The COVID-19 office in transition: cost, efficiency and the social responsibility business case
PurposeThis study aims to critically evaluate the COVID-19 and future post-COVID-19 impacts on office design, location and functioning with respect to government and community occupational health and safety expectations. It aims to assess how office efficiency and cost control agendas intersect with...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Accounting, auditing & accountability journal auditing & accountability journal, 2020-11, Vol.33 (8), p.1943-1967 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1967 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1943 |
container_title | Accounting, auditing & accountability journal |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Parker, Lee D |
description | PurposeThis study aims to critically evaluate the COVID-19 and future post-COVID-19 impacts on office design, location and functioning with respect to government and community occupational health and safety expectations. It aims to assess how office efficiency and cost control agendas intersect with corporate social accountability.Design/methodology/approachTheoretically informed by governmentality and social accountability through action, it thematically examines research literature and Web-based professional and business reports. It undertakes a timely analysis of historical office trends and emerging practice discourse during the COVID-19 global pandemic's early phase.FindingsCOVID-19 has induced a transition to teleworking, impending office design and configuration reversals and office working protocol re-engineering. Management strategies reflect prioritisation choices between occupational health and safety versus financial returns. Beyond formal accountability reports, office management strategy and rationales will become physically observable and accountable to office staff and other parties.Research limitations/implicationsFuture research must determine the balance of office change strategies employed and their evident focus on occupational health and safety or cost control and financial returns. Further investigation can reveal the relationship between formal reporting and observed activities.Practical implicationsOrganisations face strategic decisions concerning both their balancing of employee and public health and safety against capital expenditure and operation cost commitments to COVID-19 transmission prevention. They also face strategic accountability decisions as to the visibility and correspondence between their observable actions and their formal social responsibility reporting.Social implicationsOrganisations have continued scientific management office cost reduction strategies under the guise of innovative office designs. This historic trend will be tested by a pandemic, which calls for control of its spread, including radical changes to the office at potentially significant cost.Originality/valueThis paper presents one of few office studies in the accounting research literature, recognising it as central to contemporary organisational functioning and revealing the office cost control tradition as a challenge for employee and community health and safety. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/AAAJ-06-2020-4609 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_AAAJ-06-2020-4609</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2457265401</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-4b6a16496ba98e81b7b845c3f4551e4e2c2e1cc4c931cb119cd1dfdbd37311013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwA9gssWLwJXY-2KLyVVSpS2G1bOciXKVxsdOh_56EsCAx3XDv857uIeQa-B0AL-6rqnpjPGMJTzgTGS9PyAxyWTCRcHlKZryUwFKZi3NyEeOWcz5QxYyozSfSxfpj-cigpL5pnEXqOtoH3UXXO989UOtjf0tx3Dns7JHqrqb9wEVvnW5pwLj3Q9q41vVHag7RdRgjtTriJTlrdBvx6nfOyfvz02bxylbrl-WiWjEruOyZMJmGTJSZ0WWBBZjcFELatBFSAgpMbIJgrbBlCtYAlLaGuqlNnebp8D-kc3Iz9e6D_zpg7NXWH0I3nFSJkHmSSfGTgillg48xYKP2we10OCrgavSoRo-KZ2r0qEaPA8MnBncYdFv_i_xRn34DZuFzRg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2457265401</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The COVID-19 office in transition: cost, efficiency and the social responsibility business case</title><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Parker, Lee D</creator><creatorcontrib>Parker, Lee D</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeThis study aims to critically evaluate the COVID-19 and future post-COVID-19 impacts on office design, location and functioning with respect to government and community occupational health and safety expectations. It aims to assess how office efficiency and cost control agendas intersect with corporate social accountability.Design/methodology/approachTheoretically informed by governmentality and social accountability through action, it thematically examines research literature and Web-based professional and business reports. It undertakes a timely analysis of historical office trends and emerging practice discourse during the COVID-19 global pandemic's early phase.FindingsCOVID-19 has induced a transition to teleworking, impending office design and configuration reversals and office working protocol re-engineering. Management strategies reflect prioritisation choices between occupational health and safety versus financial returns. Beyond formal accountability reports, office management strategy and rationales will become physically observable and accountable to office staff and other parties.Research limitations/implicationsFuture research must determine the balance of office change strategies employed and their evident focus on occupational health and safety or cost control and financial returns. Further investigation can reveal the relationship between formal reporting and observed activities.Practical implicationsOrganisations face strategic decisions concerning both their balancing of employee and public health and safety against capital expenditure and operation cost commitments to COVID-19 transmission prevention. They also face strategic accountability decisions as to the visibility and correspondence between their observable actions and their formal social responsibility reporting.Social implicationsOrganisations have continued scientific management office cost reduction strategies under the guise of innovative office designs. This historic trend will be tested by a pandemic, which calls for control of its spread, including radical changes to the office at potentially significant cost.Originality/valueThis paper presents one of few office studies in the accounting research literature, recognising it as central to contemporary organisational functioning and revealing the office cost control tradition as a challenge for employee and community health and safety.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-3574</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-4205</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-06-2020-4609</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Business ; Capital ; Capital expenditures ; Community health ; Coronaviruses ; Cost control ; Cost reduction ; COVID-19 ; Design ; Disease transmission ; Efficiency ; GDP ; Governmentality ; Gross Domestic Product ; Health care expenditures ; Impending ; Internet ; Management consultants ; Occupational health ; Office layout ; Pandemics ; Political power ; Prioritizing ; Public health ; Radicalism ; Safety ; Scientific management ; Social responsibility ; Society ; Telecommuting ; Visibility</subject><ispartof>Accounting, auditing & accountability journal, 2020-11, Vol.33 (8), p.1943-1967</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-4b6a16496ba98e81b7b845c3f4551e4e2c2e1cc4c931cb119cd1dfdbd37311013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-4b6a16496ba98e81b7b845c3f4551e4e2c2e1cc4c931cb119cd1dfdbd37311013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2020-4609/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12824,21674,27901,27902,53219</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parker, Lee D</creatorcontrib><title>The COVID-19 office in transition: cost, efficiency and the social responsibility business case</title><title>Accounting, auditing & accountability journal</title><description>PurposeThis study aims to critically evaluate the COVID-19 and future post-COVID-19 impacts on office design, location and functioning with respect to government and community occupational health and safety expectations. It aims to assess how office efficiency and cost control agendas intersect with corporate social accountability.Design/methodology/approachTheoretically informed by governmentality and social accountability through action, it thematically examines research literature and Web-based professional and business reports. It undertakes a timely analysis of historical office trends and emerging practice discourse during the COVID-19 global pandemic's early phase.FindingsCOVID-19 has induced a transition to teleworking, impending office design and configuration reversals and office working protocol re-engineering. Management strategies reflect prioritisation choices between occupational health and safety versus financial returns. Beyond formal accountability reports, office management strategy and rationales will become physically observable and accountable to office staff and other parties.Research limitations/implicationsFuture research must determine the balance of office change strategies employed and their evident focus on occupational health and safety or cost control and financial returns. Further investigation can reveal the relationship between formal reporting and observed activities.Practical implicationsOrganisations face strategic decisions concerning both their balancing of employee and public health and safety against capital expenditure and operation cost commitments to COVID-19 transmission prevention. They also face strategic accountability decisions as to the visibility and correspondence between their observable actions and their formal social responsibility reporting.Social implicationsOrganisations have continued scientific management office cost reduction strategies under the guise of innovative office designs. This historic trend will be tested by a pandemic, which calls for control of its spread, including radical changes to the office at potentially significant cost.Originality/valueThis paper presents one of few office studies in the accounting research literature, recognising it as central to contemporary organisational functioning and revealing the office cost control tradition as a challenge for employee and community health and safety.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Business</subject><subject>Capital</subject><subject>Capital expenditures</subject><subject>Community health</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Cost reduction</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>Governmentality</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Impending</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Management consultants</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Office layout</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Political power</subject><subject>Prioritizing</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Radicalism</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Scientific management</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Telecommuting</subject><subject>Visibility</subject><issn>0951-3574</issn><issn>1758-4205</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwA9gssWLwJXY-2KLyVVSpS2G1bOciXKVxsdOh_56EsCAx3XDv857uIeQa-B0AL-6rqnpjPGMJTzgTGS9PyAxyWTCRcHlKZryUwFKZi3NyEeOWcz5QxYyozSfSxfpj-cigpL5pnEXqOtoH3UXXO989UOtjf0tx3Dns7JHqrqb9wEVvnW5pwLj3Q9q41vVHag7RdRgjtTriJTlrdBvx6nfOyfvz02bxylbrl-WiWjEruOyZMJmGTJSZ0WWBBZjcFELatBFSAgpMbIJgrbBlCtYAlLaGuqlNnebp8D-kc3Iz9e6D_zpg7NXWH0I3nFSJkHmSSfGTgillg48xYKP2we10OCrgavSoRo-KZ2r0qEaPA8MnBncYdFv_i_xRn34DZuFzRg</recordid><startdate>20201104</startdate><enddate>20201104</enddate><creator>Parker, Lee D</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201104</creationdate><title>The COVID-19 office in transition: cost, efficiency and the social responsibility business case</title><author>Parker, Lee D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-4b6a16496ba98e81b7b845c3f4551e4e2c2e1cc4c931cb119cd1dfdbd37311013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Business</topic><topic>Capital</topic><topic>Capital expenditures</topic><topic>Community health</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Cost reduction</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>Governmentality</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Impending</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Management consultants</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Office layout</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Political power</topic><topic>Prioritizing</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Radicalism</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Scientific management</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Telecommuting</topic><topic>Visibility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parker, Lee D</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Accounting, auditing & accountability journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parker, Lee D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The COVID-19 office in transition: cost, efficiency and the social responsibility business case</atitle><jtitle>Accounting, auditing & accountability journal</jtitle><date>2020-11-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1943</spage><epage>1967</epage><pages>1943-1967</pages><issn>0951-3574</issn><eissn>1758-4205</eissn><abstract>PurposeThis study aims to critically evaluate the COVID-19 and future post-COVID-19 impacts on office design, location and functioning with respect to government and community occupational health and safety expectations. It aims to assess how office efficiency and cost control agendas intersect with corporate social accountability.Design/methodology/approachTheoretically informed by governmentality and social accountability through action, it thematically examines research literature and Web-based professional and business reports. It undertakes a timely analysis of historical office trends and emerging practice discourse during the COVID-19 global pandemic's early phase.FindingsCOVID-19 has induced a transition to teleworking, impending office design and configuration reversals and office working protocol re-engineering. Management strategies reflect prioritisation choices between occupational health and safety versus financial returns. Beyond formal accountability reports, office management strategy and rationales will become physically observable and accountable to office staff and other parties.Research limitations/implicationsFuture research must determine the balance of office change strategies employed and their evident focus on occupational health and safety or cost control and financial returns. Further investigation can reveal the relationship between formal reporting and observed activities.Practical implicationsOrganisations face strategic decisions concerning both their balancing of employee and public health and safety against capital expenditure and operation cost commitments to COVID-19 transmission prevention. They also face strategic accountability decisions as to the visibility and correspondence between their observable actions and their formal social responsibility reporting.Social implicationsOrganisations have continued scientific management office cost reduction strategies under the guise of innovative office designs. This historic trend will be tested by a pandemic, which calls for control of its spread, including radical changes to the office at potentially significant cost.Originality/valueThis paper presents one of few office studies in the accounting research literature, recognising it as central to contemporary organisational functioning and revealing the office cost control tradition as a challenge for employee and community health and safety.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/AAAJ-06-2020-4609</doi><tpages>25</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0951-3574 |
ispartof | Accounting, auditing & accountability journal, 2020-11, Vol.33 (8), p.1943-1967 |
issn | 0951-3574 1758-4205 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_AAAJ-06-2020-4609 |
source | Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; ProQuest Central |
subjects | Accountability Business Capital Capital expenditures Community health Coronaviruses Cost control Cost reduction COVID-19 Design Disease transmission Efficiency GDP Governmentality Gross Domestic Product Health care expenditures Impending Internet Management consultants Occupational health Office layout Pandemics Political power Prioritizing Public health Radicalism Safety Scientific management Social responsibility Society Telecommuting Visibility |
title | The COVID-19 office in transition: cost, efficiency and the social responsibility business case |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T05%3A04%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20COVID-19%20office%20in%20transition:%20cost,%20efficiency%20and%20the%20social%20responsibility%20business%20case&rft.jtitle=Accounting,%20auditing%20&%20accountability%20journal&rft.au=Parker,%20Lee%20D&rft.date=2020-11-04&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1943&rft.epage=1967&rft.pages=1943-1967&rft.issn=0951-3574&rft.eissn=1758-4205&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2020-4609&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2457265401%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2457265401&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |