Defense Acquisitions: Future Ground-Based Vehicles and Network Initiatives Face Development and Funding Challenges

After the Army canceled the Future Combat System in June of 2009, it began developing modernization plans, including developing a new Ground Combat Vehicle (GCV) and additional network capability. At the same time, the Army was considering options on how to improve its light tactical vehicles. This...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Martin, Belva M, Graveline, William R, Allbritton, William C, DelaneyRamaker, Morgan, Ferguson, Marcus C, Foster, Dayna, Owens, Danny, Schatz, Sylvia, Swierczek, Robert S, Weir, Alyssa B
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Martin, Belva M
Graveline, William R
Allbritton, William C
DelaneyRamaker, Morgan
Ferguson, Marcus C
Foster, Dayna
Owens, Danny
Schatz, Sylvia
Swierczek, Robert S
Weir, Alyssa B
description After the Army canceled the Future Combat System in June of 2009, it began developing modernization plans, including developing a new Ground Combat Vehicle (GCV) and additional network capability. At the same time, the Army was considering options on how to improve its light tactical vehicles. This statement addresses potential issues related to developing the following: (1) the new GCV, (2) a common information network, and (3) the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) in a constrained budget environment. The statement is based largely on previous GAO work conducted over the last year in response to congressional requests and the results of other reviews of Army modernization. To conduct this work, GAO analyzed program documentation, strategies, and test results; interviewed independent experts and Army and Department of Defense (DoD) officials; and witnessed demonstrations of current and emerging network technologies. DoD reviewed the facts contained in this statement and provided technical comments, which were incorporated as appropriate. GAO is not making any recommendations with this statement; however, consistent with previous work, this statement underscores the importance of developing sound requirements and focusing up front on what modernization efforts will deliver and at what cost. Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Tactical Air and Land Forces, Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives.
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA551335</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA551335</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA5513353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjLEOwjAMRLswIOAPGPwDHVDVha20BFiYECuKUre1CA7ETvl9KsTOdNK9ezfPYoMdsiBU7pVISCmwbMEkTRHhEEPiNt9ZwRauOJDzKGC5hTPqO8Q7nHhSrNI49cY6hAZH9OH5QNbv0EwHxD3Ug_UeuUdZZrPOesHVLxfZ2uwv9TFvldxNlBj1VjVVWW6Koiz-4A_4zECm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Defense Acquisitions: Future Ground-Based Vehicles and Network Initiatives Face Development and Funding Challenges</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Martin, Belva M ; Graveline, William R ; Allbritton, William C ; DelaneyRamaker, Morgan ; Ferguson, Marcus C ; Foster, Dayna ; Owens, Danny ; Schatz, Sylvia ; Swierczek, Robert S ; Weir, Alyssa B</creator><creatorcontrib>Martin, Belva M ; Graveline, William R ; Allbritton, William C ; DelaneyRamaker, Morgan ; Ferguson, Marcus C ; Foster, Dayna ; Owens, Danny ; Schatz, Sylvia ; Swierczek, Robert S ; Weir, Alyssa B ; GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE WASHINGTON DC</creatorcontrib><description>After the Army canceled the Future Combat System in June of 2009, it began developing modernization plans, including developing a new Ground Combat Vehicle (GCV) and additional network capability. At the same time, the Army was considering options on how to improve its light tactical vehicles. This statement addresses potential issues related to developing the following: (1) the new GCV, (2) a common information network, and (3) the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) in a constrained budget environment. The statement is based largely on previous GAO work conducted over the last year in response to congressional requests and the results of other reviews of Army modernization. To conduct this work, GAO analyzed program documentation, strategies, and test results; interviewed independent experts and Army and Department of Defense (DoD) officials; and witnessed demonstrations of current and emerging network technologies. DoD reviewed the facts contained in this statement and provided technical comments, which were incorporated as appropriate. GAO is not making any recommendations with this statement; however, consistent with previous work, this statement underscores the importance of developing sound requirements and focusing up front on what modernization efforts will deliver and at what cost. Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Tactical Air and Land Forces, Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives.</description><language>eng</language><subject>AFFORDABILITY ; ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES ; ARMY ; ARMY PROCUREMENT ; AUDITING ; Combat Vehicles ; COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS ; COST EFFECTIVENESS ; COST ESTIMATES ; GROUND COMBAT VEHICLE ; GROUND VEHICLES ; HMWWV(HIGH MOBILITY MULTIPURPOSE WHEELED VEHICLES) ; HMWWW RECAPITALIZATION ; INFORMATION SYSTEMS ; INTERVIEWS ; JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE ; Logistics, Military Facilities and Supplies ; MARINE CORPS ; MARINE CORPS PROCUREMENT ; MATURE TECHNOLOGIES ; MILITARY MODERNIZATION ; Radio Communications ; REQUIREMENTS ; RISK ; SCHEDULING ; Surface Transportation and Equipment ; TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS ; TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLES</subject><creationdate>2011</creationdate><rights>Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,780,885,27567,27568</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA551335$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martin, Belva M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graveline, William R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allbritton, William C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DelaneyRamaker, Morgan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Marcus C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foster, Dayna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owens, Danny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schatz, Sylvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swierczek, Robert S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weir, Alyssa B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE WASHINGTON DC</creatorcontrib><title>Defense Acquisitions: Future Ground-Based Vehicles and Network Initiatives Face Development and Funding Challenges</title><description>After the Army canceled the Future Combat System in June of 2009, it began developing modernization plans, including developing a new Ground Combat Vehicle (GCV) and additional network capability. At the same time, the Army was considering options on how to improve its light tactical vehicles. This statement addresses potential issues related to developing the following: (1) the new GCV, (2) a common information network, and (3) the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) in a constrained budget environment. The statement is based largely on previous GAO work conducted over the last year in response to congressional requests and the results of other reviews of Army modernization. To conduct this work, GAO analyzed program documentation, strategies, and test results; interviewed independent experts and Army and Department of Defense (DoD) officials; and witnessed demonstrations of current and emerging network technologies. DoD reviewed the facts contained in this statement and provided technical comments, which were incorporated as appropriate. GAO is not making any recommendations with this statement; however, consistent with previous work, this statement underscores the importance of developing sound requirements and focusing up front on what modernization efforts will deliver and at what cost. Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Tactical Air and Land Forces, Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives.</description><subject>AFFORDABILITY</subject><subject>ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES</subject><subject>ARMY</subject><subject>ARMY PROCUREMENT</subject><subject>AUDITING</subject><subject>Combat Vehicles</subject><subject>COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS</subject><subject>COST EFFECTIVENESS</subject><subject>COST ESTIMATES</subject><subject>GROUND COMBAT VEHICLE</subject><subject>GROUND VEHICLES</subject><subject>HMWWV(HIGH MOBILITY MULTIPURPOSE WHEELED VEHICLES)</subject><subject>HMWWW RECAPITALIZATION</subject><subject>INFORMATION SYSTEMS</subject><subject>INTERVIEWS</subject><subject>JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE</subject><subject>Logistics, Military Facilities and Supplies</subject><subject>MARINE CORPS</subject><subject>MARINE CORPS PROCUREMENT</subject><subject>MATURE TECHNOLOGIES</subject><subject>MILITARY MODERNIZATION</subject><subject>Radio Communications</subject><subject>REQUIREMENTS</subject><subject>RISK</subject><subject>SCHEDULING</subject><subject>Surface Transportation and Equipment</subject><subject>TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS</subject><subject>TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLES</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjLEOwjAMRLswIOAPGPwDHVDVha20BFiYECuKUre1CA7ETvl9KsTOdNK9ezfPYoMdsiBU7pVISCmwbMEkTRHhEEPiNt9ZwRauOJDzKGC5hTPqO8Q7nHhSrNI49cY6hAZH9OH5QNbv0EwHxD3Ug_UeuUdZZrPOesHVLxfZ2uwv9TFvldxNlBj1VjVVWW6Koiz-4A_4zECm</recordid><startdate>20111026</startdate><enddate>20111026</enddate><creator>Martin, Belva M</creator><creator>Graveline, William R</creator><creator>Allbritton, William C</creator><creator>DelaneyRamaker, Morgan</creator><creator>Ferguson, Marcus C</creator><creator>Foster, Dayna</creator><creator>Owens, Danny</creator><creator>Schatz, Sylvia</creator><creator>Swierczek, Robert S</creator><creator>Weir, Alyssa B</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111026</creationdate><title>Defense Acquisitions: Future Ground-Based Vehicles and Network Initiatives Face Development and Funding Challenges</title><author>Martin, Belva M ; Graveline, William R ; Allbritton, William C ; DelaneyRamaker, Morgan ; Ferguson, Marcus C ; Foster, Dayna ; Owens, Danny ; Schatz, Sylvia ; Swierczek, Robert S ; Weir, Alyssa B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA5513353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>AFFORDABILITY</topic><topic>ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES</topic><topic>ARMY</topic><topic>ARMY PROCUREMENT</topic><topic>AUDITING</topic><topic>Combat Vehicles</topic><topic>COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS</topic><topic>COST EFFECTIVENESS</topic><topic>COST ESTIMATES</topic><topic>GROUND COMBAT VEHICLE</topic><topic>GROUND VEHICLES</topic><topic>HMWWV(HIGH MOBILITY MULTIPURPOSE WHEELED VEHICLES)</topic><topic>HMWWW RECAPITALIZATION</topic><topic>INFORMATION SYSTEMS</topic><topic>INTERVIEWS</topic><topic>JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE</topic><topic>Logistics, Military Facilities and Supplies</topic><topic>MARINE CORPS</topic><topic>MARINE CORPS PROCUREMENT</topic><topic>MATURE TECHNOLOGIES</topic><topic>MILITARY MODERNIZATION</topic><topic>Radio Communications</topic><topic>REQUIREMENTS</topic><topic>RISK</topic><topic>SCHEDULING</topic><topic>Surface Transportation and Equipment</topic><topic>TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS</topic><topic>TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLES</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martin, Belva M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graveline, William R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allbritton, William C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DelaneyRamaker, Morgan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Marcus C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foster, Dayna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owens, Danny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schatz, Sylvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swierczek, Robert S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weir, Alyssa B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE WASHINGTON DC</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martin, Belva M</au><au>Graveline, William R</au><au>Allbritton, William C</au><au>DelaneyRamaker, Morgan</au><au>Ferguson, Marcus C</au><au>Foster, Dayna</au><au>Owens, Danny</au><au>Schatz, Sylvia</au><au>Swierczek, Robert S</au><au>Weir, Alyssa B</au><aucorp>GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE WASHINGTON DC</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Defense Acquisitions: Future Ground-Based Vehicles and Network Initiatives Face Development and Funding Challenges</btitle><date>2011-10-26</date><risdate>2011</risdate><abstract>After the Army canceled the Future Combat System in June of 2009, it began developing modernization plans, including developing a new Ground Combat Vehicle (GCV) and additional network capability. At the same time, the Army was considering options on how to improve its light tactical vehicles. This statement addresses potential issues related to developing the following: (1) the new GCV, (2) a common information network, and (3) the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) in a constrained budget environment. The statement is based largely on previous GAO work conducted over the last year in response to congressional requests and the results of other reviews of Army modernization. To conduct this work, GAO analyzed program documentation, strategies, and test results; interviewed independent experts and Army and Department of Defense (DoD) officials; and witnessed demonstrations of current and emerging network technologies. DoD reviewed the facts contained in this statement and provided technical comments, which were incorporated as appropriate. GAO is not making any recommendations with this statement; however, consistent with previous work, this statement underscores the importance of developing sound requirements and focusing up front on what modernization efforts will deliver and at what cost. Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Tactical Air and Land Forces, Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA551335
source DTIC Technical Reports
subjects AFFORDABILITY
ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES
ARMY
ARMY PROCUREMENT
AUDITING
Combat Vehicles
COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS
COST EFFECTIVENESS
COST ESTIMATES
GROUND COMBAT VEHICLE
GROUND VEHICLES
HMWWV(HIGH MOBILITY MULTIPURPOSE WHEELED VEHICLES)
HMWWW RECAPITALIZATION
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
INTERVIEWS
JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE
Logistics, Military Facilities and Supplies
MARINE CORPS
MARINE CORPS PROCUREMENT
MATURE TECHNOLOGIES
MILITARY MODERNIZATION
Radio Communications
REQUIREMENTS
RISK
SCHEDULING
Surface Transportation and Equipment
TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS
TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLES
title Defense Acquisitions: Future Ground-Based Vehicles and Network Initiatives Face Development and Funding Challenges
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T03%3A15%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Defense%20Acquisitions:%20Future%20Ground-Based%20Vehicles%20and%20Network%20Initiatives%20Face%20Development%20and%20Funding%20Challenges&rft.au=Martin,%20Belva%20M&rft.aucorp=GOVERNMENT%20ACCOUNTABILITY%20OFFICE%20WASHINGTON%20DC&rft.date=2011-10-26&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA551335%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true