Enhancing Perception in Ethical Decision Making: A Method to Address Ill-Defined Training Domains

A mixed-method research approach was developed to address description, definition, and measurement in ill-defined training domains. A series of research efforts were conducted to demonstrate the approach and assess its viability. The ill-defined domain that served as the vehicle for this effort was...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Graves, Thomas R, Pleban, Robert J, Miller, Marisa L, Branciforte, Jack V, Donigian, Aram M, Johnson, Vanessa, Matthews, Michael D
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Graves, Thomas R
Pleban, Robert J
Miller, Marisa L
Branciforte, Jack V
Donigian, Aram M
Johnson, Vanessa
Matthews, Michael D
description A mixed-method research approach was developed to address description, definition, and measurement in ill-defined training domains. A series of research efforts were conducted to demonstrate the approach and assess its viability. The ill-defined domain that served as the vehicle for this effort was the sense-making (perceptual and interpretive) process of the ethical decision making experience among United States Military Academy Cadets. Here, we empirically derived a thematic model of the ethical decision making experience based on a sample of written accounts. Using the thematic model, the Ethical Perceptions Scale (EPS) was developed to measure individual and group perceptual/interpretive preferences for ethical decision making with respect to military specific ethical dilemmas. A confirmatory factor analysis supported that the Ethical Perception Scale is measuring in accord with the thematic model. We also tested the reliability and construct validity of the scale; reliability was good and construct validity indicated that the scale measures in the correct conceptual domain. The model and scale are applicable to Professional Military Ethics training for Officer Cadets and newly commissioned junior officers to cover ROTC, OCS, and USMA. The research method demonstrated may be applied to address other ill-defined domains in Army, and other, research and training contexts.
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA530670</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA530670</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA5306703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjLEKAjEQRK-xEPUPLPYHDg4OFeyCiWhxYHH9EZI9sxg3kuz_Yw7srWaYNzPrxhoOlh3xEx6YHX6EEgMxGAnkbASNjsqSDfZVW2dQMKCE5EESKO8zlgL3GFuNMzF6GLMlXv50eldXts1qtrHg7qebZn814-XWeiE3FakjmZRWh747nrr-D_4C3HY5MQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Enhancing Perception in Ethical Decision Making: A Method to Address Ill-Defined Training Domains</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Graves, Thomas R ; Pleban, Robert J ; Miller, Marisa L ; Branciforte, Jack V ; Donigian, Aram M ; Johnson, Vanessa ; Matthews, Michael D</creator><creatorcontrib>Graves, Thomas R ; Pleban, Robert J ; Miller, Marisa L ; Branciforte, Jack V ; Donigian, Aram M ; Johnson, Vanessa ; Matthews, Michael D ; ARMY RESEARCH INST FOR THE BEHAVIORAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES FORT BENNING GA</creatorcontrib><description>A mixed-method research approach was developed to address description, definition, and measurement in ill-defined training domains. A series of research efforts were conducted to demonstrate the approach and assess its viability. The ill-defined domain that served as the vehicle for this effort was the sense-making (perceptual and interpretive) process of the ethical decision making experience among United States Military Academy Cadets. Here, we empirically derived a thematic model of the ethical decision making experience based on a sample of written accounts. Using the thematic model, the Ethical Perceptions Scale (EPS) was developed to measure individual and group perceptual/interpretive preferences for ethical decision making with respect to military specific ethical dilemmas. A confirmatory factor analysis supported that the Ethical Perception Scale is measuring in accord with the thematic model. We also tested the reliability and construct validity of the scale; reliability was good and construct validity indicated that the scale measures in the correct conceptual domain. The model and scale are applicable to Professional Military Ethics training for Officer Cadets and newly commissioned junior officers to cover ROTC, OCS, and USMA. The research method demonstrated may be applied to address other ill-defined domains in Army, and other, research and training contexts.</description><language>eng</language><subject>ASSESSMENT AND TRAINING DEVELOPMENT ; CADETS ; DECISION MAKING ; DECISION MAKING EXPERIENCES ; EPS(ETHICAL PERCEPTIONS SCALE) ; ETHICAL DECISION MAKING ; ETHICS ; FACTOR ANALYSIS ; GESTALT THEORY ; Humanities and History ; ILL-DEFINED DOMAINS ; MILITARY TRAINING ; MIXED-METHOD RESEARCH ; OFFICER PERSONNEL ; PE633007A ; PERCEPTION ; Personnel Management and Labor Relations ; PROFESSIONAL MILITARY ETHICS ; Psychology ; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS ; QUALITATIVE METHODS ; RELIABILITY ; RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS ; SCALE ; THEMATIC MODELS ; VALIDATION</subject><creationdate>2010</creationdate><rights>Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,780,885,27565,27566</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA530670$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Graves, Thomas R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pleban, Robert J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Marisa L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branciforte, Jack V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donigian, Aram M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthews, Michael D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARMY RESEARCH INST FOR THE BEHAVIORAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES FORT BENNING GA</creatorcontrib><title>Enhancing Perception in Ethical Decision Making: A Method to Address Ill-Defined Training Domains</title><description>A mixed-method research approach was developed to address description, definition, and measurement in ill-defined training domains. A series of research efforts were conducted to demonstrate the approach and assess its viability. The ill-defined domain that served as the vehicle for this effort was the sense-making (perceptual and interpretive) process of the ethical decision making experience among United States Military Academy Cadets. Here, we empirically derived a thematic model of the ethical decision making experience based on a sample of written accounts. Using the thematic model, the Ethical Perceptions Scale (EPS) was developed to measure individual and group perceptual/interpretive preferences for ethical decision making with respect to military specific ethical dilemmas. A confirmatory factor analysis supported that the Ethical Perception Scale is measuring in accord with the thematic model. We also tested the reliability and construct validity of the scale; reliability was good and construct validity indicated that the scale measures in the correct conceptual domain. The model and scale are applicable to Professional Military Ethics training for Officer Cadets and newly commissioned junior officers to cover ROTC, OCS, and USMA. The research method demonstrated may be applied to address other ill-defined domains in Army, and other, research and training contexts.</description><subject>ASSESSMENT AND TRAINING DEVELOPMENT</subject><subject>CADETS</subject><subject>DECISION MAKING</subject><subject>DECISION MAKING EXPERIENCES</subject><subject>EPS(ETHICAL PERCEPTIONS SCALE)</subject><subject>ETHICAL DECISION MAKING</subject><subject>ETHICS</subject><subject>FACTOR ANALYSIS</subject><subject>GESTALT THEORY</subject><subject>Humanities and History</subject><subject>ILL-DEFINED DOMAINS</subject><subject>MILITARY TRAINING</subject><subject>MIXED-METHOD RESEARCH</subject><subject>OFFICER PERSONNEL</subject><subject>PE633007A</subject><subject>PERCEPTION</subject><subject>Personnel Management and Labor Relations</subject><subject>PROFESSIONAL MILITARY ETHICS</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS</subject><subject>QUALITATIVE METHODS</subject><subject>RELIABILITY</subject><subject>RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS</subject><subject>SCALE</subject><subject>THEMATIC MODELS</subject><subject>VALIDATION</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjLEKAjEQRK-xEPUPLPYHDg4OFeyCiWhxYHH9EZI9sxg3kuz_Yw7srWaYNzPrxhoOlh3xEx6YHX6EEgMxGAnkbASNjsqSDfZVW2dQMKCE5EESKO8zlgL3GFuNMzF6GLMlXv50eldXts1qtrHg7qebZn814-XWeiE3FakjmZRWh747nrr-D_4C3HY5MQ</recordid><startdate>201008</startdate><enddate>201008</enddate><creator>Graves, Thomas R</creator><creator>Pleban, Robert J</creator><creator>Miller, Marisa L</creator><creator>Branciforte, Jack V</creator><creator>Donigian, Aram M</creator><creator>Johnson, Vanessa</creator><creator>Matthews, Michael D</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201008</creationdate><title>Enhancing Perception in Ethical Decision Making: A Method to Address Ill-Defined Training Domains</title><author>Graves, Thomas R ; Pleban, Robert J ; Miller, Marisa L ; Branciforte, Jack V ; Donigian, Aram M ; Johnson, Vanessa ; Matthews, Michael D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA5306703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>ASSESSMENT AND TRAINING DEVELOPMENT</topic><topic>CADETS</topic><topic>DECISION MAKING</topic><topic>DECISION MAKING EXPERIENCES</topic><topic>EPS(ETHICAL PERCEPTIONS SCALE)</topic><topic>ETHICAL DECISION MAKING</topic><topic>ETHICS</topic><topic>FACTOR ANALYSIS</topic><topic>GESTALT THEORY</topic><topic>Humanities and History</topic><topic>ILL-DEFINED DOMAINS</topic><topic>MILITARY TRAINING</topic><topic>MIXED-METHOD RESEARCH</topic><topic>OFFICER PERSONNEL</topic><topic>PE633007A</topic><topic>PERCEPTION</topic><topic>Personnel Management and Labor Relations</topic><topic>PROFESSIONAL MILITARY ETHICS</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS</topic><topic>QUALITATIVE METHODS</topic><topic>RELIABILITY</topic><topic>RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS</topic><topic>SCALE</topic><topic>THEMATIC MODELS</topic><topic>VALIDATION</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Graves, Thomas R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pleban, Robert J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Marisa L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branciforte, Jack V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donigian, Aram M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthews, Michael D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARMY RESEARCH INST FOR THE BEHAVIORAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES FORT BENNING GA</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Graves, Thomas R</au><au>Pleban, Robert J</au><au>Miller, Marisa L</au><au>Branciforte, Jack V</au><au>Donigian, Aram M</au><au>Johnson, Vanessa</au><au>Matthews, Michael D</au><aucorp>ARMY RESEARCH INST FOR THE BEHAVIORAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES FORT BENNING GA</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Enhancing Perception in Ethical Decision Making: A Method to Address Ill-Defined Training Domains</btitle><date>2010-08</date><risdate>2010</risdate><abstract>A mixed-method research approach was developed to address description, definition, and measurement in ill-defined training domains. A series of research efforts were conducted to demonstrate the approach and assess its viability. The ill-defined domain that served as the vehicle for this effort was the sense-making (perceptual and interpretive) process of the ethical decision making experience among United States Military Academy Cadets. Here, we empirically derived a thematic model of the ethical decision making experience based on a sample of written accounts. Using the thematic model, the Ethical Perceptions Scale (EPS) was developed to measure individual and group perceptual/interpretive preferences for ethical decision making with respect to military specific ethical dilemmas. A confirmatory factor analysis supported that the Ethical Perception Scale is measuring in accord with the thematic model. We also tested the reliability and construct validity of the scale; reliability was good and construct validity indicated that the scale measures in the correct conceptual domain. The model and scale are applicable to Professional Military Ethics training for Officer Cadets and newly commissioned junior officers to cover ROTC, OCS, and USMA. The research method demonstrated may be applied to address other ill-defined domains in Army, and other, research and training contexts.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA530670
source DTIC Technical Reports
subjects ASSESSMENT AND TRAINING DEVELOPMENT
CADETS
DECISION MAKING
DECISION MAKING EXPERIENCES
EPS(ETHICAL PERCEPTIONS SCALE)
ETHICAL DECISION MAKING
ETHICS
FACTOR ANALYSIS
GESTALT THEORY
Humanities and History
ILL-DEFINED DOMAINS
MILITARY TRAINING
MIXED-METHOD RESEARCH
OFFICER PERSONNEL
PE633007A
PERCEPTION
Personnel Management and Labor Relations
PROFESSIONAL MILITARY ETHICS
Psychology
QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS
QUALITATIVE METHODS
RELIABILITY
RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS
SCALE
THEMATIC MODELS
VALIDATION
title Enhancing Perception in Ethical Decision Making: A Method to Address Ill-Defined Training Domains
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T05%3A12%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Enhancing%20Perception%20in%20Ethical%20Decision%20Making:%20A%20Method%20to%20Address%20Ill-Defined%20Training%20Domains&rft.au=Graves,%20Thomas%20R&rft.aucorp=ARMY%20RESEARCH%20INST%20FOR%20THE%20BEHAVIORAL%20AND%20SOCIAL%20SCIENCES%20FORT%20BENNING%20GA&rft.date=2010-08&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA530670%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true