Trust-Based Analysis of an Air Force Collision Avoidance System

This case study analyzes the factors that influence trust and acceptance among users (in this case, test pilots) of the Air Force's Automatic Ground Collision Avoidance System. Our analyses revealed that test pilots' trust depended on a number of factors, including the development of a nui...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Lyons, Joseph B, Ho, Nhut T, Koltai, Kolina S, Johnson, Walter W, Skoog, Mark, Cacanindin, Artemio, Masequesmay, Gina
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Lyons, Joseph B
Ho, Nhut T
Koltai, Kolina S
Johnson, Walter W
Skoog, Mark
Cacanindin, Artemio
Masequesmay, Gina
description This case study analyzes the factors that influence trust and acceptance among users (in this case, test pilots) of the Air Force's Automatic Ground Collision Avoidance System. Our analyses revealed that test pilots' trust depended on a number of factors, including the development of a nuisance free algorithm, designing fly-up evasive maneuvers consistent with a pilot's preferred behavior, and using training to assess, demonstrate, and verify the system's reliability. These factors are consistent with the literature on trust in automation and could lead to best practices for automation design, testing, and acceptance. Prepared in collaboration with California State University, Northridge, NASA Ames Research Center, Nasa's Armstrong Flight Research Center and Global Power Fighters Combined Test Force, Edwards Air Force Base, CA.
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA631871</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA631871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA6318713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZLAPKSotLtF1SixOTVFwzEvMqSzOLFbIT1NIzFNwzCxScMsvSk5VcM7PyckszswHipXlZ6Yk5gHFgiuLS1JzeRhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g4yba4izh25KSWZyfHFJZl5qSbyji6OZsaGFuaExAWkAQq8tMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Trust-Based Analysis of an Air Force Collision Avoidance System</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Lyons, Joseph B ; Ho, Nhut T ; Koltai, Kolina S ; Johnson, Walter W ; Skoog, Mark ; Cacanindin, Artemio ; Masequesmay, Gina</creator><creatorcontrib>Lyons, Joseph B ; Ho, Nhut T ; Koltai, Kolina S ; Johnson, Walter W ; Skoog, Mark ; Cacanindin, Artemio ; Masequesmay, Gina ; AIR FORCE RESEARCH LAB WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB OH HUMAN PERFORMANCE WING (711TH)</creatorcontrib><description>This case study analyzes the factors that influence trust and acceptance among users (in this case, test pilots) of the Air Force's Automatic Ground Collision Avoidance System. Our analyses revealed that test pilots' trust depended on a number of factors, including the development of a nuisance free algorithm, designing fly-up evasive maneuvers consistent with a pilot's preferred behavior, and using training to assess, demonstrate, and verify the system's reliability. These factors are consistent with the literature on trust in automation and could lead to best practices for automation design, testing, and acceptance. Prepared in collaboration with California State University, Northridge, NASA Ames Research Center, Nasa's Armstrong Flight Research Center and Global Power Fighters Combined Test Force, Edwards Air Force Base, CA.</description><language>eng</language><subject>AIRCRAFT ; ALGORITHMS ; AUTO-GCAS TECHNOLOGY ; AUTOMATED DESIGN HUMAN-MACHINE INTERACTION ; AUTOMATED SYSTEMS ; AUTOMATIC PILOTS ; AUTOMATION ; AUTOMATION RELIANCE ; AVIATION SAFETY ; BEHAVIOR ; CASE STUDIES ; CFIT(CONTROLLED FLIGHT INTO TERRAIN) ; COLLABORATIVE TECHNIQUES ; COLLISION AVOIDANCE ; CONTROL SYSTEMS ; DESIGN ; Flight Control and Instrumentation ; FLIGHT TRAINING ; GROUND LEVEL ; Human Factors Engineering &amp; Man Machine System ; MAN COMPUTER INTERFACE ; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS ; MANEUVERABILITY ; NUISANCE BUDGET ; PE62202F ; PHYSIOLOGICAL DISORIENTATION ; PILOTS ; RELIABILITY ; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS ; TERRAIN ; TEST AND EVALUATION ; TEST PILOT ; TRUST IN AUTOMATION ; VULNERABILITY ; WUAFRLH0HE</subject><creationdate>2015</creationdate><rights>Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,777,882,27548,27549</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA631871$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lyons, Joseph B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Nhut T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koltai, Kolina S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Walter W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skoog, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cacanindin, Artemio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masequesmay, Gina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AIR FORCE RESEARCH LAB WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB OH HUMAN PERFORMANCE WING (711TH)</creatorcontrib><title>Trust-Based Analysis of an Air Force Collision Avoidance System</title><description>This case study analyzes the factors that influence trust and acceptance among users (in this case, test pilots) of the Air Force's Automatic Ground Collision Avoidance System. Our analyses revealed that test pilots' trust depended on a number of factors, including the development of a nuisance free algorithm, designing fly-up evasive maneuvers consistent with a pilot's preferred behavior, and using training to assess, demonstrate, and verify the system's reliability. These factors are consistent with the literature on trust in automation and could lead to best practices for automation design, testing, and acceptance. Prepared in collaboration with California State University, Northridge, NASA Ames Research Center, Nasa's Armstrong Flight Research Center and Global Power Fighters Combined Test Force, Edwards Air Force Base, CA.</description><subject>AIRCRAFT</subject><subject>ALGORITHMS</subject><subject>AUTO-GCAS TECHNOLOGY</subject><subject>AUTOMATED DESIGN HUMAN-MACHINE INTERACTION</subject><subject>AUTOMATED SYSTEMS</subject><subject>AUTOMATIC PILOTS</subject><subject>AUTOMATION</subject><subject>AUTOMATION RELIANCE</subject><subject>AVIATION SAFETY</subject><subject>BEHAVIOR</subject><subject>CASE STUDIES</subject><subject>CFIT(CONTROLLED FLIGHT INTO TERRAIN)</subject><subject>COLLABORATIVE TECHNIQUES</subject><subject>COLLISION AVOIDANCE</subject><subject>CONTROL SYSTEMS</subject><subject>DESIGN</subject><subject>Flight Control and Instrumentation</subject><subject>FLIGHT TRAINING</subject><subject>GROUND LEVEL</subject><subject>Human Factors Engineering &amp; Man Machine System</subject><subject>MAN COMPUTER INTERFACE</subject><subject>MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS</subject><subject>MANEUVERABILITY</subject><subject>NUISANCE BUDGET</subject><subject>PE62202F</subject><subject>PHYSIOLOGICAL DISORIENTATION</subject><subject>PILOTS</subject><subject>RELIABILITY</subject><subject>SYSTEMS ANALYSIS</subject><subject>TERRAIN</subject><subject>TEST AND EVALUATION</subject><subject>TEST PILOT</subject><subject>TRUST IN AUTOMATION</subject><subject>VULNERABILITY</subject><subject>WUAFRLH0HE</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZLAPKSotLtF1SixOTVFwzEvMqSzOLFbIT1NIzFNwzCxScMsvSk5VcM7PyckszswHipXlZ6Yk5gHFgiuLS1JzeRhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g4yba4izh25KSWZyfHFJZl5qSbyji6OZsaGFuaExAWkAQq8tMg</recordid><startdate>20151201</startdate><enddate>20151201</enddate><creator>Lyons, Joseph B</creator><creator>Ho, Nhut T</creator><creator>Koltai, Kolina S</creator><creator>Johnson, Walter W</creator><creator>Skoog, Mark</creator><creator>Cacanindin, Artemio</creator><creator>Masequesmay, Gina</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151201</creationdate><title>Trust-Based Analysis of an Air Force Collision Avoidance System</title><author>Lyons, Joseph B ; Ho, Nhut T ; Koltai, Kolina S ; Johnson, Walter W ; Skoog, Mark ; Cacanindin, Artemio ; Masequesmay, Gina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA6318713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>AIRCRAFT</topic><topic>ALGORITHMS</topic><topic>AUTO-GCAS TECHNOLOGY</topic><topic>AUTOMATED DESIGN HUMAN-MACHINE INTERACTION</topic><topic>AUTOMATED SYSTEMS</topic><topic>AUTOMATIC PILOTS</topic><topic>AUTOMATION</topic><topic>AUTOMATION RELIANCE</topic><topic>AVIATION SAFETY</topic><topic>BEHAVIOR</topic><topic>CASE STUDIES</topic><topic>CFIT(CONTROLLED FLIGHT INTO TERRAIN)</topic><topic>COLLABORATIVE TECHNIQUES</topic><topic>COLLISION AVOIDANCE</topic><topic>CONTROL SYSTEMS</topic><topic>DESIGN</topic><topic>Flight Control and Instrumentation</topic><topic>FLIGHT TRAINING</topic><topic>GROUND LEVEL</topic><topic>Human Factors Engineering &amp; Man Machine System</topic><topic>MAN COMPUTER INTERFACE</topic><topic>MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS</topic><topic>MANEUVERABILITY</topic><topic>NUISANCE BUDGET</topic><topic>PE62202F</topic><topic>PHYSIOLOGICAL DISORIENTATION</topic><topic>PILOTS</topic><topic>RELIABILITY</topic><topic>SYSTEMS ANALYSIS</topic><topic>TERRAIN</topic><topic>TEST AND EVALUATION</topic><topic>TEST PILOT</topic><topic>TRUST IN AUTOMATION</topic><topic>VULNERABILITY</topic><topic>WUAFRLH0HE</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lyons, Joseph B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Nhut T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koltai, Kolina S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Walter W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skoog, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cacanindin, Artemio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masequesmay, Gina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AIR FORCE RESEARCH LAB WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB OH HUMAN PERFORMANCE WING (711TH)</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lyons, Joseph B</au><au>Ho, Nhut T</au><au>Koltai, Kolina S</au><au>Johnson, Walter W</au><au>Skoog, Mark</au><au>Cacanindin, Artemio</au><au>Masequesmay, Gina</au><aucorp>AIR FORCE RESEARCH LAB WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB OH HUMAN PERFORMANCE WING (711TH)</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Trust-Based Analysis of an Air Force Collision Avoidance System</btitle><date>2015-12-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><abstract>This case study analyzes the factors that influence trust and acceptance among users (in this case, test pilots) of the Air Force's Automatic Ground Collision Avoidance System. Our analyses revealed that test pilots' trust depended on a number of factors, including the development of a nuisance free algorithm, designing fly-up evasive maneuvers consistent with a pilot's preferred behavior, and using training to assess, demonstrate, and verify the system's reliability. These factors are consistent with the literature on trust in automation and could lead to best practices for automation design, testing, and acceptance. Prepared in collaboration with California State University, Northridge, NASA Ames Research Center, Nasa's Armstrong Flight Research Center and Global Power Fighters Combined Test Force, Edwards Air Force Base, CA.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA631871
source DTIC Technical Reports
subjects AIRCRAFT
ALGORITHMS
AUTO-GCAS TECHNOLOGY
AUTOMATED DESIGN HUMAN-MACHINE INTERACTION
AUTOMATED SYSTEMS
AUTOMATIC PILOTS
AUTOMATION
AUTOMATION RELIANCE
AVIATION SAFETY
BEHAVIOR
CASE STUDIES
CFIT(CONTROLLED FLIGHT INTO TERRAIN)
COLLABORATIVE TECHNIQUES
COLLISION AVOIDANCE
CONTROL SYSTEMS
DESIGN
Flight Control and Instrumentation
FLIGHT TRAINING
GROUND LEVEL
Human Factors Engineering & Man Machine System
MAN COMPUTER INTERFACE
MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS
MANEUVERABILITY
NUISANCE BUDGET
PE62202F
PHYSIOLOGICAL DISORIENTATION
PILOTS
RELIABILITY
SYSTEMS ANALYSIS
TERRAIN
TEST AND EVALUATION
TEST PILOT
TRUST IN AUTOMATION
VULNERABILITY
WUAFRLH0HE
title Trust-Based Analysis of an Air Force Collision Avoidance System
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T17%3A27%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Trust-Based%20Analysis%20of%20an%20Air%20Force%20Collision%20Avoidance%20System&rft.au=Lyons,%20Joseph%20B&rft.aucorp=AIR%20FORCE%20RESEARCH%20LAB%20WRIGHT-PATTERSON%20AFB%20OH%20HUMAN%20PERFORMANCE%20WING%20(711TH)&rft.date=2015-12-01&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA631871%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true