Developing Proactive Methods for General Aviation Data Collection

Introduction. Over the last 20 years, nearly 40,000 general aviation (GA) aircraft were involved in accidents, roughly 20% of which were fatal. To address this safety concern, scientists have often relied on accident data. Because of the rare nature of accidents, commercial aviation incident and nea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Shappell, Scott, Hackworth, Carla, Holcomb, Kali, Lanicci, John, Bazargan, Massoud, Baron, Jaclyn, Iden, Rebecca, Halperin, Daniel
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Shappell, Scott
Hackworth, Carla
Holcomb, Kali
Lanicci, John
Bazargan, Massoud
Baron, Jaclyn
Iden, Rebecca
Halperin, Daniel
description Introduction. Over the last 20 years, nearly 40,000 general aviation (GA) aircraft were involved in accidents, roughly 20% of which were fatal. To address this safety concern, scientists have often relied on accident data. Because of the rare nature of accidents, commercial aviation incident and near miss data may prove to be useful sources of safety information. In one such study, the National Transportation Safety Board interviewed GA pilots that were flying near a weather-related accident in pursuit of a different perspective than that of the accident pilot. Interviewing GA pilots about their own weather-related event may provide similar benefits. Method. To understand factors leading GA pilots to encounter adverse weather conditions, pilots involved in an adverse weather encounter were interviewed using a one-hour structured interview. The interview was developed using surveys utilized by National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). In total, 27 pilots who experienced an adverse weather encounter were interviewed, of which 25 were included in the final analysis. Results. Previous studies conducted by the FAA and others found many GA accidents involving flight into adverse weather were categorized as a willful disregard for the rules and regulations of safety; violations as defined by the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System. Contrary to what the accident record seems to suggest, flight into adverse weather may also be influenced by the lack of appreciation/understanding of the hazards associated with adverse weather. Perhaps some encounters with adverse weather were motivated by outside influences or exacerbated by some manner of mechanical failure that may have led to the willful acceptance of unnecessary hazards. Conclusions. These data suggest that current beliefs surrounding flight into adverse weather by GA pilots may be incomplete. Prepaared in cooperation with FAA Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, Oklahoma City, OK and Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, FL.
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA534693</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA534693</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA5346933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZHB0SS1LzckvyMxLVwgoyk9MLsksS1XwTS3JyE8pVkjLL1JwT81LLUrMUXAsy0wsyczPU3BJLElUcM7PyUlNBvF5GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDjJtriLOHbkpJZnJ8cUlmXmpJvKOLo6mxiZmlsTEBaQD9XC6U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Developing Proactive Methods for General Aviation Data Collection</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Shappell, Scott ; Hackworth, Carla ; Holcomb, Kali ; Lanicci, John ; Bazargan, Massoud ; Baron, Jaclyn ; Iden, Rebecca ; Halperin, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Shappell, Scott ; Hackworth, Carla ; Holcomb, Kali ; Lanicci, John ; Bazargan, Massoud ; Baron, Jaclyn ; Iden, Rebecca ; Halperin, Daniel ; CLEMSON UNIV SC</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction. Over the last 20 years, nearly 40,000 general aviation (GA) aircraft were involved in accidents, roughly 20% of which were fatal. To address this safety concern, scientists have often relied on accident data. Because of the rare nature of accidents, commercial aviation incident and near miss data may prove to be useful sources of safety information. In one such study, the National Transportation Safety Board interviewed GA pilots that were flying near a weather-related accident in pursuit of a different perspective than that of the accident pilot. Interviewing GA pilots about their own weather-related event may provide similar benefits. Method. To understand factors leading GA pilots to encounter adverse weather conditions, pilots involved in an adverse weather encounter were interviewed using a one-hour structured interview. The interview was developed using surveys utilized by National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). In total, 27 pilots who experienced an adverse weather encounter were interviewed, of which 25 were included in the final analysis. Results. Previous studies conducted by the FAA and others found many GA accidents involving flight into adverse weather were categorized as a willful disregard for the rules and regulations of safety; violations as defined by the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System. Contrary to what the accident record seems to suggest, flight into adverse weather may also be influenced by the lack of appreciation/understanding of the hazards associated with adverse weather. Perhaps some encounters with adverse weather were motivated by outside influences or exacerbated by some manner of mechanical failure that may have led to the willful acceptance of unnecessary hazards. Conclusions. These data suggest that current beliefs surrounding flight into adverse weather by GA pilots may be incomplete. Prepaared in cooperation with FAA Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, Oklahoma City, OK and Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, FL.</description><language>eng</language><subject>ADVERSE CONDITIONS ; ALL WEATHER AVIATION ; AVIATION ACCIDENTS ; AVIATION WEATHER ENCOUNTERS ; CLASSIFICATION ; COMMERCIAL AVIATION ; DATA ACQUISITION ; FAILURE(MECHANICS) ; GALLIUM ; GENERAL AVIATION ; HAZARDS ; HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING ; Human Factors Engineering &amp; Man Machine System ; Information Science ; Military Aircraft Operations ; PILONING ; PILOTS ; SAFETY ; WEATHER KNOWLEDGE</subject><creationdate>2010</creationdate><rights>Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,778,883,27554,27555</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA534693$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shappell, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hackworth, Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holcomb, Kali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanicci, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bazargan, Massoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baron, Jaclyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iden, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halperin, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CLEMSON UNIV SC</creatorcontrib><title>Developing Proactive Methods for General Aviation Data Collection</title><description>Introduction. Over the last 20 years, nearly 40,000 general aviation (GA) aircraft were involved in accidents, roughly 20% of which were fatal. To address this safety concern, scientists have often relied on accident data. Because of the rare nature of accidents, commercial aviation incident and near miss data may prove to be useful sources of safety information. In one such study, the National Transportation Safety Board interviewed GA pilots that were flying near a weather-related accident in pursuit of a different perspective than that of the accident pilot. Interviewing GA pilots about their own weather-related event may provide similar benefits. Method. To understand factors leading GA pilots to encounter adverse weather conditions, pilots involved in an adverse weather encounter were interviewed using a one-hour structured interview. The interview was developed using surveys utilized by National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). In total, 27 pilots who experienced an adverse weather encounter were interviewed, of which 25 were included in the final analysis. Results. Previous studies conducted by the FAA and others found many GA accidents involving flight into adverse weather were categorized as a willful disregard for the rules and regulations of safety; violations as defined by the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System. Contrary to what the accident record seems to suggest, flight into adverse weather may also be influenced by the lack of appreciation/understanding of the hazards associated with adverse weather. Perhaps some encounters with adverse weather were motivated by outside influences or exacerbated by some manner of mechanical failure that may have led to the willful acceptance of unnecessary hazards. Conclusions. These data suggest that current beliefs surrounding flight into adverse weather by GA pilots may be incomplete. Prepaared in cooperation with FAA Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, Oklahoma City, OK and Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, FL.</description><subject>ADVERSE CONDITIONS</subject><subject>ALL WEATHER AVIATION</subject><subject>AVIATION ACCIDENTS</subject><subject>AVIATION WEATHER ENCOUNTERS</subject><subject>CLASSIFICATION</subject><subject>COMMERCIAL AVIATION</subject><subject>DATA ACQUISITION</subject><subject>FAILURE(MECHANICS)</subject><subject>GALLIUM</subject><subject>GENERAL AVIATION</subject><subject>HAZARDS</subject><subject>HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING</subject><subject>Human Factors Engineering &amp; Man Machine System</subject><subject>Information Science</subject><subject>Military Aircraft Operations</subject><subject>PILONING</subject><subject>PILOTS</subject><subject>SAFETY</subject><subject>WEATHER KNOWLEDGE</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZHB0SS1LzckvyMxLVwgoyk9MLsksS1XwTS3JyE8pVkjLL1JwT81LLUrMUXAsy0wsyczPU3BJLElUcM7PyUlNBvF5GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDjJtriLOHbkpJZnJ8cUlmXmpJvKOLo6mxiZmlsTEBaQD9XC6U</recordid><startdate>201011</startdate><enddate>201011</enddate><creator>Shappell, Scott</creator><creator>Hackworth, Carla</creator><creator>Holcomb, Kali</creator><creator>Lanicci, John</creator><creator>Bazargan, Massoud</creator><creator>Baron, Jaclyn</creator><creator>Iden, Rebecca</creator><creator>Halperin, Daniel</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201011</creationdate><title>Developing Proactive Methods for General Aviation Data Collection</title><author>Shappell, Scott ; Hackworth, Carla ; Holcomb, Kali ; Lanicci, John ; Bazargan, Massoud ; Baron, Jaclyn ; Iden, Rebecca ; Halperin, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA5346933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>ADVERSE CONDITIONS</topic><topic>ALL WEATHER AVIATION</topic><topic>AVIATION ACCIDENTS</topic><topic>AVIATION WEATHER ENCOUNTERS</topic><topic>CLASSIFICATION</topic><topic>COMMERCIAL AVIATION</topic><topic>DATA ACQUISITION</topic><topic>FAILURE(MECHANICS)</topic><topic>GALLIUM</topic><topic>GENERAL AVIATION</topic><topic>HAZARDS</topic><topic>HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING</topic><topic>Human Factors Engineering &amp; Man Machine System</topic><topic>Information Science</topic><topic>Military Aircraft Operations</topic><topic>PILONING</topic><topic>PILOTS</topic><topic>SAFETY</topic><topic>WEATHER KNOWLEDGE</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shappell, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hackworth, Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holcomb, Kali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanicci, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bazargan, Massoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baron, Jaclyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iden, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halperin, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CLEMSON UNIV SC</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shappell, Scott</au><au>Hackworth, Carla</au><au>Holcomb, Kali</au><au>Lanicci, John</au><au>Bazargan, Massoud</au><au>Baron, Jaclyn</au><au>Iden, Rebecca</au><au>Halperin, Daniel</au><aucorp>CLEMSON UNIV SC</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Developing Proactive Methods for General Aviation Data Collection</btitle><date>2010-11</date><risdate>2010</risdate><abstract>Introduction. Over the last 20 years, nearly 40,000 general aviation (GA) aircraft were involved in accidents, roughly 20% of which were fatal. To address this safety concern, scientists have often relied on accident data. Because of the rare nature of accidents, commercial aviation incident and near miss data may prove to be useful sources of safety information. In one such study, the National Transportation Safety Board interviewed GA pilots that were flying near a weather-related accident in pursuit of a different perspective than that of the accident pilot. Interviewing GA pilots about their own weather-related event may provide similar benefits. Method. To understand factors leading GA pilots to encounter adverse weather conditions, pilots involved in an adverse weather encounter were interviewed using a one-hour structured interview. The interview was developed using surveys utilized by National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). In total, 27 pilots who experienced an adverse weather encounter were interviewed, of which 25 were included in the final analysis. Results. Previous studies conducted by the FAA and others found many GA accidents involving flight into adverse weather were categorized as a willful disregard for the rules and regulations of safety; violations as defined by the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System. Contrary to what the accident record seems to suggest, flight into adverse weather may also be influenced by the lack of appreciation/understanding of the hazards associated with adverse weather. Perhaps some encounters with adverse weather were motivated by outside influences or exacerbated by some manner of mechanical failure that may have led to the willful acceptance of unnecessary hazards. Conclusions. These data suggest that current beliefs surrounding flight into adverse weather by GA pilots may be incomplete. Prepaared in cooperation with FAA Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, Oklahoma City, OK and Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, FL.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA534693
source DTIC Technical Reports
subjects ADVERSE CONDITIONS
ALL WEATHER AVIATION
AVIATION ACCIDENTS
AVIATION WEATHER ENCOUNTERS
CLASSIFICATION
COMMERCIAL AVIATION
DATA ACQUISITION
FAILURE(MECHANICS)
GALLIUM
GENERAL AVIATION
HAZARDS
HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING
Human Factors Engineering & Man Machine System
Information Science
Military Aircraft Operations
PILONING
PILOTS
SAFETY
WEATHER KNOWLEDGE
title Developing Proactive Methods for General Aviation Data Collection
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T01%3A01%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Developing%20Proactive%20Methods%20for%20General%20Aviation%20Data%20Collection&rft.au=Shappell,%20Scott&rft.aucorp=CLEMSON%20UNIV%20SC&rft.date=2010-11&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA534693%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true