Effects of Acquired Glenoid Bone Defects on Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

Background Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is the accepted method of treatment for selected shoulder disorders. The purpose of this study was to compare primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty surgical techniques as well as clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with acquired glenoid bone...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 2010, Vol.92 (5), p.1144-1154
Hauptverfasser: Klein, Steven M., MD, Dunning, Page, BA, Pupello, Derek, MBA, Mulieri, Philip, MD, PhD, Frankle, Mark A., MD, Downes, Katheryne, MPH
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1154
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1144
container_title Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
container_volume 92
creator Klein, Steven M., MD
Dunning, Page, BA
Pupello, Derek, MBA
Mulieri, Philip, MD, PhD
Frankle, Mark A., MD
Downes, Katheryne, MPH
description Background Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is the accepted method of treatment for selected shoulder disorders. The purpose of this study was to compare primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty surgical techniques as well as clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with acquired glenoid bone defects and in those with normal glenoid morphology. Methods Preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography scans were performed on 216 shoulders in 211 patients undergoing primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty between 2004 and 2007. The glenoids were classified as normal or abnormal on the basis of preoperative radiographs and three-dimensional reconstructions of the scapula. One hundred and forty-three shoulders had been followed for two years. There were eighty-seven normal and fifty-six abnormal glenoids. The surgical techniques that were compared included bone-grafting and glenosphere selection. The clinical outcomes for the two groups were compared with respect to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score. Results Surgical technique differed between the groups. All fifty-six glenoids with acquired bone defects had center screw placement along an alternative (scapular spine) centerline. A bone graft was used in twenty-two shoulders with acquired glenoid bone defects compared with none of those with normal glenoid morphology (p = 0.016). Shoulders with glenoid defects were treated with larger glenospheres (36 or 40 mm) more often than those with normal glenoids (p < 0.001). No significant difference was detected between the groups with regard to the preoperative or postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores. Radiographs did not demonstrate failure or resorption of a glenoid bone graft when present. All outcomes improved significantly postoperatively. There were five complications, and one patient was unsatisfied with the result. Conclusions Glenoid bone defects, when managed with an alteration of surgical technique, including bone-grafting when indicated, are not a contraindication to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Level of Evidence Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0021-9355(10)71305-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0021935510713059</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0021935510713059</els_id><sourcerecordid>1_s2_0_S0021935510713059</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S00219355107130593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqlj81Kw0AUhWehYKs-gnCXdZF6p2ks2RT6qzvBdD-EyY2ZOs7YuZlC375tCL6Aq8M5fBz4hHiSOJYoX18KxIlM8jTLRhKfZzLFLMlvxOBvvhND5j0iTqc4G4i4qWvSLYOvYaEP0QSq4M2S86aCpXcEa-oBB0UMX0aXFnakG2cOkaB0Fayscd38EVvtf4jBOPikIwUmKBofbUUBFqFtgv-1JbenB3Fbl5bpsc97Md9udqv3hC7laCgo3X9-04l472NwF05JxROFqpO8ykjsDPP03wdn5ZpjeQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Acquired Glenoid Bone Defects on Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Klein, Steven M., MD ; Dunning, Page, BA ; Pupello, Derek, MBA ; Mulieri, Philip, MD, PhD ; Frankle, Mark A., MD ; Downes, Katheryne, MPH</creator><creatorcontrib>Klein, Steven M., MD ; Dunning, Page, BA ; Pupello, Derek, MBA ; Mulieri, Philip, MD, PhD ; Frankle, Mark A., MD ; Downes, Katheryne, MPH</creatorcontrib><description>Background Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is the accepted method of treatment for selected shoulder disorders. The purpose of this study was to compare primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty surgical techniques as well as clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with acquired glenoid bone defects and in those with normal glenoid morphology. Methods Preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography scans were performed on 216 shoulders in 211 patients undergoing primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty between 2004 and 2007. The glenoids were classified as normal or abnormal on the basis of preoperative radiographs and three-dimensional reconstructions of the scapula. One hundred and forty-three shoulders had been followed for two years. There were eighty-seven normal and fifty-six abnormal glenoids. The surgical techniques that were compared included bone-grafting and glenosphere selection. The clinical outcomes for the two groups were compared with respect to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score. Results Surgical technique differed between the groups. All fifty-six glenoids with acquired bone defects had center screw placement along an alternative (scapular spine) centerline. A bone graft was used in twenty-two shoulders with acquired glenoid bone defects compared with none of those with normal glenoid morphology (p = 0.016). Shoulders with glenoid defects were treated with larger glenospheres (36 or 40 mm) more often than those with normal glenoids (p &lt; 0.001). No significant difference was detected between the groups with regard to the preoperative or postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores. Radiographs did not demonstrate failure or resorption of a glenoid bone graft when present. All outcomes improved significantly postoperatively. There were five complications, and one patient was unsatisfied with the result. Conclusions Glenoid bone defects, when managed with an alteration of surgical technique, including bone-grafting when indicated, are not a contraindication to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Level of Evidence Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9355</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9355(10)71305-9</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Orthopedics</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2010, Vol.92 (5), p.1144-1154</ispartof><rights>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Klein, Steven M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunning, Page, BA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pupello, Derek, MBA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulieri, Philip, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frankle, Mark A., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Downes, Katheryne, MPH</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Acquired Glenoid Bone Defects on Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty</title><title>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</title><description>Background Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is the accepted method of treatment for selected shoulder disorders. The purpose of this study was to compare primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty surgical techniques as well as clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with acquired glenoid bone defects and in those with normal glenoid morphology. Methods Preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography scans were performed on 216 shoulders in 211 patients undergoing primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty between 2004 and 2007. The glenoids were classified as normal or abnormal on the basis of preoperative radiographs and three-dimensional reconstructions of the scapula. One hundred and forty-three shoulders had been followed for two years. There were eighty-seven normal and fifty-six abnormal glenoids. The surgical techniques that were compared included bone-grafting and glenosphere selection. The clinical outcomes for the two groups were compared with respect to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score. Results Surgical technique differed between the groups. All fifty-six glenoids with acquired bone defects had center screw placement along an alternative (scapular spine) centerline. A bone graft was used in twenty-two shoulders with acquired glenoid bone defects compared with none of those with normal glenoid morphology (p = 0.016). Shoulders with glenoid defects were treated with larger glenospheres (36 or 40 mm) more often than those with normal glenoids (p &lt; 0.001). No significant difference was detected between the groups with regard to the preoperative or postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores. Radiographs did not demonstrate failure or resorption of a glenoid bone graft when present. All outcomes improved significantly postoperatively. There were five complications, and one patient was unsatisfied with the result. Conclusions Glenoid bone defects, when managed with an alteration of surgical technique, including bone-grafting when indicated, are not a contraindication to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Level of Evidence Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><subject>Orthopedics</subject><issn>0021-9355</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqlj81Kw0AUhWehYKs-gnCXdZF6p2ks2RT6qzvBdD-EyY2ZOs7YuZlC375tCL6Aq8M5fBz4hHiSOJYoX18KxIlM8jTLRhKfZzLFLMlvxOBvvhND5j0iTqc4G4i4qWvSLYOvYaEP0QSq4M2S86aCpXcEa-oBB0UMX0aXFnakG2cOkaB0Fayscd38EVvtf4jBOPikIwUmKBofbUUBFqFtgv-1JbenB3Fbl5bpsc97Md9udqv3hC7laCgo3X9-04l472NwF05JxROFqpO8ykjsDPP03wdn5ZpjeQ</recordid><startdate>2010</startdate><enddate>2010</enddate><creator>Klein, Steven M., MD</creator><creator>Dunning, Page, BA</creator><creator>Pupello, Derek, MBA</creator><creator>Mulieri, Philip, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Frankle, Mark A., MD</creator><creator>Downes, Katheryne, MPH</creator><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>2010</creationdate><title>Effects of Acquired Glenoid Bone Defects on Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty</title><author>Klein, Steven M., MD ; Dunning, Page, BA ; Pupello, Derek, MBA ; Mulieri, Philip, MD, PhD ; Frankle, Mark A., MD ; Downes, Katheryne, MPH</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S00219355107130593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Orthopedics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Klein, Steven M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunning, Page, BA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pupello, Derek, MBA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulieri, Philip, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frankle, Mark A., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Downes, Katheryne, MPH</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Klein, Steven M., MD</au><au>Dunning, Page, BA</au><au>Pupello, Derek, MBA</au><au>Mulieri, Philip, MD, PhD</au><au>Frankle, Mark A., MD</au><au>Downes, Katheryne, MPH</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Acquired Glenoid Bone Defects on Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle><date>2010</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1144</spage><epage>1154</epage><pages>1144-1154</pages><issn>0021-9355</issn><abstract>Background Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is the accepted method of treatment for selected shoulder disorders. The purpose of this study was to compare primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty surgical techniques as well as clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with acquired glenoid bone defects and in those with normal glenoid morphology. Methods Preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography scans were performed on 216 shoulders in 211 patients undergoing primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty between 2004 and 2007. The glenoids were classified as normal or abnormal on the basis of preoperative radiographs and three-dimensional reconstructions of the scapula. One hundred and forty-three shoulders had been followed for two years. There were eighty-seven normal and fifty-six abnormal glenoids. The surgical techniques that were compared included bone-grafting and glenosphere selection. The clinical outcomes for the two groups were compared with respect to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score. Results Surgical technique differed between the groups. All fifty-six glenoids with acquired bone defects had center screw placement along an alternative (scapular spine) centerline. A bone graft was used in twenty-two shoulders with acquired glenoid bone defects compared with none of those with normal glenoid morphology (p = 0.016). Shoulders with glenoid defects were treated with larger glenospheres (36 or 40 mm) more often than those with normal glenoids (p &lt; 0.001). No significant difference was detected between the groups with regard to the preoperative or postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores. Radiographs did not demonstrate failure or resorption of a glenoid bone graft when present. All outcomes improved significantly postoperatively. There were five complications, and one patient was unsatisfied with the result. Conclusions Glenoid bone defects, when managed with an alteration of surgical technique, including bone-grafting when indicated, are not a contraindication to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Level of Evidence Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</abstract><doi>10.1016/S0021-9355(10)71305-9</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9355
ispartof Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2010, Vol.92 (5), p.1144-1154
issn 0021-9355
language eng
recordid cdi_elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0021935510713059
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Orthopedics
title Effects of Acquired Glenoid Bone Defects on Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T23%3A43%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Acquired%20Glenoid%20Bone%20Defects%20on%20Surgical%20Technique%20and%20Clinical%20Outcomes%20in%20Reverse%20Shoulder%20Arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20joint%20surgery.%20American%20volume&rft.au=Klein,%20Steven%20M.,%20MD&rft.date=2010&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1144&rft.epage=1154&rft.pages=1144-1154&rft.issn=0021-9355&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0021-9355(10)71305-9&rft_dat=%3Celsevier%3E1_s2_0_S0021935510713059%3C/elsevier%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0021935510713059&rfr_iscdi=true