</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Asian review of accounting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kalia, Deepali</au><au>Basu, Debarati</au><au>Kundu, Sayantan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Board characteristics and demand for audit quality: a meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Asian review of accounting</jtitle><date>2023-02-09</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>153</spage><epage>175</epage><pages>153-175</pages><issn>1321-7348</issn><eissn>1758-8863</eissn><abstract>PurposeThe study explores extant knowledge on the nature of the relationship between internal and external corporate governance mechanisms, particularly board characteristics and audit quality, respectively, while also investigating how the relationship varies across geographies.Design/methodology/approachThe extant knowledge is synthesized using a meta-analysis, which is conducted using a sample of 56 empirical studies from publications of varying grades. The studies span over 25 years (1996–2021) and cover 147 empirical samples (343,787 firm-year observations) across more than 20 countries. The dependent variable is audit fees, and the independent variable captures 12 different measures of board characteristics.FindingsOverall, the results reveal a positive association between board characteristics and audit fees, indicating complementarity between governance mechanisms. Effect size analysis shows board characteristics, like size and independence, are positively associated with audit fees. However, heterogeneity is noted for some characteristics, and further analysis by geography (developed vs emerging countries) explains the heterogeneity.Practical implicationsThis study helps multiple stakeholders like firms, shareholders, boards, regulators and policymakers in designing and strengthening governance frameworks.Social implicationsBoth governance and auditing literature benefit from identifying specific board characteristics that drive audit quality consistently across different institutional settings and samples. Heterogeneity analysis helps improve the understanding of contradictions documented in prior literature.Originality/valueThis meta-analysis is the first to explore the interplay between internal and external corporate governance mechanisms, with a focus on board characteristics and audit quality. The study provides valuable insights on how different governance mechanisms influence each other while highlighting, for the first time, how the interaction between governance mechanisms varies by a country's level of development.</abstract><cop>Bingley</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/ARA-05-2022-0121</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8647-1855</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9347-1279</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6047-7156</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1321-7348 |
ispartof | Asian review of accounting, 2023-02, Vol.31 (1), p.153-175 |
issn | 1321-7348 1758-8863 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_ARA-05-2022-0121 |
source | Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection |
subjects | Audit committees Audit fees Audit quality Boards of directors Corporate governance Emerging markets Meta-analysis Public Company Accounting Reform & Investor Protection Act 2002-US |
title | Board characteristics and demand for audit quality: a meta-analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T22%3A26%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_econi&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Board%20characteristics%20and%20demand%20for%20audit%20quality:%20a%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Asian%20review%20of%20accounting&rft.au=Kalia,%20Deepali&rft.date=2023-02-09&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=175&rft.pages=153-175&rft.issn=1321-7348&rft.eissn=1758-8863&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/ARA-05-2022-0121&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_econi%3E2774012994%3C/proquest_econi%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2774012994&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |