Improving Enlisted Fleet Manning
The primary objective of the Navy s Manpower, Personnel, Training & Education (MPT&E) system is to man the fleet with sailors whose skills and experience levels match those of the job (i.e., billet) requirements. Achieving fleet manning levels that are deemed sufficient by Navy leadership, h...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Report |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | |
| container_volume | |
| creator | Belcher, Steven W Rodney, David M McIntosh, Molly F Golfin, Peggy A Sutton, Warren T Griffis, Henry S Reese, David L Lawler, Kletus S |
| description | The primary objective of the Navy s Manpower, Personnel, Training & Education (MPT&E) system is to man the fleet with sailors whose skills and experience levels match those of the job (i.e., billet) requirements. Achieving fleet manning levels that are deemed sufficient by Navy leadership, however, has proved to be a perennial challenge. Providing the right number and mix of sailors to the fleet is a complicated process. Many underlying issues combine and interact in complex ways to produce persistent inventory shortfalls and skill/ experience misalignments, which impede the MPT&E system s ability to meet fleet manning goals. Over the past eight years, enlisted sea duty manning levels have steadily dropped (see figure 1). During the first three quarters of FY 2013, aggregate sea manning levels hovered around 90 percent, meaning that about 15,000 funded sea-duty billets were not filled. Furthermore, the primary fleet manning metric Fit, which accounts for how well sailors skills and experience levels match those required by billets showed even lower levels, meaning that even more billets were not filled with the right types of sailors. |
| format | Report |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA608942</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA608942</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA6089423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZFDwzC0oyi_LzEtXcM3LySwuSU1RcMtJTS1R8E3MywMK8zCwpiXmFKfyQmluBhk31xBnD92Ukszk-OKSzLzUknhHF0czAwtLEyNjAtIA10QiSA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Improving Enlisted Fleet Manning</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Belcher, Steven W ; Rodney, David M ; McIntosh, Molly F ; Golfin, Peggy A ; Sutton, Warren T ; Griffis, Henry S ; Reese, David L ; Lawler, Kletus S</creator><creatorcontrib>Belcher, Steven W ; Rodney, David M ; McIntosh, Molly F ; Golfin, Peggy A ; Sutton, Warren T ; Griffis, Henry S ; Reese, David L ; Lawler, Kletus S ; CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES ALEXANDRIA VA RESOURCE ANALYSIS DIV</creatorcontrib><description>The primary objective of the Navy s Manpower, Personnel, Training & Education (MPT&E) system is to man the fleet with sailors whose skills and experience levels match those of the job (i.e., billet) requirements. Achieving fleet manning levels that are deemed sufficient by Navy leadership, however, has proved to be a perennial challenge. Providing the right number and mix of sailors to the fleet is a complicated process. Many underlying issues combine and interact in complex ways to produce persistent inventory shortfalls and skill/ experience misalignments, which impede the MPT&E system s ability to meet fleet manning goals. Over the past eight years, enlisted sea duty manning levels have steadily dropped (see figure 1). During the first three quarters of FY 2013, aggregate sea manning levels hovered around 90 percent, meaning that about 15,000 funded sea-duty billets were not filled. Furthermore, the primary fleet manning metric Fit, which accounts for how well sailors skills and experience levels match those required by billets showed even lower levels, meaning that even more billets were not filled with the right types of sailors.</description><language>eng</language><subject>ACCESSION TRAINING PIPELINES ; AUTHORIZED BILLET STRUCTURE. INDIVIDUALS ACCOUNT ; BILLETS(PERSONNEL) ; CASE STUDIES ; ENDSTRENGTH ; ENLISTED COMMUNITIES ; ENLISTED PERSONNEL ; ENLISTED SUPPLY CHAIN ; ESS-SIM(ENLISTED STEADY-STATE SIMULATION) ; FIT AND FILL ; FLEET MANNING ; FLEETS(SHIPS) ; MANPOWER ; Military Forces and Organizations ; MILITARY FORCES(UNITED STATES) ; MPT AND E POLICY ; MPT AND E(MANPOWER PERSONNEL TRAINING AND EDUCATION) ; NAVAL PERSONNEL ; NEC(NAVY ENLISTED CLASSIFICATION) ; PE605154N ; Personnel Management and Labor Relations ; POLICIES ; RCN FIT GAPS ; RCN(RATING CONTROL NUMBER) ; SEA-SHORE FLOW ; TRAINING ; UIC(UNIT IDENTIFICATION CODE) ; UIC-LEVEL FIT GAPS</subject><creationdate>2014</creationdate><rights>Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,780,885,27567,27568</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA608942$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Belcher, Steven W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodney, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McIntosh, Molly F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golfin, Peggy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Warren T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffis, Henry S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reese, David L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawler, Kletus S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES ALEXANDRIA VA RESOURCE ANALYSIS DIV</creatorcontrib><title>Improving Enlisted Fleet Manning</title><description>The primary objective of the Navy s Manpower, Personnel, Training & Education (MPT&E) system is to man the fleet with sailors whose skills and experience levels match those of the job (i.e., billet) requirements. Achieving fleet manning levels that are deemed sufficient by Navy leadership, however, has proved to be a perennial challenge. Providing the right number and mix of sailors to the fleet is a complicated process. Many underlying issues combine and interact in complex ways to produce persistent inventory shortfalls and skill/ experience misalignments, which impede the MPT&E system s ability to meet fleet manning goals. Over the past eight years, enlisted sea duty manning levels have steadily dropped (see figure 1). During the first three quarters of FY 2013, aggregate sea manning levels hovered around 90 percent, meaning that about 15,000 funded sea-duty billets were not filled. Furthermore, the primary fleet manning metric Fit, which accounts for how well sailors skills and experience levels match those required by billets showed even lower levels, meaning that even more billets were not filled with the right types of sailors.</description><subject>ACCESSION TRAINING PIPELINES</subject><subject>AUTHORIZED BILLET STRUCTURE. INDIVIDUALS ACCOUNT</subject><subject>BILLETS(PERSONNEL)</subject><subject>CASE STUDIES</subject><subject>ENDSTRENGTH</subject><subject>ENLISTED COMMUNITIES</subject><subject>ENLISTED PERSONNEL</subject><subject>ENLISTED SUPPLY CHAIN</subject><subject>ESS-SIM(ENLISTED STEADY-STATE SIMULATION)</subject><subject>FIT AND FILL</subject><subject>FLEET MANNING</subject><subject>FLEETS(SHIPS)</subject><subject>MANPOWER</subject><subject>Military Forces and Organizations</subject><subject>MILITARY FORCES(UNITED STATES)</subject><subject>MPT AND E POLICY</subject><subject>MPT AND E(MANPOWER PERSONNEL TRAINING AND EDUCATION)</subject><subject>NAVAL PERSONNEL</subject><subject>NEC(NAVY ENLISTED CLASSIFICATION)</subject><subject>PE605154N</subject><subject>Personnel Management and Labor Relations</subject><subject>POLICIES</subject><subject>RCN FIT GAPS</subject><subject>RCN(RATING CONTROL NUMBER)</subject><subject>SEA-SHORE FLOW</subject><subject>TRAINING</subject><subject>UIC(UNIT IDENTIFICATION CODE)</subject><subject>UIC-LEVEL FIT GAPS</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZFDwzC0oyi_LzEtXcM3LySwuSU1RcMtJTS1R8E3MywMK8zCwpiXmFKfyQmluBhk31xBnD92Ukszk-OKSzLzUknhHF0czAwtLEyNjAtIA10QiSA</recordid><startdate>201407</startdate><enddate>201407</enddate><creator>Belcher, Steven W</creator><creator>Rodney, David M</creator><creator>McIntosh, Molly F</creator><creator>Golfin, Peggy A</creator><creator>Sutton, Warren T</creator><creator>Griffis, Henry S</creator><creator>Reese, David L</creator><creator>Lawler, Kletus S</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201407</creationdate><title>Improving Enlisted Fleet Manning</title><author>Belcher, Steven W ; Rodney, David M ; McIntosh, Molly F ; Golfin, Peggy A ; Sutton, Warren T ; Griffis, Henry S ; Reese, David L ; Lawler, Kletus S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA6089423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>ACCESSION TRAINING PIPELINES</topic><topic>AUTHORIZED BILLET STRUCTURE. INDIVIDUALS ACCOUNT</topic><topic>BILLETS(PERSONNEL)</topic><topic>CASE STUDIES</topic><topic>ENDSTRENGTH</topic><topic>ENLISTED COMMUNITIES</topic><topic>ENLISTED PERSONNEL</topic><topic>ENLISTED SUPPLY CHAIN</topic><topic>ESS-SIM(ENLISTED STEADY-STATE SIMULATION)</topic><topic>FIT AND FILL</topic><topic>FLEET MANNING</topic><topic>FLEETS(SHIPS)</topic><topic>MANPOWER</topic><topic>Military Forces and Organizations</topic><topic>MILITARY FORCES(UNITED STATES)</topic><topic>MPT AND E POLICY</topic><topic>MPT AND E(MANPOWER PERSONNEL TRAINING AND EDUCATION)</topic><topic>NAVAL PERSONNEL</topic><topic>NEC(NAVY ENLISTED CLASSIFICATION)</topic><topic>PE605154N</topic><topic>Personnel Management and Labor Relations</topic><topic>POLICIES</topic><topic>RCN FIT GAPS</topic><topic>RCN(RATING CONTROL NUMBER)</topic><topic>SEA-SHORE FLOW</topic><topic>TRAINING</topic><topic>UIC(UNIT IDENTIFICATION CODE)</topic><topic>UIC-LEVEL FIT GAPS</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Belcher, Steven W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodney, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McIntosh, Molly F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golfin, Peggy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Warren T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffis, Henry S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reese, David L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawler, Kletus S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES ALEXANDRIA VA RESOURCE ANALYSIS DIV</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Belcher, Steven W</au><au>Rodney, David M</au><au>McIntosh, Molly F</au><au>Golfin, Peggy A</au><au>Sutton, Warren T</au><au>Griffis, Henry S</au><au>Reese, David L</au><au>Lawler, Kletus S</au><aucorp>CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES ALEXANDRIA VA RESOURCE ANALYSIS DIV</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Improving Enlisted Fleet Manning</btitle><date>2014-07</date><risdate>2014</risdate><abstract>The primary objective of the Navy s Manpower, Personnel, Training & Education (MPT&E) system is to man the fleet with sailors whose skills and experience levels match those of the job (i.e., billet) requirements. Achieving fleet manning levels that are deemed sufficient by Navy leadership, however, has proved to be a perennial challenge. Providing the right number and mix of sailors to the fleet is a complicated process. Many underlying issues combine and interact in complex ways to produce persistent inventory shortfalls and skill/ experience misalignments, which impede the MPT&E system s ability to meet fleet manning goals. Over the past eight years, enlisted sea duty manning levels have steadily dropped (see figure 1). During the first three quarters of FY 2013, aggregate sea manning levels hovered around 90 percent, meaning that about 15,000 funded sea-duty billets were not filled. Furthermore, the primary fleet manning metric Fit, which accounts for how well sailors skills and experience levels match those required by billets showed even lower levels, meaning that even more billets were not filled with the right types of sailors.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | |
| ispartof | |
| issn | |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA608942 |
| source | DTIC Technical Reports |
| subjects | ACCESSION TRAINING PIPELINES AUTHORIZED BILLET STRUCTURE. INDIVIDUALS ACCOUNT BILLETS(PERSONNEL) CASE STUDIES ENDSTRENGTH ENLISTED COMMUNITIES ENLISTED PERSONNEL ENLISTED SUPPLY CHAIN ESS-SIM(ENLISTED STEADY-STATE SIMULATION) FIT AND FILL FLEET MANNING FLEETS(SHIPS) MANPOWER Military Forces and Organizations MILITARY FORCES(UNITED STATES) MPT AND E POLICY MPT AND E(MANPOWER PERSONNEL TRAINING AND EDUCATION) NAVAL PERSONNEL NEC(NAVY ENLISTED CLASSIFICATION) PE605154N Personnel Management and Labor Relations POLICIES RCN FIT GAPS RCN(RATING CONTROL NUMBER) SEA-SHORE FLOW TRAINING UIC(UNIT IDENTIFICATION CODE) UIC-LEVEL FIT GAPS |
| title | Improving Enlisted Fleet Manning |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T23%3A45%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Improving%20Enlisted%20Fleet%20Manning&rft.au=Belcher,%20Steven%20W&rft.aucorp=CENTER%20FOR%20NAVAL%20ANALYSES%20ALEXANDRIA%20VA%20RESOURCE%20ANALYSIS%20DIV&rft.date=2014-07&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA608942%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |