A Comparison of Two Methods for Solving Electromagnetic Field Integral Equation
The present paper aims to compare Harrington's direct method of moment (MoM) with the conjugate gradient method (CGM) by evaluating the total current solving the electric field integral equation (EFIE). Based on their performances, the number of iterations needed for convergence, storage, and t...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of differential equations 2011, Vol.2011 (2011), p.1-9 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 9 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2011 |
| container_start_page | 1 |
| container_title | International journal of differential equations |
| container_volume | 2011 |
| creator | Jebli, L. |
| description | The present paper aims to compare Harrington's direct method of moment (MoM) with the conjugate gradient method (CGM) by evaluating the total current solving the electric field integral equation (EFIE). Based on their performances, the number of iterations needed for convergence, storage, and the level of precision, it is found that the direct MoM is more efficient than other iterative CGM. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>emarefa</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emarefa_primary_451437</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>451437</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-emarefa_primary_4514373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFiUELgjAYQEcUJOVPCL4_IGTTmccQpQ7RIe8ydLPF3GfbKvr3dYiuvct78CYkiNk2i3KWxtNfJ3ROQueu6w8037CcBeS0gwKHkVvl0ABKqJ8IR-Ev2DmQaOGM-qFMD6UWrbc48N4Ir1qolNAdHIwXveUaytude4VmSWaSayfCrxdkVZV1sY_EwK2QvBmt-tSrSdI4oRn9999yMTxb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparison of Two Methods for Solving Electromagnetic Field Integral Equation</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Jebli, L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jebli, L.</creatorcontrib><description>The present paper aims to compare Harrington's direct method of moment (MoM) with the conjugate gradient method (CGM) by evaluating the total current solving the electric field integral equation (EFIE). Based on their performances, the number of iterations needed for convergence, storage, and the level of precision, it is found that the direct MoM is more efficient than other iterative CGM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1687-9643</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1687-9651</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cairo, Egypt: Hindawi Puplishing Corporation</publisher><ispartof>International journal of differential equations, 2011, Vol.2011 (2011), p.1-9</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jebli, L.</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparison of Two Methods for Solving Electromagnetic Field Integral Equation</title><title>International journal of differential equations</title><description>The present paper aims to compare Harrington's direct method of moment (MoM) with the conjugate gradient method (CGM) by evaluating the total current solving the electric field integral equation (EFIE). Based on their performances, the number of iterations needed for convergence, storage, and the level of precision, it is found that the direct MoM is more efficient than other iterative CGM.</description><issn>1687-9643</issn><issn>1687-9651</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFiUELgjAYQEcUJOVPCL4_IGTTmccQpQ7RIe8ydLPF3GfbKvr3dYiuvct78CYkiNk2i3KWxtNfJ3ROQueu6w8037CcBeS0gwKHkVvl0ABKqJ8IR-Ev2DmQaOGM-qFMD6UWrbc48N4Ir1qolNAdHIwXveUaytude4VmSWaSayfCrxdkVZV1sY_EwK2QvBmt-tSrSdI4oRn9999yMTxb</recordid><startdate>2011</startdate><enddate>2011</enddate><creator>Jebli, L.</creator><general>Hindawi Puplishing Corporation</general><scope>ADJCN</scope><scope>AHFXO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2011</creationdate><title>A Comparison of Two Methods for Solving Electromagnetic Field Integral Equation</title><author>Jebli, L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-emarefa_primary_4514373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jebli, L.</creatorcontrib><collection>الدوريات العلمية والإحصائية - e-Marefa Academic and Statistical Periodicals</collection><collection>معرفة - المحتوى العربي الأكاديمي المتكامل - e-Marefa Academic Complete</collection><jtitle>International journal of differential equations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jebli, L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparison of Two Methods for Solving Electromagnetic Field Integral Equation</atitle><jtitle>International journal of differential equations</jtitle><date>2011</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>2011</volume><issue>2011</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>1-9</pages><issn>1687-9643</issn><eissn>1687-9651</eissn><abstract>The present paper aims to compare Harrington's direct method of moment (MoM) with the conjugate gradient method (CGM) by evaluating the total current solving the electric field integral equation (EFIE). Based on their performances, the number of iterations needed for convergence, storage, and the level of precision, it is found that the direct MoM is more efficient than other iterative CGM.</abstract><cop>Cairo, Egypt</cop><pub>Hindawi Puplishing Corporation</pub><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1687-9643 |
| ispartof | International journal of differential equations, 2011, Vol.2011 (2011), p.1-9 |
| issn | 1687-9643 1687-9651 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_emarefa_primary_451437 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| title | A Comparison of Two Methods for Solving Electromagnetic Field Integral Equation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T04%3A46%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-emarefa&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparison%20of%20Two%20Methods%20for%20Solving%20Electromagnetic%20Field%20Integral%20Equation&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20differential%20equations&rft.au=Jebli,%20L.&rft.date=2011&rft.volume=2011&rft.issue=2011&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=1-9&rft.issn=1687-9643&rft.eissn=1687-9651&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cemarefa%3E451437%3C/emarefa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |