How We Think: Thinking Critically and Creatively and How Military Professionals Can Do it Better

Military professionals prefer thinking that is rational and analytical, and which helps in the selection of ideas that meet feasibility, acceptability, and suitability criterion. In addition, they prefer to select rational and analytical ideas that have a history of working in similar situations as...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: McConnell, Richard, Lira, Leonard L, Long, Ken, Gerges, Mark, McCollum, Bill
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator McConnell, Richard
Lira, Leonard L
Long, Ken
Gerges, Mark
McCollum, Bill
description Military professionals prefer thinking that is rational and analytical, and which helps in the selection of ideas that meet feasibility, acceptability, and suitability criterion. In addition, they prefer to select rational and analytical ideas that have a history of working in similar situations as before. This creates a paradigmatic mode of typical thinking, which is the opposite of deep, reflective, multi-perspective thinking. This field expedient means of just enough thinking to find usual solutions has been so successful, through trial and error, that it takes a deliberate act of will to do original thinking that may take practitioners out of their professional paradigm. It has been so successful that there is great pressure among practitioners to keep doing it precisely because it has been a good way to solve problems that fit within the accepted paradigm of the military profession. In fact, it has made those kinds of problems so solvable that we are increasingly only left with the kinds of hard problems that our paradigmatic thinking is not well suited to handle. However, it is not the paradigmatic way of thinking that is faulty, but rather that when we try to apply it outside of the appropriate context, it begins failing us. The fault is not in the mode of thinking but in its improper application to certain contexts. These contexts are the medium- to ill-structured problems that FM 5-0 introduces to the profession. To meet these types of problems, the military profession is expanding its thinking repertoire to include concepts such as Design, in order to allow its critical and creative thinking to account for problems that fall outside of the assumed context of the military operating parameters. This essay will summarize how cognitive theorists have described critical and creative thinking in general, and how some military practitioners have applied them. Published in Small Wars Journal, p2-7, September 16, 2011.
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA550214</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA550214</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA5502143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZEjwyC9XCE9VCMnIzMu2glCZeekKzkWZJZnJiTk5lQqJeSlAbmpiSWZZKpQL0uSbmZNZklhUqRBQlJ-WWlycmZ-XmFOs4JyYp-CSr5BZouCUWlKSWsTDwJoGFE_lhdLcDDJuriHOHropQPPji0sy81JL4h1dHE1NDYwMTYwJSAMApHQ4-g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>How We Think: Thinking Critically and Creatively and How Military Professionals Can Do it Better</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>McConnell, Richard ; Lira, Leonard L ; Long, Ken ; Gerges, Mark ; McCollum, Bill</creator><creatorcontrib>McConnell, Richard ; Lira, Leonard L ; Long, Ken ; Gerges, Mark ; McCollum, Bill ; ARMY COMMAND AND GENERAL STAFF COLL FORT LEAVENWORTH KS</creatorcontrib><description>Military professionals prefer thinking that is rational and analytical, and which helps in the selection of ideas that meet feasibility, acceptability, and suitability criterion. In addition, they prefer to select rational and analytical ideas that have a history of working in similar situations as before. This creates a paradigmatic mode of typical thinking, which is the opposite of deep, reflective, multi-perspective thinking. This field expedient means of just enough thinking to find usual solutions has been so successful, through trial and error, that it takes a deliberate act of will to do original thinking that may take practitioners out of their professional paradigm. It has been so successful that there is great pressure among practitioners to keep doing it precisely because it has been a good way to solve problems that fit within the accepted paradigm of the military profession. In fact, it has made those kinds of problems so solvable that we are increasingly only left with the kinds of hard problems that our paradigmatic thinking is not well suited to handle. However, it is not the paradigmatic way of thinking that is faulty, but rather that when we try to apply it outside of the appropriate context, it begins failing us. The fault is not in the mode of thinking but in its improper application to certain contexts. These contexts are the medium- to ill-structured problems that FM 5-0 introduces to the profession. To meet these types of problems, the military profession is expanding its thinking repertoire to include concepts such as Design, in order to allow its critical and creative thinking to account for problems that fall outside of the assumed context of the military operating parameters. This essay will summarize how cognitive theorists have described critical and creative thinking in general, and how some military practitioners have applied them. Published in Small Wars Journal, p2-7, September 16, 2011.</description><language>eng</language><subject>COGNITION ; COGNITIVE THEORISTS ; CREATIVE THINKING ; CREATIVITY ; CRITICAL THINKING ; DECISION MAKING ; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS ; LEADERSHIP ; LEADERSHIP TRAINING ; MILITARY COMMANDERS ; Military Forces and Organizations ; MILITARY FORCES(UNITED STATES) ; MILITARY PRACTITIONERS ; PARADIGMATIC THINKING ; Personnel Management and Labor Relations ; PROBLEM SOLVING ; Psychology ; REPRINTS ; THEORY ; VOCABULARY</subject><creationdate>2011</creationdate><rights>Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,780,885,27567,27568</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA550214$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>McConnell, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lira, Leonard L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerges, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCollum, Bill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARMY COMMAND AND GENERAL STAFF COLL FORT LEAVENWORTH KS</creatorcontrib><title>How We Think: Thinking Critically and Creatively and How Military Professionals Can Do it Better</title><description>Military professionals prefer thinking that is rational and analytical, and which helps in the selection of ideas that meet feasibility, acceptability, and suitability criterion. In addition, they prefer to select rational and analytical ideas that have a history of working in similar situations as before. This creates a paradigmatic mode of typical thinking, which is the opposite of deep, reflective, multi-perspective thinking. This field expedient means of just enough thinking to find usual solutions has been so successful, through trial and error, that it takes a deliberate act of will to do original thinking that may take practitioners out of their professional paradigm. It has been so successful that there is great pressure among practitioners to keep doing it precisely because it has been a good way to solve problems that fit within the accepted paradigm of the military profession. In fact, it has made those kinds of problems so solvable that we are increasingly only left with the kinds of hard problems that our paradigmatic thinking is not well suited to handle. However, it is not the paradigmatic way of thinking that is faulty, but rather that when we try to apply it outside of the appropriate context, it begins failing us. The fault is not in the mode of thinking but in its improper application to certain contexts. These contexts are the medium- to ill-structured problems that FM 5-0 introduces to the profession. To meet these types of problems, the military profession is expanding its thinking repertoire to include concepts such as Design, in order to allow its critical and creative thinking to account for problems that fall outside of the assumed context of the military operating parameters. This essay will summarize how cognitive theorists have described critical and creative thinking in general, and how some military practitioners have applied them. Published in Small Wars Journal, p2-7, September 16, 2011.</description><subject>COGNITION</subject><subject>COGNITIVE THEORISTS</subject><subject>CREATIVE THINKING</subject><subject>CREATIVITY</subject><subject>CRITICAL THINKING</subject><subject>DECISION MAKING</subject><subject>INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS</subject><subject>LEADERSHIP</subject><subject>LEADERSHIP TRAINING</subject><subject>MILITARY COMMANDERS</subject><subject>Military Forces and Organizations</subject><subject>MILITARY FORCES(UNITED STATES)</subject><subject>MILITARY PRACTITIONERS</subject><subject>PARADIGMATIC THINKING</subject><subject>Personnel Management and Labor Relations</subject><subject>PROBLEM SOLVING</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>REPRINTS</subject><subject>THEORY</subject><subject>VOCABULARY</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZEjwyC9XCE9VCMnIzMu2glCZeekKzkWZJZnJiTk5lQqJeSlAbmpiSWZZKpQL0uSbmZNZklhUqRBQlJ-WWlycmZ-XmFOs4JyYp-CSr5BZouCUWlKSWsTDwJoGFE_lhdLcDDJuriHOHropQPPji0sy81JL4h1dHE1NDYwMTYwJSAMApHQ4-g</recordid><startdate>20110916</startdate><enddate>20110916</enddate><creator>McConnell, Richard</creator><creator>Lira, Leonard L</creator><creator>Long, Ken</creator><creator>Gerges, Mark</creator><creator>McCollum, Bill</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110916</creationdate><title>How We Think: Thinking Critically and Creatively and How Military Professionals Can Do it Better</title><author>McConnell, Richard ; Lira, Leonard L ; Long, Ken ; Gerges, Mark ; McCollum, Bill</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA5502143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>COGNITION</topic><topic>COGNITIVE THEORISTS</topic><topic>CREATIVE THINKING</topic><topic>CREATIVITY</topic><topic>CRITICAL THINKING</topic><topic>DECISION MAKING</topic><topic>INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS</topic><topic>LEADERSHIP</topic><topic>LEADERSHIP TRAINING</topic><topic>MILITARY COMMANDERS</topic><topic>Military Forces and Organizations</topic><topic>MILITARY FORCES(UNITED STATES)</topic><topic>MILITARY PRACTITIONERS</topic><topic>PARADIGMATIC THINKING</topic><topic>Personnel Management and Labor Relations</topic><topic>PROBLEM SOLVING</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>REPRINTS</topic><topic>THEORY</topic><topic>VOCABULARY</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McConnell, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lira, Leonard L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerges, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCollum, Bill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARMY COMMAND AND GENERAL STAFF COLL FORT LEAVENWORTH KS</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McConnell, Richard</au><au>Lira, Leonard L</au><au>Long, Ken</au><au>Gerges, Mark</au><au>McCollum, Bill</au><aucorp>ARMY COMMAND AND GENERAL STAFF COLL FORT LEAVENWORTH KS</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>How We Think: Thinking Critically and Creatively and How Military Professionals Can Do it Better</btitle><date>2011-09-16</date><risdate>2011</risdate><abstract>Military professionals prefer thinking that is rational and analytical, and which helps in the selection of ideas that meet feasibility, acceptability, and suitability criterion. In addition, they prefer to select rational and analytical ideas that have a history of working in similar situations as before. This creates a paradigmatic mode of typical thinking, which is the opposite of deep, reflective, multi-perspective thinking. This field expedient means of just enough thinking to find usual solutions has been so successful, through trial and error, that it takes a deliberate act of will to do original thinking that may take practitioners out of their professional paradigm. It has been so successful that there is great pressure among practitioners to keep doing it precisely because it has been a good way to solve problems that fit within the accepted paradigm of the military profession. In fact, it has made those kinds of problems so solvable that we are increasingly only left with the kinds of hard problems that our paradigmatic thinking is not well suited to handle. However, it is not the paradigmatic way of thinking that is faulty, but rather that when we try to apply it outside of the appropriate context, it begins failing us. The fault is not in the mode of thinking but in its improper application to certain contexts. These contexts are the medium- to ill-structured problems that FM 5-0 introduces to the profession. To meet these types of problems, the military profession is expanding its thinking repertoire to include concepts such as Design, in order to allow its critical and creative thinking to account for problems that fall outside of the assumed context of the military operating parameters. This essay will summarize how cognitive theorists have described critical and creative thinking in general, and how some military practitioners have applied them. Published in Small Wars Journal, p2-7, September 16, 2011.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA550214
source DTIC Technical Reports
subjects COGNITION
COGNITIVE THEORISTS
CREATIVE THINKING
CREATIVITY
CRITICAL THINKING
DECISION MAKING
INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS
LEADERSHIP
LEADERSHIP TRAINING
MILITARY COMMANDERS
Military Forces and Organizations
MILITARY FORCES(UNITED STATES)
MILITARY PRACTITIONERS
PARADIGMATIC THINKING
Personnel Management and Labor Relations
PROBLEM SOLVING
Psychology
REPRINTS
THEORY
VOCABULARY
title How We Think: Thinking Critically and Creatively and How Military Professionals Can Do it Better
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T14%3A57%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=How%20We%20Think:%20Thinking%20Critically%20and%20Creatively%20and%20How%20Military%20Professionals%20Can%20Do%20it%20Better&rft.au=McConnell,%20Richard&rft.aucorp=ARMY%20COMMAND%20AND%20GENERAL%20STAFF%20COLL%20FORT%20LEAVENWORTH%20KS&rft.date=2011-09-16&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA550214%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true