The paradox of risk management; a project management practice perspective

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate the interplay between risk management and uncertainty and the contextual variability of risk management practice. More precisely, the research empirically measures the relation between the extent of use of risk management and the level of project...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of managing projects in business 2012-03, Vol.5 (2), p.230-247
Hauptverfasser: Besner, Claude, Hobbs, Brian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 247
container_issue 2
container_start_page 230
container_title International journal of managing projects in business
container_volume 5
creator Besner, Claude
Hobbs, Brian
description Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate the interplay between risk management and uncertainty and the contextual variability of risk management practice. More precisely, the research empirically measures the relation between the extent of use of risk management and the level of project uncertainty.Design methodology approach - The research defines risk management from an empirical perspective., i.e. from an empirically-identified set of tools that is actually used to perform risk management. This toolset is derived from the results of an ongoing major worldwide survey on what experienced practitioners actually do to manage their projects. This paper directly relates uncertainty to the degree of project definition. It uses a sample of 1,296 responses for which the interplay between risk management and uncertainty could be measured.Findings - The results are very coherent. They verify and empirically validate many of the propositions drawn from a review of the literature. But results challenge some of the propositions found in the conventional project management literature and some commonly held views. The research shows that the use of risk management practices and tools is negatively related to the degree of project uncertainty. This somewhat counter-intuitive result is consistent with a general tendency for all project management tools and techniques to be used more intensively in better defined contexts.Practical implications - The empirical investigation of actual risk practices and their contextual variability can help better understand risk management practice and manage risks better. The research also clarifies the concepts of uncertainty, risk and risk management.Originality value - The results confirm some well-known assumptions about practices, but at the same time produced unexpected results that can stimulate the development of new practices adapted to highly uncertain contexts. The project management field needs to develop new responses for specific contexts for which it was not primarily developed. The results of this research point in the direction of such a need for ill-defined projects and highly uncertain contexts.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/17538371211214923
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_17538371211214923</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2617175601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-d08e848f627069135875aa2ba92feec412ad772c42f8a02279fec8b49ab9f7603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFLAzEQhYMoWKs_wNvi2dVMst0keJJitVDwUs9hNjvRrW13Tbai_96UiogiCIEJb943eRnGToFfAHB9CWoktVQgIJ3CCLnHBlst11KX-193pQ_ZUYwLzktTAAzYdP5EWYcB6_Yta30WmvicrXCNj7SidX-VYdaFdkGu_6YmCV3fuERSiF1qNq90zA48LiOdfNYhe5jczMd3-ez-djq-nuVOaujzmmvShfalUCkDyJFWI0RRoRGeyBUgsFZKuEJ4jVwIZTw5XRUGK-NVyeWQne3mplwvG4q9XbSbsE5PWiONKDk3ZTLBzuRCG2Mgb7vQrDC8W-B2uzD7a2GJ4Tsm_THgsv4Xcv4H8tNqu9rLD3hJeJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>939260096</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The paradox of risk management; a project management practice perspective</title><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Besner, Claude ; Hobbs, Brian</creator><contributor>Drouin, Nathalie</contributor><creatorcontrib>Besner, Claude ; Hobbs, Brian ; Drouin, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate the interplay between risk management and uncertainty and the contextual variability of risk management practice. More precisely, the research empirically measures the relation between the extent of use of risk management and the level of project uncertainty.Design methodology approach - The research defines risk management from an empirical perspective., i.e. from an empirically-identified set of tools that is actually used to perform risk management. This toolset is derived from the results of an ongoing major worldwide survey on what experienced practitioners actually do to manage their projects. This paper directly relates uncertainty to the degree of project definition. It uses a sample of 1,296 responses for which the interplay between risk management and uncertainty could be measured.Findings - The results are very coherent. They verify and empirically validate many of the propositions drawn from a review of the literature. But results challenge some of the propositions found in the conventional project management literature and some commonly held views. The research shows that the use of risk management practices and tools is negatively related to the degree of project uncertainty. This somewhat counter-intuitive result is consistent with a general tendency for all project management tools and techniques to be used more intensively in better defined contexts.Practical implications - The empirical investigation of actual risk practices and their contextual variability can help better understand risk management practice and manage risks better. The research also clarifies the concepts of uncertainty, risk and risk management.Originality value - The results confirm some well-known assumptions about practices, but at the same time produced unexpected results that can stimulate the development of new practices adapted to highly uncertain contexts. The project management field needs to develop new responses for specific contexts for which it was not primarily developed. The results of this research point in the direction of such a need for ill-defined projects and highly uncertain contexts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1753-8378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1753-8386</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/17538371211214923</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Influence ; Planning ; Principal components analysis ; Project management ; Risk management ; Studies ; Success</subject><ispartof>International journal of managing projects in business, 2012-03, Vol.5 (2), p.230-247</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Copyright Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-d08e848f627069135875aa2ba92feec412ad772c42f8a02279fec8b49ab9f7603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-d08e848f627069135875aa2ba92feec412ad772c42f8a02279fec8b49ab9f7603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/17538371211214923/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/17538371211214923/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,967,11635,21695,27924,27925,52686,52689,53244,53372</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Drouin, Nathalie</contributor><creatorcontrib>Besner, Claude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hobbs, Brian</creatorcontrib><title>The paradox of risk management; a project management practice perspective</title><title>International journal of managing projects in business</title><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate the interplay between risk management and uncertainty and the contextual variability of risk management practice. More precisely, the research empirically measures the relation between the extent of use of risk management and the level of project uncertainty.Design methodology approach - The research defines risk management from an empirical perspective., i.e. from an empirically-identified set of tools that is actually used to perform risk management. This toolset is derived from the results of an ongoing major worldwide survey on what experienced practitioners actually do to manage their projects. This paper directly relates uncertainty to the degree of project definition. It uses a sample of 1,296 responses for which the interplay between risk management and uncertainty could be measured.Findings - The results are very coherent. They verify and empirically validate many of the propositions drawn from a review of the literature. But results challenge some of the propositions found in the conventional project management literature and some commonly held views. The research shows that the use of risk management practices and tools is negatively related to the degree of project uncertainty. This somewhat counter-intuitive result is consistent with a general tendency for all project management tools and techniques to be used more intensively in better defined contexts.Practical implications - The empirical investigation of actual risk practices and their contextual variability can help better understand risk management practice and manage risks better. The research also clarifies the concepts of uncertainty, risk and risk management.Originality value - The results confirm some well-known assumptions about practices, but at the same time produced unexpected results that can stimulate the development of new practices adapted to highly uncertain contexts. The project management field needs to develop new responses for specific contexts for which it was not primarily developed. The results of this research point in the direction of such a need for ill-defined projects and highly uncertain contexts.</description><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>Project management</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Success</subject><issn>1753-8378</issn><issn>1753-8386</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEFLAzEQhYMoWKs_wNvi2dVMst0keJJitVDwUs9hNjvRrW13Tbai_96UiogiCIEJb943eRnGToFfAHB9CWoktVQgIJ3CCLnHBlst11KX-193pQ_ZUYwLzktTAAzYdP5EWYcB6_Yta30WmvicrXCNj7SidX-VYdaFdkGu_6YmCV3fuERSiF1qNq90zA48LiOdfNYhe5jczMd3-ez-djq-nuVOaujzmmvShfalUCkDyJFWI0RRoRGeyBUgsFZKuEJ4jVwIZTw5XRUGK-NVyeWQne3mplwvG4q9XbSbsE5PWiONKDk3ZTLBzuRCG2Mgb7vQrDC8W-B2uzD7a2GJ4Tsm_THgsv4Xcv4H8tNqu9rLD3hJeJw</recordid><startdate>20120330</startdate><enddate>20120330</enddate><creator>Besner, Claude</creator><creator>Hobbs, Brian</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120330</creationdate><title>The paradox of risk management; a project management practice perspective</title><author>Besner, Claude ; Hobbs, Brian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-d08e848f627069135875aa2ba92feec412ad772c42f8a02279fec8b49ab9f7603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>Project management</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Success</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Besner, Claude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hobbs, Brian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International journal of managing projects in business</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Besner, Claude</au><au>Hobbs, Brian</au><au>Drouin, Nathalie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The paradox of risk management; a project management practice perspective</atitle><jtitle>International journal of managing projects in business</jtitle><date>2012-03-30</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>230</spage><epage>247</epage><pages>230-247</pages><issn>1753-8378</issn><eissn>1753-8386</eissn><abstract>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate the interplay between risk management and uncertainty and the contextual variability of risk management practice. More precisely, the research empirically measures the relation between the extent of use of risk management and the level of project uncertainty.Design methodology approach - The research defines risk management from an empirical perspective., i.e. from an empirically-identified set of tools that is actually used to perform risk management. This toolset is derived from the results of an ongoing major worldwide survey on what experienced practitioners actually do to manage their projects. This paper directly relates uncertainty to the degree of project definition. It uses a sample of 1,296 responses for which the interplay between risk management and uncertainty could be measured.Findings - The results are very coherent. They verify and empirically validate many of the propositions drawn from a review of the literature. But results challenge some of the propositions found in the conventional project management literature and some commonly held views. The research shows that the use of risk management practices and tools is negatively related to the degree of project uncertainty. This somewhat counter-intuitive result is consistent with a general tendency for all project management tools and techniques to be used more intensively in better defined contexts.Practical implications - The empirical investigation of actual risk practices and their contextual variability can help better understand risk management practice and manage risks better. The research also clarifies the concepts of uncertainty, risk and risk management.Originality value - The results confirm some well-known assumptions about practices, but at the same time produced unexpected results that can stimulate the development of new practices adapted to highly uncertain contexts. The project management field needs to develop new responses for specific contexts for which it was not primarily developed. The results of this research point in the direction of such a need for ill-defined projects and highly uncertain contexts.</abstract><cop>Bingley</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/17538371211214923</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1753-8378
ispartof International journal of managing projects in business, 2012-03, Vol.5 (2), p.230-247
issn 1753-8378
1753-8386
language eng
recordid cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_17538371211214923
source Emerald A-Z Current Journals; Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection
subjects Influence
Planning
Principal components analysis
Project management
Risk management
Studies
Success
title The paradox of risk management; a project management practice perspective
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T02%3A38%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20paradox%20of%20risk%20management;%20a%20project%20management%20practice%20perspective&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20managing%20projects%20in%20business&rft.au=Besner,%20Claude&rft.date=2012-03-30&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=230&rft.epage=247&rft.pages=230-247&rft.issn=1753-8378&rft.eissn=1753-8386&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/17538371211214923&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2617175601%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=939260096&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true