Direct Push Chemical Sensors for DNAPL
The Department of Defense (DoD) critically requires faster, cheaper, and more accurate procedures to characterize and monitor volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the subsurface. Chlorinated solvents in the form of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs) pose the most serious challenge. Failure to...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Report |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Lieberman, Stephen H |
description | The Department of Defense (DoD) critically requires faster, cheaper, and more accurate procedures to characterize and monitor volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the subsurface. Chlorinated solvents in the form of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs) pose the most serious challenge. Failure to adequately define DNAPLs source terms plagues many remediation efforts, wasting millions of dollars and possibly exacerbating the problem by redistributing the contaminant over a larger area. The inadequacy of current characterization techniques makes for highly uncertain clean-up time and cost estimates. With present methods it is likely that decades and tens of billions of dollars will be required to cleanup DoD sites. Chlorinated solvents form DNAPLs because they are immiscible with and denser than water. Unlike petroleum hydrocarbons, DNAPLs sink as they travel through the vadose zone and into the ground water, leaving behind a trail of micro-globules in the soil matrix [1], [2]). The heterogeneously distributed free-product phase can continue to contaminate large volumes of groundwater for decades to centuries [3]. Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) has been detected in more than 10% of the wells tested in California [4]; the 5 ppb maximum allowable contaminant level (MCL) was exceeded in more than a quarter of the wells testing positive. Defining the 3-dimensional subsurface distribution of VOCs traditionally relies on drilling, discrete sampling, and laboratory analysis. This strategy is messy, yields an incomplete picture, and the data are often suspect. Samples are extracted from the soil cores at widely separated intervals (typically several feet), the choice of where to sample is made arbitrarily, and volatiles are easily lost during the process. Unconsolidated sands and silty soils tend to flow in the saturated zone, resulting in poor retention of samples collected via split spoon below the water table. |
format | Report |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA604030</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA604030</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA6040303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZFBzySxKTS5RCCgtzlBwzkjNzUxOzFEITs0rzi8qVkjLL1Jw8XMM8OFhYE1LzClO5YXS3Awybq4hzh66KSWZyfHFJZl5qSXxji6OZgYmBsYGxgSkAX7YI3c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Direct Push Chemical Sensors for DNAPL</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Lieberman, Stephen H</creator><creatorcontrib>Lieberman, Stephen H ; SPACE AND NAVAL WARFARE SYSTEMS COMMAND SAN DIEGO CA</creatorcontrib><description>The Department of Defense (DoD) critically requires faster, cheaper, and more accurate procedures to characterize and monitor volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the subsurface. Chlorinated solvents in the form of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs) pose the most serious challenge. Failure to adequately define DNAPLs source terms plagues many remediation efforts, wasting millions of dollars and possibly exacerbating the problem by redistributing the contaminant over a larger area. The inadequacy of current characterization techniques makes for highly uncertain clean-up time and cost estimates. With present methods it is likely that decades and tens of billions of dollars will be required to cleanup DoD sites. Chlorinated solvents form DNAPLs because they are immiscible with and denser than water. Unlike petroleum hydrocarbons, DNAPLs sink as they travel through the vadose zone and into the ground water, leaving behind a trail of micro-globules in the soil matrix [1], [2]). The heterogeneously distributed free-product phase can continue to contaminate large volumes of groundwater for decades to centuries [3]. Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) has been detected in more than 10% of the wells tested in California [4]; the 5 ppb maximum allowable contaminant level (MCL) was exceeded in more than a quarter of the wells testing positive. Defining the 3-dimensional subsurface distribution of VOCs traditionally relies on drilling, discrete sampling, and laboratory analysis. This strategy is messy, yields an incomplete picture, and the data are often suspect. Samples are extracted from the soil cores at widely separated intervals (typically several feet), the choice of where to sample is made arbitrarily, and volatiles are easily lost during the process. Unconsolidated sands and silty soils tend to flow in the saturated zone, resulting in poor retention of samples collected via split spoon below the water table.</description><language>eng</language><subject>AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS ; CALIBRATION ; CHEMICAL DETECTION ; CHLORINATED SOLVENTS ; CHLORINATION ; COST ANALYSIS ; DATA PROCESSING ; DEMONSTRATIONS ; DIRECT PUSH CHEMICAL SENSORS ; DNAPL(DENSE NON-AQUEOUS PHASE LIQUIDS) ; FLUORESCENCE ; GROUND WATER ; HALOGENS ; IMPLEMENTATION ; LIF(LASER-INDUCED FLUORESCENCE) ; MCL(MAXIMUM CONTAMINANT LEVEL) ; Miscellaneous Detection and Detectors ; MWW(MULTI-WAVELENGTH WAVEFORMS) ; PAH FLUORESCENCE ; PAH(POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS) ; Physical Chemistry ; PROBES ; SAMPLING ; SOILS ; SOLVENTS ; TEST AND EVALUATION ; VIDEO IMAGES ; VOC(VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS) ; WATER ANALYSIS ; Water Pollution and Control ; XSD-MIP(HALOGEN SPECIFIC DETECTOR MEMBRANE INTERFACE PROBES)</subject><creationdate>2007</creationdate><rights>Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,780,885,27567,27568</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA604030$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lieberman, Stephen H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SPACE AND NAVAL WARFARE SYSTEMS COMMAND SAN DIEGO CA</creatorcontrib><title>Direct Push Chemical Sensors for DNAPL</title><description>The Department of Defense (DoD) critically requires faster, cheaper, and more accurate procedures to characterize and monitor volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the subsurface. Chlorinated solvents in the form of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs) pose the most serious challenge. Failure to adequately define DNAPLs source terms plagues many remediation efforts, wasting millions of dollars and possibly exacerbating the problem by redistributing the contaminant over a larger area. The inadequacy of current characterization techniques makes for highly uncertain clean-up time and cost estimates. With present methods it is likely that decades and tens of billions of dollars will be required to cleanup DoD sites. Chlorinated solvents form DNAPLs because they are immiscible with and denser than water. Unlike petroleum hydrocarbons, DNAPLs sink as they travel through the vadose zone and into the ground water, leaving behind a trail of micro-globules in the soil matrix [1], [2]). The heterogeneously distributed free-product phase can continue to contaminate large volumes of groundwater for decades to centuries [3]. Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) has been detected in more than 10% of the wells tested in California [4]; the 5 ppb maximum allowable contaminant level (MCL) was exceeded in more than a quarter of the wells testing positive. Defining the 3-dimensional subsurface distribution of VOCs traditionally relies on drilling, discrete sampling, and laboratory analysis. This strategy is messy, yields an incomplete picture, and the data are often suspect. Samples are extracted from the soil cores at widely separated intervals (typically several feet), the choice of where to sample is made arbitrarily, and volatiles are easily lost during the process. Unconsolidated sands and silty soils tend to flow in the saturated zone, resulting in poor retention of samples collected via split spoon below the water table.</description><subject>AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS</subject><subject>CALIBRATION</subject><subject>CHEMICAL DETECTION</subject><subject>CHLORINATED SOLVENTS</subject><subject>CHLORINATION</subject><subject>COST ANALYSIS</subject><subject>DATA PROCESSING</subject><subject>DEMONSTRATIONS</subject><subject>DIRECT PUSH CHEMICAL SENSORS</subject><subject>DNAPL(DENSE NON-AQUEOUS PHASE LIQUIDS)</subject><subject>FLUORESCENCE</subject><subject>GROUND WATER</subject><subject>HALOGENS</subject><subject>IMPLEMENTATION</subject><subject>LIF(LASER-INDUCED FLUORESCENCE)</subject><subject>MCL(MAXIMUM CONTAMINANT LEVEL)</subject><subject>Miscellaneous Detection and Detectors</subject><subject>MWW(MULTI-WAVELENGTH WAVEFORMS)</subject><subject>PAH FLUORESCENCE</subject><subject>PAH(POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS)</subject><subject>Physical Chemistry</subject><subject>PROBES</subject><subject>SAMPLING</subject><subject>SOILS</subject><subject>SOLVENTS</subject><subject>TEST AND EVALUATION</subject><subject>VIDEO IMAGES</subject><subject>VOC(VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS)</subject><subject>WATER ANALYSIS</subject><subject>Water Pollution and Control</subject><subject>XSD-MIP(HALOGEN SPECIFIC DETECTOR MEMBRANE INTERFACE PROBES)</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZFBzySxKTS5RCCgtzlBwzkjNzUxOzFEITs0rzi8qVkjLL1Jw8XMM8OFhYE1LzClO5YXS3Awybq4hzh66KSWZyfHFJZl5qSXxji6OZgYmBsYGxgSkAX7YI3c</recordid><startdate>200701</startdate><enddate>200701</enddate><creator>Lieberman, Stephen H</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200701</creationdate><title>Direct Push Chemical Sensors for DNAPL</title><author>Lieberman, Stephen H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA6040303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS</topic><topic>CALIBRATION</topic><topic>CHEMICAL DETECTION</topic><topic>CHLORINATED SOLVENTS</topic><topic>CHLORINATION</topic><topic>COST ANALYSIS</topic><topic>DATA PROCESSING</topic><topic>DEMONSTRATIONS</topic><topic>DIRECT PUSH CHEMICAL SENSORS</topic><topic>DNAPL(DENSE NON-AQUEOUS PHASE LIQUIDS)</topic><topic>FLUORESCENCE</topic><topic>GROUND WATER</topic><topic>HALOGENS</topic><topic>IMPLEMENTATION</topic><topic>LIF(LASER-INDUCED FLUORESCENCE)</topic><topic>MCL(MAXIMUM CONTAMINANT LEVEL)</topic><topic>Miscellaneous Detection and Detectors</topic><topic>MWW(MULTI-WAVELENGTH WAVEFORMS)</topic><topic>PAH FLUORESCENCE</topic><topic>PAH(POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS)</topic><topic>Physical Chemistry</topic><topic>PROBES</topic><topic>SAMPLING</topic><topic>SOILS</topic><topic>SOLVENTS</topic><topic>TEST AND EVALUATION</topic><topic>VIDEO IMAGES</topic><topic>VOC(VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS)</topic><topic>WATER ANALYSIS</topic><topic>Water Pollution and Control</topic><topic>XSD-MIP(HALOGEN SPECIFIC DETECTOR MEMBRANE INTERFACE PROBES)</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lieberman, Stephen H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SPACE AND NAVAL WARFARE SYSTEMS COMMAND SAN DIEGO CA</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lieberman, Stephen H</au><aucorp>SPACE AND NAVAL WARFARE SYSTEMS COMMAND SAN DIEGO CA</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Direct Push Chemical Sensors for DNAPL</btitle><date>2007-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><abstract>The Department of Defense (DoD) critically requires faster, cheaper, and more accurate procedures to characterize and monitor volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the subsurface. Chlorinated solvents in the form of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs) pose the most serious challenge. Failure to adequately define DNAPLs source terms plagues many remediation efforts, wasting millions of dollars and possibly exacerbating the problem by redistributing the contaminant over a larger area. The inadequacy of current characterization techniques makes for highly uncertain clean-up time and cost estimates. With present methods it is likely that decades and tens of billions of dollars will be required to cleanup DoD sites. Chlorinated solvents form DNAPLs because they are immiscible with and denser than water. Unlike petroleum hydrocarbons, DNAPLs sink as they travel through the vadose zone and into the ground water, leaving behind a trail of micro-globules in the soil matrix [1], [2]). The heterogeneously distributed free-product phase can continue to contaminate large volumes of groundwater for decades to centuries [3]. Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) has been detected in more than 10% of the wells tested in California [4]; the 5 ppb maximum allowable contaminant level (MCL) was exceeded in more than a quarter of the wells testing positive. Defining the 3-dimensional subsurface distribution of VOCs traditionally relies on drilling, discrete sampling, and laboratory analysis. This strategy is messy, yields an incomplete picture, and the data are often suspect. Samples are extracted from the soil cores at widely separated intervals (typically several feet), the choice of where to sample is made arbitrarily, and volatiles are easily lost during the process. Unconsolidated sands and silty soils tend to flow in the saturated zone, resulting in poor retention of samples collected via split spoon below the water table.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA604030 |
source | DTIC Technical Reports |
subjects | AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS CALIBRATION CHEMICAL DETECTION CHLORINATED SOLVENTS CHLORINATION COST ANALYSIS DATA PROCESSING DEMONSTRATIONS DIRECT PUSH CHEMICAL SENSORS DNAPL(DENSE NON-AQUEOUS PHASE LIQUIDS) FLUORESCENCE GROUND WATER HALOGENS IMPLEMENTATION LIF(LASER-INDUCED FLUORESCENCE) MCL(MAXIMUM CONTAMINANT LEVEL) Miscellaneous Detection and Detectors MWW(MULTI-WAVELENGTH WAVEFORMS) PAH FLUORESCENCE PAH(POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS) Physical Chemistry PROBES SAMPLING SOILS SOLVENTS TEST AND EVALUATION VIDEO IMAGES VOC(VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS) WATER ANALYSIS Water Pollution and Control XSD-MIP(HALOGEN SPECIFIC DETECTOR MEMBRANE INTERFACE PROBES) |
title | Direct Push Chemical Sensors for DNAPL |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T08%3A37%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Direct%20Push%20Chemical%20Sensors%20for%20DNAPL&rft.au=Lieberman,%20Stephen%20H&rft.aucorp=SPACE%20AND%20NAVAL%20WARFARE%20SYSTEMS%20COMMAND%20SAN%20DIEGO%20CA&rft.date=2007-01&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA604030%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |