Direct Push Chemical Sensors for DNAPL

The Department of Defense (DoD) critically requires faster, cheaper, and more accurate procedures to characterize and monitor volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the subsurface. Chlorinated solvents in the form of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs) pose the most serious challenge. Failure to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Lieberman, Stephen H
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Lieberman, Stephen H
description The Department of Defense (DoD) critically requires faster, cheaper, and more accurate procedures to characterize and monitor volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the subsurface. Chlorinated solvents in the form of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs) pose the most serious challenge. Failure to adequately define DNAPLs source terms plagues many remediation efforts, wasting millions of dollars and possibly exacerbating the problem by redistributing the contaminant over a larger area. The inadequacy of current characterization techniques makes for highly uncertain clean-up time and cost estimates. With present methods it is likely that decades and tens of billions of dollars will be required to cleanup DoD sites. Chlorinated solvents form DNAPLs because they are immiscible with and denser than water. Unlike petroleum hydrocarbons, DNAPLs sink as they travel through the vadose zone and into the ground water, leaving behind a trail of micro-globules in the soil matrix [1], [2]). The heterogeneously distributed free-product phase can continue to contaminate large volumes of groundwater for decades to centuries [3]. Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) has been detected in more than 10% of the wells tested in California [4]; the 5 ppb maximum allowable contaminant level (MCL) was exceeded in more than a quarter of the wells testing positive. Defining the 3-dimensional subsurface distribution of VOCs traditionally relies on drilling, discrete sampling, and laboratory analysis. This strategy is messy, yields an incomplete picture, and the data are often suspect. Samples are extracted from the soil cores at widely separated intervals (typically several feet), the choice of where to sample is made arbitrarily, and volatiles are easily lost during the process. Unconsolidated sands and silty soils tend to flow in the saturated zone, resulting in poor retention of samples collected via split spoon below the water table.
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA604030</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA604030</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA6040303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZFBzySxKTS5RCCgtzlBwzkjNzUxOzFEITs0rzi8qVkjLL1Jw8XMM8OFhYE1LzClO5YXS3Awybq4hzh66KSWZyfHFJZl5qSXxji6OZgYmBsYGxgSkAX7YI3c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Direct Push Chemical Sensors for DNAPL</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Lieberman, Stephen H</creator><creatorcontrib>Lieberman, Stephen H ; SPACE AND NAVAL WARFARE SYSTEMS COMMAND SAN DIEGO CA</creatorcontrib><description>The Department of Defense (DoD) critically requires faster, cheaper, and more accurate procedures to characterize and monitor volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the subsurface. Chlorinated solvents in the form of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs) pose the most serious challenge. Failure to adequately define DNAPLs source terms plagues many remediation efforts, wasting millions of dollars and possibly exacerbating the problem by redistributing the contaminant over a larger area. The inadequacy of current characterization techniques makes for highly uncertain clean-up time and cost estimates. With present methods it is likely that decades and tens of billions of dollars will be required to cleanup DoD sites. Chlorinated solvents form DNAPLs because they are immiscible with and denser than water. Unlike petroleum hydrocarbons, DNAPLs sink as they travel through the vadose zone and into the ground water, leaving behind a trail of micro-globules in the soil matrix [1], [2]). The heterogeneously distributed free-product phase can continue to contaminate large volumes of groundwater for decades to centuries [3]. Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) has been detected in more than 10% of the wells tested in California [4]; the 5 ppb maximum allowable contaminant level (MCL) was exceeded in more than a quarter of the wells testing positive. Defining the 3-dimensional subsurface distribution of VOCs traditionally relies on drilling, discrete sampling, and laboratory analysis. This strategy is messy, yields an incomplete picture, and the data are often suspect. Samples are extracted from the soil cores at widely separated intervals (typically several feet), the choice of where to sample is made arbitrarily, and volatiles are easily lost during the process. Unconsolidated sands and silty soils tend to flow in the saturated zone, resulting in poor retention of samples collected via split spoon below the water table.</description><language>eng</language><subject>AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS ; CALIBRATION ; CHEMICAL DETECTION ; CHLORINATED SOLVENTS ; CHLORINATION ; COST ANALYSIS ; DATA PROCESSING ; DEMONSTRATIONS ; DIRECT PUSH CHEMICAL SENSORS ; DNAPL(DENSE NON-AQUEOUS PHASE LIQUIDS) ; FLUORESCENCE ; GROUND WATER ; HALOGENS ; IMPLEMENTATION ; LIF(LASER-INDUCED FLUORESCENCE) ; MCL(MAXIMUM CONTAMINANT LEVEL) ; Miscellaneous Detection and Detectors ; MWW(MULTI-WAVELENGTH WAVEFORMS) ; PAH FLUORESCENCE ; PAH(POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS) ; Physical Chemistry ; PROBES ; SAMPLING ; SOILS ; SOLVENTS ; TEST AND EVALUATION ; VIDEO IMAGES ; VOC(VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS) ; WATER ANALYSIS ; Water Pollution and Control ; XSD-MIP(HALOGEN SPECIFIC DETECTOR MEMBRANE INTERFACE PROBES)</subject><creationdate>2007</creationdate><rights>Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,780,885,27567,27568</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA604030$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lieberman, Stephen H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SPACE AND NAVAL WARFARE SYSTEMS COMMAND SAN DIEGO CA</creatorcontrib><title>Direct Push Chemical Sensors for DNAPL</title><description>The Department of Defense (DoD) critically requires faster, cheaper, and more accurate procedures to characterize and monitor volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the subsurface. Chlorinated solvents in the form of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs) pose the most serious challenge. Failure to adequately define DNAPLs source terms plagues many remediation efforts, wasting millions of dollars and possibly exacerbating the problem by redistributing the contaminant over a larger area. The inadequacy of current characterization techniques makes for highly uncertain clean-up time and cost estimates. With present methods it is likely that decades and tens of billions of dollars will be required to cleanup DoD sites. Chlorinated solvents form DNAPLs because they are immiscible with and denser than water. Unlike petroleum hydrocarbons, DNAPLs sink as they travel through the vadose zone and into the ground water, leaving behind a trail of micro-globules in the soil matrix [1], [2]). The heterogeneously distributed free-product phase can continue to contaminate large volumes of groundwater for decades to centuries [3]. Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) has been detected in more than 10% of the wells tested in California [4]; the 5 ppb maximum allowable contaminant level (MCL) was exceeded in more than a quarter of the wells testing positive. Defining the 3-dimensional subsurface distribution of VOCs traditionally relies on drilling, discrete sampling, and laboratory analysis. This strategy is messy, yields an incomplete picture, and the data are often suspect. Samples are extracted from the soil cores at widely separated intervals (typically several feet), the choice of where to sample is made arbitrarily, and volatiles are easily lost during the process. Unconsolidated sands and silty soils tend to flow in the saturated zone, resulting in poor retention of samples collected via split spoon below the water table.</description><subject>AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS</subject><subject>CALIBRATION</subject><subject>CHEMICAL DETECTION</subject><subject>CHLORINATED SOLVENTS</subject><subject>CHLORINATION</subject><subject>COST ANALYSIS</subject><subject>DATA PROCESSING</subject><subject>DEMONSTRATIONS</subject><subject>DIRECT PUSH CHEMICAL SENSORS</subject><subject>DNAPL(DENSE NON-AQUEOUS PHASE LIQUIDS)</subject><subject>FLUORESCENCE</subject><subject>GROUND WATER</subject><subject>HALOGENS</subject><subject>IMPLEMENTATION</subject><subject>LIF(LASER-INDUCED FLUORESCENCE)</subject><subject>MCL(MAXIMUM CONTAMINANT LEVEL)</subject><subject>Miscellaneous Detection and Detectors</subject><subject>MWW(MULTI-WAVELENGTH WAVEFORMS)</subject><subject>PAH FLUORESCENCE</subject><subject>PAH(POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS)</subject><subject>Physical Chemistry</subject><subject>PROBES</subject><subject>SAMPLING</subject><subject>SOILS</subject><subject>SOLVENTS</subject><subject>TEST AND EVALUATION</subject><subject>VIDEO IMAGES</subject><subject>VOC(VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS)</subject><subject>WATER ANALYSIS</subject><subject>Water Pollution and Control</subject><subject>XSD-MIP(HALOGEN SPECIFIC DETECTOR MEMBRANE INTERFACE PROBES)</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZFBzySxKTS5RCCgtzlBwzkjNzUxOzFEITs0rzi8qVkjLL1Jw8XMM8OFhYE1LzClO5YXS3Awybq4hzh66KSWZyfHFJZl5qSXxji6OZgYmBsYGxgSkAX7YI3c</recordid><startdate>200701</startdate><enddate>200701</enddate><creator>Lieberman, Stephen H</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200701</creationdate><title>Direct Push Chemical Sensors for DNAPL</title><author>Lieberman, Stephen H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA6040303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS</topic><topic>CALIBRATION</topic><topic>CHEMICAL DETECTION</topic><topic>CHLORINATED SOLVENTS</topic><topic>CHLORINATION</topic><topic>COST ANALYSIS</topic><topic>DATA PROCESSING</topic><topic>DEMONSTRATIONS</topic><topic>DIRECT PUSH CHEMICAL SENSORS</topic><topic>DNAPL(DENSE NON-AQUEOUS PHASE LIQUIDS)</topic><topic>FLUORESCENCE</topic><topic>GROUND WATER</topic><topic>HALOGENS</topic><topic>IMPLEMENTATION</topic><topic>LIF(LASER-INDUCED FLUORESCENCE)</topic><topic>MCL(MAXIMUM CONTAMINANT LEVEL)</topic><topic>Miscellaneous Detection and Detectors</topic><topic>MWW(MULTI-WAVELENGTH WAVEFORMS)</topic><topic>PAH FLUORESCENCE</topic><topic>PAH(POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS)</topic><topic>Physical Chemistry</topic><topic>PROBES</topic><topic>SAMPLING</topic><topic>SOILS</topic><topic>SOLVENTS</topic><topic>TEST AND EVALUATION</topic><topic>VIDEO IMAGES</topic><topic>VOC(VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS)</topic><topic>WATER ANALYSIS</topic><topic>Water Pollution and Control</topic><topic>XSD-MIP(HALOGEN SPECIFIC DETECTOR MEMBRANE INTERFACE PROBES)</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lieberman, Stephen H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SPACE AND NAVAL WARFARE SYSTEMS COMMAND SAN DIEGO CA</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lieberman, Stephen H</au><aucorp>SPACE AND NAVAL WARFARE SYSTEMS COMMAND SAN DIEGO CA</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Direct Push Chemical Sensors for DNAPL</btitle><date>2007-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><abstract>The Department of Defense (DoD) critically requires faster, cheaper, and more accurate procedures to characterize and monitor volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the subsurface. Chlorinated solvents in the form of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs) pose the most serious challenge. Failure to adequately define DNAPLs source terms plagues many remediation efforts, wasting millions of dollars and possibly exacerbating the problem by redistributing the contaminant over a larger area. The inadequacy of current characterization techniques makes for highly uncertain clean-up time and cost estimates. With present methods it is likely that decades and tens of billions of dollars will be required to cleanup DoD sites. Chlorinated solvents form DNAPLs because they are immiscible with and denser than water. Unlike petroleum hydrocarbons, DNAPLs sink as they travel through the vadose zone and into the ground water, leaving behind a trail of micro-globules in the soil matrix [1], [2]). The heterogeneously distributed free-product phase can continue to contaminate large volumes of groundwater for decades to centuries [3]. Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) has been detected in more than 10% of the wells tested in California [4]; the 5 ppb maximum allowable contaminant level (MCL) was exceeded in more than a quarter of the wells testing positive. Defining the 3-dimensional subsurface distribution of VOCs traditionally relies on drilling, discrete sampling, and laboratory analysis. This strategy is messy, yields an incomplete picture, and the data are often suspect. Samples are extracted from the soil cores at widely separated intervals (typically several feet), the choice of where to sample is made arbitrarily, and volatiles are easily lost during the process. Unconsolidated sands and silty soils tend to flow in the saturated zone, resulting in poor retention of samples collected via split spoon below the water table.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA604030
source DTIC Technical Reports
subjects AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS
CALIBRATION
CHEMICAL DETECTION
CHLORINATED SOLVENTS
CHLORINATION
COST ANALYSIS
DATA PROCESSING
DEMONSTRATIONS
DIRECT PUSH CHEMICAL SENSORS
DNAPL(DENSE NON-AQUEOUS PHASE LIQUIDS)
FLUORESCENCE
GROUND WATER
HALOGENS
IMPLEMENTATION
LIF(LASER-INDUCED FLUORESCENCE)
MCL(MAXIMUM CONTAMINANT LEVEL)
Miscellaneous Detection and Detectors
MWW(MULTI-WAVELENGTH WAVEFORMS)
PAH FLUORESCENCE
PAH(POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS)
Physical Chemistry
PROBES
SAMPLING
SOILS
SOLVENTS
TEST AND EVALUATION
VIDEO IMAGES
VOC(VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS)
WATER ANALYSIS
Water Pollution and Control
XSD-MIP(HALOGEN SPECIFIC DETECTOR MEMBRANE INTERFACE PROBES)
title Direct Push Chemical Sensors for DNAPL
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T08%3A37%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Direct%20Push%20Chemical%20Sensors%20for%20DNAPL&rft.au=Lieberman,%20Stephen%20H&rft.aucorp=SPACE%20AND%20NAVAL%20WARFARE%20SYSTEMS%20COMMAND%20SAN%20DIEGO%20CA&rft.date=2007-01&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA604030%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true