Why is collaboration minimised at the accident scene?

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to study why collaboration among police, fire, and ambulance services is minimised at accident scenes.Design methodology approach - Observations and semi-structured interviews were carried out during 2007-2008. The data material comprises a total of 248 hours o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Disaster prevention and management 2011-04, Vol.20 (2), p.159-171
Hauptverfasser: Berlin, Johan M., Carlström, Eric D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 171
container_issue 2
container_start_page 159
container_title Disaster prevention and management
container_volume 20
creator Berlin, Johan M.
Carlström, Eric D.
description Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to study why collaboration among police, fire, and ambulance services is minimised at accident scenes.Design methodology approach - Observations and semi-structured interviews were carried out during 2007-2008. The data material comprises a total of 248 hours of observations on 20 occasions and 57 interviews with 80 people.Findings - The study identifies the difference between rhetoric and practice in connection with accident work. Collaboration is seen as a rhetorical ideal rather than something that is carried out in normal practice. Asymmetry, uncertainty and lack of incentives are important explanations as to why only limited forms of collaboration are actually implemented.Research limitations implications - The paper shows a distinction between collaboration as rhetoric and practical collaboration at accident scenes.Practical implications - The article proposes a multi-faceted collaboration concept. In this way, collaboration can be developed and refined.Originality value - The results of the study show that police, fire, and ambulance services want to develop excellent forms of collaboration at the accident scene, but avoid this as it leads to uncertainty and asymmetries and because of a lack of incentives. However, simpler forms of collaboration may be realistic in the organisation of everyday work at accident scenes.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/09653561111126094
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_09653561111126094</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2333772331</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1534-12242b88e177e022dd46ac8688856b6186ab22177cddd5b56037fc97e102644f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkD9PwzAUxC0EEqXwAdgsZgLPju04E0IVBaRKLCBGy7FfVFf5h50O_fYkKlu55Q33e3fSEXLL4IEx0I9QKplLxWZxBaU4IwtWSJ0pBnBOFrOfTQC_JFcp7QBgYssFkd_bAw2Jur5pbNVHO4a-o23oQhsSempHOm6RWueCx26kyWGHT9fkorZNwpu_uyRf65fP1Vu2-Xh9Xz1vMsdkLjLGueCV1siKAoFz74WyTiuttVSVYlrZivPJdN57WUkFeVG7skAGXAlR50tyd8wdYv-zxzSaXb-P3VRptBJQSi3EBN0fIWwx2sabIYbWxoM52cQMfs6E_3EGZp7y9C3_BZ27YR8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>864095844</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why is collaboration minimised at the accident scene?</title><source>Emerald Insight</source><source>Emerald</source><creator>Berlin, Johan M. ; Carlström, Eric D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Berlin, Johan M. ; Carlström, Eric D.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to study why collaboration among police, fire, and ambulance services is minimised at accident scenes.Design methodology approach - Observations and semi-structured interviews were carried out during 2007-2008. The data material comprises a total of 248 hours of observations on 20 occasions and 57 interviews with 80 people.Findings - The study identifies the difference between rhetoric and practice in connection with accident work. Collaboration is seen as a rhetorical ideal rather than something that is carried out in normal practice. Asymmetry, uncertainty and lack of incentives are important explanations as to why only limited forms of collaboration are actually implemented.Research limitations implications - The paper shows a distinction between collaboration as rhetoric and practical collaboration at accident scenes.Practical implications - The article proposes a multi-faceted collaboration concept. In this way, collaboration can be developed and refined.Originality value - The results of the study show that police, fire, and ambulance services want to develop excellent forms of collaboration at the accident scene, but avoid this as it leads to uncertainty and asymmetries and because of a lack of incentives. However, simpler forms of collaboration may be realistic in the organisation of everyday work at accident scenes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0965-3562</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-6100</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/09653561111126094</identifier><identifier>CODEN: DPMAEY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Accidents ; Behavior ; Collaboration ; Decision making ; Emergency services ; Organizational behavior ; Police ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Disaster prevention and management, 2011-04, Vol.20 (2), p.159-171</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Copyright Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1534-12242b88e177e022dd46ac8688856b6186ab22177cddd5b56037fc97e102644f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/09653561111126094/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/09653561111126094/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,11615,21675,27903,27904,52664,52667,53222,53350</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berlin, Johan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlström, Eric D.</creatorcontrib><title>Why is collaboration minimised at the accident scene?</title><title>Disaster prevention and management</title><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to study why collaboration among police, fire, and ambulance services is minimised at accident scenes.Design methodology approach - Observations and semi-structured interviews were carried out during 2007-2008. The data material comprises a total of 248 hours of observations on 20 occasions and 57 interviews with 80 people.Findings - The study identifies the difference between rhetoric and practice in connection with accident work. Collaboration is seen as a rhetorical ideal rather than something that is carried out in normal practice. Asymmetry, uncertainty and lack of incentives are important explanations as to why only limited forms of collaboration are actually implemented.Research limitations implications - The paper shows a distinction between collaboration as rhetoric and practical collaboration at accident scenes.Practical implications - The article proposes a multi-faceted collaboration concept. In this way, collaboration can be developed and refined.Originality value - The results of the study show that police, fire, and ambulance services want to develop excellent forms of collaboration at the accident scene, but avoid this as it leads to uncertainty and asymmetries and because of a lack of incentives. However, simpler forms of collaboration may be realistic in the organisation of everyday work at accident scenes.</description><subject>Accidents</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Emergency services</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Police</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0965-3562</issn><issn>1758-6100</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkD9PwzAUxC0EEqXwAdgsZgLPju04E0IVBaRKLCBGy7FfVFf5h50O_fYkKlu55Q33e3fSEXLL4IEx0I9QKplLxWZxBaU4IwtWSJ0pBnBOFrOfTQC_JFcp7QBgYssFkd_bAw2Jur5pbNVHO4a-o23oQhsSempHOm6RWueCx26kyWGHT9fkorZNwpu_uyRf65fP1Vu2-Xh9Xz1vMsdkLjLGueCV1siKAoFz74WyTiuttVSVYlrZivPJdN57WUkFeVG7skAGXAlR50tyd8wdYv-zxzSaXb-P3VRptBJQSi3EBN0fIWwx2sabIYbWxoM52cQMfs6E_3EGZp7y9C3_BZ27YR8</recordid><startdate>20110426</startdate><enddate>20110426</enddate><creator>Berlin, Johan M.</creator><creator>Carlström, Eric D.</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110426</creationdate><title>Why is collaboration minimised at the accident scene?</title><author>Berlin, Johan M. ; Carlström, Eric D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1534-12242b88e177e022dd46ac8688856b6186ab22177cddd5b56037fc97e102644f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Accidents</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Emergency services</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Police</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berlin, Johan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlström, Eric D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Disaster prevention and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berlin, Johan M.</au><au>Carlström, Eric D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why is collaboration minimised at the accident scene?</atitle><jtitle>Disaster prevention and management</jtitle><date>2011-04-26</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>159</spage><epage>171</epage><pages>159-171</pages><issn>0965-3562</issn><eissn>1758-6100</eissn><coden>DPMAEY</coden><abstract>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to study why collaboration among police, fire, and ambulance services is minimised at accident scenes.Design methodology approach - Observations and semi-structured interviews were carried out during 2007-2008. The data material comprises a total of 248 hours of observations on 20 occasions and 57 interviews with 80 people.Findings - The study identifies the difference between rhetoric and practice in connection with accident work. Collaboration is seen as a rhetorical ideal rather than something that is carried out in normal practice. Asymmetry, uncertainty and lack of incentives are important explanations as to why only limited forms of collaboration are actually implemented.Research limitations implications - The paper shows a distinction between collaboration as rhetoric and practical collaboration at accident scenes.Practical implications - The article proposes a multi-faceted collaboration concept. In this way, collaboration can be developed and refined.Originality value - The results of the study show that police, fire, and ambulance services want to develop excellent forms of collaboration at the accident scene, but avoid this as it leads to uncertainty and asymmetries and because of a lack of incentives. However, simpler forms of collaboration may be realistic in the organisation of everyday work at accident scenes.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/09653561111126094</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0965-3562
ispartof Disaster prevention and management, 2011-04, Vol.20 (2), p.159-171
issn 0965-3562
1758-6100
language eng
recordid cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_09653561111126094
source Emerald Insight; Emerald
subjects Accidents
Behavior
Collaboration
Decision making
Emergency services
Organizational behavior
Police
Studies
title Why is collaboration minimised at the accident scene?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T19%3A21%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20is%20collaboration%20minimised%20at%20the%20accident%20scene?&rft.jtitle=Disaster%20prevention%20and%20management&rft.au=Berlin,%20Johan%20M.&rft.date=2011-04-26&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=159&rft.epage=171&rft.pages=159-171&rft.issn=0965-3562&rft.eissn=1758-6100&rft.coden=DPMAEY&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/09653561111126094&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2333772331%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=864095844&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true