Human capital vs social capital

Purpose - The aim of this paper is to assess whether employment insecurity instability is a necessary consequence of operating as a self-employed worker in the external labour market (ELM) and to examine the role for social capital to influence any such potential insecurity instability.Design method...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of social economics 2007-07, Vol.34 (8), p.525-537
1. Verfasser: Nisbet, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 537
container_issue 8
container_start_page 525
container_title International journal of social economics
container_volume 34
creator Nisbet, Peter
description Purpose - The aim of this paper is to assess whether employment insecurity instability is a necessary consequence of operating as a self-employed worker in the external labour market (ELM) and to examine the role for social capital to influence any such potential insecurity instability.Design methodology approach - A total of 124 workers in the UK construction industry - 78 self-employed and 46 directly employed - and 12 employers were interviewed in a period spanning the New Construction Industry Scheme in 1999 to provide the empirical evidence for this research.Findings - Belying the common assumptions of atomistic dependence in the face of employers hiring from a competitive and undifferentiated labour pool in an ELM, the results of this research clearly demonstrate a key role for social capital to influence the allocation of work in the ELM and thus minimise the importance of job tenure in determining perceptions of employment security stability.Practical implications - The role for social capital to influence the allocation of work has attracted increasing attention in recent years. This paper provides further evidence that job tenure by itself, cannot be used as a definitive measure of employment security insecurity in both internal and ELMs.Originality value - There is relatively little empirical research on the role of social capital to influence the distribution of work; particularly in the ELM. This paper responds to the increasing call for research in this area to focus on micro social action rather than on macro structural variables and mechanisms.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/03068290710763044
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>istex_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_03068290710763044</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ark_67375_4W2_SMCHQWVC_X</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c164X-bc440478e3f8168c87747f3f597e92aab157ecb8636607ea0072872fb530771f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM1OwzAQhC0EEqHwAJzIA2BY_65zRBE0SEUI8dPeLMe1pUADUVwQvD2JWnEpp1nNfjOHIeSUwQVjYC5BgDa8AGSAWoCUeyRjqAzVyPg-ycY_HQBxSI5SegUAZQxk5Kz6bN177l3XrN0q_0p5-vDNcG2dY3IQ3SqFk61OyPPN9VNZ0dn99La8mlHPtFzQ2ksJEk0Q0TBtvEGUGEVUBYaCO1czhcHXRgutAYMDQG6Qx1oJQGRRTAjd9DZpHb5t1zet63-s69-sRoHKyjm3j3dl9TB_Ke1i4M83fGhD71bLv8TOELZbjvXwP87AjvvtxsQv8-5c2w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Human capital vs social capital</title><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><creator>Nisbet, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Nisbet, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - The aim of this paper is to assess whether employment insecurity instability is a necessary consequence of operating as a self-employed worker in the external labour market (ELM) and to examine the role for social capital to influence any such potential insecurity instability.Design methodology approach - A total of 124 workers in the UK construction industry - 78 self-employed and 46 directly employed - and 12 employers were interviewed in a period spanning the New Construction Industry Scheme in 1999 to provide the empirical evidence for this research.Findings - Belying the common assumptions of atomistic dependence in the face of employers hiring from a competitive and undifferentiated labour pool in an ELM, the results of this research clearly demonstrate a key role for social capital to influence the allocation of work in the ELM and thus minimise the importance of job tenure in determining perceptions of employment security stability.Practical implications - The role for social capital to influence the allocation of work has attracted increasing attention in recent years. This paper provides further evidence that job tenure by itself, cannot be used as a definitive measure of employment security insecurity in both internal and ELMs.Originality value - There is relatively little empirical research on the role of social capital to influence the distribution of work; particularly in the ELM. This paper responds to the increasing call for research in this area to focus on micro social action rather than on macro structural variables and mechanisms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-8293</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-6712</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/03068290710763044</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Construction industry ; Employment protection ; Human capital ; Self employed workers ; Social capital ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>International journal of social economics, 2007-07, Vol.34 (8), p.525-537</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c164X-bc440478e3f8168c87747f3f597e92aab157ecb8636607ea0072872fb530771f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/03068290710763044/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/03068290710763044/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,11614,27901,27902,52661,52664</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nisbet, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Human capital vs social capital</title><title>International journal of social economics</title><description>Purpose - The aim of this paper is to assess whether employment insecurity instability is a necessary consequence of operating as a self-employed worker in the external labour market (ELM) and to examine the role for social capital to influence any such potential insecurity instability.Design methodology approach - A total of 124 workers in the UK construction industry - 78 self-employed and 46 directly employed - and 12 employers were interviewed in a period spanning the New Construction Industry Scheme in 1999 to provide the empirical evidence for this research.Findings - Belying the common assumptions of atomistic dependence in the face of employers hiring from a competitive and undifferentiated labour pool in an ELM, the results of this research clearly demonstrate a key role for social capital to influence the allocation of work in the ELM and thus minimise the importance of job tenure in determining perceptions of employment security stability.Practical implications - The role for social capital to influence the allocation of work has attracted increasing attention in recent years. This paper provides further evidence that job tenure by itself, cannot be used as a definitive measure of employment security insecurity in both internal and ELMs.Originality value - There is relatively little empirical research on the role of social capital to influence the distribution of work; particularly in the ELM. This paper responds to the increasing call for research in this area to focus on micro social action rather than on macro structural variables and mechanisms.</description><subject>Construction industry</subject><subject>Employment protection</subject><subject>Human capital</subject><subject>Self employed workers</subject><subject>Social capital</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0306-8293</issn><issn>1758-6712</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkM1OwzAQhC0EEqHwAJzIA2BY_65zRBE0SEUI8dPeLMe1pUADUVwQvD2JWnEpp1nNfjOHIeSUwQVjYC5BgDa8AGSAWoCUeyRjqAzVyPg-ycY_HQBxSI5SegUAZQxk5Kz6bN177l3XrN0q_0p5-vDNcG2dY3IQ3SqFk61OyPPN9VNZ0dn99La8mlHPtFzQ2ksJEk0Q0TBtvEGUGEVUBYaCO1czhcHXRgutAYMDQG6Qx1oJQGRRTAjd9DZpHb5t1zet63-s69-sRoHKyjm3j3dl9TB_Ke1i4M83fGhD71bLv8TOELZbjvXwP87AjvvtxsQv8-5c2w</recordid><startdate>20070710</startdate><enddate>20070710</enddate><creator>Nisbet, Peter</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070710</creationdate><title>Human capital vs social capital</title><author>Nisbet, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c164X-bc440478e3f8168c87747f3f597e92aab157ecb8636607ea0072872fb530771f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Construction industry</topic><topic>Employment protection</topic><topic>Human capital</topic><topic>Self employed workers</topic><topic>Social capital</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nisbet, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><jtitle>International journal of social economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nisbet, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Human capital vs social capital</atitle><jtitle>International journal of social economics</jtitle><date>2007-07-10</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>525</spage><epage>537</epage><pages>525-537</pages><issn>0306-8293</issn><eissn>1758-6712</eissn><abstract>Purpose - The aim of this paper is to assess whether employment insecurity instability is a necessary consequence of operating as a self-employed worker in the external labour market (ELM) and to examine the role for social capital to influence any such potential insecurity instability.Design methodology approach - A total of 124 workers in the UK construction industry - 78 self-employed and 46 directly employed - and 12 employers were interviewed in a period spanning the New Construction Industry Scheme in 1999 to provide the empirical evidence for this research.Findings - Belying the common assumptions of atomistic dependence in the face of employers hiring from a competitive and undifferentiated labour pool in an ELM, the results of this research clearly demonstrate a key role for social capital to influence the allocation of work in the ELM and thus minimise the importance of job tenure in determining perceptions of employment security stability.Practical implications - The role for social capital to influence the allocation of work has attracted increasing attention in recent years. This paper provides further evidence that job tenure by itself, cannot be used as a definitive measure of employment security insecurity in both internal and ELMs.Originality value - There is relatively little empirical research on the role of social capital to influence the distribution of work; particularly in the ELM. This paper responds to the increasing call for research in this area to focus on micro social action rather than on macro structural variables and mechanisms.</abstract><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/03068290710763044</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0306-8293
ispartof International journal of social economics, 2007-07, Vol.34 (8), p.525-537
issn 0306-8293
1758-6712
language eng
recordid cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_03068290710763044
source Emerald A-Z Current Journals
subjects Construction industry
Employment protection
Human capital
Self employed workers
Social capital
United Kingdom
title Human capital vs social capital
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T00%3A18%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-istex_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Human%20capital%20vs%20social%20capital&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20social%20economics&rft.au=Nisbet,%20Peter&rft.date=2007-07-10&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=525&rft.epage=537&rft.pages=525-537&rft.issn=0306-8293&rft.eissn=1758-6712&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/03068290710763044&rft_dat=%3Cistex_emera%3Eark_67375_4W2_SMCHQWVC_X%3C/istex_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true