Enhancing Perception in Ethical Decision Making: A Method to Address Ill-Defined Training Domains
A mixed-method research approach was developed to address description, definition, and measurement in ill-defined training domains. A series of research efforts were conducted to demonstrate the approach and assess its viability. The ill-defined domain that served as the vehicle for this effort was...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Report |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Graves, Thomas R Pleban, Robert J Miller, Marisa L Branciforte, Jack V Donigian, Aram M Johnson, Vanessa Matthews, Michael D |
description | A mixed-method research approach was developed to address description, definition, and measurement in ill-defined training domains. A series of research efforts were conducted to demonstrate the approach and assess its viability. The ill-defined domain that served as the vehicle for this effort was the sense-making (perceptual and interpretive) process of the ethical decision making experience among United States Military Academy Cadets. Here, we empirically derived a thematic model of the ethical decision making experience based on a sample of written accounts. Using the thematic model, the Ethical Perceptions Scale (EPS) was developed to measure individual and group perceptual/interpretive preferences for ethical decision making with respect to military specific ethical dilemmas. A confirmatory factor analysis supported that the Ethical Perception Scale is measuring in accord with the thematic model. We also tested the reliability and construct validity of the scale; reliability was good and construct validity indicated that the scale measures in the correct conceptual domain. The model and scale are applicable to Professional Military Ethics training for Officer Cadets and newly commissioned junior officers to cover ROTC, OCS, and USMA. The research method demonstrated may be applied to address other ill-defined domains in Army, and other, research and training contexts. |
format | Report |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA530670</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA530670</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA5306703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjLEKAjEQRK-xEPUPLPYHDg4OFeyCiWhxYHH9EZI9sxg3kuz_Yw7srWaYNzPrxhoOlh3xEx6YHX6EEgMxGAnkbASNjsqSDfZVW2dQMKCE5EESKO8zlgL3GFuNMzF6GLMlXv50eldXts1qtrHg7qebZn814-XWeiE3FakjmZRWh747nrr-D_4C3HY5MQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Enhancing Perception in Ethical Decision Making: A Method to Address Ill-Defined Training Domains</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Graves, Thomas R ; Pleban, Robert J ; Miller, Marisa L ; Branciforte, Jack V ; Donigian, Aram M ; Johnson, Vanessa ; Matthews, Michael D</creator><creatorcontrib>Graves, Thomas R ; Pleban, Robert J ; Miller, Marisa L ; Branciforte, Jack V ; Donigian, Aram M ; Johnson, Vanessa ; Matthews, Michael D ; ARMY RESEARCH INST FOR THE BEHAVIORAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES FORT BENNING GA</creatorcontrib><description>A mixed-method research approach was developed to address description, definition, and measurement in ill-defined training domains. A series of research efforts were conducted to demonstrate the approach and assess its viability. The ill-defined domain that served as the vehicle for this effort was the sense-making (perceptual and interpretive) process of the ethical decision making experience among United States Military Academy Cadets. Here, we empirically derived a thematic model of the ethical decision making experience based on a sample of written accounts. Using the thematic model, the Ethical Perceptions Scale (EPS) was developed to measure individual and group perceptual/interpretive preferences for ethical decision making with respect to military specific ethical dilemmas. A confirmatory factor analysis supported that the Ethical Perception Scale is measuring in accord with the thematic model. We also tested the reliability and construct validity of the scale; reliability was good and construct validity indicated that the scale measures in the correct conceptual domain. The model and scale are applicable to Professional Military Ethics training for Officer Cadets and newly commissioned junior officers to cover ROTC, OCS, and USMA. The research method demonstrated may be applied to address other ill-defined domains in Army, and other, research and training contexts.</description><language>eng</language><subject>ASSESSMENT AND TRAINING DEVELOPMENT ; CADETS ; DECISION MAKING ; DECISION MAKING EXPERIENCES ; EPS(ETHICAL PERCEPTIONS SCALE) ; ETHICAL DECISION MAKING ; ETHICS ; FACTOR ANALYSIS ; GESTALT THEORY ; Humanities and History ; ILL-DEFINED DOMAINS ; MILITARY TRAINING ; MIXED-METHOD RESEARCH ; OFFICER PERSONNEL ; PE633007A ; PERCEPTION ; Personnel Management and Labor Relations ; PROFESSIONAL MILITARY ETHICS ; Psychology ; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS ; QUALITATIVE METHODS ; RELIABILITY ; RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS ; SCALE ; THEMATIC MODELS ; VALIDATION</subject><creationdate>2010</creationdate><rights>Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,780,885,27565,27566</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA530670$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Graves, Thomas R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pleban, Robert J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Marisa L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branciforte, Jack V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donigian, Aram M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthews, Michael D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARMY RESEARCH INST FOR THE BEHAVIORAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES FORT BENNING GA</creatorcontrib><title>Enhancing Perception in Ethical Decision Making: A Method to Address Ill-Defined Training Domains</title><description>A mixed-method research approach was developed to address description, definition, and measurement in ill-defined training domains. A series of research efforts were conducted to demonstrate the approach and assess its viability. The ill-defined domain that served as the vehicle for this effort was the sense-making (perceptual and interpretive) process of the ethical decision making experience among United States Military Academy Cadets. Here, we empirically derived a thematic model of the ethical decision making experience based on a sample of written accounts. Using the thematic model, the Ethical Perceptions Scale (EPS) was developed to measure individual and group perceptual/interpretive preferences for ethical decision making with respect to military specific ethical dilemmas. A confirmatory factor analysis supported that the Ethical Perception Scale is measuring in accord with the thematic model. We also tested the reliability and construct validity of the scale; reliability was good and construct validity indicated that the scale measures in the correct conceptual domain. The model and scale are applicable to Professional Military Ethics training for Officer Cadets and newly commissioned junior officers to cover ROTC, OCS, and USMA. The research method demonstrated may be applied to address other ill-defined domains in Army, and other, research and training contexts.</description><subject>ASSESSMENT AND TRAINING DEVELOPMENT</subject><subject>CADETS</subject><subject>DECISION MAKING</subject><subject>DECISION MAKING EXPERIENCES</subject><subject>EPS(ETHICAL PERCEPTIONS SCALE)</subject><subject>ETHICAL DECISION MAKING</subject><subject>ETHICS</subject><subject>FACTOR ANALYSIS</subject><subject>GESTALT THEORY</subject><subject>Humanities and History</subject><subject>ILL-DEFINED DOMAINS</subject><subject>MILITARY TRAINING</subject><subject>MIXED-METHOD RESEARCH</subject><subject>OFFICER PERSONNEL</subject><subject>PE633007A</subject><subject>PERCEPTION</subject><subject>Personnel Management and Labor Relations</subject><subject>PROFESSIONAL MILITARY ETHICS</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS</subject><subject>QUALITATIVE METHODS</subject><subject>RELIABILITY</subject><subject>RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS</subject><subject>SCALE</subject><subject>THEMATIC MODELS</subject><subject>VALIDATION</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjLEKAjEQRK-xEPUPLPYHDg4OFeyCiWhxYHH9EZI9sxg3kuz_Yw7srWaYNzPrxhoOlh3xEx6YHX6EEgMxGAnkbASNjsqSDfZVW2dQMKCE5EESKO8zlgL3GFuNMzF6GLMlXv50eldXts1qtrHg7qebZn814-XWeiE3FakjmZRWh747nrr-D_4C3HY5MQ</recordid><startdate>201008</startdate><enddate>201008</enddate><creator>Graves, Thomas R</creator><creator>Pleban, Robert J</creator><creator>Miller, Marisa L</creator><creator>Branciforte, Jack V</creator><creator>Donigian, Aram M</creator><creator>Johnson, Vanessa</creator><creator>Matthews, Michael D</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201008</creationdate><title>Enhancing Perception in Ethical Decision Making: A Method to Address Ill-Defined Training Domains</title><author>Graves, Thomas R ; Pleban, Robert J ; Miller, Marisa L ; Branciforte, Jack V ; Donigian, Aram M ; Johnson, Vanessa ; Matthews, Michael D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA5306703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>ASSESSMENT AND TRAINING DEVELOPMENT</topic><topic>CADETS</topic><topic>DECISION MAKING</topic><topic>DECISION MAKING EXPERIENCES</topic><topic>EPS(ETHICAL PERCEPTIONS SCALE)</topic><topic>ETHICAL DECISION MAKING</topic><topic>ETHICS</topic><topic>FACTOR ANALYSIS</topic><topic>GESTALT THEORY</topic><topic>Humanities and History</topic><topic>ILL-DEFINED DOMAINS</topic><topic>MILITARY TRAINING</topic><topic>MIXED-METHOD RESEARCH</topic><topic>OFFICER PERSONNEL</topic><topic>PE633007A</topic><topic>PERCEPTION</topic><topic>Personnel Management and Labor Relations</topic><topic>PROFESSIONAL MILITARY ETHICS</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS</topic><topic>QUALITATIVE METHODS</topic><topic>RELIABILITY</topic><topic>RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS</topic><topic>SCALE</topic><topic>THEMATIC MODELS</topic><topic>VALIDATION</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Graves, Thomas R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pleban, Robert J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Marisa L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branciforte, Jack V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donigian, Aram M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthews, Michael D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARMY RESEARCH INST FOR THE BEHAVIORAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES FORT BENNING GA</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Graves, Thomas R</au><au>Pleban, Robert J</au><au>Miller, Marisa L</au><au>Branciforte, Jack V</au><au>Donigian, Aram M</au><au>Johnson, Vanessa</au><au>Matthews, Michael D</au><aucorp>ARMY RESEARCH INST FOR THE BEHAVIORAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES FORT BENNING GA</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Enhancing Perception in Ethical Decision Making: A Method to Address Ill-Defined Training Domains</btitle><date>2010-08</date><risdate>2010</risdate><abstract>A mixed-method research approach was developed to address description, definition, and measurement in ill-defined training domains. A series of research efforts were conducted to demonstrate the approach and assess its viability. The ill-defined domain that served as the vehicle for this effort was the sense-making (perceptual and interpretive) process of the ethical decision making experience among United States Military Academy Cadets. Here, we empirically derived a thematic model of the ethical decision making experience based on a sample of written accounts. Using the thematic model, the Ethical Perceptions Scale (EPS) was developed to measure individual and group perceptual/interpretive preferences for ethical decision making with respect to military specific ethical dilemmas. A confirmatory factor analysis supported that the Ethical Perception Scale is measuring in accord with the thematic model. We also tested the reliability and construct validity of the scale; reliability was good and construct validity indicated that the scale measures in the correct conceptual domain. The model and scale are applicable to Professional Military Ethics training for Officer Cadets and newly commissioned junior officers to cover ROTC, OCS, and USMA. The research method demonstrated may be applied to address other ill-defined domains in Army, and other, research and training contexts.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA530670 |
source | DTIC Technical Reports |
subjects | ASSESSMENT AND TRAINING DEVELOPMENT CADETS DECISION MAKING DECISION MAKING EXPERIENCES EPS(ETHICAL PERCEPTIONS SCALE) ETHICAL DECISION MAKING ETHICS FACTOR ANALYSIS GESTALT THEORY Humanities and History ILL-DEFINED DOMAINS MILITARY TRAINING MIXED-METHOD RESEARCH OFFICER PERSONNEL PE633007A PERCEPTION Personnel Management and Labor Relations PROFESSIONAL MILITARY ETHICS Psychology QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS QUALITATIVE METHODS RELIABILITY RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS SCALE THEMATIC MODELS VALIDATION |
title | Enhancing Perception in Ethical Decision Making: A Method to Address Ill-Defined Training Domains |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T05%3A12%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Enhancing%20Perception%20in%20Ethical%20Decision%20Making:%20A%20Method%20to%20Address%20Ill-Defined%20Training%20Domains&rft.au=Graves,%20Thomas%20R&rft.aucorp=ARMY%20RESEARCH%20INST%20FOR%20THE%20BEHAVIORAL%20AND%20SOCIAL%20SCIENCES%20FORT%20BENNING%20GA&rft.date=2010-08&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA530670%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |