Indications for sublobar resection of clinical-stage IA radiological pure-solid lung adenocarcinoma
Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to identify clinical factors associated with lepidic growth in resected clinical-stage IA radiological pure-solid lung adenocarcinoma for identifying a possible sublobar resection candidate in the population. Methods Clinicopathological data was reviewed...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2017 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery |
container_volume | |
creator | Hattori, Aritoshi, MD Matsunaga, Takeshi, MD Takamochi, Kazuya, MD Oh, Shiaki, MD Suzuki, Kenji, MD |
description | Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to identify clinical factors associated with lepidic growth in resected clinical-stage IA radiological pure-solid lung adenocarcinoma for identifying a possible sublobar resection candidate in the population. Methods Clinicopathological data was reviewed for 200 surgically resected clinical-stage IA pure-solid lung adenocarcinomas. Radiological pure-solid tumor was defined as a tumor without a ground glass opacity component, i.e., a consolidation tumor ratio equal to 1.0. Lepidic predominant adenocarcinoma (LPA) included adenocarcinomas in situ, minimally invasive adenocarcinomas and lepidic predominant invasive adenocarcinomas. Results Fifty-seven (29%) patients showed LPA. The 5-year overall survival (OS) of clinical-stage IA pure-solid adenocarcinoma was 83.4% and that of LPA and non-LPA was 98.1% vs. 76.6% (p=0.0012). A multivariate analysis revealed that maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was an independently significant variable of LPA (p3.3 (62.7% vs. 82.9%, p=0.0281). Conclusions Higher SUVmax value may be useful for identifying patients with clinical-stage IA radiological pure-solid lung adenocarcinoma in whom sublobar resection should not be considered, even if technically feasible. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.03.153 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0022522317308991</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0022522317308991</els_id><sourcerecordid>1_s2_0_S0022522317308991</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S00225223173089913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqljs1KxDAUhbNQmPHnCdzcF2i9SZip3QgiirN29iGT3pbUmCu57YBvbwv6BK4O5-PwcZS601hr1Pv7sR6ncJbaoG5qtLXe2Qu1RTSm2hljN-pKZETEBnW7VeGQuxj8FDkL9FxA5lPiky9QSCisHLiHkGJeZqmSyQ8EhycovouceFgpfM2FKuEUO0hzHsB3lDn4EmLmT3-jLnufhG5_81o9vr4cn98qWso5UnF_-g_6Jhl5LnnZOe3EOHTv6_f1um4sPrSttv8W_ABNSV6T</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Indications for sublobar resection of clinical-stage IA radiological pure-solid lung adenocarcinoma</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Hattori, Aritoshi, MD ; Matsunaga, Takeshi, MD ; Takamochi, Kazuya, MD ; Oh, Shiaki, MD ; Suzuki, Kenji, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Hattori, Aritoshi, MD ; Matsunaga, Takeshi, MD ; Takamochi, Kazuya, MD ; Oh, Shiaki, MD ; Suzuki, Kenji, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to identify clinical factors associated with lepidic growth in resected clinical-stage IA radiological pure-solid lung adenocarcinoma for identifying a possible sublobar resection candidate in the population. Methods Clinicopathological data was reviewed for 200 surgically resected clinical-stage IA pure-solid lung adenocarcinomas. Radiological pure-solid tumor was defined as a tumor without a ground glass opacity component, i.e., a consolidation tumor ratio equal to 1.0. Lepidic predominant adenocarcinoma (LPA) included adenocarcinomas in situ, minimally invasive adenocarcinomas and lepidic predominant invasive adenocarcinomas. Results Fifty-seven (29%) patients showed LPA. The 5-year overall survival (OS) of clinical-stage IA pure-solid adenocarcinoma was 83.4% and that of LPA and non-LPA was 98.1% vs. 76.6% (p=0.0012). A multivariate analysis revealed that maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was an independently significant variable of LPA (p<0.0001) and a significant prognostic factor (p=0.034). The predictive criterion of LPA was SUVmax≤3.3 based on a receiver operating characteristics curve, and 77 (39%) patients who met this criterion showed less pathologic invasiveness regarding lymphatic (p=0.0012) and vascular (p<0.0001) invasions, nodal metastasis (p=0.0007), and better OS than those who did not (SUVmax≤3.3 vs. SUVmax>3.3 rates being 91.7% vs. 78.6%, p=0.0031). Moreover, the 3-year locoregional recurrence-free survival of the sublobar resection arm was significantly worse than that of the lobectomy arm when the tumor showed SUVmax>3.3 (62.7% vs. 82.9%, p=0.0281). Conclusions Higher SUVmax value may be useful for identifying patients with clinical-stage IA radiological pure-solid lung adenocarcinoma in whom sublobar resection should not be considered, even if technically feasible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5223</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.03.153</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Cardiothoracic Surgery</subject><ispartof>The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2017</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hattori, Aritoshi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsunaga, Takeshi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takamochi, Kazuya, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Shiaki, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Kenji, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Indications for sublobar resection of clinical-stage IA radiological pure-solid lung adenocarcinoma</title><title>The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery</title><description>Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to identify clinical factors associated with lepidic growth in resected clinical-stage IA radiological pure-solid lung adenocarcinoma for identifying a possible sublobar resection candidate in the population. Methods Clinicopathological data was reviewed for 200 surgically resected clinical-stage IA pure-solid lung adenocarcinomas. Radiological pure-solid tumor was defined as a tumor without a ground glass opacity component, i.e., a consolidation tumor ratio equal to 1.0. Lepidic predominant adenocarcinoma (LPA) included adenocarcinomas in situ, minimally invasive adenocarcinomas and lepidic predominant invasive adenocarcinomas. Results Fifty-seven (29%) patients showed LPA. The 5-year overall survival (OS) of clinical-stage IA pure-solid adenocarcinoma was 83.4% and that of LPA and non-LPA was 98.1% vs. 76.6% (p=0.0012). A multivariate analysis revealed that maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was an independently significant variable of LPA (p<0.0001) and a significant prognostic factor (p=0.034). The predictive criterion of LPA was SUVmax≤3.3 based on a receiver operating characteristics curve, and 77 (39%) patients who met this criterion showed less pathologic invasiveness regarding lymphatic (p=0.0012) and vascular (p<0.0001) invasions, nodal metastasis (p=0.0007), and better OS than those who did not (SUVmax≤3.3 vs. SUVmax>3.3 rates being 91.7% vs. 78.6%, p=0.0031). Moreover, the 3-year locoregional recurrence-free survival of the sublobar resection arm was significantly worse than that of the lobectomy arm when the tumor showed SUVmax>3.3 (62.7% vs. 82.9%, p=0.0281). Conclusions Higher SUVmax value may be useful for identifying patients with clinical-stage IA radiological pure-solid lung adenocarcinoma in whom sublobar resection should not be considered, even if technically feasible.</description><subject>Cardiothoracic Surgery</subject><issn>0022-5223</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqljs1KxDAUhbNQmPHnCdzcF2i9SZip3QgiirN29iGT3pbUmCu57YBvbwv6BK4O5-PwcZS601hr1Pv7sR6ncJbaoG5qtLXe2Qu1RTSm2hljN-pKZETEBnW7VeGQuxj8FDkL9FxA5lPiky9QSCisHLiHkGJeZqmSyQ8EhycovouceFgpfM2FKuEUO0hzHsB3lDn4EmLmT3-jLnufhG5_81o9vr4cn98qWso5UnF_-g_6Jhl5LnnZOe3EOHTv6_f1um4sPrSttv8W_ABNSV6T</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Hattori, Aritoshi, MD</creator><creator>Matsunaga, Takeshi, MD</creator><creator>Takamochi, Kazuya, MD</creator><creator>Oh, Shiaki, MD</creator><creator>Suzuki, Kenji, MD</creator><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Indications for sublobar resection of clinical-stage IA radiological pure-solid lung adenocarcinoma</title><author>Hattori, Aritoshi, MD ; Matsunaga, Takeshi, MD ; Takamochi, Kazuya, MD ; Oh, Shiaki, MD ; Suzuki, Kenji, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S00225223173089913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Cardiothoracic Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hattori, Aritoshi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsunaga, Takeshi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takamochi, Kazuya, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Shiaki, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Kenji, MD</creatorcontrib><jtitle>The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hattori, Aritoshi, MD</au><au>Matsunaga, Takeshi, MD</au><au>Takamochi, Kazuya, MD</au><au>Oh, Shiaki, MD</au><au>Suzuki, Kenji, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Indications for sublobar resection of clinical-stage IA radiological pure-solid lung adenocarcinoma</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery</jtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><issn>0022-5223</issn><abstract>Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to identify clinical factors associated with lepidic growth in resected clinical-stage IA radiological pure-solid lung adenocarcinoma for identifying a possible sublobar resection candidate in the population. Methods Clinicopathological data was reviewed for 200 surgically resected clinical-stage IA pure-solid lung adenocarcinomas. Radiological pure-solid tumor was defined as a tumor without a ground glass opacity component, i.e., a consolidation tumor ratio equal to 1.0. Lepidic predominant adenocarcinoma (LPA) included adenocarcinomas in situ, minimally invasive adenocarcinomas and lepidic predominant invasive adenocarcinomas. Results Fifty-seven (29%) patients showed LPA. The 5-year overall survival (OS) of clinical-stage IA pure-solid adenocarcinoma was 83.4% and that of LPA and non-LPA was 98.1% vs. 76.6% (p=0.0012). A multivariate analysis revealed that maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was an independently significant variable of LPA (p<0.0001) and a significant prognostic factor (p=0.034). The predictive criterion of LPA was SUVmax≤3.3 based on a receiver operating characteristics curve, and 77 (39%) patients who met this criterion showed less pathologic invasiveness regarding lymphatic (p=0.0012) and vascular (p<0.0001) invasions, nodal metastasis (p=0.0007), and better OS than those who did not (SUVmax≤3.3 vs. SUVmax>3.3 rates being 91.7% vs. 78.6%, p=0.0031). Moreover, the 3-year locoregional recurrence-free survival of the sublobar resection arm was significantly worse than that of the lobectomy arm when the tumor showed SUVmax>3.3 (62.7% vs. 82.9%, p=0.0281). Conclusions Higher SUVmax value may be useful for identifying patients with clinical-stage IA radiological pure-solid lung adenocarcinoma in whom sublobar resection should not be considered, even if technically feasible.</abstract><doi>10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.03.153</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-5223 |
ispartof | The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2017 |
issn | 0022-5223 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0022522317308991 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Cardiothoracic Surgery |
title | Indications for sublobar resection of clinical-stage IA radiological pure-solid lung adenocarcinoma |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T05%3A00%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Indications%20for%20sublobar%20resection%20of%20clinical-stage%20IA%20radiological%20pure-solid%20lung%20adenocarcinoma&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20thoracic%20and%20cardiovascular%20surgery&rft.au=Hattori,%20Aritoshi,%20MD&rft.date=2017&rft.issn=0022-5223&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.03.153&rft_dat=%3Celsevier%3E1_s2_0_S0022522317308991%3C/elsevier%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0022522317308991&rfr_iscdi=true |