Indications for sublobar resection of clinical-stage IA radiological pure-solid lung adenocarcinoma

Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to identify clinical factors associated with lepidic growth in resected clinical-stage IA radiological pure-solid lung adenocarcinoma for identifying a possible sublobar resection candidate in the population. Methods Clinicopathological data was reviewed...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2017
Hauptverfasser: Hattori, Aritoshi, MD, Matsunaga, Takeshi, MD, Takamochi, Kazuya, MD, Oh, Shiaki, MD, Suzuki, Kenji, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
container_volume
creator Hattori, Aritoshi, MD
Matsunaga, Takeshi, MD
Takamochi, Kazuya, MD
Oh, Shiaki, MD
Suzuki, Kenji, MD
description Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to identify clinical factors associated with lepidic growth in resected clinical-stage IA radiological pure-solid lung adenocarcinoma for identifying a possible sublobar resection candidate in the population. Methods Clinicopathological data was reviewed for 200 surgically resected clinical-stage IA pure-solid lung adenocarcinomas. Radiological pure-solid tumor was defined as a tumor without a ground glass opacity component, i.e., a consolidation tumor ratio equal to 1.0. Lepidic predominant adenocarcinoma (LPA) included adenocarcinomas in situ, minimally invasive adenocarcinomas and lepidic predominant invasive adenocarcinomas. Results Fifty-seven (29%) patients showed LPA. The 5-year overall survival (OS) of clinical-stage IA pure-solid adenocarcinoma was 83.4% and that of LPA and non-LPA was 98.1% vs. 76.6% (p=0.0012). A multivariate analysis revealed that maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was an independently significant variable of LPA (p3.3 (62.7% vs. 82.9%, p=0.0281). Conclusions Higher SUVmax value may be useful for identifying patients with clinical-stage IA radiological pure-solid lung adenocarcinoma in whom sublobar resection should not be considered, even if technically feasible.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.03.153
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0022522317308991</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0022522317308991</els_id><sourcerecordid>1_s2_0_S0022522317308991</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S00225223173089913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqljs1KxDAUhbNQmPHnCdzcF2i9SZip3QgiirN29iGT3pbUmCu57YBvbwv6BK4O5-PwcZS601hr1Pv7sR6ncJbaoG5qtLXe2Qu1RTSm2hljN-pKZETEBnW7VeGQuxj8FDkL9FxA5lPiky9QSCisHLiHkGJeZqmSyQ8EhycovouceFgpfM2FKuEUO0hzHsB3lDn4EmLmT3-jLnufhG5_81o9vr4cn98qWso5UnF_-g_6Jhl5LnnZOe3EOHTv6_f1um4sPrSttv8W_ABNSV6T</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Indications for sublobar resection of clinical-stage IA radiological pure-solid lung adenocarcinoma</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Hattori, Aritoshi, MD ; Matsunaga, Takeshi, MD ; Takamochi, Kazuya, MD ; Oh, Shiaki, MD ; Suzuki, Kenji, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Hattori, Aritoshi, MD ; Matsunaga, Takeshi, MD ; Takamochi, Kazuya, MD ; Oh, Shiaki, MD ; Suzuki, Kenji, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to identify clinical factors associated with lepidic growth in resected clinical-stage IA radiological pure-solid lung adenocarcinoma for identifying a possible sublobar resection candidate in the population. Methods Clinicopathological data was reviewed for 200 surgically resected clinical-stage IA pure-solid lung adenocarcinomas. Radiological pure-solid tumor was defined as a tumor without a ground glass opacity component, i.e., a consolidation tumor ratio equal to 1.0. Lepidic predominant adenocarcinoma (LPA) included adenocarcinomas in situ, minimally invasive adenocarcinomas and lepidic predominant invasive adenocarcinomas. Results Fifty-seven (29%) patients showed LPA. The 5-year overall survival (OS) of clinical-stage IA pure-solid adenocarcinoma was 83.4% and that of LPA and non-LPA was 98.1% vs. 76.6% (p=0.0012). A multivariate analysis revealed that maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was an independently significant variable of LPA (p&lt;0.0001) and a significant prognostic factor (p=0.034). The predictive criterion of LPA was SUVmax≤3.3 based on a receiver operating characteristics curve, and 77 (39%) patients who met this criterion showed less pathologic invasiveness regarding lymphatic (p=0.0012) and vascular (p&lt;0.0001) invasions, nodal metastasis (p=0.0007), and better OS than those who did not (SUVmax≤3.3 vs. SUVmax&gt;3.3 rates being 91.7% vs. 78.6%, p=0.0031). Moreover, the 3-year locoregional recurrence-free survival of the sublobar resection arm was significantly worse than that of the lobectomy arm when the tumor showed SUVmax&gt;3.3 (62.7% vs. 82.9%, p=0.0281). Conclusions Higher SUVmax value may be useful for identifying patients with clinical-stage IA radiological pure-solid lung adenocarcinoma in whom sublobar resection should not be considered, even if technically feasible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5223</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.03.153</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Cardiothoracic Surgery</subject><ispartof>The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2017</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hattori, Aritoshi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsunaga, Takeshi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takamochi, Kazuya, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Shiaki, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Kenji, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Indications for sublobar resection of clinical-stage IA radiological pure-solid lung adenocarcinoma</title><title>The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery</title><description>Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to identify clinical factors associated with lepidic growth in resected clinical-stage IA radiological pure-solid lung adenocarcinoma for identifying a possible sublobar resection candidate in the population. Methods Clinicopathological data was reviewed for 200 surgically resected clinical-stage IA pure-solid lung adenocarcinomas. Radiological pure-solid tumor was defined as a tumor without a ground glass opacity component, i.e., a consolidation tumor ratio equal to 1.0. Lepidic predominant adenocarcinoma (LPA) included adenocarcinomas in situ, minimally invasive adenocarcinomas and lepidic predominant invasive adenocarcinomas. Results Fifty-seven (29%) patients showed LPA. The 5-year overall survival (OS) of clinical-stage IA pure-solid adenocarcinoma was 83.4% and that of LPA and non-LPA was 98.1% vs. 76.6% (p=0.0012). A multivariate analysis revealed that maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was an independently significant variable of LPA (p&lt;0.0001) and a significant prognostic factor (p=0.034). The predictive criterion of LPA was SUVmax≤3.3 based on a receiver operating characteristics curve, and 77 (39%) patients who met this criterion showed less pathologic invasiveness regarding lymphatic (p=0.0012) and vascular (p&lt;0.0001) invasions, nodal metastasis (p=0.0007), and better OS than those who did not (SUVmax≤3.3 vs. SUVmax&gt;3.3 rates being 91.7% vs. 78.6%, p=0.0031). Moreover, the 3-year locoregional recurrence-free survival of the sublobar resection arm was significantly worse than that of the lobectomy arm when the tumor showed SUVmax&gt;3.3 (62.7% vs. 82.9%, p=0.0281). Conclusions Higher SUVmax value may be useful for identifying patients with clinical-stage IA radiological pure-solid lung adenocarcinoma in whom sublobar resection should not be considered, even if technically feasible.</description><subject>Cardiothoracic Surgery</subject><issn>0022-5223</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqljs1KxDAUhbNQmPHnCdzcF2i9SZip3QgiirN29iGT3pbUmCu57YBvbwv6BK4O5-PwcZS601hr1Pv7sR6ncJbaoG5qtLXe2Qu1RTSm2hljN-pKZETEBnW7VeGQuxj8FDkL9FxA5lPiky9QSCisHLiHkGJeZqmSyQ8EhycovouceFgpfM2FKuEUO0hzHsB3lDn4EmLmT3-jLnufhG5_81o9vr4cn98qWso5UnF_-g_6Jhl5LnnZOe3EOHTv6_f1um4sPrSttv8W_ABNSV6T</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Hattori, Aritoshi, MD</creator><creator>Matsunaga, Takeshi, MD</creator><creator>Takamochi, Kazuya, MD</creator><creator>Oh, Shiaki, MD</creator><creator>Suzuki, Kenji, MD</creator><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Indications for sublobar resection of clinical-stage IA radiological pure-solid lung adenocarcinoma</title><author>Hattori, Aritoshi, MD ; Matsunaga, Takeshi, MD ; Takamochi, Kazuya, MD ; Oh, Shiaki, MD ; Suzuki, Kenji, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S00225223173089913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Cardiothoracic Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hattori, Aritoshi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsunaga, Takeshi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takamochi, Kazuya, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Shiaki, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Kenji, MD</creatorcontrib><jtitle>The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hattori, Aritoshi, MD</au><au>Matsunaga, Takeshi, MD</au><au>Takamochi, Kazuya, MD</au><au>Oh, Shiaki, MD</au><au>Suzuki, Kenji, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Indications for sublobar resection of clinical-stage IA radiological pure-solid lung adenocarcinoma</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery</jtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><issn>0022-5223</issn><abstract>Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to identify clinical factors associated with lepidic growth in resected clinical-stage IA radiological pure-solid lung adenocarcinoma for identifying a possible sublobar resection candidate in the population. Methods Clinicopathological data was reviewed for 200 surgically resected clinical-stage IA pure-solid lung adenocarcinomas. Radiological pure-solid tumor was defined as a tumor without a ground glass opacity component, i.e., a consolidation tumor ratio equal to 1.0. Lepidic predominant adenocarcinoma (LPA) included adenocarcinomas in situ, minimally invasive adenocarcinomas and lepidic predominant invasive adenocarcinomas. Results Fifty-seven (29%) patients showed LPA. The 5-year overall survival (OS) of clinical-stage IA pure-solid adenocarcinoma was 83.4% and that of LPA and non-LPA was 98.1% vs. 76.6% (p=0.0012). A multivariate analysis revealed that maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was an independently significant variable of LPA (p&lt;0.0001) and a significant prognostic factor (p=0.034). The predictive criterion of LPA was SUVmax≤3.3 based on a receiver operating characteristics curve, and 77 (39%) patients who met this criterion showed less pathologic invasiveness regarding lymphatic (p=0.0012) and vascular (p&lt;0.0001) invasions, nodal metastasis (p=0.0007), and better OS than those who did not (SUVmax≤3.3 vs. SUVmax&gt;3.3 rates being 91.7% vs. 78.6%, p=0.0031). Moreover, the 3-year locoregional recurrence-free survival of the sublobar resection arm was significantly worse than that of the lobectomy arm when the tumor showed SUVmax&gt;3.3 (62.7% vs. 82.9%, p=0.0281). Conclusions Higher SUVmax value may be useful for identifying patients with clinical-stage IA radiological pure-solid lung adenocarcinoma in whom sublobar resection should not be considered, even if technically feasible.</abstract><doi>10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.03.153</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-5223
ispartof The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2017
issn 0022-5223
language eng
recordid cdi_elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0022522317308991
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Cardiothoracic Surgery
title Indications for sublobar resection of clinical-stage IA radiological pure-solid lung adenocarcinoma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T05%3A00%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Indications%20for%20sublobar%20resection%20of%20clinical-stage%20IA%20radiological%20pure-solid%20lung%20adenocarcinoma&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20thoracic%20and%20cardiovascular%20surgery&rft.au=Hattori,%20Aritoshi,%20MD&rft.date=2017&rft.issn=0022-5223&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.03.153&rft_dat=%3Celsevier%3E1_s2_0_S0022522317308991%3C/elsevier%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0022522317308991&rfr_iscdi=true