The question of research relevance: a university management perspective

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to empirically investigate the issue of research relevance from the frame of reference of university leaders. Its specific aim is to gain insights into how “relevance” is conceptualised, and the underlying assumptions upon which such conceptualizations are based.D...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Accounting, auditing & accountability journal auditing & accountability journal, 2020-10, Vol.33 (6), p.1247-1275
Hauptverfasser: Tucker, Basil P, Parker, Lee D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1275
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1247
container_title Accounting, auditing & accountability journal
container_volume 33
creator Tucker, Basil P
Parker, Lee D
description PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to empirically investigate the issue of research relevance from the frame of reference of university leaders. Its specific aim is to gain insights into how “relevance” is conceptualised, and the underlying assumptions upon which such conceptualizations are based.Design/methodology/approachAdopting an inductive approach, the study collects and analyses data from semi-structured interviews with 31 senior research-related university leaders, and archival sources in five Australian universities.FindingsResearch relevance is primarily viewed as a means of responding to government and political imperatives, as a pathway to ensuring university legitimacy, and as a means of generating further resources. The authors apply this understanding to develop a framework that adopts a nuanced view of relevance, reflecting what is driving research, and to whom research is principally targeted.Research limitations/implicationsThe evidence-base upon which the study is based represents a relatively small number of university leaders of Australian universities. Moreover, restricting the investigation to a few senior hierarchical levels nonetheless offers insights into high level organisational drivers hitherto neglected in the accounting research literature on university strategy, governance and accountability. While not addressing perceptions across the university population, this study focusses on and unpacks the social construction of relevance of this select group as research policy makers.Originality/valueAs one of the few empirically informed investigations exploring the issue of research relevance from the perspective of university leaders, this study provides insights rather than “answers”. Its findings therefore serve as a foundational basis for further empirical and theoretical enquiry.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/AAAJ-01-2018-3325
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_AAAJ-01-2018-3325</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2534630335</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-a88533010b201e4da32c8e251997550160602f165f176cb9521167f1c2e391753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkMFOwzAMhiMEEmPwANwqcQ7YSdOm3KoJBmgSl3GOssxlnba2JO2kvT0p44LEyZbt37_9MXaLcI8I-qEsyzcOyAWg5lIKdcYmmCvNUwHqnE2gUMilytNLdhXCFgCiSk_YfLmh5Gug0Ndtk7RV4imQ9W4Tkx0dbOPoMbHJ0NQH8qHuj8neNvaT9tT0SRdLHbk-9q7ZRWV3gW5-45R9PD8tZy988T5_nZUL7lJQPbdaKymj9yoeSunaSuE0CYVFkSsFmEEGosJMVZhnblUogZjlFTpBsoj_yCm7O-3tfPtzttm2g2-ipRFKppkEKccpPE0534bgqTKdr_fWHw2CGXmZkZcBNCMvM_KKGjhp4m_e7tb_Sv4glt9w62ng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2534630335</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The question of research relevance: a university management perspective</title><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><source>ProQuest Central Korea</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Tucker, Basil P ; Parker, Lee D</creator><creatorcontrib>Tucker, Basil P ; Parker, Lee D</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to empirically investigate the issue of research relevance from the frame of reference of university leaders. Its specific aim is to gain insights into how “relevance” is conceptualised, and the underlying assumptions upon which such conceptualizations are based.Design/methodology/approachAdopting an inductive approach, the study collects and analyses data from semi-structured interviews with 31 senior research-related university leaders, and archival sources in five Australian universities.FindingsResearch relevance is primarily viewed as a means of responding to government and political imperatives, as a pathway to ensuring university legitimacy, and as a means of generating further resources. The authors apply this understanding to develop a framework that adopts a nuanced view of relevance, reflecting what is driving research, and to whom research is principally targeted.Research limitations/implicationsThe evidence-base upon which the study is based represents a relatively small number of university leaders of Australian universities. Moreover, restricting the investigation to a few senior hierarchical levels nonetheless offers insights into high level organisational drivers hitherto neglected in the accounting research literature on university strategy, governance and accountability. While not addressing perceptions across the university population, this study focusses on and unpacks the social construction of relevance of this select group as research policy makers.Originality/valueAs one of the few empirically informed investigations exploring the issue of research relevance from the perspective of university leaders, this study provides insights rather than “answers”. Its findings therefore serve as a foundational basis for further empirical and theoretical enquiry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-3574</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-4205</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-01-2018-3325</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Colleges &amp; universities ; Debates ; Dependency theory ; Governance ; Higher education ; Legitimacy ; Management accounting ; Performance evaluation ; Policy making ; Relevance ; Social construction ; Stakeholders</subject><ispartof>Accounting, auditing &amp; accountability journal, 2020-10, Vol.33 (6), p.1247-1275</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-a88533010b201e4da32c8e251997550160602f165f176cb9521167f1c2e391753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-a88533010b201e4da32c8e251997550160602f165f176cb9521167f1c2e391753</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1858-1590</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/AAAJ-01-2018-3325/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21694,27923,27924,53243</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tucker, Basil P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Lee D</creatorcontrib><title>The question of research relevance: a university management perspective</title><title>Accounting, auditing &amp; accountability journal</title><description>PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to empirically investigate the issue of research relevance from the frame of reference of university leaders. Its specific aim is to gain insights into how “relevance” is conceptualised, and the underlying assumptions upon which such conceptualizations are based.Design/methodology/approachAdopting an inductive approach, the study collects and analyses data from semi-structured interviews with 31 senior research-related university leaders, and archival sources in five Australian universities.FindingsResearch relevance is primarily viewed as a means of responding to government and political imperatives, as a pathway to ensuring university legitimacy, and as a means of generating further resources. The authors apply this understanding to develop a framework that adopts a nuanced view of relevance, reflecting what is driving research, and to whom research is principally targeted.Research limitations/implicationsThe evidence-base upon which the study is based represents a relatively small number of university leaders of Australian universities. Moreover, restricting the investigation to a few senior hierarchical levels nonetheless offers insights into high level organisational drivers hitherto neglected in the accounting research literature on university strategy, governance and accountability. While not addressing perceptions across the university population, this study focusses on and unpacks the social construction of relevance of this select group as research policy makers.Originality/valueAs one of the few empirically informed investigations exploring the issue of research relevance from the perspective of university leaders, this study provides insights rather than “answers”. Its findings therefore serve as a foundational basis for further empirical and theoretical enquiry.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Colleges &amp; universities</subject><subject>Debates</subject><subject>Dependency theory</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Legitimacy</subject><subject>Management accounting</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Relevance</subject><subject>Social construction</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><issn>0951-3574</issn><issn>1758-4205</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptkMFOwzAMhiMEEmPwANwqcQ7YSdOm3KoJBmgSl3GOssxlnba2JO2kvT0p44LEyZbt37_9MXaLcI8I-qEsyzcOyAWg5lIKdcYmmCvNUwHqnE2gUMilytNLdhXCFgCiSk_YfLmh5Gug0Ndtk7RV4imQ9W4Tkx0dbOPoMbHJ0NQH8qHuj8neNvaT9tT0SRdLHbk-9q7ZRWV3gW5-45R9PD8tZy988T5_nZUL7lJQPbdaKymj9yoeSunaSuE0CYVFkSsFmEEGosJMVZhnblUogZjlFTpBsoj_yCm7O-3tfPtzttm2g2-ipRFKppkEKccpPE0534bgqTKdr_fWHw2CGXmZkZcBNCMvM_KKGjhp4m_e7tb_Sv4glt9w62ng</recordid><startdate>20201008</startdate><enddate>20201008</enddate><creator>Tucker, Basil P</creator><creator>Parker, Lee D</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1858-1590</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201008</creationdate><title>The question of research relevance: a university management perspective</title><author>Tucker, Basil P ; Parker, Lee D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-a88533010b201e4da32c8e251997550160602f165f176cb9521167f1c2e391753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Colleges &amp; universities</topic><topic>Debates</topic><topic>Dependency theory</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Legitimacy</topic><topic>Management accounting</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Relevance</topic><topic>Social construction</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tucker, Basil P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Lee D</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting &amp; Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Accounting, auditing &amp; accountability journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tucker, Basil P</au><au>Parker, Lee D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The question of research relevance: a university management perspective</atitle><jtitle>Accounting, auditing &amp; accountability journal</jtitle><date>2020-10-08</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1247</spage><epage>1275</epage><pages>1247-1275</pages><issn>0951-3574</issn><eissn>1758-4205</eissn><abstract>PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to empirically investigate the issue of research relevance from the frame of reference of university leaders. Its specific aim is to gain insights into how “relevance” is conceptualised, and the underlying assumptions upon which such conceptualizations are based.Design/methodology/approachAdopting an inductive approach, the study collects and analyses data from semi-structured interviews with 31 senior research-related university leaders, and archival sources in five Australian universities.FindingsResearch relevance is primarily viewed as a means of responding to government and political imperatives, as a pathway to ensuring university legitimacy, and as a means of generating further resources. The authors apply this understanding to develop a framework that adopts a nuanced view of relevance, reflecting what is driving research, and to whom research is principally targeted.Research limitations/implicationsThe evidence-base upon which the study is based represents a relatively small number of university leaders of Australian universities. Moreover, restricting the investigation to a few senior hierarchical levels nonetheless offers insights into high level organisational drivers hitherto neglected in the accounting research literature on university strategy, governance and accountability. While not addressing perceptions across the university population, this study focusses on and unpacks the social construction of relevance of this select group as research policy makers.Originality/valueAs one of the few empirically informed investigations exploring the issue of research relevance from the perspective of university leaders, this study provides insights rather than “answers”. Its findings therefore serve as a foundational basis for further empirical and theoretical enquiry.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/AAAJ-01-2018-3325</doi><tpages>29</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1858-1590</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0951-3574
ispartof Accounting, auditing & accountability journal, 2020-10, Vol.33 (6), p.1247-1275
issn 0951-3574
1758-4205
language eng
recordid cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_AAAJ-01-2018-3325
source Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection; ProQuest Central Korea; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; ProQuest Central
subjects Accountability
Colleges & universities
Debates
Dependency theory
Governance
Higher education
Legitimacy
Management accounting
Performance evaluation
Policy making
Relevance
Social construction
Stakeholders
title The question of research relevance: a university management perspective
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T22%3A30%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20question%20of%20research%20relevance:%20a%20university%20management%20perspective&rft.jtitle=Accounting,%20auditing%20&%20accountability%20journal&rft.au=Tucker,%20Basil%20P&rft.date=2020-10-08&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1247&rft.epage=1275&rft.pages=1247-1275&rft.issn=0951-3574&rft.eissn=1758-4205&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/AAAJ-01-2018-3325&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2534630335%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2534630335&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true