Artificial Intelligence in Education: Next-Gen Teacher Perspectives

The progress made by artificial intelligence (AI) worldwide has led, through the Beijing Consensus, UNESCO to recommend to governments, in 2019, to include AI in educational policies and processes. While numerous studies inventory students' and teachers’ opinions on the use of AI in education (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Amfiteatru economic 2024-02, Vol.26 (65), p.145-161
Hauptverfasser: Samarescu, Nicoleta, Bumbac, Robert, Zamfiroiu, Alin, Iorgulescu, Maria Cristina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 161
container_issue 65
container_start_page 145
container_title Amfiteatru economic
container_volume 26
creator Samarescu, Nicoleta
Bumbac, Robert
Zamfiroiu, Alin
Iorgulescu, Maria Cristina
description The progress made by artificial intelligence (AI) worldwide has led, through the Beijing Consensus, UNESCO to recommend to governments, in 2019, to include AI in educational policies and processes. While numerous studies inventory students' and teachers’ opinions on the use of AI in education (AIEd), this article differs by analysing the factors that influence the behavioural intention to use AI from the training stage of future primary and secondary teachers in Romania. Through exploratory quantitative research, carried out on a sample of 270 students from the Faculty of Education, Social Sciences and Psychology, the interaction of subjects with AI and the intention of integrating AIEd are followed using binary logistic regression. The analysis conducted shows that among the six variables of the model, “the confidence in personal ability to use AI” and “the perception of a greater number of advantages” have a positive and significant impact on the willingness to use AI in the educational process, more than “being previously used”, “the knowledge level” or “student requirements”. These findings are of particular importance for the revision of teacher training programmes and the development of educational policies that increase the confidence of future teachers in the ability to use AI, eliminating fears or misconceptions about AI.
doi_str_mv 10.24818/EA/2024/65/145
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ceeol_econi</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_econis_econstor_281814</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>1214973</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>1214973</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-8cdcc56920f4c3ed257a5dd5e068f91425800df181c78bfe8edd374c7640146c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkM1Lw0AQxRdRsNSePQkBzzH7md14CyXWQlEP9bzE3YluiUnd3Yr-926tUJzLG5jfzDweQpcE31CuiCqauqCY8qIUBeHiBE0o5TKvCOanaEKEoqnn5TmahbDBqaRgiZugee2j65xxbZ8thwh9715hMJC5IWvszrTRjcNt9gBfMV_AkK2hNW_gsyfwYQsmuk8IF-isa_sAsz-doue7Zj2_z1ePi-W8XuWGExJzZawxoqwo7rhhYKmQrbBWAC5Vl9xRoTC2HVHESPXSgQJrmeRGlhwn74ZN0fXh7taPHzsIUW_GnR_SS80wEVgJxniiigNl_BiCh05vvXtv_bcmWP-GpZta78PSpdAphLSRHTbAjIMLR17JquKKSZyQq3_IXkIcvabpHuHHuQEY-6MvQgmvJGM_l6V4yg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3015085334</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Artificial Intelligence in Education: Next-Gen Teacher Perspectives</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Samarescu, Nicoleta ; Bumbac, Robert ; Zamfiroiu, Alin ; Iorgulescu, Maria Cristina</creator><creatorcontrib>Samarescu, Nicoleta ; Bumbac, Robert ; Zamfiroiu, Alin ; Iorgulescu, Maria Cristina ; Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania and National Institute for Research Development in Informatics – ICI Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania ; Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania ; National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, University Centre Pite?ti, Pite?ti, Romania</creatorcontrib><description>The progress made by artificial intelligence (AI) worldwide has led, through the Beijing Consensus, UNESCO to recommend to governments, in 2019, to include AI in educational policies and processes. While numerous studies inventory students' and teachers’ opinions on the use of AI in education (AIEd), this article differs by analysing the factors that influence the behavioural intention to use AI from the training stage of future primary and secondary teachers in Romania. Through exploratory quantitative research, carried out on a sample of 270 students from the Faculty of Education, Social Sciences and Psychology, the interaction of subjects with AI and the intention of integrating AIEd are followed using binary logistic regression. The analysis conducted shows that among the six variables of the model, “the confidence in personal ability to use AI” and “the perception of a greater number of advantages” have a positive and significant impact on the willingness to use AI in the educational process, more than “being previously used”, “the knowledge level” or “student requirements”. These findings are of particular importance for the revision of teacher training programmes and the development of educational policies that increase the confidence of future teachers in the ability to use AI, eliminating fears or misconceptions about AI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1582-9146</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2247-9104</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2247-9104</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.24818/EA/2024/65/145</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bucharest: EDITURA ASE</publisher><subject>Artificial intelligence ; behaviour intention ; Business Economy / Management ; education ; Education policy ; future teachers ; Misconceptions ; Perceptions ; Psychology ; Quantitative analysis ; Social sciences ; Students ; teacher training ; Teachers ; Teaching ; technology ; Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)</subject><ispartof>Amfiteatru economic, 2024-02, Vol.26 (65), p.145-161</ispartof><rights>2024. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-8cdcc56920f4c3ed257a5dd5e068f91425800df181c78bfe8edd374c7640146c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-8cdcc56920f4c3ed257a5dd5e068f91425800df181c78bfe8edd374c7640146c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2024_80184.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Samarescu, Nicoleta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bumbac, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zamfiroiu, Alin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iorgulescu, Maria Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania and National Institute for Research Development in Informatics – ICI Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, University Centre Pite?ti, Pite?ti, Romania</creatorcontrib><title>Artificial Intelligence in Education: Next-Gen Teacher Perspectives</title><title>Amfiteatru economic</title><addtitle>Economic Amphitheater</addtitle><description>The progress made by artificial intelligence (AI) worldwide has led, through the Beijing Consensus, UNESCO to recommend to governments, in 2019, to include AI in educational policies and processes. While numerous studies inventory students' and teachers’ opinions on the use of AI in education (AIEd), this article differs by analysing the factors that influence the behavioural intention to use AI from the training stage of future primary and secondary teachers in Romania. Through exploratory quantitative research, carried out on a sample of 270 students from the Faculty of Education, Social Sciences and Psychology, the interaction of subjects with AI and the intention of integrating AIEd are followed using binary logistic regression. The analysis conducted shows that among the six variables of the model, “the confidence in personal ability to use AI” and “the perception of a greater number of advantages” have a positive and significant impact on the willingness to use AI in the educational process, more than “being previously used”, “the knowledge level” or “student requirements”. These findings are of particular importance for the revision of teacher training programmes and the development of educational policies that increase the confidence of future teachers in the ability to use AI, eliminating fears or misconceptions about AI.</description><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>behaviour intention</subject><subject>Business Economy / Management</subject><subject>education</subject><subject>Education policy</subject><subject>future teachers</subject><subject>Misconceptions</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>teacher training</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>technology</subject><subject>Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)</subject><issn>1582-9146</issn><issn>2247-9104</issn><issn>2247-9104</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkM1Lw0AQxRdRsNSePQkBzzH7md14CyXWQlEP9bzE3YluiUnd3Yr-926tUJzLG5jfzDweQpcE31CuiCqauqCY8qIUBeHiBE0o5TKvCOanaEKEoqnn5TmahbDBqaRgiZugee2j65xxbZ8thwh9715hMJC5IWvszrTRjcNt9gBfMV_AkK2hNW_gsyfwYQsmuk8IF-isa_sAsz-doue7Zj2_z1ePi-W8XuWGExJzZawxoqwo7rhhYKmQrbBWAC5Vl9xRoTC2HVHESPXSgQJrmeRGlhwn74ZN0fXh7taPHzsIUW_GnR_SS80wEVgJxniiigNl_BiCh05vvXtv_bcmWP-GpZta78PSpdAphLSRHTbAjIMLR17JquKKSZyQq3_IXkIcvabpHuHHuQEY-6MvQgmvJGM_l6V4yg</recordid><startdate>20240201</startdate><enddate>20240201</enddate><creator>Samarescu, Nicoleta</creator><creator>Bumbac, Robert</creator><creator>Zamfiroiu, Alin</creator><creator>Iorgulescu, Maria Cristina</creator><general>EDITURA ASE</general><general>ASE Publishing House</general><general>The Bucharest University of Economic Studies</general><general>Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, Faculty of Commerce</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope><scope>OT2</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240201</creationdate><title>Artificial Intelligence in Education: Next-Gen Teacher Perspectives</title><author>Samarescu, Nicoleta ; Bumbac, Robert ; Zamfiroiu, Alin ; Iorgulescu, Maria Cristina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-8cdcc56920f4c3ed257a5dd5e068f91425800df181c78bfe8edd374c7640146c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>behaviour intention</topic><topic>Business Economy / Management</topic><topic>education</topic><topic>Education policy</topic><topic>future teachers</topic><topic>Misconceptions</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>teacher training</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>technology</topic><topic>Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Samarescu, Nicoleta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bumbac, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zamfiroiu, Alin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iorgulescu, Maria Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania and National Institute for Research Development in Informatics – ICI Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, University Centre Pite?ti, Pite?ti, Romania</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library - CEEOL Journals</collection><collection>EconStor</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Amfiteatru economic</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Samarescu, Nicoleta</au><au>Bumbac, Robert</au><au>Zamfiroiu, Alin</au><au>Iorgulescu, Maria Cristina</au><aucorp>Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania and National Institute for Research Development in Informatics – ICI Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania</aucorp><aucorp>Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania</aucorp><aucorp>National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, University Centre Pite?ti, Pite?ti, Romania</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Artificial Intelligence in Education: Next-Gen Teacher Perspectives</atitle><jtitle>Amfiteatru economic</jtitle><addtitle>Economic Amphitheater</addtitle><date>2024-02-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>65</issue><spage>145</spage><epage>161</epage><pages>145-161</pages><issn>1582-9146</issn><issn>2247-9104</issn><eissn>2247-9104</eissn><abstract>The progress made by artificial intelligence (AI) worldwide has led, through the Beijing Consensus, UNESCO to recommend to governments, in 2019, to include AI in educational policies and processes. While numerous studies inventory students' and teachers’ opinions on the use of AI in education (AIEd), this article differs by analysing the factors that influence the behavioural intention to use AI from the training stage of future primary and secondary teachers in Romania. Through exploratory quantitative research, carried out on a sample of 270 students from the Faculty of Education, Social Sciences and Psychology, the interaction of subjects with AI and the intention of integrating AIEd are followed using binary logistic regression. The analysis conducted shows that among the six variables of the model, “the confidence in personal ability to use AI” and “the perception of a greater number of advantages” have a positive and significant impact on the willingness to use AI in the educational process, more than “being previously used”, “the knowledge level” or “student requirements”. These findings are of particular importance for the revision of teacher training programmes and the development of educational policies that increase the confidence of future teachers in the ability to use AI, eliminating fears or misconceptions about AI.</abstract><cop>Bucharest</cop><pub>EDITURA ASE</pub><doi>10.24818/EA/2024/65/145</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1582-9146
ispartof Amfiteatru economic, 2024-02, Vol.26 (65), p.145-161
issn 1582-9146
2247-9104
2247-9104
language eng
recordid cdi_econis_econstor_281814
source EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Artificial intelligence
behaviour intention
Business Economy / Management
education
Education policy
future teachers
Misconceptions
Perceptions
Psychology
Quantitative analysis
Social sciences
Students
teacher training
Teachers
Teaching
technology
Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)
title Artificial Intelligence in Education: Next-Gen Teacher Perspectives
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A55%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol_econi&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Artificial%20Intelligence%20in%20Education:%20Next-Gen%20Teacher%20Perspectives&rft.jtitle=Amfiteatru%20economic&rft.au=Samarescu,%20Nicoleta&rft.aucorp=Bucharest%20University%20of%20Economic%20Studies,%20Bucharest,%20Romania%20and%20National%20Institute%20for%20Research%20Development%20in%20Informatics%20%C2%96%20ICI%20Bucharest,%20Bucharest,%20Romania&rft.date=2024-02-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=65&rft.spage=145&rft.epage=161&rft.pages=145-161&rft.issn=1582-9146&rft.eissn=2247-9104&rft_id=info:doi/10.24818/EA/2024/65/145&rft_dat=%3Cceeol_econi%3E1214973%3C/ceeol_econi%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3015085334&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=1214973&rfr_iscdi=true