Life cycle costing: a review of published case studies
Purpose - Despite existing life cycle costing (LCC) method descriptions and practicable suggestions for conducting LCC analyses, no systematic analyses on actual implementations of LCC methods exist. This paper aims to review reports on LCC applications to provide an overview of LCC uses and impleme...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Managerial auditing journal 2008-03, Vol.23 (3), p.240-261 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 261 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 240 |
container_title | Managerial auditing journal |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Korpi, Eric Ala-Risku, Timo |
description | Purpose - Despite existing life cycle costing (LCC) method descriptions and practicable suggestions for conducting LCC analyses, no systematic analyses on actual implementations of LCC methods exist. This paper aims to review reports on LCC applications to provide an overview of LCC uses and implementation feasibility.Design methodology approach - A review of LCC cases reported in academic and practitioner literature. Case reports were compared against one another and against the defining articles in the field.Findings - Most of the reported LCC applications were far from ideal. Compared to the methods suggested in the literature many of the case study applications: covered fewer parts of the whole life cycle, estimated the costs on a lower level of detail, used cost estimation methods based on expert opinion rather than statistical methods, and were content with deterministic estimates of life cycle costs instead of using sensitivity analyses.Research limitations implications - This review is limited to reported LCC applications only. Further research is encouraged in the form of a field-based multiple-case study to reveal context-specific dimensions of LCC analysis and implementation challenges in more detail.Practical implications - This review highlights the difficulty of conducting a reliable LCC analysis, and points out typical problems that should be carefully considered before drawing conclusions from the LCC analysis.Originality value - First systematic analysis of LCC applications that gives directions for further research on the LCC concept. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/02686900810857703 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_02686900810857703</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1464100141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-1dbe15db7b7e82277f81e6e38daa3b09c90e8257c0e8e161de4b1e426a3a284e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gLfgwZPR_Upm402LbYWCIErBy7JJJpqaNnE3Ufvv3RLxYD14mZeZed6ZYQg5ZvScMaouKI9VnFCqfBIBULFDBgwiFQKIaJcMNv3QA3yfHDi3oJRxyeSAxLOywCBbZ5WPtWvL1fNlYAKL7yV-BHURNF1ale4F8yAzDgPXdnmJ7pDsFaZyePStQ_I4vnkYTcPZ3eR2dDULM8mSNmR5iizKU0gBFecAhWIYo1C5MSKlSZZQX48g84IsZjnKlKHksRGGK4liSE77uY2t3zp0rV6WLsOqMiusO6dFlCTAIfHgyS9wUXd25W_THCQwkCLyEOuhzNbOWSx0Y8ulsWvNqN68UW-90XvC3lO6Fj9_DMa-6hgERFrOuR5P7-fXkyelpedpz-MSranyf604-9uyheomL8QXxlCN3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>274717435</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Life cycle costing: a review of published case studies</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><creator>Korpi, Eric ; Ala-Risku, Timo</creator><creatorcontrib>Korpi, Eric ; Ala-Risku, Timo</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - Despite existing life cycle costing (LCC) method descriptions and practicable suggestions for conducting LCC analyses, no systematic analyses on actual implementations of LCC methods exist. This paper aims to review reports on LCC applications to provide an overview of LCC uses and implementation feasibility.Design methodology approach - A review of LCC cases reported in academic and practitioner literature. Case reports were compared against one another and against the defining articles in the field.Findings - Most of the reported LCC applications were far from ideal. Compared to the methods suggested in the literature many of the case study applications: covered fewer parts of the whole life cycle, estimated the costs on a lower level of detail, used cost estimation methods based on expert opinion rather than statistical methods, and were content with deterministic estimates of life cycle costs instead of using sensitivity analyses.Research limitations implications - This review is limited to reported LCC applications only. Further research is encouraged in the form of a field-based multiple-case study to reveal context-specific dimensions of LCC analysis and implementation challenges in more detail.Practical implications - This review highlights the difficulty of conducting a reliable LCC analysis, and points out typical problems that should be carefully considered before drawing conclusions from the LCC analysis.Originality value - First systematic analysis of LCC applications that gives directions for further research on the LCC concept.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-6902</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7735</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/02686900810857703</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Accounting procedures ; Case studies ; Construction industry ; Cost analysis ; Decision making ; Design ; Life cycle costs ; Literature reviews ; Methods ; Product life cycle ; Repair & maintenance ; Statistical analysis ; Studies ; Suppliers</subject><ispartof>Managerial auditing journal, 2008-03, Vol.23 (3), p.240-261</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Copyright Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-1dbe15db7b7e82277f81e6e38daa3b09c90e8257c0e8e161de4b1e426a3a284e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-1dbe15db7b7e82277f81e6e38daa3b09c90e8257c0e8e161de4b1e426a3a284e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02686900810857703/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02686900810857703/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,11614,27901,27902,52661,52664</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Korpi, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ala-Risku, Timo</creatorcontrib><title>Life cycle costing: a review of published case studies</title><title>Managerial auditing journal</title><description>Purpose - Despite existing life cycle costing (LCC) method descriptions and practicable suggestions for conducting LCC analyses, no systematic analyses on actual implementations of LCC methods exist. This paper aims to review reports on LCC applications to provide an overview of LCC uses and implementation feasibility.Design methodology approach - A review of LCC cases reported in academic and practitioner literature. Case reports were compared against one another and against the defining articles in the field.Findings - Most of the reported LCC applications were far from ideal. Compared to the methods suggested in the literature many of the case study applications: covered fewer parts of the whole life cycle, estimated the costs on a lower level of detail, used cost estimation methods based on expert opinion rather than statistical methods, and were content with deterministic estimates of life cycle costs instead of using sensitivity analyses.Research limitations implications - This review is limited to reported LCC applications only. Further research is encouraged in the form of a field-based multiple-case study to reveal context-specific dimensions of LCC analysis and implementation challenges in more detail.Practical implications - This review highlights the difficulty of conducting a reliable LCC analysis, and points out typical problems that should be carefully considered before drawing conclusions from the LCC analysis.Originality value - First systematic analysis of LCC applications that gives directions for further research on the LCC concept.</description><subject>Accounting procedures</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Construction industry</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Life cycle costs</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Product life cycle</subject><subject>Repair & maintenance</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Suppliers</subject><issn>0268-6902</issn><issn>1758-7735</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gLfgwZPR_Upm402LbYWCIErBy7JJJpqaNnE3Ufvv3RLxYD14mZeZed6ZYQg5ZvScMaouKI9VnFCqfBIBULFDBgwiFQKIaJcMNv3QA3yfHDi3oJRxyeSAxLOywCBbZ5WPtWvL1fNlYAKL7yV-BHURNF1ale4F8yAzDgPXdnmJ7pDsFaZyePStQ_I4vnkYTcPZ3eR2dDULM8mSNmR5iizKU0gBFecAhWIYo1C5MSKlSZZQX48g84IsZjnKlKHksRGGK4liSE77uY2t3zp0rV6WLsOqMiusO6dFlCTAIfHgyS9wUXd25W_THCQwkCLyEOuhzNbOWSx0Y8ulsWvNqN68UW-90XvC3lO6Fj9_DMa-6hgERFrOuR5P7-fXkyelpedpz-MSranyf604-9uyheomL8QXxlCN3Q</recordid><startdate>20080321</startdate><enddate>20080321</enddate><creator>Korpi, Eric</creator><creator>Ala-Risku, Timo</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080321</creationdate><title>Life cycle costing: a review of published case studies</title><author>Korpi, Eric ; Ala-Risku, Timo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-1dbe15db7b7e82277f81e6e38daa3b09c90e8257c0e8e161de4b1e426a3a284e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Accounting procedures</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Construction industry</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Life cycle costs</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Product life cycle</topic><topic>Repair & maintenance</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Suppliers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Korpi, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ala-Risku, Timo</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Managerial auditing journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Korpi, Eric</au><au>Ala-Risku, Timo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Life cycle costing: a review of published case studies</atitle><jtitle>Managerial auditing journal</jtitle><date>2008-03-21</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>240</spage><epage>261</epage><pages>240-261</pages><issn>0268-6902</issn><eissn>1758-7735</eissn><abstract>Purpose - Despite existing life cycle costing (LCC) method descriptions and practicable suggestions for conducting LCC analyses, no systematic analyses on actual implementations of LCC methods exist. This paper aims to review reports on LCC applications to provide an overview of LCC uses and implementation feasibility.Design methodology approach - A review of LCC cases reported in academic and practitioner literature. Case reports were compared against one another and against the defining articles in the field.Findings - Most of the reported LCC applications were far from ideal. Compared to the methods suggested in the literature many of the case study applications: covered fewer parts of the whole life cycle, estimated the costs on a lower level of detail, used cost estimation methods based on expert opinion rather than statistical methods, and were content with deterministic estimates of life cycle costs instead of using sensitivity analyses.Research limitations implications - This review is limited to reported LCC applications only. Further research is encouraged in the form of a field-based multiple-case study to reveal context-specific dimensions of LCC analysis and implementation challenges in more detail.Practical implications - This review highlights the difficulty of conducting a reliable LCC analysis, and points out typical problems that should be carefully considered before drawing conclusions from the LCC analysis.Originality value - First systematic analysis of LCC applications that gives directions for further research on the LCC concept.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/02686900810857703</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0268-6902 |
ispartof | Managerial auditing journal, 2008-03, Vol.23 (3), p.240-261 |
issn | 0268-6902 1758-7735 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_02686900810857703 |
source | Emerald Journals |
subjects | Accounting procedures Case studies Construction industry Cost analysis Decision making Design Life cycle costs Literature reviews Methods Product life cycle Repair & maintenance Statistical analysis Studies Suppliers |
title | Life cycle costing: a review of published case studies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T23%3A37%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Life%20cycle%20costing:%20a%20review%20of%20published%20case%20studies&rft.jtitle=Managerial%20auditing%20journal&rft.au=Korpi,%20Eric&rft.date=2008-03-21&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=240&rft.epage=261&rft.pages=240-261&rft.issn=0268-6902&rft.eissn=1758-7735&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/02686900810857703&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E1464100141%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=274717435&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |