Seismic response analysis models of an oil storage tank with a floating roof
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effects of the finite element models on the response of a free surface or a floating roof, which is important for safety assessment of oil storage tanks.Design methodology approach - Structural analyses of shell structures using the three-dim...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Engineering computations 2011-01, Vol.28 (6), p.701-716 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 716 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 701 |
| container_title | Engineering computations |
| container_volume | 28 |
| creator | Nagashima, Toshio Tsukuda, Takenari Suemasu, Hiroshi Sogabe, Kiyoshi |
| description | Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effects of the finite element models on the response of a free surface or a floating roof, which is important for safety assessment of oil storage tanks.Design methodology approach - Structural analyses of shell structures using the three-dimensional finite element method (FEM), potential flow analyses by FEM, and fluid-structure interaction analyses by strong coupling of the structural and fluid analyses were performed. In-house software was utilized for computations shown in this paper except the solver for non-symmetric sparse matrix.Findings - A model with a rigid tank and an elastic roof was confirmed to be able to perform the seismic response analysis most effectively from the viewpoint of computational cost with no reduction in accuracy.Research limitations implications - The stress distribution on the floating roof will be evaluated to assess the safety of oil storage tanks subjected to seismic waves in the future research.Originality value - This paper shows the dynamic responses of a liquid storage tank subjected to seismic motion using four different analysis models and the results were compared. It was concluded that a model with a rigid tank and an elastic roof can perform the seismic response analysis most effectively from the viewpoint of both accuracy and computational cost. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1108/02644401111154637 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_02644401111154637</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2423996101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-dc60c0cdd0d805867e6e4c0b2247f1ee8ca3ed417ae3515e90515d85f2403bda3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1PwzAMhiMEEuPjB3CLOHGg4DRpkx3RxJc0iQNwrrLEHR1pU5JOaP-eVEMcGPhgS_bz2vJLyBmDK8ZAXUNeCiGAjVGIkss9MmGyUJkEKffJZJxnI3BIjmJcAYDkHCZk_oxNbBtDA8bedxGp7rTbxCbS1lt0kfo6tahvHI2DD3qJdNDdO_1shjeqae28HppuSYP39Qk5qLWLePpdj8nr3e3L7CGbP90_zm7mmeGKD5k1JRgw1oJVUKhSYonCwCLPhawZojKaoxVMauQFK3AKKVtV1LkAvrCaH5OL7d4--I81xqFqm2jQOd2hX8eKlZLxEkSuEnr-C135dUgvxkopnvPk1TRBbAuZ4GMMWFd9aFodNhWDarS32rE3aS63GmwxaGd_JDto1ds64fA3_v-FLwHGh1o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>883235469</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seismic response analysis models of an oil storage tank with a floating roof</title><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><creator>Nagashima, Toshio ; Tsukuda, Takenari ; Suemasu, Hiroshi ; Sogabe, Kiyoshi</creator><creatorcontrib>Nagashima, Toshio ; Tsukuda, Takenari ; Suemasu, Hiroshi ; Sogabe, Kiyoshi</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effects of the finite element models on the response of a free surface or a floating roof, which is important for safety assessment of oil storage tanks.Design methodology approach - Structural analyses of shell structures using the three-dimensional finite element method (FEM), potential flow analyses by FEM, and fluid-structure interaction analyses by strong coupling of the structural and fluid analyses were performed. In-house software was utilized for computations shown in this paper except the solver for non-symmetric sparse matrix.Findings - A model with a rigid tank and an elastic roof was confirmed to be able to perform the seismic response analysis most effectively from the viewpoint of computational cost with no reduction in accuracy.Research limitations implications - The stress distribution on the floating roof will be evaluated to assess the safety of oil storage tanks subjected to seismic waves in the future research.Originality value - This paper shows the dynamic responses of a liquid storage tank subjected to seismic motion using four different analysis models and the results were compared. It was concluded that a model with a rigid tank and an elastic roof can perform the seismic response analysis most effectively from the viewpoint of both accuracy and computational cost.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-4401</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7077</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/02644401111154637</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Boundary conditions ; Computational efficiency ; Earthquakes ; Finite element analysis ; Finite element method ; Fire prevention ; Floating structures ; Fluid-structure interaction ; Mathematical models ; Methods ; Numerical analysis ; Roofs ; Seismic response ; Seismology ; Storage tanks ; Studies ; Tanks ; Velocity</subject><ispartof>Engineering computations, 2011-01, Vol.28 (6), p.701-716</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Copyright Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-dc60c0cdd0d805867e6e4c0b2247f1ee8ca3ed417ae3515e90515d85f2403bda3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-dc60c0cdd0d805867e6e4c0b2247f1ee8ca3ed417ae3515e90515d85f2403bda3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02644401111154637/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02644401111154637/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,967,11635,27924,27925,52686,52689</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nagashima, Toshio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsukuda, Takenari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suemasu, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sogabe, Kiyoshi</creatorcontrib><title>Seismic response analysis models of an oil storage tank with a floating roof</title><title>Engineering computations</title><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effects of the finite element models on the response of a free surface or a floating roof, which is important for safety assessment of oil storage tanks.Design methodology approach - Structural analyses of shell structures using the three-dimensional finite element method (FEM), potential flow analyses by FEM, and fluid-structure interaction analyses by strong coupling of the structural and fluid analyses were performed. In-house software was utilized for computations shown in this paper except the solver for non-symmetric sparse matrix.Findings - A model with a rigid tank and an elastic roof was confirmed to be able to perform the seismic response analysis most effectively from the viewpoint of computational cost with no reduction in accuracy.Research limitations implications - The stress distribution on the floating roof will be evaluated to assess the safety of oil storage tanks subjected to seismic waves in the future research.Originality value - This paper shows the dynamic responses of a liquid storage tank subjected to seismic motion using four different analysis models and the results were compared. It was concluded that a model with a rigid tank and an elastic roof can perform the seismic response analysis most effectively from the viewpoint of both accuracy and computational cost.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>Computational efficiency</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Finite element analysis</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Fire prevention</subject><subject>Floating structures</subject><subject>Fluid-structure interaction</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Numerical analysis</subject><subject>Roofs</subject><subject>Seismic response</subject><subject>Seismology</subject><subject>Storage tanks</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tanks</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><issn>0264-4401</issn><issn>1758-7077</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1PwzAMhiMEEuPjB3CLOHGg4DRpkx3RxJc0iQNwrrLEHR1pU5JOaP-eVEMcGPhgS_bz2vJLyBmDK8ZAXUNeCiGAjVGIkss9MmGyUJkEKffJZJxnI3BIjmJcAYDkHCZk_oxNbBtDA8bedxGp7rTbxCbS1lt0kfo6tahvHI2DD3qJdNDdO_1shjeqae28HppuSYP39Qk5qLWLePpdj8nr3e3L7CGbP90_zm7mmeGKD5k1JRgw1oJVUKhSYonCwCLPhawZojKaoxVMauQFK3AKKVtV1LkAvrCaH5OL7d4--I81xqFqm2jQOd2hX8eKlZLxEkSuEnr-C135dUgvxkopnvPk1TRBbAuZ4GMMWFd9aFodNhWDarS32rE3aS63GmwxaGd_JDto1ds64fA3_v-FLwHGh1o</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Nagashima, Toshio</creator><creator>Tsukuda, Takenari</creator><creator>Suemasu, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Sogabe, Kiyoshi</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7SM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Seismic response analysis models of an oil storage tank with a floating roof</title><author>Nagashima, Toshio ; Tsukuda, Takenari ; Suemasu, Hiroshi ; Sogabe, Kiyoshi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-dc60c0cdd0d805867e6e4c0b2247f1ee8ca3ed417ae3515e90515d85f2403bda3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>Computational efficiency</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Finite element analysis</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Fire prevention</topic><topic>Floating structures</topic><topic>Fluid-structure interaction</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Numerical analysis</topic><topic>Roofs</topic><topic>Seismic response</topic><topic>Seismology</topic><topic>Storage tanks</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tanks</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nagashima, Toshio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsukuda, Takenari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suemasu, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sogabe, Kiyoshi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Earthquake Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Engineering computations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nagashima, Toshio</au><au>Tsukuda, Takenari</au><au>Suemasu, Hiroshi</au><au>Sogabe, Kiyoshi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seismic response analysis models of an oil storage tank with a floating roof</atitle><jtitle>Engineering computations</jtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>701</spage><epage>716</epage><pages>701-716</pages><issn>0264-4401</issn><eissn>1758-7077</eissn><abstract>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effects of the finite element models on the response of a free surface or a floating roof, which is important for safety assessment of oil storage tanks.Design methodology approach - Structural analyses of shell structures using the three-dimensional finite element method (FEM), potential flow analyses by FEM, and fluid-structure interaction analyses by strong coupling of the structural and fluid analyses were performed. In-house software was utilized for computations shown in this paper except the solver for non-symmetric sparse matrix.Findings - A model with a rigid tank and an elastic roof was confirmed to be able to perform the seismic response analysis most effectively from the viewpoint of computational cost with no reduction in accuracy.Research limitations implications - The stress distribution on the floating roof will be evaluated to assess the safety of oil storage tanks subjected to seismic waves in the future research.Originality value - This paper shows the dynamic responses of a liquid storage tank subjected to seismic motion using four different analysis models and the results were compared. It was concluded that a model with a rigid tank and an elastic roof can perform the seismic response analysis most effectively from the viewpoint of both accuracy and computational cost.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/02644401111154637</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0264-4401 |
| ispartof | Engineering computations, 2011-01, Vol.28 (6), p.701-716 |
| issn | 0264-4401 1758-7077 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_02644401111154637 |
| source | Emerald A-Z Current Journals |
| subjects | Accuracy Boundary conditions Computational efficiency Earthquakes Finite element analysis Finite element method Fire prevention Floating structures Fluid-structure interaction Mathematical models Methods Numerical analysis Roofs Seismic response Seismology Storage tanks Studies Tanks Velocity |
| title | Seismic response analysis models of an oil storage tank with a floating roof |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T20%3A48%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seismic%20response%20analysis%20models%20of%20an%20oil%20storage%20tank%20with%20a%20floating%20roof&rft.jtitle=Engineering%20computations&rft.au=Nagashima,%20Toshio&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=701&rft.epage=716&rft.pages=701-716&rft.issn=0264-4401&rft.eissn=1758-7077&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/02644401111154637&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2423996101%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=883235469&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |