The Rate of Contralateral Proximal Femoral Fracture Following Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning Compared with Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures

Background As the population ages, the number of proximal femoral fractures seen each year is expected to increase. Subsequent contralateral hip fractures have been reported to occur in as many as 11.8% of patients after surgical fixation of the initial fracture, but it is unknown if this rate is si...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 2012, Vol.94 (5), p.418-425
Hauptverfasser: Souder, Christopher D., MD, Brennan, Michael L., MD, Brennan, Kindyle Losey, PhD, Song, Juhee, PhD, Williams, Johnathan, BS, Chaput, Christopher, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 425
container_issue 5
container_start_page 418
container_title Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
container_volume 94
creator Souder, Christopher D., MD
Brennan, Michael L., MD
Brennan, Kindyle Losey, PhD
Song, Juhee, PhD
Williams, Johnathan, BS
Chaput, Christopher, MD
description Background As the population ages, the number of proximal femoral fractures seen each year is expected to increase. Subsequent contralateral hip fractures have been reported to occur in as many as 11.8% of patients after surgical fixation of the initial fracture, but it is unknown if this rate is similar among patients managed with different surgical procedures. Methods A retrospective comparative study was performed at a single institution at which electronic medical records and digital radiographs were reviewed for 1177 patients who underwent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning or arthroplasty for the treatment of a proximal femoral fracture. For the primary outcome of subsequent fracture, logistic regression analysis was applied. Results Four hundred and ninety-five patients were managed with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning, and 682 were managed with arthroplasty. Patients who underwent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning were two times more likely to have a subsequent contralateral femoral fracture in comparison with those who underwent arthroplasty, with contralateral fracture rates of 10.10% for the closed reduction and percutaneous pinning group and 5.57% for the arthroplasty group (p = 0.0035). Conclusions Patients undergoing closed reduction and percutaneous pinning as the initial treatment for a hip fracture had an increased risk of a subsequent contralateral hip fracture in comparison with those undergoing arthroplasty, after controlling for patient characteristics. Level of Evidence Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0021-9355(12)70158-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0021935512701583</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0021935512701583</els_id><sourcerecordid>1_s2_0_S0021935512701583</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S00219355127015833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqlUMtOwzAQ9AEkyuMTkPYIh4CdNBQuSCgi6glVJffIcjbEreOtbIfSn-IbcSLoD3DZ3RmNdkbD2LXgd4KLh_t3zlORPGV5fiPS2wUX-WOSnbDZkT5j595vOOfzOV_M2HfVIaxlQKAWCrLBSRNRnLBy9KX7eJTY00iUTqowOISSjKG9th9QGPLYwBqbQQVNFqRtYIVODUFapMHDSls7KanfSRe1ex06eHGhc7Qz0ocDtOQgxBiVQxl6tGHM8mf6hmp7dPaX7LSVxuPV775gz-VrVSwTjOBTo6uV0VYrabZ4QL-hwdmoq0Xt05rXUztjCyKdqsmyfz_4ASfeeT0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Rate of Contralateral Proximal Femoral Fracture Following Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning Compared with Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Souder, Christopher D., MD ; Brennan, Michael L., MD ; Brennan, Kindyle Losey, PhD ; Song, Juhee, PhD ; Williams, Johnathan, BS ; Chaput, Christopher, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Souder, Christopher D., MD ; Brennan, Michael L., MD ; Brennan, Kindyle Losey, PhD ; Song, Juhee, PhD ; Williams, Johnathan, BS ; Chaput, Christopher, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Background As the population ages, the number of proximal femoral fractures seen each year is expected to increase. Subsequent contralateral hip fractures have been reported to occur in as many as 11.8% of patients after surgical fixation of the initial fracture, but it is unknown if this rate is similar among patients managed with different surgical procedures. Methods A retrospective comparative study was performed at a single institution at which electronic medical records and digital radiographs were reviewed for 1177 patients who underwent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning or arthroplasty for the treatment of a proximal femoral fracture. For the primary outcome of subsequent fracture, logistic regression analysis was applied. Results Four hundred and ninety-five patients were managed with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning, and 682 were managed with arthroplasty. Patients who underwent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning were two times more likely to have a subsequent contralateral femoral fracture in comparison with those who underwent arthroplasty, with contralateral fracture rates of 10.10% for the closed reduction and percutaneous pinning group and 5.57% for the arthroplasty group (p = 0.0035). Conclusions Patients undergoing closed reduction and percutaneous pinning as the initial treatment for a hip fracture had an increased risk of a subsequent contralateral hip fracture in comparison with those undergoing arthroplasty, after controlling for patient characteristics. Level of Evidence Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9355</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9355(12)70158-3</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Orthopedics</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2012, Vol.94 (5), p.418-425</ispartof><rights>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Souder, Christopher D., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Michael L., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Kindyle Losey, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Juhee, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Johnathan, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaput, Christopher, MD</creatorcontrib><title>The Rate of Contralateral Proximal Femoral Fracture Following Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning Compared with Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures</title><title>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</title><description>Background As the population ages, the number of proximal femoral fractures seen each year is expected to increase. Subsequent contralateral hip fractures have been reported to occur in as many as 11.8% of patients after surgical fixation of the initial fracture, but it is unknown if this rate is similar among patients managed with different surgical procedures. Methods A retrospective comparative study was performed at a single institution at which electronic medical records and digital radiographs were reviewed for 1177 patients who underwent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning or arthroplasty for the treatment of a proximal femoral fracture. For the primary outcome of subsequent fracture, logistic regression analysis was applied. Results Four hundred and ninety-five patients were managed with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning, and 682 were managed with arthroplasty. Patients who underwent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning were two times more likely to have a subsequent contralateral femoral fracture in comparison with those who underwent arthroplasty, with contralateral fracture rates of 10.10% for the closed reduction and percutaneous pinning group and 5.57% for the arthroplasty group (p = 0.0035). Conclusions Patients undergoing closed reduction and percutaneous pinning as the initial treatment for a hip fracture had an increased risk of a subsequent contralateral hip fracture in comparison with those undergoing arthroplasty, after controlling for patient characteristics. Level of Evidence Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><subject>Orthopedics</subject><issn>0021-9355</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqlUMtOwzAQ9AEkyuMTkPYIh4CdNBQuSCgi6glVJffIcjbEreOtbIfSn-IbcSLoD3DZ3RmNdkbD2LXgd4KLh_t3zlORPGV5fiPS2wUX-WOSnbDZkT5j595vOOfzOV_M2HfVIaxlQKAWCrLBSRNRnLBy9KX7eJTY00iUTqowOISSjKG9th9QGPLYwBqbQQVNFqRtYIVODUFapMHDSls7KanfSRe1ex06eHGhc7Qz0ocDtOQgxBiVQxl6tGHM8mf6hmp7dPaX7LSVxuPV775gz-VrVSwTjOBTo6uV0VYrabZ4QL-hwdmoq0Xt05rXUztjCyKdqsmyfz_4ASfeeT0</recordid><startdate>2012</startdate><enddate>2012</enddate><creator>Souder, Christopher D., MD</creator><creator>Brennan, Michael L., MD</creator><creator>Brennan, Kindyle Losey, PhD</creator><creator>Song, Juhee, PhD</creator><creator>Williams, Johnathan, BS</creator><creator>Chaput, Christopher, MD</creator><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>2012</creationdate><title>The Rate of Contralateral Proximal Femoral Fracture Following Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning Compared with Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures</title><author>Souder, Christopher D., MD ; Brennan, Michael L., MD ; Brennan, Kindyle Losey, PhD ; Song, Juhee, PhD ; Williams, Johnathan, BS ; Chaput, Christopher, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S00219355127015833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Orthopedics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Souder, Christopher D., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Michael L., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Kindyle Losey, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Juhee, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Johnathan, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaput, Christopher, MD</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Souder, Christopher D., MD</au><au>Brennan, Michael L., MD</au><au>Brennan, Kindyle Losey, PhD</au><au>Song, Juhee, PhD</au><au>Williams, Johnathan, BS</au><au>Chaput, Christopher, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Rate of Contralateral Proximal Femoral Fracture Following Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning Compared with Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle><date>2012</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>418</spage><epage>425</epage><pages>418-425</pages><issn>0021-9355</issn><abstract>Background As the population ages, the number of proximal femoral fractures seen each year is expected to increase. Subsequent contralateral hip fractures have been reported to occur in as many as 11.8% of patients after surgical fixation of the initial fracture, but it is unknown if this rate is similar among patients managed with different surgical procedures. Methods A retrospective comparative study was performed at a single institution at which electronic medical records and digital radiographs were reviewed for 1177 patients who underwent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning or arthroplasty for the treatment of a proximal femoral fracture. For the primary outcome of subsequent fracture, logistic regression analysis was applied. Results Four hundred and ninety-five patients were managed with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning, and 682 were managed with arthroplasty. Patients who underwent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning were two times more likely to have a subsequent contralateral femoral fracture in comparison with those who underwent arthroplasty, with contralateral fracture rates of 10.10% for the closed reduction and percutaneous pinning group and 5.57% for the arthroplasty group (p = 0.0035). Conclusions Patients undergoing closed reduction and percutaneous pinning as the initial treatment for a hip fracture had an increased risk of a subsequent contralateral hip fracture in comparison with those undergoing arthroplasty, after controlling for patient characteristics. Level of Evidence Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</abstract><doi>10.1016/S0021-9355(12)70158-3</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9355
ispartof Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2012, Vol.94 (5), p.418-425
issn 0021-9355
language eng
recordid cdi_elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0021935512701583
source Alma/SFX Local Collection; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Orthopedics
title The Rate of Contralateral Proximal Femoral Fracture Following Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning Compared with Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T04%3A49%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Rate%20of%20Contralateral%20Proximal%20Femoral%20Fracture%20Following%20Closed%20Reduction%20and%20Percutaneous%20Pinning%20Compared%20with%20Arthroplasty%20for%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Femoral%20Neck%20Fractures&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20joint%20surgery.%20American%20volume&rft.au=Souder,%20Christopher%20D.,%20MD&rft.date=2012&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=418&rft.epage=425&rft.pages=418-425&rft.issn=0021-9355&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0021-9355(12)70158-3&rft_dat=%3Celsevier%3E1_s2_0_S0021935512701583%3C/elsevier%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0021935512701583&rfr_iscdi=true