Board characteristics and demand for audit quality: a meta-analysis

PurposeThe study explores extant knowledge on the nature of the relationship between internal and external corporate governance mechanisms, particularly board characteristics and audit quality, respectively, while also investigating how the relationship varies across geographies.Design/methodology/a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Asian review of accounting 2023-02, Vol.31 (1), p.153-175
Hauptverfasser: Kalia, Deepali, Basu, Debarati, Kundu, Sayantan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 175
container_issue 1
container_start_page 153
container_title Asian review of accounting
container_volume 31
creator Kalia, Deepali
Basu, Debarati
Kundu, Sayantan
description PurposeThe study explores extant knowledge on the nature of the relationship between internal and external corporate governance mechanisms, particularly board characteristics and audit quality, respectively, while also investigating how the relationship varies across geographies.Design/methodology/approachThe extant knowledge is synthesized using a meta-analysis, which is conducted using a sample of 56 empirical studies from publications of varying grades. The studies span over 25 years (1996–2021) and cover 147 empirical samples (343,787 firm-year observations) across more than 20 countries. The dependent variable is audit fees, and the independent variable captures 12 different measures of board characteristics.FindingsOverall, the results reveal a positive association between board characteristics and audit fees, indicating complementarity between governance mechanisms. Effect size analysis shows board characteristics, like size and independence, are positively associated with audit fees. However, heterogeneity is noted for some characteristics, and further analysis by geography (developed vs emerging countries) explains the heterogeneity.Practical implicationsThis study helps multiple stakeholders like firms, shareholders, boards, regulators and policymakers in designing and strengthening governance frameworks.Social implicationsBoth governance and auditing literature benefit from identifying specific board characteristics that drive audit quality consistently across different institutional settings and samples. Heterogeneity analysis helps improve the understanding of contradictions documented in prior literature.Originality/valueThis meta-analysis is the first to explore the interplay between internal and external corporate governance mechanisms, with a focus on board characteristics and audit quality. The study provides valuable insights on how different governance mechanisms influence each other while highlighting, for the first time, how the interaction between governance mechanisms varies by a country's level of development.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/ARA-05-2022-0121
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_econi</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_ARA-05-2022-0121</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2774012994</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-4e982defd0eb2dd0cd5e0c91db13d3e9fb22d9dd41013d7dcf8b38b97ed66d653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkEtLAzEUhYMoWKt7lwHXsXnM5OGuFl9QEETXIZObwSkznTaZWfTfm6EFEVydy-Wcw70fQreM3jNG9WL5sSS0JJxyTijj7AzNmCo10VqK8zwLzogShb5EVyltKJVKCjVDq8feRcD-20XnhxCbNDQ-YbcFDKGbpO4jdiM0A96Prm2GwwN2uAuDI27r2kNq0jW6qF2bws1J5-jr-elz9UrW7y9vq-WaeCHkQIpgNIdQAw0VB6AeykC9YVAxASKYuuIcDEDBaF4o8LWuhK6MCiAlyFLM0d2xdxf7_RjSYDf9GPMRyXKlivy1MUV20aPLxz6lGGq7i03n4sEyaidUNqOytLQTKjuhyhF8jATfb5v0G9DCCC0nhHO0OFm6EF0L_5X-4S9-ADzadJQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2774012994</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Board characteristics and demand for audit quality: a meta-analysis</title><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Kalia, Deepali ; Basu, Debarati ; Kundu, Sayantan</creator><creatorcontrib>Kalia, Deepali ; Basu, Debarati ; Kundu, Sayantan</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeThe study explores extant knowledge on the nature of the relationship between internal and external corporate governance mechanisms, particularly board characteristics and audit quality, respectively, while also investigating how the relationship varies across geographies.Design/methodology/approachThe extant knowledge is synthesized using a meta-analysis, which is conducted using a sample of 56 empirical studies from publications of varying grades. The studies span over 25 years (1996–2021) and cover 147 empirical samples (343,787 firm-year observations) across more than 20 countries. The dependent variable is audit fees, and the independent variable captures 12 different measures of board characteristics.FindingsOverall, the results reveal a positive association between board characteristics and audit fees, indicating complementarity between governance mechanisms. Effect size analysis shows board characteristics, like size and independence, are positively associated with audit fees. However, heterogeneity is noted for some characteristics, and further analysis by geography (developed vs emerging countries) explains the heterogeneity.Practical implicationsThis study helps multiple stakeholders like firms, shareholders, boards, regulators and policymakers in designing and strengthening governance frameworks.Social implicationsBoth governance and auditing literature benefit from identifying specific board characteristics that drive audit quality consistently across different institutional settings and samples. Heterogeneity analysis helps improve the understanding of contradictions documented in prior literature.Originality/valueThis meta-analysis is the first to explore the interplay between internal and external corporate governance mechanisms, with a focus on board characteristics and audit quality. The study provides valuable insights on how different governance mechanisms influence each other while highlighting, for the first time, how the interaction between governance mechanisms varies by a country's level of development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1321-7348</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-8863</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/ARA-05-2022-0121</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Audit committees ; Audit fees ; Audit quality ; Boards of directors ; Corporate governance ; Emerging markets ; Meta-analysis ; Public Company Accounting Reform &amp; Investor Protection Act 2002-US</subject><ispartof>Asian review of accounting, 2023-02, Vol.31 (1), p.153-175</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-4e982defd0eb2dd0cd5e0c91db13d3e9fb22d9dd41013d7dcf8b38b97ed66d653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-4e982defd0eb2dd0cd5e0c91db13d3e9fb22d9dd41013d7dcf8b38b97ed66d653</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8647-1855 ; 0000-0002-9347-1279 ; 0000-0002-6047-7156</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ARA-05-2022-0121/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,21697,27926,27927,53246</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kalia, Deepali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basu, Debarati</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kundu, Sayantan</creatorcontrib><title>Board characteristics and demand for audit quality: a meta-analysis</title><title>Asian review of accounting</title><description>PurposeThe study explores extant knowledge on the nature of the relationship between internal and external corporate governance mechanisms, particularly board characteristics and audit quality, respectively, while also investigating how the relationship varies across geographies.Design/methodology/approachThe extant knowledge is synthesized using a meta-analysis, which is conducted using a sample of 56 empirical studies from publications of varying grades. The studies span over 25 years (1996–2021) and cover 147 empirical samples (343,787 firm-year observations) across more than 20 countries. The dependent variable is audit fees, and the independent variable captures 12 different measures of board characteristics.FindingsOverall, the results reveal a positive association between board characteristics and audit fees, indicating complementarity between governance mechanisms. Effect size analysis shows board characteristics, like size and independence, are positively associated with audit fees. However, heterogeneity is noted for some characteristics, and further analysis by geography (developed vs emerging countries) explains the heterogeneity.Practical implicationsThis study helps multiple stakeholders like firms, shareholders, boards, regulators and policymakers in designing and strengthening governance frameworks.Social implicationsBoth governance and auditing literature benefit from identifying specific board characteristics that drive audit quality consistently across different institutional settings and samples. Heterogeneity analysis helps improve the understanding of contradictions documented in prior literature.Originality/valueThis meta-analysis is the first to explore the interplay between internal and external corporate governance mechanisms, with a focus on board characteristics and audit quality. The study provides valuable insights on how different governance mechanisms influence each other while highlighting, for the first time, how the interaction between governance mechanisms varies by a country's level of development.</description><subject>Audit committees</subject><subject>Audit fees</subject><subject>Audit quality</subject><subject>Boards of directors</subject><subject>Corporate governance</subject><subject>Emerging markets</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Public Company Accounting Reform &amp; Investor Protection Act 2002-US</subject><issn>1321-7348</issn><issn>1758-8863</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptkEtLAzEUhYMoWKt7lwHXsXnM5OGuFl9QEETXIZObwSkznTaZWfTfm6EFEVydy-Wcw70fQreM3jNG9WL5sSS0JJxyTijj7AzNmCo10VqK8zwLzogShb5EVyltKJVKCjVDq8feRcD-20XnhxCbNDQ-YbcFDKGbpO4jdiM0A96Prm2GwwN2uAuDI27r2kNq0jW6qF2bws1J5-jr-elz9UrW7y9vq-WaeCHkQIpgNIdQAw0VB6AeykC9YVAxASKYuuIcDEDBaF4o8LWuhK6MCiAlyFLM0d2xdxf7_RjSYDf9GPMRyXKlivy1MUV20aPLxz6lGGq7i03n4sEyaidUNqOytLQTKjuhyhF8jATfb5v0G9DCCC0nhHO0OFm6EF0L_5X-4S9-ADzadJQ</recordid><startdate>20230209</startdate><enddate>20230209</enddate><creator>Kalia, Deepali</creator><creator>Basu, Debarati</creator><creator>Kundu, Sayantan</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8647-1855</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9347-1279</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6047-7156</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230209</creationdate><title>Board characteristics and demand for audit quality: a meta-analysis</title><author>Kalia, Deepali ; Basu, Debarati ; Kundu, Sayantan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-4e982defd0eb2dd0cd5e0c91db13d3e9fb22d9dd41013d7dcf8b38b97ed66d653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Audit committees</topic><topic>Audit fees</topic><topic>Audit quality</topic><topic>Boards of directors</topic><topic>Corporate governance</topic><topic>Emerging markets</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Public Company Accounting Reform &amp; Investor Protection Act 2002-US</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kalia, Deepali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basu, Debarati</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kundu, Sayantan</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>ProQuest: Accounting and Tax</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Asian &amp; European Business Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Asian review of accounting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kalia, Deepali</au><au>Basu, Debarati</au><au>Kundu, Sayantan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Board characteristics and demand for audit quality: a meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Asian review of accounting</jtitle><date>2023-02-09</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>153</spage><epage>175</epage><pages>153-175</pages><issn>1321-7348</issn><eissn>1758-8863</eissn><abstract>PurposeThe study explores extant knowledge on the nature of the relationship between internal and external corporate governance mechanisms, particularly board characteristics and audit quality, respectively, while also investigating how the relationship varies across geographies.Design/methodology/approachThe extant knowledge is synthesized using a meta-analysis, which is conducted using a sample of 56 empirical studies from publications of varying grades. The studies span over 25 years (1996–2021) and cover 147 empirical samples (343,787 firm-year observations) across more than 20 countries. The dependent variable is audit fees, and the independent variable captures 12 different measures of board characteristics.FindingsOverall, the results reveal a positive association between board characteristics and audit fees, indicating complementarity between governance mechanisms. Effect size analysis shows board characteristics, like size and independence, are positively associated with audit fees. However, heterogeneity is noted for some characteristics, and further analysis by geography (developed vs emerging countries) explains the heterogeneity.Practical implicationsThis study helps multiple stakeholders like firms, shareholders, boards, regulators and policymakers in designing and strengthening governance frameworks.Social implicationsBoth governance and auditing literature benefit from identifying specific board characteristics that drive audit quality consistently across different institutional settings and samples. Heterogeneity analysis helps improve the understanding of contradictions documented in prior literature.Originality/valueThis meta-analysis is the first to explore the interplay between internal and external corporate governance mechanisms, with a focus on board characteristics and audit quality. The study provides valuable insights on how different governance mechanisms influence each other while highlighting, for the first time, how the interaction between governance mechanisms varies by a country's level of development.</abstract><cop>Bingley</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/ARA-05-2022-0121</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8647-1855</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9347-1279</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6047-7156</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1321-7348
ispartof Asian review of accounting, 2023-02, Vol.31 (1), p.153-175
issn 1321-7348
1758-8863
language eng
recordid cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_ARA-05-2022-0121
source Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection
subjects Audit committees
Audit fees
Audit quality
Boards of directors
Corporate governance
Emerging markets
Meta-analysis
Public Company Accounting Reform & Investor Protection Act 2002-US
title Board characteristics and demand for audit quality: a meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T22%3A26%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_econi&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Board%20characteristics%20and%20demand%20for%20audit%20quality:%20a%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Asian%20review%20of%20accounting&rft.au=Kalia,%20Deepali&rft.date=2023-02-09&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=175&rft.pages=153-175&rft.issn=1321-7348&rft.eissn=1758-8863&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/ARA-05-2022-0121&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_econi%3E2774012994%3C/proquest_econi%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2774012994&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true