The Impact of Depression and Pain Catastrophization on Initial Presentation and Treatment Outcomes for Atraumatic Hand Conditions

Background Prior studies have suggested that patient-rated hand function is impacted by depression and pain catastrophization. We studied the impact that these comorbidities have on treatment outcomes. Methods Two hundred and fifty-six patients presenting to an orthopaedic hand clinic were followed...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 2014, Vol.96 (10), p.806-814
Hauptverfasser: London, Daniel A., BA, Stepan, Jeffrey G., BS, Boyer, Martin I., MD, FRCS(C), Calfee, Ryan P., MD, MSc
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 814
container_issue 10
container_start_page 806
container_title Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
container_volume 96
creator London, Daniel A., BA
Stepan, Jeffrey G., BS
Boyer, Martin I., MD, FRCS(C)
Calfee, Ryan P., MD, MSc
description Background Prior studies have suggested that patient-rated hand function is impacted by depression and pain catastrophization. We studied the impact that these comorbidities have on treatment outcomes. Methods Two hundred and fifty-six patients presenting to an orthopaedic hand clinic were followed in this prospective cohort investigation. Patients who were prescribed treatment for atraumatic hand/wrist conditions were eligible for inclusion. At enrollment, all patients completed the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ; scale of 0 to 100, with 100 indicating the best hand performance). One month and three months after treatment, patients again completed the MHQ. Participants’ psychological comorbidity status was categorized as either affected (a CES-D score of ≥16, indicating depression, or a PCS score of ≥30, indicating catastrophization) or unaffected (a CES-D score of
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0021-9355(14)74183-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0021935514741839</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0021935514741839</els_id><sourcerecordid>1_s2_0_S0021935514741839</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S00219355147418393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqlj0FLAzEQhXNQsFp_gjBHPawm3dS6F0FWS3uy0L2HIZ2lqbvJkmQFvfnPTar4B4SBYd5878Fj7ErwW8HF_d2W85koqnI-vxbyZiHFQ1lUJ2zyJ5-x8xAOnHMp-WLCvpo9wbofUEdwLTzT4CkE4yyg3cEGjYUaI4bo3bA3nxjzK83ammiwg03CycYfPVsaTxj7JMHrGLXrKUDrPDxFj2OfMA2rjNXO7kw2hSk7bbELdPm7L9jj8qWpVwWl492QV7oz1mjs3uiDwsGN3iZOCRVmiqtj4VxMyGPbqvx3wDeyumid</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Impact of Depression and Pain Catastrophization on Initial Presentation and Treatment Outcomes for Atraumatic Hand Conditions</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>London, Daniel A., BA ; Stepan, Jeffrey G., BS ; Boyer, Martin I., MD, FRCS(C) ; Calfee, Ryan P., MD, MSc</creator><creatorcontrib>London, Daniel A., BA ; Stepan, Jeffrey G., BS ; Boyer, Martin I., MD, FRCS(C) ; Calfee, Ryan P., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><description>Background Prior studies have suggested that patient-rated hand function is impacted by depression and pain catastrophization. We studied the impact that these comorbidities have on treatment outcomes. Methods Two hundred and fifty-six patients presenting to an orthopaedic hand clinic were followed in this prospective cohort investigation. Patients who were prescribed treatment for atraumatic hand/wrist conditions were eligible for inclusion. At enrollment, all patients completed the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ; scale of 0 to 100, with 100 indicating the best hand performance). One month and three months after treatment, patients again completed the MHQ. Participants’ psychological comorbidity status was categorized as either affected (a CES-D score of ≥16, indicating depression, or a PCS score of ≥30, indicating catastrophization) or unaffected (a CES-D score of &lt;16 and a PCS score of &lt;30). Diagnoses and treatments for both the affected and unaffected groups were examined. The effect of time and patient status, and their interaction, on MHQ scores was evaluated by mixed modeling. Results Fifty patients were categorized as affected and 206 as unaffected. Diagnoses and treatments differed minimally between the two groups. At the time of enrollment, the mean MHQ score of the unaffected group (64.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 62.5 to 67.3) was significantly higher than that of the affected group (48.1; 95% CI, 43.3 to 53.0). Both groups demonstrated similar significant absolute improvement over baseline at three months after treatment (an increase of 12.5 points [95% CI, 7.5 to 17.4] in the affected group and 12.8 points [95% CI, 10.4 to 15.3] in the unaffected group). Thus, at the time of final follow-up, the rating of hand function by the affected patients (60.6 [95% CI, 55.0 to 66.2]) was still significantly poorer than the rating by the unaffected patients (77.7 [95% CI, 75.0 to 80.5]). Conclusions Although patients affected by depression and/or pain catastrophization reported worse self-rated hand function at baseline and at the time of follow-up, these patients showed similar absolute improvement in self-rated hand function following treatment compared with patients with unaffected status. Level of Evidence Prognostic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9355</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9355(14)74183-9</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Orthopedics</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2014, Vol.96 (10), p.806-814</ispartof><rights>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>London, Daniel A., BA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stepan, Jeffrey G., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyer, Martin I., MD, FRCS(C)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calfee, Ryan P., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><title>The Impact of Depression and Pain Catastrophization on Initial Presentation and Treatment Outcomes for Atraumatic Hand Conditions</title><title>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</title><description>Background Prior studies have suggested that patient-rated hand function is impacted by depression and pain catastrophization. We studied the impact that these comorbidities have on treatment outcomes. Methods Two hundred and fifty-six patients presenting to an orthopaedic hand clinic were followed in this prospective cohort investigation. Patients who were prescribed treatment for atraumatic hand/wrist conditions were eligible for inclusion. At enrollment, all patients completed the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ; scale of 0 to 100, with 100 indicating the best hand performance). One month and three months after treatment, patients again completed the MHQ. Participants’ psychological comorbidity status was categorized as either affected (a CES-D score of ≥16, indicating depression, or a PCS score of ≥30, indicating catastrophization) or unaffected (a CES-D score of &lt;16 and a PCS score of &lt;30). Diagnoses and treatments for both the affected and unaffected groups were examined. The effect of time and patient status, and their interaction, on MHQ scores was evaluated by mixed modeling. Results Fifty patients were categorized as affected and 206 as unaffected. Diagnoses and treatments differed minimally between the two groups. At the time of enrollment, the mean MHQ score of the unaffected group (64.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 62.5 to 67.3) was significantly higher than that of the affected group (48.1; 95% CI, 43.3 to 53.0). Both groups demonstrated similar significant absolute improvement over baseline at three months after treatment (an increase of 12.5 points [95% CI, 7.5 to 17.4] in the affected group and 12.8 points [95% CI, 10.4 to 15.3] in the unaffected group). Thus, at the time of final follow-up, the rating of hand function by the affected patients (60.6 [95% CI, 55.0 to 66.2]) was still significantly poorer than the rating by the unaffected patients (77.7 [95% CI, 75.0 to 80.5]). Conclusions Although patients affected by depression and/or pain catastrophization reported worse self-rated hand function at baseline and at the time of follow-up, these patients showed similar absolute improvement in self-rated hand function following treatment compared with patients with unaffected status. Level of Evidence Prognostic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><subject>Orthopedics</subject><issn>0021-9355</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqlj0FLAzEQhXNQsFp_gjBHPawm3dS6F0FWS3uy0L2HIZ2lqbvJkmQFvfnPTar4B4SBYd5878Fj7ErwW8HF_d2W85koqnI-vxbyZiHFQ1lUJ2zyJ5-x8xAOnHMp-WLCvpo9wbofUEdwLTzT4CkE4yyg3cEGjYUaI4bo3bA3nxjzK83ammiwg03CycYfPVsaTxj7JMHrGLXrKUDrPDxFj2OfMA2rjNXO7kw2hSk7bbELdPm7L9jj8qWpVwWl492QV7oz1mjs3uiDwsGN3iZOCRVmiqtj4VxMyGPbqvx3wDeyumid</recordid><startdate>2014</startdate><enddate>2014</enddate><creator>London, Daniel A., BA</creator><creator>Stepan, Jeffrey G., BS</creator><creator>Boyer, Martin I., MD, FRCS(C)</creator><creator>Calfee, Ryan P., MD, MSc</creator><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>2014</creationdate><title>The Impact of Depression and Pain Catastrophization on Initial Presentation and Treatment Outcomes for Atraumatic Hand Conditions</title><author>London, Daniel A., BA ; Stepan, Jeffrey G., BS ; Boyer, Martin I., MD, FRCS(C) ; Calfee, Ryan P., MD, MSc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S00219355147418393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Orthopedics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>London, Daniel A., BA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stepan, Jeffrey G., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyer, Martin I., MD, FRCS(C)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calfee, Ryan P., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>London, Daniel A., BA</au><au>Stepan, Jeffrey G., BS</au><au>Boyer, Martin I., MD, FRCS(C)</au><au>Calfee, Ryan P., MD, MSc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Impact of Depression and Pain Catastrophization on Initial Presentation and Treatment Outcomes for Atraumatic Hand Conditions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle><date>2014</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>806</spage><epage>814</epage><pages>806-814</pages><issn>0021-9355</issn><abstract>Background Prior studies have suggested that patient-rated hand function is impacted by depression and pain catastrophization. We studied the impact that these comorbidities have on treatment outcomes. Methods Two hundred and fifty-six patients presenting to an orthopaedic hand clinic were followed in this prospective cohort investigation. Patients who were prescribed treatment for atraumatic hand/wrist conditions were eligible for inclusion. At enrollment, all patients completed the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ; scale of 0 to 100, with 100 indicating the best hand performance). One month and three months after treatment, patients again completed the MHQ. Participants’ psychological comorbidity status was categorized as either affected (a CES-D score of ≥16, indicating depression, or a PCS score of ≥30, indicating catastrophization) or unaffected (a CES-D score of &lt;16 and a PCS score of &lt;30). Diagnoses and treatments for both the affected and unaffected groups were examined. The effect of time and patient status, and their interaction, on MHQ scores was evaluated by mixed modeling. Results Fifty patients were categorized as affected and 206 as unaffected. Diagnoses and treatments differed minimally between the two groups. At the time of enrollment, the mean MHQ score of the unaffected group (64.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 62.5 to 67.3) was significantly higher than that of the affected group (48.1; 95% CI, 43.3 to 53.0). Both groups demonstrated similar significant absolute improvement over baseline at three months after treatment (an increase of 12.5 points [95% CI, 7.5 to 17.4] in the affected group and 12.8 points [95% CI, 10.4 to 15.3] in the unaffected group). Thus, at the time of final follow-up, the rating of hand function by the affected patients (60.6 [95% CI, 55.0 to 66.2]) was still significantly poorer than the rating by the unaffected patients (77.7 [95% CI, 75.0 to 80.5]). Conclusions Although patients affected by depression and/or pain catastrophization reported worse self-rated hand function at baseline and at the time of follow-up, these patients showed similar absolute improvement in self-rated hand function following treatment compared with patients with unaffected status. Level of Evidence Prognostic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</abstract><doi>10.1016/S0021-9355(14)74183-9</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9355
ispartof Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2014, Vol.96 (10), p.806-814
issn 0021-9355
language eng
recordid cdi_elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0021935514741839
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Orthopedics
title The Impact of Depression and Pain Catastrophization on Initial Presentation and Treatment Outcomes for Atraumatic Hand Conditions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T13%3A47%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Impact%20of%20Depression%20and%20Pain%20Catastrophization%20on%20Initial%20Presentation%20and%20Treatment%20Outcomes%20for%20Atraumatic%20Hand%20Conditions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20joint%20surgery.%20American%20volume&rft.au=London,%20Daniel%20A.,%20BA&rft.date=2014&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=806&rft.epage=814&rft.pages=806-814&rft.issn=0021-9355&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0021-9355(14)74183-9&rft_dat=%3Celsevier%3E1_s2_0_S0021935514741839%3C/elsevier%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0021935514741839&rfr_iscdi=true