School performance management practices and school achievement
Purpose - The literature is very rich in its discussion on how to measure school performance, but there are still a number of gaps to investigate in relation to the determinants of that performance, especially at the level of school performance management practices. The purpose of the paper is to un...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of productivity and performance management 2012-01, Vol.61 (3), p.272-289 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 289 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 272 |
container_title | International journal of productivity and performance management |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Sarrico, Cláudia S Rosa, Maria J Manatos, Maria J |
description | Purpose - The literature is very rich in its discussion on how to measure school performance, but there are still a number of gaps to investigate in relation to the determinants of that performance, especially at the level of school performance management practices. The purpose of the paper is to understand better performance management practices in schools and how they may relate to school achievement.Design methodology approach - Frequently, the performance of schools is evaluated using solely output measures: especially exam classifications, but also progression rates, completion rates and wastage rates. Previously, a value-added approach was used to quantitatively evaluate Portuguese secondary schools beyond output results. From the results of this exercise, a sample of schools with different levels of observed performance was chosen. In-depth case studies of the sample of schools were undertaken to gather an understanding of their performance management practices, taking Bouckaert and Halligan's framework of analysis.Findings - Self-evaluation and performance management are not well developed in schools. Most schools monitor exam results, progression and completion rates. However, they do not seem to do it in a formal and systematic way, and find it difficult to understand the reasons for the results obtained. Incorporation of performance measures into performance management is incipient, and most acknowledge the difficulty of going from measurement of results to improvement actions. Few can demonstrate that improvement actions have resulted from self-evaluation and very few evaluate improvement actions' results. There seems to be an agreement that the external evaluation of schools has prompted the development of self-evaluation.Originality value - This is a study at the meso level of analysis of public sector performance, that of state education. The study contributes to a better understanding of performance management in Portuguese secondary schools. More generally, it investigates the usefulness of the Bouckaert and Halligan framework to assess progress in performance management and whether that will lead to progress in performance itself. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/17410401211205641 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_17410401211205641</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1019639315</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-d88c6379ad048dd157f92a64d4d15338f1303bca4aa4d3f549226d1cd1241203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AHfFlQuruUmaJhtBxBcMuHD2IebhdGibmnQE_70Z62pEcHPvXXzncM9B6BTwJQAWV1AzwAwDASC44gz20AzqSpScV2J_ezMot8AhOkppjTGRAugMXb-YVQhtMbjoQ-x0b1yRp35znevHYojajI1xqdC9LdLEarNq3Mc3cIwOvG6TO_nZc7S8v1vePpaL54en25tFaZioxtIKYTitpbaYCWuhqr0kmjPL8k2p8EAxfTWaac0s9RWThHALxgJhOQ-do_PJdojhfePSqLomGde2undhkxRgkJxKms3m6GwHXYdN7PNzShKaGVKLDMEEmRhSis6rITadjp_ZSW37VL_6zBo8aXLwqFv7L8nFH5JdVA3W0y990IGO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>923393278</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>School performance management practices and school achievement</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Sarrico, Cláudia S ; Rosa, Maria J ; Manatos, Maria J</creator><contributor>Sarrico, Cláudia S.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Sarrico, Cláudia S ; Rosa, Maria J ; Manatos, Maria J ; Sarrico, Cláudia S.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - The literature is very rich in its discussion on how to measure school performance, but there are still a number of gaps to investigate in relation to the determinants of that performance, especially at the level of school performance management practices. The purpose of the paper is to understand better performance management practices in schools and how they may relate to school achievement.Design methodology approach - Frequently, the performance of schools is evaluated using solely output measures: especially exam classifications, but also progression rates, completion rates and wastage rates. Previously, a value-added approach was used to quantitatively evaluate Portuguese secondary schools beyond output results. From the results of this exercise, a sample of schools with different levels of observed performance was chosen. In-depth case studies of the sample of schools were undertaken to gather an understanding of their performance management practices, taking Bouckaert and Halligan's framework of analysis.Findings - Self-evaluation and performance management are not well developed in schools. Most schools monitor exam results, progression and completion rates. However, they do not seem to do it in a formal and systematic way, and find it difficult to understand the reasons for the results obtained. Incorporation of performance measures into performance management is incipient, and most acknowledge the difficulty of going from measurement of results to improvement actions. Few can demonstrate that improvement actions have resulted from self-evaluation and very few evaluate improvement actions' results. There seems to be an agreement that the external evaluation of schools has prompted the development of self-evaluation.Originality value - This is a study at the meso level of analysis of public sector performance, that of state education. The study contributes to a better understanding of performance management in Portuguese secondary schools. More generally, it investigates the usefulness of the Bouckaert and Halligan framework to assess progress in performance management and whether that will lead to progress in performance itself.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1741-0401</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-6658</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/17410401211205641</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Debates ; Decision making ; Design engineering ; Determinants ; Education ; Education policy ; Gaps ; Management ; Monitors ; Performance evaluation ; Performance management ; Productivity ; Progressions ; Public sector ; Schools ; Self evaluation ; Society ; Studies ; Working groups</subject><ispartof>International journal of productivity and performance management, 2012-01, Vol.61 (3), p.272-289</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Copyright Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-d88c6379ad048dd157f92a64d4d15338f1303bca4aa4d3f549226d1cd1241203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-d88c6379ad048dd157f92a64d4d15338f1303bca4aa4d3f549226d1cd1241203</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/17410401211205641/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/17410401211205641/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,968,11640,21700,27929,27930,52691,52694,53249,53377</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Sarrico, Cláudia S.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Sarrico, Cláudia S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosa, Maria J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manatos, Maria J</creatorcontrib><title>School performance management practices and school achievement</title><title>International journal of productivity and performance management</title><description>Purpose - The literature is very rich in its discussion on how to measure school performance, but there are still a number of gaps to investigate in relation to the determinants of that performance, especially at the level of school performance management practices. The purpose of the paper is to understand better performance management practices in schools and how they may relate to school achievement.Design methodology approach - Frequently, the performance of schools is evaluated using solely output measures: especially exam classifications, but also progression rates, completion rates and wastage rates. Previously, a value-added approach was used to quantitatively evaluate Portuguese secondary schools beyond output results. From the results of this exercise, a sample of schools with different levels of observed performance was chosen. In-depth case studies of the sample of schools were undertaken to gather an understanding of their performance management practices, taking Bouckaert and Halligan's framework of analysis.Findings - Self-evaluation and performance management are not well developed in schools. Most schools monitor exam results, progression and completion rates. However, they do not seem to do it in a formal and systematic way, and find it difficult to understand the reasons for the results obtained. Incorporation of performance measures into performance management is incipient, and most acknowledge the difficulty of going from measurement of results to improvement actions. Few can demonstrate that improvement actions have resulted from self-evaluation and very few evaluate improvement actions' results. There seems to be an agreement that the external evaluation of schools has prompted the development of self-evaluation.Originality value - This is a study at the meso level of analysis of public sector performance, that of state education. The study contributes to a better understanding of performance management in Portuguese secondary schools. More generally, it investigates the usefulness of the Bouckaert and Halligan framework to assess progress in performance management and whether that will lead to progress in performance itself.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Debates</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Design engineering</subject><subject>Determinants</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Education policy</subject><subject>Gaps</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Monitors</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Performance management</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Progressions</subject><subject>Public sector</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Self evaluation</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Working groups</subject><issn>1741-0401</issn><issn>1758-6658</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AHfFlQuruUmaJhtBxBcMuHD2IebhdGibmnQE_70Z62pEcHPvXXzncM9B6BTwJQAWV1AzwAwDASC44gz20AzqSpScV2J_ezMot8AhOkppjTGRAugMXb-YVQhtMbjoQ-x0b1yRp35znevHYojajI1xqdC9LdLEarNq3Mc3cIwOvG6TO_nZc7S8v1vePpaL54en25tFaZioxtIKYTitpbaYCWuhqr0kmjPL8k2p8EAxfTWaac0s9RWThHALxgJhOQ-do_PJdojhfePSqLomGde2undhkxRgkJxKms3m6GwHXYdN7PNzShKaGVKLDMEEmRhSis6rITadjp_ZSW37VL_6zBo8aXLwqFv7L8nFH5JdVA3W0y990IGO</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Sarrico, Cláudia S</creator><creator>Rosa, Maria J</creator><creator>Manatos, Maria J</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>School performance management practices and school achievement</title><author>Sarrico, Cláudia S ; Rosa, Maria J ; Manatos, Maria J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-d88c6379ad048dd157f92a64d4d15338f1303bca4aa4d3f549226d1cd1241203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Debates</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Design engineering</topic><topic>Determinants</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Education policy</topic><topic>Gaps</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Monitors</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Performance management</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Progressions</topic><topic>Public sector</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Self evaluation</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Working groups</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sarrico, Cláudia S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosa, Maria J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manatos, Maria J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International journal of productivity and performance management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sarrico, Cláudia S</au><au>Rosa, Maria J</au><au>Manatos, Maria J</au><au>Sarrico, Cláudia S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>School performance management practices and school achievement</atitle><jtitle>International journal of productivity and performance management</jtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>272</spage><epage>289</epage><pages>272-289</pages><issn>1741-0401</issn><eissn>1758-6658</eissn><abstract>Purpose - The literature is very rich in its discussion on how to measure school performance, but there are still a number of gaps to investigate in relation to the determinants of that performance, especially at the level of school performance management practices. The purpose of the paper is to understand better performance management practices in schools and how they may relate to school achievement.Design methodology approach - Frequently, the performance of schools is evaluated using solely output measures: especially exam classifications, but also progression rates, completion rates and wastage rates. Previously, a value-added approach was used to quantitatively evaluate Portuguese secondary schools beyond output results. From the results of this exercise, a sample of schools with different levels of observed performance was chosen. In-depth case studies of the sample of schools were undertaken to gather an understanding of their performance management practices, taking Bouckaert and Halligan's framework of analysis.Findings - Self-evaluation and performance management are not well developed in schools. Most schools monitor exam results, progression and completion rates. However, they do not seem to do it in a formal and systematic way, and find it difficult to understand the reasons for the results obtained. Incorporation of performance measures into performance management is incipient, and most acknowledge the difficulty of going from measurement of results to improvement actions. Few can demonstrate that improvement actions have resulted from self-evaluation and very few evaluate improvement actions' results. There seems to be an agreement that the external evaluation of schools has prompted the development of self-evaluation.Originality value - This is a study at the meso level of analysis of public sector performance, that of state education. The study contributes to a better understanding of performance management in Portuguese secondary schools. More generally, it investigates the usefulness of the Bouckaert and Halligan framework to assess progress in performance management and whether that will lead to progress in performance itself.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/17410401211205641</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1741-0401 |
ispartof | International journal of productivity and performance management, 2012-01, Vol.61 (3), p.272-289 |
issn | 1741-0401 1758-6658 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_17410401211205641 |
source | Emerald Journals; Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection |
subjects | Accountability Debates Decision making Design engineering Determinants Education Education policy Gaps Management Monitors Performance evaluation Performance management Productivity Progressions Public sector Schools Self evaluation Society Studies Working groups |
title | School performance management practices and school achievement |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T14%3A50%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=School%20performance%20management%20practices%20and%20school%20achievement&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20productivity%20and%20performance%20management&rft.au=Sarrico,%20Cl%C3%A1udia%20S&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=272&rft.epage=289&rft.pages=272-289&rft.issn=1741-0401&rft.eissn=1758-6658&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/17410401211205641&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E1019639315%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=923393278&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |