Perhaps the Dodo should have accounted for human beings? Accounts of humanity and (its) extinction
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to offer a counter-narrative to accounts of specific species extinction. The authors place humanity’s ways of organising at the core and recognise that only fundamental re-appraisal of humanity’s taken-for-granted narratives offers hope for biodiversity and susta...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Accounting, auditing & accountability journal auditing & accountability journal, 2018-03, Vol.31 (3), p.826-848 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 848 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 826 |
container_title | Accounting, auditing & accountability journal |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Gray, Rob Milne, Markus J |
description | Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to offer a counter-narrative to accounts of specific species extinction. The authors place humanity’s ways of organising at the core and recognise that only fundamental re-appraisal of humanity’s taken-for-granted narratives offers hope for biodiversity and sustainability. The authors challenge producers of accounts of all sorts to reconsider the context and level of resolution of their accounts. The authors argue that humankind is the root cause of most (if not all) current species extinctions; that such extinctions represent one reason why humanity might itself be threatened with extinction; and why human extinction might be a good thing. The authors need to imagine other, better, futures.
Design/methodology/approach
The piece is an essay which assembles a wide range of literature in order to support its contentions.
Findings
There are many individual accounts of species which explore the (albeit very serious) symptoms of a problem without, the authors maintain, examining the systematic source of the problem. The source problem is western mankind’s organisation and somewhat taciturn conception of humanity. There is a lack of accounts offering new possibilities.
Research limitations/implications
The piece is an essay and, consequently, limited to the quality of the argument presented. The essay suggests that the principal implications relate to how producers of counter-accounts frame their construction of accounts and how accounts of species extinction need to be more cognisant of underlying causes.
Practical implications
Without substantial change, planetary ecology, including humanity, is very seriously threatened. Imagining a plausible future is a most practical act of faith.
Social implications
The essay suggests that as accountants the authors might think to approach the counter-accounts with a lower level of resolution: one that is directed towards a more challenging notion of what it is to be human.
Originality/value
Whilst building upon the growing sophistication in the understanding of (new) accounts and responding to the emerging literatures on biodiversity, species extinction and utopian vision the authors offer what the authors believe to be a unique suggestion in the accounting literature about the extinction of mankind. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/AAAJ-03-2016-2483 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_AAAJ-03-2016-2483</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2015012976</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-6a0356773065e2d60decf861dc89dd5b64e3ccdf9271ac4d2837d59c47cffa5c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwA9gsscBgOMexnUwo4htVggFmy7UdkqqNi-0g-u9JFBYkphve97k7PQidUrikFIqrqqqeCTCSARUkywu2h2ZU8oLkGfB9NIOSU8K4zA_RUYwrABioYoaWry40ehtxahy-9dbj2Ph-bXGjvxzWxvi-S87i2gfc9Bvd4aVru494jaspi9jXU9KmHdadxedtihfYfae2M6n13TE6qPU6upPfOUfv93dvN49k8fLwdFMtiBn-SkRoYFxIyUBwl1kB1pm6ENSaorSWL0XumDG2LjNJtcltVjBpeWlyaepac8Pm6Gzauw3-s3cxqZXvQzecVIMVDjQrpRhadGqZ4GMMrlbb0G502CkKalSpRpUK2AgJNaocGJgYt3FBr-2_yB_77Acei3Vj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2015012976</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perhaps the Dodo should have accounted for human beings? Accounts of humanity and (its) extinction</title><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><source>ProQuest Central Korea</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Gray, Rob ; Milne, Markus J</creator><creatorcontrib>Gray, Rob ; Milne, Markus J</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to offer a counter-narrative to accounts of specific species extinction. The authors place humanity’s ways of organising at the core and recognise that only fundamental re-appraisal of humanity’s taken-for-granted narratives offers hope for biodiversity and sustainability. The authors challenge producers of accounts of all sorts to reconsider the context and level of resolution of their accounts. The authors argue that humankind is the root cause of most (if not all) current species extinctions; that such extinctions represent one reason why humanity might itself be threatened with extinction; and why human extinction might be a good thing. The authors need to imagine other, better, futures.
Design/methodology/approach
The piece is an essay which assembles a wide range of literature in order to support its contentions.
Findings
There are many individual accounts of species which explore the (albeit very serious) symptoms of a problem without, the authors maintain, examining the systematic source of the problem. The source problem is western mankind’s organisation and somewhat taciturn conception of humanity. There is a lack of accounts offering new possibilities.
Research limitations/implications
The piece is an essay and, consequently, limited to the quality of the argument presented. The essay suggests that the principal implications relate to how producers of counter-accounts frame their construction of accounts and how accounts of species extinction need to be more cognisant of underlying causes.
Practical implications
Without substantial change, planetary ecology, including humanity, is very seriously threatened. Imagining a plausible future is a most practical act of faith.
Social implications
The essay suggests that as accountants the authors might think to approach the counter-accounts with a lower level of resolution: one that is directed towards a more challenging notion of what it is to be human.
Originality/value
Whilst building upon the growing sophistication in the understanding of (new) accounts and responding to the emerging literatures on biodiversity, species extinction and utopian vision the authors offer what the authors believe to be a unique suggestion in the accounting literature about the extinction of mankind.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-3574</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-4205</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-03-2016-2483</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Accounting ; Accounts ; Alienation ; Biodiversity ; Earth ; Ecology ; Endangered & extinct species ; Ethics ; Extinction ; Humans ; Modernity ; Narratives ; Sophistication</subject><ispartof>Accounting, auditing & accountability journal, 2018-03, Vol.31 (3), p.826-848</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-6a0356773065e2d60decf861dc89dd5b64e3ccdf9271ac4d2837d59c47cffa5c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-6a0356773065e2d60decf861dc89dd5b64e3ccdf9271ac4d2837d59c47cffa5c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2016-2483/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21675,27903,27904,53223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gray, Rob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milne, Markus J</creatorcontrib><title>Perhaps the Dodo should have accounted for human beings? Accounts of humanity and (its) extinction</title><title>Accounting, auditing & accountability journal</title><description>Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to offer a counter-narrative to accounts of specific species extinction. The authors place humanity’s ways of organising at the core and recognise that only fundamental re-appraisal of humanity’s taken-for-granted narratives offers hope for biodiversity and sustainability. The authors challenge producers of accounts of all sorts to reconsider the context and level of resolution of their accounts. The authors argue that humankind is the root cause of most (if not all) current species extinctions; that such extinctions represent one reason why humanity might itself be threatened with extinction; and why human extinction might be a good thing. The authors need to imagine other, better, futures.
Design/methodology/approach
The piece is an essay which assembles a wide range of literature in order to support its contentions.
Findings
There are many individual accounts of species which explore the (albeit very serious) symptoms of a problem without, the authors maintain, examining the systematic source of the problem. The source problem is western mankind’s organisation and somewhat taciturn conception of humanity. There is a lack of accounts offering new possibilities.
Research limitations/implications
The piece is an essay and, consequently, limited to the quality of the argument presented. The essay suggests that the principal implications relate to how producers of counter-accounts frame their construction of accounts and how accounts of species extinction need to be more cognisant of underlying causes.
Practical implications
Without substantial change, planetary ecology, including humanity, is very seriously threatened. Imagining a plausible future is a most practical act of faith.
Social implications
The essay suggests that as accountants the authors might think to approach the counter-accounts with a lower level of resolution: one that is directed towards a more challenging notion of what it is to be human.
Originality/value
Whilst building upon the growing sophistication in the understanding of (new) accounts and responding to the emerging literatures on biodiversity, species extinction and utopian vision the authors offer what the authors believe to be a unique suggestion in the accounting literature about the extinction of mankind.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Accounts</subject><subject>Alienation</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Endangered & extinct species</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Extinction</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Modernity</subject><subject>Narratives</subject><subject>Sophistication</subject><issn>0951-3574</issn><issn>1758-4205</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptkD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwA9gsscBgOMexnUwo4htVggFmy7UdkqqNi-0g-u9JFBYkphve97k7PQidUrikFIqrqqqeCTCSARUkywu2h2ZU8oLkGfB9NIOSU8K4zA_RUYwrABioYoaWry40ehtxahy-9dbj2Ph-bXGjvxzWxvi-S87i2gfc9Bvd4aVru494jaspi9jXU9KmHdadxedtihfYfae2M6n13TE6qPU6upPfOUfv93dvN49k8fLwdFMtiBn-SkRoYFxIyUBwl1kB1pm6ENSaorSWL0XumDG2LjNJtcltVjBpeWlyaepac8Pm6Gzauw3-s3cxqZXvQzecVIMVDjQrpRhadGqZ4GMMrlbb0G502CkKalSpRpUK2AgJNaocGJgYt3FBr-2_yB_77Acei3Vj</recordid><startdate>20180319</startdate><enddate>20180319</enddate><creator>Gray, Rob</creator><creator>Milne, Markus J</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180319</creationdate><title>Perhaps the Dodo should have accounted for human beings? Accounts of humanity and (its) extinction</title><author>Gray, Rob ; Milne, Markus J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-6a0356773065e2d60decf861dc89dd5b64e3ccdf9271ac4d2837d59c47cffa5c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Accounts</topic><topic>Alienation</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Endangered & extinct species</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Extinction</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Modernity</topic><topic>Narratives</topic><topic>Sophistication</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gray, Rob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milne, Markus J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Accounting, auditing & accountability journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gray, Rob</au><au>Milne, Markus J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perhaps the Dodo should have accounted for human beings? Accounts of humanity and (its) extinction</atitle><jtitle>Accounting, auditing & accountability journal</jtitle><date>2018-03-19</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>826</spage><epage>848</epage><pages>826-848</pages><issn>0951-3574</issn><eissn>1758-4205</eissn><abstract>Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to offer a counter-narrative to accounts of specific species extinction. The authors place humanity’s ways of organising at the core and recognise that only fundamental re-appraisal of humanity’s taken-for-granted narratives offers hope for biodiversity and sustainability. The authors challenge producers of accounts of all sorts to reconsider the context and level of resolution of their accounts. The authors argue that humankind is the root cause of most (if not all) current species extinctions; that such extinctions represent one reason why humanity might itself be threatened with extinction; and why human extinction might be a good thing. The authors need to imagine other, better, futures.
Design/methodology/approach
The piece is an essay which assembles a wide range of literature in order to support its contentions.
Findings
There are many individual accounts of species which explore the (albeit very serious) symptoms of a problem without, the authors maintain, examining the systematic source of the problem. The source problem is western mankind’s organisation and somewhat taciturn conception of humanity. There is a lack of accounts offering new possibilities.
Research limitations/implications
The piece is an essay and, consequently, limited to the quality of the argument presented. The essay suggests that the principal implications relate to how producers of counter-accounts frame their construction of accounts and how accounts of species extinction need to be more cognisant of underlying causes.
Practical implications
Without substantial change, planetary ecology, including humanity, is very seriously threatened. Imagining a plausible future is a most practical act of faith.
Social implications
The essay suggests that as accountants the authors might think to approach the counter-accounts with a lower level of resolution: one that is directed towards a more challenging notion of what it is to be human.
Originality/value
Whilst building upon the growing sophistication in the understanding of (new) accounts and responding to the emerging literatures on biodiversity, species extinction and utopian vision the authors offer what the authors believe to be a unique suggestion in the accounting literature about the extinction of mankind.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/AAAJ-03-2016-2483</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0951-3574 |
ispartof | Accounting, auditing & accountability journal, 2018-03, Vol.31 (3), p.826-848 |
issn | 0951-3574 1758-4205 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_AAAJ-03-2016-2483 |
source | Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection; ProQuest Central Korea; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; ProQuest Central |
subjects | Accountability Accounting Accounts Alienation Biodiversity Earth Ecology Endangered & extinct species Ethics Extinction Humans Modernity Narratives Sophistication |
title | Perhaps the Dodo should have accounted for human beings? Accounts of humanity and (its) extinction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T18%3A54%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perhaps%20the%20Dodo%20should%20have%20accounted%20for%20human%20beings?%20Accounts%20of%20humanity%20and%20(its)%20extinction&rft.jtitle=Accounting,%20auditing%20&%20accountability%20journal&rft.au=Gray,%20Rob&rft.date=2018-03-19&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=826&rft.epage=848&rft.pages=826-848&rft.issn=0951-3574&rft.eissn=1758-4205&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2016-2483&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2015012976%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2015012976&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |