Perhaps the Dodo should have accounted for human beings? Accounts of humanity and (its) extinction

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to offer a counter-narrative to accounts of specific species extinction. The authors place humanity’s ways of organising at the core and recognise that only fundamental re-appraisal of humanity’s taken-for-granted narratives offers hope for biodiversity and susta...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Accounting, auditing & accountability journal auditing & accountability journal, 2018-03, Vol.31 (3), p.826-848
Hauptverfasser: Gray, Rob, Milne, Markus J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 848
container_issue 3
container_start_page 826
container_title Accounting, auditing & accountability journal
container_volume 31
creator Gray, Rob
Milne, Markus J
description Purpose The purpose of this paper is to offer a counter-narrative to accounts of specific species extinction. The authors place humanity’s ways of organising at the core and recognise that only fundamental re-appraisal of humanity’s taken-for-granted narratives offers hope for biodiversity and sustainability. The authors challenge producers of accounts of all sorts to reconsider the context and level of resolution of their accounts. The authors argue that humankind is the root cause of most (if not all) current species extinctions; that such extinctions represent one reason why humanity might itself be threatened with extinction; and why human extinction might be a good thing. The authors need to imagine other, better, futures. Design/methodology/approach The piece is an essay which assembles a wide range of literature in order to support its contentions. Findings There are many individual accounts of species which explore the (albeit very serious) symptoms of a problem without, the authors maintain, examining the systematic source of the problem. The source problem is western mankind’s organisation and somewhat taciturn conception of humanity. There is a lack of accounts offering new possibilities. Research limitations/implications The piece is an essay and, consequently, limited to the quality of the argument presented. The essay suggests that the principal implications relate to how producers of counter-accounts frame their construction of accounts and how accounts of species extinction need to be more cognisant of underlying causes. Practical implications Without substantial change, planetary ecology, including humanity, is very seriously threatened. Imagining a plausible future is a most practical act of faith. Social implications The essay suggests that as accountants the authors might think to approach the counter-accounts with a lower level of resolution: one that is directed towards a more challenging notion of what it is to be human. Originality/value Whilst building upon the growing sophistication in the understanding of (new) accounts and responding to the emerging literatures on biodiversity, species extinction and utopian vision the authors offer what the authors believe to be a unique suggestion in the accounting literature about the extinction of mankind.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/AAAJ-03-2016-2483
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_AAAJ-03-2016-2483</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2015012976</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-6a0356773065e2d60decf861dc89dd5b64e3ccdf9271ac4d2837d59c47cffa5c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwA9gsscBgOMexnUwo4htVggFmy7UdkqqNi-0g-u9JFBYkphve97k7PQidUrikFIqrqqqeCTCSARUkywu2h2ZU8oLkGfB9NIOSU8K4zA_RUYwrABioYoaWry40ehtxahy-9dbj2Ph-bXGjvxzWxvi-S87i2gfc9Bvd4aVru494jaspi9jXU9KmHdadxedtihfYfae2M6n13TE6qPU6upPfOUfv93dvN49k8fLwdFMtiBn-SkRoYFxIyUBwl1kB1pm6ENSaorSWL0XumDG2LjNJtcltVjBpeWlyaepac8Pm6Gzauw3-s3cxqZXvQzecVIMVDjQrpRhadGqZ4GMMrlbb0G502CkKalSpRpUK2AgJNaocGJgYt3FBr-2_yB_77Acei3Vj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2015012976</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perhaps the Dodo should have accounted for human beings? Accounts of humanity and (its) extinction</title><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><source>ProQuest Central Korea</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Gray, Rob ; Milne, Markus J</creator><creatorcontrib>Gray, Rob ; Milne, Markus J</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The purpose of this paper is to offer a counter-narrative to accounts of specific species extinction. The authors place humanity’s ways of organising at the core and recognise that only fundamental re-appraisal of humanity’s taken-for-granted narratives offers hope for biodiversity and sustainability. The authors challenge producers of accounts of all sorts to reconsider the context and level of resolution of their accounts. The authors argue that humankind is the root cause of most (if not all) current species extinctions; that such extinctions represent one reason why humanity might itself be threatened with extinction; and why human extinction might be a good thing. The authors need to imagine other, better, futures. Design/methodology/approach The piece is an essay which assembles a wide range of literature in order to support its contentions. Findings There are many individual accounts of species which explore the (albeit very serious) symptoms of a problem without, the authors maintain, examining the systematic source of the problem. The source problem is western mankind’s organisation and somewhat taciturn conception of humanity. There is a lack of accounts offering new possibilities. Research limitations/implications The piece is an essay and, consequently, limited to the quality of the argument presented. The essay suggests that the principal implications relate to how producers of counter-accounts frame their construction of accounts and how accounts of species extinction need to be more cognisant of underlying causes. Practical implications Without substantial change, planetary ecology, including humanity, is very seriously threatened. Imagining a plausible future is a most practical act of faith. Social implications The essay suggests that as accountants the authors might think to approach the counter-accounts with a lower level of resolution: one that is directed towards a more challenging notion of what it is to be human. Originality/value Whilst building upon the growing sophistication in the understanding of (new) accounts and responding to the emerging literatures on biodiversity, species extinction and utopian vision the authors offer what the authors believe to be a unique suggestion in the accounting literature about the extinction of mankind.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-3574</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-4205</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-03-2016-2483</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Accounting ; Accounts ; Alienation ; Biodiversity ; Earth ; Ecology ; Endangered &amp; extinct species ; Ethics ; Extinction ; Humans ; Modernity ; Narratives ; Sophistication</subject><ispartof>Accounting, auditing &amp; accountability journal, 2018-03, Vol.31 (3), p.826-848</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-6a0356773065e2d60decf861dc89dd5b64e3ccdf9271ac4d2837d59c47cffa5c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-6a0356773065e2d60decf861dc89dd5b64e3ccdf9271ac4d2837d59c47cffa5c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2016-2483/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21675,27903,27904,53223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gray, Rob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milne, Markus J</creatorcontrib><title>Perhaps the Dodo should have accounted for human beings? Accounts of humanity and (its) extinction</title><title>Accounting, auditing &amp; accountability journal</title><description>Purpose The purpose of this paper is to offer a counter-narrative to accounts of specific species extinction. The authors place humanity’s ways of organising at the core and recognise that only fundamental re-appraisal of humanity’s taken-for-granted narratives offers hope for biodiversity and sustainability. The authors challenge producers of accounts of all sorts to reconsider the context and level of resolution of their accounts. The authors argue that humankind is the root cause of most (if not all) current species extinctions; that such extinctions represent one reason why humanity might itself be threatened with extinction; and why human extinction might be a good thing. The authors need to imagine other, better, futures. Design/methodology/approach The piece is an essay which assembles a wide range of literature in order to support its contentions. Findings There are many individual accounts of species which explore the (albeit very serious) symptoms of a problem without, the authors maintain, examining the systematic source of the problem. The source problem is western mankind’s organisation and somewhat taciturn conception of humanity. There is a lack of accounts offering new possibilities. Research limitations/implications The piece is an essay and, consequently, limited to the quality of the argument presented. The essay suggests that the principal implications relate to how producers of counter-accounts frame their construction of accounts and how accounts of species extinction need to be more cognisant of underlying causes. Practical implications Without substantial change, planetary ecology, including humanity, is very seriously threatened. Imagining a plausible future is a most practical act of faith. Social implications The essay suggests that as accountants the authors might think to approach the counter-accounts with a lower level of resolution: one that is directed towards a more challenging notion of what it is to be human. Originality/value Whilst building upon the growing sophistication in the understanding of (new) accounts and responding to the emerging literatures on biodiversity, species extinction and utopian vision the authors offer what the authors believe to be a unique suggestion in the accounting literature about the extinction of mankind.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Accounts</subject><subject>Alienation</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Endangered &amp; extinct species</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Extinction</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Modernity</subject><subject>Narratives</subject><subject>Sophistication</subject><issn>0951-3574</issn><issn>1758-4205</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptkD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwA9gsscBgOMexnUwo4htVggFmy7UdkqqNi-0g-u9JFBYkphve97k7PQidUrikFIqrqqqeCTCSARUkywu2h2ZU8oLkGfB9NIOSU8K4zA_RUYwrABioYoaWry40ehtxahy-9dbj2Ph-bXGjvxzWxvi-S87i2gfc9Bvd4aVru494jaspi9jXU9KmHdadxedtihfYfae2M6n13TE6qPU6upPfOUfv93dvN49k8fLwdFMtiBn-SkRoYFxIyUBwl1kB1pm6ENSaorSWL0XumDG2LjNJtcltVjBpeWlyaepac8Pm6Gzauw3-s3cxqZXvQzecVIMVDjQrpRhadGqZ4GMMrlbb0G502CkKalSpRpUK2AgJNaocGJgYt3FBr-2_yB_77Acei3Vj</recordid><startdate>20180319</startdate><enddate>20180319</enddate><creator>Gray, Rob</creator><creator>Milne, Markus J</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180319</creationdate><title>Perhaps the Dodo should have accounted for human beings? Accounts of humanity and (its) extinction</title><author>Gray, Rob ; Milne, Markus J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-6a0356773065e2d60decf861dc89dd5b64e3ccdf9271ac4d2837d59c47cffa5c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Accounts</topic><topic>Alienation</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Endangered &amp; extinct species</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Extinction</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Modernity</topic><topic>Narratives</topic><topic>Sophistication</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gray, Rob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milne, Markus J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting &amp; Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Accounting, auditing &amp; accountability journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gray, Rob</au><au>Milne, Markus J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perhaps the Dodo should have accounted for human beings? Accounts of humanity and (its) extinction</atitle><jtitle>Accounting, auditing &amp; accountability journal</jtitle><date>2018-03-19</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>826</spage><epage>848</epage><pages>826-848</pages><issn>0951-3574</issn><eissn>1758-4205</eissn><abstract>Purpose The purpose of this paper is to offer a counter-narrative to accounts of specific species extinction. The authors place humanity’s ways of organising at the core and recognise that only fundamental re-appraisal of humanity’s taken-for-granted narratives offers hope for biodiversity and sustainability. The authors challenge producers of accounts of all sorts to reconsider the context and level of resolution of their accounts. The authors argue that humankind is the root cause of most (if not all) current species extinctions; that such extinctions represent one reason why humanity might itself be threatened with extinction; and why human extinction might be a good thing. The authors need to imagine other, better, futures. Design/methodology/approach The piece is an essay which assembles a wide range of literature in order to support its contentions. Findings There are many individual accounts of species which explore the (albeit very serious) symptoms of a problem without, the authors maintain, examining the systematic source of the problem. The source problem is western mankind’s organisation and somewhat taciturn conception of humanity. There is a lack of accounts offering new possibilities. Research limitations/implications The piece is an essay and, consequently, limited to the quality of the argument presented. The essay suggests that the principal implications relate to how producers of counter-accounts frame their construction of accounts and how accounts of species extinction need to be more cognisant of underlying causes. Practical implications Without substantial change, planetary ecology, including humanity, is very seriously threatened. Imagining a plausible future is a most practical act of faith. Social implications The essay suggests that as accountants the authors might think to approach the counter-accounts with a lower level of resolution: one that is directed towards a more challenging notion of what it is to be human. Originality/value Whilst building upon the growing sophistication in the understanding of (new) accounts and responding to the emerging literatures on biodiversity, species extinction and utopian vision the authors offer what the authors believe to be a unique suggestion in the accounting literature about the extinction of mankind.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/AAAJ-03-2016-2483</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0951-3574
ispartof Accounting, auditing & accountability journal, 2018-03, Vol.31 (3), p.826-848
issn 0951-3574
1758-4205
language eng
recordid cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_AAAJ-03-2016-2483
source Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection; ProQuest Central Korea; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; ProQuest Central
subjects Accountability
Accounting
Accounts
Alienation
Biodiversity
Earth
Ecology
Endangered & extinct species
Ethics
Extinction
Humans
Modernity
Narratives
Sophistication
title Perhaps the Dodo should have accounted for human beings? Accounts of humanity and (its) extinction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T18%3A54%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perhaps%20the%20Dodo%20should%20have%20accounted%20for%20human%20beings?%20Accounts%20of%20humanity%20and%20(its)%20extinction&rft.jtitle=Accounting,%20auditing%20&%20accountability%20journal&rft.au=Gray,%20Rob&rft.date=2018-03-19&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=826&rft.epage=848&rft.pages=826-848&rft.issn=0951-3574&rft.eissn=1758-4205&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2016-2483&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2015012976%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2015012976&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true